More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Designing for Knowledge Construction to Facilitate the Uptake of Open Science: Laying out the Design Space

Authors:

Viktoria Pammer-SchindlerAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 246, Pages 1 - 16

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517450

Published: 29 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The uptake of open science resources needs knowledge construction on the side of the readers/receivers of scientific content. The design of technologies surrounding open science resources can facilitate such knowledge construction, but this has not been investigated yet. To do so, we first conducted a scoping review of literature, from which we draw design heuristics for knowledge construction in digital environments. Subsequently, we grouped the underlying technological functionalities into three design categories: i) structuring and supporting collaboration, ii) supporting the learning process, and iii) structuring, visualising and navigating (learning) content. Finally, we mapped the design categories and associated design heuristics to core components of popular open science platforms. This mapping constitutes a design space (design implications), which informs researchers and designers in the HCI community about suitable functionalities for supporting knowledge construction in existing or new digital open science platforms.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Materials (3491102.3517450-supplemental-materials.zip)

Download
606.55 KB

MP4 File (3491102.3517450-talk-video.mp4)

Talk Video

Download
232.12 MB

MP4 File (3491102.3517450-video-preview.mp4)

Video Preview

Download
21.19 MB

References

[1]

Academia. 2007. About Academia. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://www.academia.edu/about

[2]

Faheem Ahmed, Piers Campbell, Ahmad Jaffar, and Luiz Fernando Capretz. 2009. Managing support requests in open source software project: The role of online forums. In 2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology. IEEE, 590–594. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSIT.2009.5234491

[3]

Alexa. 1997. SEO and competitive analysis software. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://www.alexa.com/

[4]

Hilary Arksey and Lisa O’Malley. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology 8, 1(2005), 19–32.

[5]

arXiv. 2019. About arXiv. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://arxiv.org/about

[6]

Valeria Arza and Mariano Fressoli. 2017. Systematizing benefits of open science practices. Information Services & Use 37, 4 (2017), 463–474.

Digital Library

[7]

Reuven Aviv, Zippy Erlich, Gilad Ravid, and Aviva Geva. 2003. Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 7, 3 (2003), 1–23.

[8]

John R. Baird, Peter J. Fensham, Richard F. Gunstone, and Richard T. White. 1991. The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning. Journal of research in Science Teaching 28, 2 (1991), 163–182.

[9]

Pieter J. Beers, Paul A. Kirschner, Henny P. A. Boshuizen, and Wim H. Gijselaers. 2005. Coercing Knowledge Construction in Collaborative Learning Environments. In Proceedings of The 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The next 10 Years! (Taipei, Taiwan) (CSCL ’05). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 8–17.

Digital Library

[10]

Jürgen Buder and Daniel Bodemer. 2008. Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3, 2(2008), 123–139.

[11]

Kathryn Castle. 1997. Constructing Knowledge of Constructivism. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 18, 1 (1997), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901029708549137 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10901029708549137

[12]

Shih-Fu Chang, John R Smith, Mandis Beigi, and Ana Benitez. 1997. Visual information retrieval from large distributed online repositories. Commun. ACM 40, 12 (1997), 63–71.

Digital Library

[13]

Min Chi, Kenneth Koedinger, Geoffrey Gordon, Pamela Jordan, and Kurt Vanlehn. 2011. Instructional Factors Analysis: A Cognitive Model For Multiple Instructional Interventions.EDM 2011 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 61–70.

[14]

National Research Council 1996. National science education standards. National Academies Press.

[15]

Ulrike Cress and Joachim Kimmerle. 2008. A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3, 2(2008), 105–122.

[16]

Sidney D’Mello and Art Graesser. 2013. AutoTutor and affective AutoTutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2, 4(2013), 1–39.

Digital Library

[17]

Janice A. Dole and Gale M. Sinatra. 1998. Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist 33, 2-3 (1998), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294

[18]

Hendrik Drachsler, Katrien Verbert, Olga C Santos, and Nikos Manouselis. 2015. Panorama of recommender systems to support learning. In Recommender systems handbook. Springer, 421–451.

[19]

Helen S. Du and Christian Wagner. 2007. Learning With Weblogs: Enhancing Cognitive and Social Knowledge Construction. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 50, 1(2007), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2006.890848

[20]

Suzanne Dumouchel, Emilie Blotière, Gert Breitfuss, Yin Chen, Francesca Di Donato, Maria Eskevich, Paula Forbes, Haris Georgiadis, Arnaud Gingold, Elisa Gorgaini, 2020. GOTRIPLE: a user-centric process to develop a discovery platform. Information 11, 12 (2020), 563.

[21]

Florian Echtler and Maximilian Häußler. 2018. Open source, open science, and the replication crisis in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.

Digital Library

[22]

Katherine M. Edmondson. 2005. Chapter 2 - Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In Assessing Science Understanding, Joel J. Mintzes, James H. Wandersee, and Joseph D. Novak (Eds.). Academic Press, Burlington, 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012498365-6/50004-4

[23]

Elsevier. 2020. Elsevier Open Science: Elsevier partners with the research community to empower open science. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://www.elsevier.com/open-science

[24]

Gijsbert Erkens, Jeroen Janssen, Jos Jaspers, and Gellof Kanselaar. 2006. Visualizing participation to facilitate argumentation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Vol. 2. 1095–1096.

