More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Spending Time: Co-Designing a Personalized Calendar at the Care Center

Authors:

Chatrine Elisabeth Larsen,

Christoffer Caesar Faelled,

Emil Færch Skov,

Thomas Gustafsen,

Antonia Krummheuer,

Matthias RehmAuthors Info & Claims

NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

Article No.: 71, Pages 1 - 11

https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420144

Published: 26 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This paper reports on a full iteration from a project with an older adult, P, residing at a 24hour Danish care center for adults with acquired brain damage. P has due to a cognitive impairment severe challenges in remembering planned activities, which requires a substantial need for staff to remind him round the clock, thus leading to further dependency on staff and lack of self-determination. Grounded in Participatory Design, thereby taking into account P’s and staff members’ situated problems, a planning system was designed together with P and prototyped with the MEAN-stack implemented on a Raspberry Pi. The prototype was then deployed over two periods (one week and three months) to be evaluated with P and staff members in its real context. Findings demonstrate how reciprocity ensured commitment and additional knowledge about the problem-field. The evaluations of the prototype revealed the importance of staff cooperation for system integration but also showed how the prototype enabled new meaningful social routines to form for both the co-designing resident and staff. Thus, the paper sheds light on the many mechanics embedded when embarking on design work, which goes full circle within a Scandinavian healthcare context.

References

[1]

Laura Benton, Asimina Vasalou, Rilla Khaled, Hilary Johnson, and Daniel Gooch. 2014. Diversity for Design: A Framework for Involving Neurodiverse Children in the Technology Design Process. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3747–3756. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557244

Digital Library

[2]

Jeanette Blomberg and Helena Karasti. 2012. Positioning Ethnography within Participatory Design. Routledge, UK, 86–116. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543

[3]

Susanne Bødker, Pelle Ehn, Joergen Knudsen, Morten Kyng, and Kim Madsen. 1988. Computer support for cooperative design. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. 377–394.

[4]

Laurens Boer and Jared Donovan. 2012. Provotypes for participatory innovation. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’12 (06 2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318014

Digital Library

[5]

Eva Brandt, Thomas Binder, and Elizabeth Sanders. 2012. Tools and techniques: Ways to engage telling, making and enacting. Routledge, UK, 145–181.

[6]

Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2014. Design Decisions and the Sharing of Power in PD. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts - Volume 2 (Windhoek, Namibia) (PDC ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662192

Digital Library

[7]

Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2016. What is a Participatory Design Result?. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (Aarhus, Denmark) (PDC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1145/2940299.2940316

Digital Library

[8]

Margot Brereton, Paul Roe, Ronald Schroeter, and Anita Lee Hong. 2014. Beyond Ethnography: Engagement and Reciprocity As Foundations for Design Research out Here. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1183–1186. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557374

Digital Library

[9]

Pelle Ehn and Richard Badham. 2002. Participatory design and the collective designer, In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. PDC, 1–10.

[10]

Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2014. In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. International journal of human-computer studies 74 (2014), 93–106.

[11]

Julia Galliers, Stephanie Wilson, Abi Roper, Naomi Cocks, Jane Marshall, Sam Muscroft, and Tim Pring. 2012. Words Are Not Enough: Empowering People with Aphasia in the Design Process. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1(Roskilde, Denmark) (PDC ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347643

Digital Library

[12]

Julia Galliers, Stephanie Wilson, Abi Roper, Naomi Cocks, Jane Marshall, Sam Muscroft, and Tim Pring. 2012. Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process. In Proceedings of the 12th participatory design conference: Research papers-volume 1. 51–60.

Digital Library

[13]

Joan Greenbaum and Kim Halskov. 1993. PD a Personal Statement. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (June 1993), 47–. https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.214816

[14]

Judith Gregory. 2003. Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. International Journal of Engineering Education 19, 1 (2003), 62–74.

[15]

Tuomo Hänninen and Hilkka Soininen. 1997. Age-associated memory impairment. Drugs & aging 11, 6 (1997), 480–489.

