More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

extended-abstract

Machinoia, Machine of Multiple Me: Integrating with Past, Future and Alternative Selves

Authors:

Pat Pataranutaporn,

Valdemar Danry,

Pattie MaesAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 26, Pages 1 - 7

https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450387

Published: 08 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Our body and mind relate in ways which are extraordinarily enigmatic and seemingly incomprehensible. Recent findings exemplify this by showing not just that our minds can phenomenologically inhabit multiple bodies but also that our body can be accessed by multiple minds. As an exploration of this concept, we present Machinoia, a symbiotic augmentation that extends the user with two additional heads each of which are unique variations of the users identity: who you once were, and who you’ll eventually become. We used a generative adversarial network to synthesize life-like human faces and controlled them through artificial attitude models extracted from social media data of the wearer, thus creating “artificial personal intelligences” of the wearer, bringing to life past and future versions of oneself.

References

[1]

Sun Joo Ahn, Amanda Minh Tran Le, and Jeremy Bailenson. 2013. The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology 16, 1 (2013), 7–38.

[2]

Domna Banakou, Sameer Kishore, and Mel Slater. 2018. Virtually being einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 917.

[3]

Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. ” O’Reilly Media, Inc.”.

Digital Library

[4]

CBC. 2019. Inseparable: Ten Years Joined At The Head. Inseparable: Ten Years Joined At The Head (Jun 2019). https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/the-hogan-twins-share-a-brain-and-see-out-of-each-others-eyes

[5]

Tom Cochrane. 2020. A case of shared consciousness. Synthese (2020), 1–19.

[6]

Radu Cozmei. 2017. NOTES ON HEAD SYMBOLISM. Éditeur en chef: Doina Mihaela Popa Éditeur assistant: Daniela Lucia Ene (2017), 224.

[7]

Valdemar Danry, Pat Pataranutaporn, Yaoli Mao, and Pattie Maes. 2020. Wearable Reasoner: Towards Enhanced Human Rationality Through A Wearable Device With An Explainable AI Assistant. In Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference. 1–12.

Digital Library

[8]

Susan Dominus. 2011. Could Conjoined Twins Share a Mind?https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/magazine/could-conjoined-twins-share-a-mind.html

[9]

Yuval Noah Harari. 2018. Homo deus: a brief history of tomorrow. Harper Perennial.

[10]

Martin Heidegger, John Macquarrie, and Edward Robinson. 1962. Being and time. (1962).

[11]

Constance Jones and James D Ryan. 2006. Encyclopedia of hinduism. Infobase Publishing.

[12]

Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. 2019. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4401–4410.

[13]

Michael R. Kelly. 2019. Phenomenology and Time-Consciousness. https://www.iep.utm.edu/phe-time/

[14]

Peter Korn, Evangelos Bekiaris, and Maria Gemou. 2009. Towards open access accessibility everywhere: The ÆGIS concept. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 535–543.

Digital Library

[15]

Sang-won Leigh, Harpreet Sareen, Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao, Xin Liu, and Pattie Maes. 2017. Body-Borne Computers as Extensions of Self. Computers 6, 1 (2017), 12.

[16]

Joseph Carl Robnett Licklider. 1960. Man-computer symbiosis. IRE transactions on human factors in electronics1 (1960), 4–11.

[17]

Hugo Liu and Pattie Maes. 2004. What would they think?: a computational model of attitudes. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 38–45.

Digital Library

[18]

Thomas W Malone. 2018. How human-computer’Superminds’ are redefining the future of work. MIT Sloan Management Review 59, 4 (2018), 34–41.

[19]

Thomas W Malone. 2018. Superminds: The surprising power of people and computers thinking together. Little, Brown Spark.

[20]

Reiji Miura, Kasahara Shunichi, Michiteru Kitazaki, Adrien Verhulst, Masahiko Inami, and Maki. Sugimoto. 2021. MultiSoma: Distributed Embodiment with Synchronized Behavior and Perception. In Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference. 1–9.