[25]

Bernhard Ertl. 2009. Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge Construction in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - Volume 1 (Rhodes, Greece) (CSCL’09). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 137–141.

[26]

Sebastian S Feger, Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen, Paweł W Woźniak, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2019. The Role of HCI in Reproducible Science: Understanding, Supporting and Motivating Core Practices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.

[27]

Michael J. Fell. 2019. The economic impacts of open science: a rapid evidence assessment. Publications 2019 7, 3 (2019), 46.

[28]

Piyum Fernando and Stacey Kuznetsov. 2020. OScH in the Wild: Dissemination of Open Science Hardware and Implications for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[29]

Frank Fischer, Johannes Bruhn, Cornelia Gräsel, and Heinz Mandl. 2002. Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12, 2 (2002), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6

[30]

Frontiers. 2017. About Frontiers: Frontiers is a leading Open Access Publisher and Open Science Platform. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://www.frontiersin.org/about/about-frontiers

[31]

Dilrukshi Gamage, Shantha Fernando, and Indika Perera. 2014. Factors affecting to effective eLearning: Learners Perspective. Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ) 2, 5 (2014), 42–48.

[32]

Francisco J. García-Penalvo Carlos García and A. Merlo de Figuerola Jose. 2010. Open knowledge management in higher education. Online Information Review(2010).

[33]

Xun Ge, Yifei Dong, and Kun Huang. 2006. Shared Knowledge Construction Process in an Open-Source Software Development Community: An Investigation of the Gallery Community. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (Bloomington, Indiana) (ICLS ’06). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 189–195.

Digital Library

[34]

GitHub. 2011. GitHub Features: The tools you need to build what you want.Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://github.com/features

[35]

Charlotte N. Gunawardena, Constance A. Lowe, and Terry Anderson. 1997. Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17, 4 (Dec. 1997), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG

[36]

Lydia Harbarth, Svea Delsing, Florian Richtscheid, Volkan Yücepur, Florian Feldmann, Milad Akhavanfarm, Sven Manske, Julia Othlinghaus, and H Ulrich Hoppe. 2018. Learning by Tagging–Supporting Constructive Learning in Video-Based Environments. DeLFI 2018-Die 16. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik (2018).

[37]

Heeok Heo, Kyu Yon Lim, and Youngsoo Kim. 2010. Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education 55, 3 (2010), 1383–1392.

Digital Library

[38]

Khe Hew and Wing Cheung. 2010. Fostering Higher Knowledge Construction Levels in Online Discussion Forums: An Exploratory Case Study. IJWLTT 5 (01 2010), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.4018/jwltt.2010100103

Digital Library

[39]

Khe Foon Hew and Wing Sum Cheung. 2011. Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: An analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques. Instructional Science 39, 3 (2011), 303–319.

[40]

Cindy E Hmelo-Silver. 2003. Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education 41, 4 (2003), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.07.001

Digital Library

[41]

Cindy E Hmelo-Silver. 2003. Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education 41, 4 (2003), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.07.001

Digital Library

[42]

David Hung, Seng Chee Tan, and Chen Der-Thanq. 2005. How the Internet facilitates learning as dialog: Design considerations for online discussions. International Journal of Instructional Media 32, 1 (2005), 37–47.

[43]

Sanna Järvelä, Paul A. Kirschner, Ernesto Panadero, Jonna Malmberg, Chris Phielix, Jos Jaspers, Marika Koivuniemi, and Hanna Järvenoja. 2015. Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development 63, 1(2015), 125–142.

[44]

Hyoungwook Jin, Minsuk Chang, and Juho Kim. 2019. SolveDeep: A System for Supporting Subgoal Learning in Online Math Problem Solving. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312822

Digital Library

[45]

JSTOR. 2010. About JSTOR. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://about.jstor.org/

[46]

Heather Kanuka and Terry Anderson. 1998. Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l’ducation Distance 13, 1(1998), 57–74. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/86791

[47]

Joachim Kimmerle, Ulrike Cress, Christoph Held, and Johannes Moskaliuk. 2010. Social Software and Knowledge Building: Supporting Co-Evolution of Individual and Collective Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 1 (Chicago, Illinois) (ICLS ’10). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 9–16.

[48]

Joachim Kimmerle, Johannes Moskaliuk, and Ulrike Cress. 2009. Learning and Knowledge Building with Social Software. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - Volume 1 (Rhodes, Greece) (CSCL’09). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 459–468.

[49]

Joachim Kimmerle, Johannes Moskaliuk, and Ulrike Cress. 2011. Using wikis for learning and knowledge building: Results of an experimental study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 14, 4 (2011), 138–148.