[16]

Niels Hendriks, Liesbeth Huybrechts, Andrea Wilkinson, and Karin Slegers. 2014. Challenges in doing participatory design with people with dementia. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts-Volume 2. 33–36.

Digital Library

[17]

Niels Hendriks, Frederik Truyen, and erik duval. 2013. Designing With Dementia: Guidelines For Participatory Design Together With Persons With Dementia. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013: 14th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Vol. 8117. Springer, Belgium, 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40483-2_46

[18]

Hjerneskade Foreningen. 2016. Hvor mange faar hjerneskade?Hjerneskadeforeningen. https://hjerneskadet.dk/viden-om-hjerneskade/hjerneskader-i-tal/Last accessed: 14-12-2019.

[19]

John M. Carroll and Mary Beth Rosson. 2007. Participatory design in community informatics. Design Studies 28, 3 (May 2007), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.007

[20]

Suhas Govind Joshi and Tone Bratteteig. 2016. Designing for prolonged mastery. On involving old people in participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 28, 1 (2016).

[21]

Robert Jungk and Norbert Müllert. 1987. Future Workshops: How to create desirable futures. Institute for Social Inventions London.

[22]

Finn Kensing and Joan Greenbaum. 2013. Heritage: Having a say. Routledge, UK, 21–36.

[23]

Antonia Lina Krummheuer, Matthias Rehm, and Kasper Rodil. 2020. Triadic Human-Robot Interaction. Distributed Agency and Memory in Robot Assisted Interactions. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, United States, 317–319. https://humanrobotinteraction.org/2020/ ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’20 ; Conference date: 23-03-2020 Through 26-03-2020.

[24]

Stephen Lindsay, Katie Brittain, Daniel Jackson, Cassim Ladha, Karim Ladha, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 521–530.

Digital Library

[25]

Brenda McPhail, Terry Costantino, David Bruckmann, Ross Barclay, and Andrew Clement. 1998. CAVEAT Exemplar: Participatory Design in ANon-Profit Volunteer Organisation. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 7, 3–4 (Jan. 1998), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008631020266

Digital Library

[26]

Preben Holst Mogensen. 1992. Towards a Provotyping Approach in Systems Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 4 (1992), 31–53.

[27]

Michael J. Muller. 2002. Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 1051–1068.

[28]

Niels Hendriks, Karin Slegers, and Pieter Duysburgh. 2015. Codesign with people living with cognitive or sensory impairments: a case for method stories and uniqueness. CoDesign 11, 1 (February 2015), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1020316

[29]

Yoram Reich, Suresh L. Konda, Ira A. Monarch, and Eswaran Subrahmanian. 1992. Participation and Design: An Extended View. In Participatory Design Conference, Sarah Kuhn and Michael Muller (Eds.). Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, Cambridge, US, 63–71.

[30]

Horst W. J. Rittel and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4, 2 (1973), 155–169.

[31]

Toni Robertson and Jesper Simonsen. 2012. Participatory Design: an introduction. Routledge, UK, 1–17.

[32]

Kasper Rodil, Emil Nielsen, and Jonathan Nielsen. 2018. Sharing Memories: Co-Designing Assistive Technology with Aphasic Adults and Support Staff. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development 10 (01 2018), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2018010102

[33]

Kasper Rodil, Matthias Rehm, and Antonia Lina Krummheuer. 2018. Co-designing Social Robots with Cognitively Impaired Citizens. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240253

Digital Library

[34]

Nada Savitch, Panayiotis Zaphiris, M. Smith, R. Litherland, N. Aggarwal, and E. Potier. 2006. Involving People with Dementia in the Development of a Discussion Forum: A Community-centred Approach. Springer, London, UK, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-365-5_24

[35]

Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 705–714.

Digital Library

[36]

Clay Spinuzzi. 2005. The Methodology of Participatory Design. Technical Communication 52, 2 (2005), 163–174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43089196

[37]

Charalambos Vrasidas. 2000. Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 6, 4(2000), 339–362.