Digital Library

[21]

Florian Floyd Mueller, Pedro Lopes, Paul Strohmeier, Wendy Ju, Caitlyn Seim, Martin Weigel, Suranga Nanayakkara, Marianna Obrist, Zhuying Li, Joseph Delfa, 2020. Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.

Digital Library

[22]

Craig Murray. 2001. The Experience of Body Boundaries by Siamese Twins. New Ideas in Psychology 19 (08 2001), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(00)00018-0

[23]

Craig Murray and Judith Sixsmith. 1999. The Corporeal Body in Virtual Reality. Ethos 27 (09 1999), 315 – 343. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1999.27.3.315

[24]

Rasipuram Krishnaswami Narayan. 2006. The Ramayana: a shortened modern prose version of the Indian epic. Penguin.

[25]

Tabitha C Peck, Sofia Seinfeld, Salvatore M Aglioti, and Mel Slater. 2013. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and cognition 22, 3 (2013), 779–787.

[26]

Judith Pyke. 2014. Twin Life: Sharing Mind and Body. Documentary CBC Television. Veröffentlicht am 2 (2014).

[27]

Evan F Risko and Sam J Gilbert. 2016. Cognitive offloading. Trends in cognitive sciences 20, 9 (2016), 676–688.

[28]

Madeline Schwartzman. 2011. See yourself sensing: redefining human perception. Black Dog.

[29]

Gizem Şenel and Mel Slater. 2020. Conversation with Your Future Self About Nicotine Dependence. In Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality, Patrick Bourdot, Victoria Interrante, Regis Kopper, Anne-Hélène Olivier, Hideo Saito, and Gabriel Zachmann (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 216–223.

[30]

Aliaksandr Siarohin, Stéphane Lathuilière, Sergey Tulyakov, Elisa Ricci, and Nicu Sebe. 2020. First order motion model for image animation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.00196(2020).

[31]

Benjamin C. Storm, Sean M. Stone, and Aaron S. Benjamin. 2017. Using the Internet to access information inflates future use of the Internet to access other information.Memory 25, 6 (2017), 717 – 723. http://libproxy.mit.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=123150468&site=ehost-live&scope=site

[32]

Ruth Vanita and Kumkum Roy. 2000. Shiva Purana: The Birth of Kartikeya (Sanskrit). In Same-Sex Love in India. Springer, 77–80.

[33]

Anita Williams Woolley, Ishani Aggarwal, and Thomas W Malone. 2015. Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24, 6 (2015), 420–424.

Cited By

Guo APataranutaporn PMaes P(2024)Exploring the Impact of AI Value Alignment in Collaborative Ideation: Effects on Perception, Ownership, and OutputExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650892(1-11)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650892

Recommendations

The Chinese Room Argument Reconsidered: Essentialism, Indeterminacy, and Strong AI

I argue that John Searle's (1980) influential Chinese room argument (CRA) against computationalism and strong AI survives existing objections, including Block's (1998) internalized systems reply, Fodor's (1991b) deviant causal chain reply, and Hauser's (...
Post-turing Methodology: Breaking the Wall on the Way to Artificial General Intelligence
Artificial General Intelligence
Abstract
This article offers comprehensive criticism of the Turing test and develops quality criteria for new artificial general intelligence (AGI) assessment tests. It is shown that the prerequisites A. Turing drew upon when reducing personality and human ...
The problem of machine ethics in artificial intelligence
Abstract
The advent of the intelligent robot has occupied a significant position in society over the past decades and has given rise to new issues in society. As we know, the primary aim of artificial intelligence or robotic research is not only to develop ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2021

2965 pages

ISBN:9781450380959

DOI:10.1145/3411763

Editors:
Yoshifumi Kitamura
Tohoku University, Japan
,
Aaron Quigley
University of New South Wales, Australia
,
Katherine Isbister
University of California Santa Cruz, USA
,
Takeo Igarashi
The University of Tokyo, Japan

Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 May 2021

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Extended-abstract
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '21: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 8 - 13, 2021

Yokohama, Japan

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
382
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)57
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Guo APataranutaporn PMaes P(2024)Exploring the Impact of AI Value Alignment in Collaborative Ideation: Effects on Perception, Ownership, and OutputExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650892(1-11)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650892

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents