[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3405962.3405992acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Estimating Deflation Representing People Spreading in Stream Data

Published: 24 August 2020 Publication History

Abstract

With the expanded use of social media such as Twitter in recent years, it has become easy to add various information such as location data using mobile devices. Using those data, one can observe the real world without using physical sensors. Therefore, social media have high operational value as social sensors. As described herein, we aim to support decision-making for people who intend to visit a specific place at which an event or some trouble recently occurred. After proposing a method of real-time extraction of data reflecting a burst state showing people's concentration, their inactivity, and continuous flow and dispersion, we confirm the method's effectiveness.

References

[1]
T. Sakaki and Y. Matsuo, Twitter as a Social Sensor: Can Social Sensors Exceed Physical Sensors? Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 27(1), pp. 67--74 (2012).
[2]
J. Kleinberg, Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams, In Proc. 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 91--101, ACM(2002).
[3]
Y. Zhu and D.Shasha, Efficient Elastic Burst Detec-tion in Data Streams, Proc. 9th ACM SIGMOD Inter-national Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 336--345, ACM(2003).
[4]
D. Shasha and Y. Zhu, High Performance Discovery in Time Series, Techniques and Case Studies (Mono-graphs in Computer Science), Springer-Verlag(2004).
[5]
X. Zhang and D. Shasha, Better Burst Detection, Proc. 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 146--149, IEEE computer Society (2006).
[6]
R. Ebina, K. Nakamura and S. Oyanagi, A Proposal for a Real-Time Burst Detection Method, DBSJ Journal, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 1--6(2010).
[7]
R. Ebina, K. Nakamura and S. Oyanagi, A Proposal for a Real-time Burst Analysis Method, IPSJ TOD, Vol.5(3), pp. 86--96(2012).
[8]
M. Endo, Y. Shoji, M. Hirota, S. Ohno and H. Ishikawa, On Best Time Estimation Method for Phenological Observations Using Geotagged Tweets, IWIN2016, pp. 205--210 (2016).
[9]
M. Endo, M. Hirota, S. Ohno and H. Ishikawa, Best- Time Estimation Method by Region and Tourist Spot using Information Interpolation, IWIN2016, pp. 209--216 (2017).

Index Terms

  1. Estimating Deflation Representing People Spreading in Stream Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WIMS 2020: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
    June 2020
    279 pages
    ISBN:9781450375429
    DOI:10.1145/3405962
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 August 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Burst structure
    2. Deflation structure
    3. Twitter
    4. real time analysis
    5. social sensor

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    WIMS 2020

    Acceptance Rates

    WIMS 2020 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 63 submissions, 56%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 140 of 278 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 22
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media