[38]

Patricia Wall and Andrea Mosher. 1994. Representations of work: Bringing designers and users together. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, USA, 87–98.

[39]

Mike Wu, Brian Richards, and Ron Baecker. 2004. Participatory Design with Individuals Who Have Amnesia. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices - Volume 1 (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (PDC 04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1145/1011870.1011895

Digital Library

Cited By

Muashekele CRodil KWinschiers-Theophilus HKandjengo S(2024)Recovering lost futures of the past: Situating alternative futures within an indigenous Afrocentric orientation and past trajectoryProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666101(28-40)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666094.3666101
Vidas DThompson ZKelly RWaycott JTamplin JVieira Sousa TKulik LLampit ALautenschlager NBaker F(2024)Family Caregiver Experiences of Using a Mobile App for Music-based Training to Support Dementia CareProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642308(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642308
Houben Mvan Berlo MAntonissen FWouters EBrankaert R(2023)Switch2Move: Designing a Tangible Interface with People Living with Dementia for Initiating and Engaging in Music-Supported Exercises at HomeProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596017(1457-1471)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563657.3596017
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Spending Time: Co-Designing a Personalized Calendar at the Care Center

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Older adults and hackathons: a qualitative study

Globally observed trends in aging indicate that older adults constitute a growing share of the population and an increasing demographic in the modern technologies marketplace. Therefore, it has become important to address the issue of participation of ...
Co-Design with Older Adults: Examining and Reflecting on Collaboration with Aging Communities
CSCW2

Co-design methods have involved older adults in the design process to fill the knowledge gap that younger adult designers might encounter when designing for an aging population. A focus of co-design means establishing equal and equitable relationships ...
A Robot of My Own: Participatory Design of Socially Assistive Robots for Independently Living Older Adults Diagnosed with Depression
Proceedings, Part I, of the First International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging - Volume 9193

This paper presents an ongoing project using participatory design methods to develop design concepts for socially assistive robots SARs with older adults diagnosed with depression and co-occurring physical illness. We frame SARs development in the ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

NordiCHI '20: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

October 2020

1177 pages

ISBN:9781450375795

DOI:10.1145/3419249

General Chairs:
David Lamas
Tallinn University, Estonia
,
Hegle Sarapuu
Trinidad Wiseman, Estonia
,
Publications Chairs:
Ilja Šmorgun
Tallinn University, Estonia
,
Gerd Berget
Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

NordiCHI '20

NordiCHI '20: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society

October 25 - 29, 2020

Tallinn, Estonia

Acceptance Rates

NordiCHI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 89 of 399 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
157
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)35
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Muashekele CRodil KWinschiers-Theophilus HKandjengo S(2024)Recovering lost futures of the past: Situating alternative futures within an indigenous Afrocentric orientation and past trajectoryProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666101(28-40)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666094.3666101
Vidas DThompson ZKelly RWaycott JTamplin JVieira Sousa TKulik LLampit ALautenschlager NBaker F(2024)Family Caregiver Experiences of Using a Mobile App for Music-based Training to Support Dementia CareProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642308(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642308
Houben Mvan Berlo MAntonissen FWouters EBrankaert R(2023)Switch2Move: Designing a Tangible Interface with People Living with Dementia for Initiating and Engaging in Music-Supported Exercises at HomeProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596017(1457-1471)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563657.3596017
Ruitenburg YBrankaert RHouben MLee MPasman G(2023)Happje: Stimulating Collaborative Cooking for People with DementiaExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585653(1-9)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544549.3585653
Houben MBrankaert RKenning GBongers IEggen B(2022)Designing for Everyday Sounds at Home with People with Dementia and their PartnersProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501993(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501993
Suijkerbuijk SThoolen MNap HMinkman MIJsselsteijn WBrankaert Rde Kort Y(2022)Adaptivity in Research Practice with People Living with Dementia: A Designer's ReflectionDementia Lab 2022: The Residue of Design10.1007/978-3-031-14466-0_2(13-25)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14466-0_2

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents