[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3408877.3432560acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Engaging Black Female Students in a Year-Long Preparatory Experience for AP CS Principles

Published: 05 March 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In 2020, over 116,000 students took the Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles (AP CSP) Exam. Although Black female students have participated in AP CSP at higher rates than for the AP CSA course, their representation is still disproportionately lower than the school population of Black females. In this Experience Report, we present the early results of an NSF-sponsored effort that provides an AP CSP preparatory experience and CS career awareness to Black female students from rural, urban, and suburban communities in the state of Alabama.
At the project's core is a peer-learning community (PLC) facilitated by Black female teachers with deep knowledge of AP CSP. An intensive summer experience prepares students for the AP CSP course through culturally-responsive, project-based learning experiences designed to connect advanced computing concepts to the students' personal lives and career aspirations. Interactions and support continue throughout the academic year to facilitate AP exam readiness. Online interactions among the PLC members serve to mitigate the barriers that young women of color typically encounter when pursuing CS education, increasing their persistence and success in CS.
We examined whether students' project participation enhances self-efficacy and perceived competency in CS, increases positive attitudes, awareness, and desire to pursue CS studies and careers, and mitigates perceived socio-cultural barriers to pursue studies and careers in CS. Our initial findings include AP CSP examination qualifying rates (87.5%) that numerically exceeded the 2020 national/statewide rates for all groups (i.e., based on race, gender, and their intersection), increased perceptions of Black females as belonging in CS, and gains in computing self-efficacy.

References

[1]
College Board, Participation in AP Computer Science Principles more than doubles 3 years after launch, https://www.collegeboard.org/releases/2019/participation-csp-nearly-doubles, July 31, 2019.
[2]
College Board, AP Archived Data, Retrieved August 26, 2020 from https://research.collegeboard.org/programs/ap/data/archived.
[3]
Allison M. Ryan, 2000. Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents? motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist 35, 2, 101--111.
[4]
Edward W. Morris, 2007. 'Ladies' or ?Loudies?? Perceptions and experiences of Black girls in classrooms. Youth & Society, 38, 4, 490--515.
[5]
Danyelle T. Ireland, Kimberley E. Freeman, Cynthia E. Winston-Proctor, Kendra D. DeLaine, Stacey M. Lowe, and Kamilah M. Woodson, 2018. (Un)hidden figures: A synthesis of research examining the intersectional experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education. Review of Research in Education, 42, 226--254.
[6]
LaVar J. Charleston, Phillis L. George, Jerlando F.L. Jackson, Jonathan Berhanu, and Mauriell H. Amechi, 2014. Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of black women in US computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7, 3, 166--176.
[7]
Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas, 2020. The intersectional experiences of Black women in computing. In The 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20), Portland, OR, USA, 199--205.
[8]
Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler, 2020. The intersection of being Black and being a woman: Examining the effect of social computing relationships on computer science career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20, 2, 9--1 to 9--15.
[9]
Amber Solomon, DeKita Moon, Armisha L. Roberts, and Juan E. Gilbert, 2018. Not just Black and not just a woman: Black women belonging in computing. 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), February 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA, 5 pages.
[10]
Jakita O. Thomas, Nicole Joseph, Arian Williams, Chan?tel Crum, and Jamika Burge, 2018. Speaking truth to power: Exploring the intersectional experiences of Black women in computing. 2018 Research on Equity, Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), February 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA, 8 pages.
[11]
Ryoko Yamaguchi and Jamika D. Burge, 2019. Intersectionality in the narratives of Black women in computing through the education and workforce pipeline. 2019. Journal for Multicultural Education, 13, 3, 215--235.
[12]
Maria Ong, Carol Wright, Lorelle Espinosa, and Gary Orfield, 2011. Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review 81, 2, 172--209.
[13]
April L. Few, 2007. Integrating black consciousness and critical race feminism into family studies research. Journal of Family Issues 28, 4, 452--473.
[14]
Amanda K. Sesko and Monica Biernat, 2010. Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, 2, 356--360.
[15]
Girl Scout Research Institute, 2012. Generation STEM: What girls say about Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. Retrieved August 26, 2020 from https://www.girlscouts.org/join/educators/generation_stem_full_report.pdf.
[16]
Erin McPherson, Bernadette Park, and Tiffany A. Ito, 2018. The role of prototype matching in science pursuits: perceptions of scientists that are inaccurate and diverge from self-perceptions predict reduced interest in a science career. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44, 6, 881--898.
[17]
Martin M. Chemers, Eileen L. Zurbriggen, Moin Syed, Barbara K. Goza, and Steve Bearman, 2011. The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues 67, 3, 469--491.
[18]
Paulette Vincent-Ruz and Christian D. Schunn, 2018. The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education 5, 48 1--12.
[19]
Jane Margolis, Rachel Estrella, Joanna Goode, Jennifer J. Holme, and Kimberly Nao, 2008. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[20]
Joshua L. Weese and Russell Feldhausen, 2017. STEM Outreach: Assessing Computational Thinking and Problem Solving. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2017, Columbus, OH, USA, 1--12.
[21]
Kathy Haynie, 2016. Evaluation Report for SMASH Computer Science Education. Report prepared for National Science Foundation. Skillman, NJ. https://mk0smashwofe7fve1j.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Kapor_SMASH-Impact-Report_2016_final.pdf
[22]
Melissa M. McDonald, Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Jennifer K. Vrabel, and Martha Escobar, 2019. A single-item measure for assessing STEM identity. Frontiers in Education 4, 78, 1--15.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Creating Apps for Community and Social Good: Preliminary Learning Outcomes from a Middle School Computer Science CurriculumACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/365867424:3(1-26)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Novel Insights into Elementary Girls' Experiences in Physiological ComputingProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630900(764-770)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Understanding U.S. secondary computer science teachers’ challenges and needsComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.2209474(1-33)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Engaging Black Female Students in a Year-Long Preparatory Experience for AP CS Principles

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      March 2021
      1454 pages
      ISBN:9781450380621
      DOI:10.1145/3408877
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 05 March 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. ap cs principles
      2. broadening participation in computing

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      SIGCSE '21
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE TS 2025
      The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 26 - March 1, 2025
      Pittsburgh , PA , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)120
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Creating Apps for Community and Social Good: Preliminary Learning Outcomes from a Middle School Computer Science CurriculumACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/365867424:3(1-26)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Novel Insights into Elementary Girls' Experiences in Physiological ComputingProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630900(764-770)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
      • (2023)Understanding U.S. secondary computer science teachers’ challenges and needsComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2023.2209474(1-33)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
      • (2022)What do We Know about Computing Education for K-12 in Non-formal Settings? A Systematic Literature Review of Recent ResearchProceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3501385.3543960(264-281)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2022
      • (2021)Teaching through a Global PandemicProceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3502870.3506565(1-25)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2021

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media