[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3497701.3497727acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicebiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Connection and Underlying Cause between Financial Statement Fraud Cases

Published: 24 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

There are more and more cases of fraud associated with manipulation of financial statements today. Various schemes and management motivations for manipulating financial statements. However, is there a common thread between these cases that can be studied, so that it can provide a conclusion about prevention and improvement in the future? Our study seeks to present an analysis of cases of financial reporting fraud that occur in the world from a financial audit point of view. This research is a qualitative research in the form of inductive case study analysis. We present case studies using the background flow, financial statement fraud schemes, management motivation and financial auditor involvement. At the end we made a conclusion, drew a connection and underlying discussion along with lessons learned about the case. The results of our study found that the existence of pressure in the form of high expectations, failure of expansion and overly optimistic investment and misuse of company assets for personal use became the common underlying cause among these financial fraud cases. The implication of our study is that financial auditor or forensic accountant should pay more attention when those factors occurs or identified when they conducting audit or examination.

References

[1]
ACFE, “Report To The Nations 2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse,” 2020.
[2]
B. L. Handoko and Natasya, “Fraud diamond model for fraudulent financial statement detection,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., 2019.
[3]
L. Gao and A. G. Brink, “Whistleblowing studies in accounting research: A review of experimental studies on the determinants of whistleblowing,” J. Account. Lit., vol. 38, no. May, pp. 1–13, 2017.
[4]
P. Morgan and V. Pontines, “Financial Stability and Financial Inclusion,” SSRN Electron. J., 2014.
[5]
J. Z. Haislip, G. F. Peters, and V. J. Richardson, “The effect of auditor IT expertise on internal controls,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., 2016.
[6]
B. L. Handoko, A. S. L. Lindawati, and D. L. Warganegara, “Financial Statement Fraud Revisited, Learn From Auditor Negligence,” J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 12, no. 06, pp. 2774–2781, 2020.
[7]
N. A. Aris, S. Maznah, M. Arif, R. Othman, and M. M. Zain, “Fraudulent Financial Statement Detection Using Statistical Techniques: The Case Of Small Medium Automotive Enterprise,” vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1469–1478, 2015.
[8]
J. D. Ratley, “REPORT TO THE NATIONS Letter from the President,” 2016.
[9]
V. Bouvatier, L. Lepetit, and F. Strobel, “Bank income smoothing, ownership concentration and the regulatory environment,” J. Bank. Financ., 2014.
[10]
D. R. Cressey, Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. USA: Glencoe, 1953.
[11]
D. T. Wolfe and D. R. Hermanson, “The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud,” CPA J., vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 38–42, 2004.
[12]
Crowe Horwath, “The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements,” Crowe Horwath LLP, pp. 1–62, 2012.
[13]
G. L. Vousinas, “Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model,” J. Financ. Crime, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 372–381, 2019.
[14]
C. Albrecht, D. Holland, R. Malagueño, S. Dolan, and S. Tzafrir, “The Role of Power in Financial Statement Fraud Schemes,” J. Bus. Ethics, 2015.
[15]
C. K. Lau and K. W. Ooi, “A case study on fraudulent financial reporting: Evidence from Malaysia,” Account. Res. J., 2016.
[16]
U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th, abrigat ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2016, 2016.
[17]
M. P. Beccar-Varela, M. C. Mariani, O. K. Tweneboah, and I. Florescu, “Analysis of the Lehman Brothers collapse and the Flash Crash event by applying wavelets methodologies,” Phys. A Stat. Mech. its Appl., vol. 474, pp. 162–171, 2017.
[18]
S. Abdul, R. Bukhari, and H. M. Hanif, “Olympus Fraud & Corporate Governance Failure: A Well Drilled-Down Case Study,” no. February 2020, 2019.
[19]
M. Agostini and G. Favero, “Accounting fraud, business failure and creative auditing: A microanalysis of the strange case of the Sunbeam Corporation,” Account. Hist., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 472–487, 2017.
[20]
C. H. Kemmerer and T. J. Shawver, “Tyco: A Top-Down Approach to Ethical Failure,” SSRN Electron. J., vol. 11, no. 2, 2011.
[21]
E. Crosina and M. G. Pratt, “Toward a model of organizational mourning: The case of former Lehman brothers bankers,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 66–98, 2019.
[22]
B. Y. Kenneth and N. G. Ang, “Olympus Has Surely Fallen: An Examination of the Woes that Family Business Face,” pp. 1–10, 2020.
[23]
P. Sweeney, “ACCOUNTING FRAUD Learning from the Wrongs.,” Financ. Exec., 2000.
[24]
A. Azadinamin, “The Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers: Causes of Failure & Recommendations Going Forward,” SSRN Electron. J., no. August 2013, 2012.
[25]
D. Elam, M. Madrigal de Barrera, and M. Jackson, “Olympus Imaging Fraud Scandal: A Case Study,” Am. J. Bus. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2016.
[26]
T. Therese and A. R. Jakobsen, “Greed at the Top: Fraud and the Failure of Oversight at Adelphia Communications Corporation and Tyco International Ltd,” no. June, 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)How Information Technology Literacy Moderated Factors Affecting Quality of Computer-Based Audit2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS)10.1109/ICORIS56080.2022.10031571(1-6)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICEBI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on E-Business and Internet
October 2021
200 pages
ISBN:9781450385657
DOI:10.1145/3497701
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 January 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Cause
  2. Connection
  3. Fraud
  4. Motivation
  5. Scheme
  6. Underlying

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICEBI 2021

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)65
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)How Information Technology Literacy Moderated Factors Affecting Quality of Computer-Based Audit2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS)10.1109/ICORIS56080.2022.10031571(1-6)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media