[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3409251.3411729acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Foresight Safety: Sharing Drivers’ State among Connected Road Users

Published: 21 September 2020 Publication History

Abstract

When drivers approach a potentially critical situation, they tend to glance over drivers of neighboring vehicles to gather a mutual understanding of the respective states and intentions. Then, experienced drivers can take quick decisions and prevent the onset of a danger. Yet, such a safety-effective behavior finds no equals in current automated driving, although the technologies to build a similar solution are already available. Therefore, it is important to investigate the effects of sharing drivers’ state among road users to understand the potential benefit for pre-critical situations. A networked simulators study was performed involving two drivers in a cut-in maneuver. Results indicate that when a driver is notified that the driver in the adjacent vehicle is distracted, the preferred reaction is to change lane, putting more space between the respective vehicles. Such a preventive action should therefore become the target behavior for automated vehicles capable of a human-like driving style.

References

[1]
P. Pretto, M. Mörtl, N. Neuhuber “Fluid interface concept for automated driving”, in H. Krömker, Ed., MobiTAS 2020: 2 nd International Conference in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing, 2020.
[2]
“§ 1 Grundregeln.” https://www.stvo.de/strassenverkehrsordnung/89-1-grundregeln (accessed Jun. 04, 2020).
[3]
H.-P. Schoener, “How Good is Good Enough?” in Autonomous Driving. Springer, 2019.
[4]
“2018 Automated Driving Tests | Euro NCAP.” https://www.euroncap.com:443/en/vehicle-safety/safety-campaigns/2018-automated-driving-tests/ (accessed Jun. 03, 2020).
[5]
M. Heesen, M. Baumann, J. Kelsch, D. Nause, and M. Friedrich, “Investigation of Cooperative Driving Behaviour during Lane Change in a Multi-Driver Simulation Environment” 2012.
[6]
S. Mattes and A. Hallen, “Surrogate Distraction Measurement Techniques” 2008, pp. 107–122.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AutomotiveUI '20: 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
September 2020
116 pages
ISBN:9781450380669
DOI:10.1145/3409251
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 September 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Foresight safety
  2. driver distraction
  3. networked simulators

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

AutomotiveUI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 111
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media