[50]

Joachim Kimmerle, Johannes Moskaliuk, Aileen Oeberst, and Ulrike Cress. 2015. Learning and Collective Knowledge Construction With Social Media: A Process-Oriented Perspective. Educational Psychologist 50, 2 (2015), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1036273 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1036273

[51]

Aniket Kittur and Robert E. Kraut. 2008. Harnessing the Wisdom of Crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through Coordination. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Diego, CA, USA) (CSCW ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460572

Digital Library

[52]

René Kizilcec, Kathryn Papadopoulos, and Lalida Sritanyaratana. 2014. Showing face in video instruction: Effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (04 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557207

Digital Library

[53]

Ingo Kollar, Frank Fischer, and James D. Slotta. 2005. Internal and External Collaboration Scripts in Web-Based Science Learning at Schools. In Proceedings of Th 2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The next 10 Years!(Taipei, Taiwan) (CSCL ’05). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 331–340.

Digital Library

[54]

Shu-Sheng Liaw, Marek Hatala, and Hsiu-Mei Huang. 2010. Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education 54, 2 (2010), 446–454.

Digital Library

[55]

[55] ACM Digital Library.2012. Retrieved December 17, 2021 from https://dl.acm.org/

[56]

Mei Lin, Anne Preston, Ahmed Kharrufa, and Zhuoran Kong. 2016. Making L2 learners’ reasoning skills visible: The potential of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Thinking Skills and Creativity 22 (2016), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.004

[57]

Ping Liu, Feiwen Li, and Zhiwei Yang. 2020. A Grounded Theory Approach for Modelling the Knowledge Construction Process in Exploratory Search(JCDL ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 409–412. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383583.3398600

Digital Library

[58]

Thomas Ludwig, Volkmar Pipek, and Peter Tolmie. 2018. Designing for Collaborative Infrastructuring: Supporting Resonance Activities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 113 (Nov. 2018), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274382

Digital Library

[59]

Roberto Martinez Maldonado, Judy Kay, Kalina Yacef, and Beat Schwendimann. 2012. An interactive teacher’s dashboard for monitoring groups in a multi-tabletop learning environment. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 482–492.

Digital Library

[60]

Greg J. McInerny, Min Chen, Robin Freeman, David Gavaghan, Miriah Meyer, Francis Rowland, David J. Spiegelhalter, Moritz Stefaner, Geizi Tessarolo, and Joaquin Hortal. 2014. Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. Trends in ecology & evolution 29, 3 (2014), 148–157.

[61]

Mendeley. 2017. What is Mendeley Web?Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://www.mendeley.com/guides/web

[62]

Toni-Jan Keith Palma Monserrat, Yawen Li, Shengdong Zhao, and Xiang Cao. 2014. L. IVE: an integrated interactive video-based learning environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3399–3402.

Digital Library

[63]

Briana B. Morrison, Lauren E. Margulieux, and Mark Guzdial. 2015. Subgoals, Context, and Worked Examples in Learning Computing Problem Solving(ICER ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2787622.2787733

Digital Library

[64]

Johannes Moskaliuk, Franziska Bokhorst, and Ulrike Cress. 2016. Learning from others’ experiences: How patterns foster interpersonal transfer of knowledge-in-use. Computers in Human Behavior 55 (02 2016), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.051

Digital Library

[65]

Johannes Moskaliuk, Joachim Kimmerle, and Ulrike Cress. 2008. Learning and Knowledge Building with Wikis: The Impact of Incongruity between People’s Knowledge and a Wiki’s Information(ICLS’08). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 99–106.

[66]

Joseph D. Novak. 1993. Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology 6, 2 (1993), 167–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/08936039308404338 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08936039308404338

[67]

Aileen Oeberst, Iassen Halatchliyski, Joachim Kimmerle, and Ulrike Cress. 2014. Knowledge Construction in Wikipedia: A Systemic-Constructivist Analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences 23, 2 (2014), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.888352 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.888352

[68]

Sandra Y. Okita, Selen Turkay, Mihwa Kim, and Yumiko Murai. 2013. Learning by teaching with virtual peers and the effects of technological design choices on learning. Computers & Education 63 (2013), 176–196.

Digital Library

[69]

Jun Oshima and Marlene Scardamalia. 1996. Knowledge-Building and Conceptual Change: An Inquiry into Student-Directed Construction of Scientific Explanations. In Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Learning Sciences (Evanston, Illinois) (ICLS ’96). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 256–263.

[70]

Irene V. Pasquetto, Ashley E. Sands, Peter T. Darch, and Christine L. Borgman. 2016. Open data in scientific settings: From policy to practice. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1585–1596.

Digital Library

[71]

Jean Piaget. 1977. The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures.New York: Viking Press.

[72]

Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino, Carlos Alario-Hoyos, Xavier Soldani, and Carlos Delgado Kloos. 2015. Lessons learned from the design of situated learning environments to support collaborative knowledge construction. Computers & Education 87 (2015), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.019

Digital Library

[73]

Mikko Rajanen and Netta Iivari. 2013. Open source and human computer interaction philosophies in open source projects: Incompatible or co-existent?. In Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media. 67–74.

Digital Library

[74]

Mikko Rajanen and Netta Iivari. 2015. Power, Empowerment and Open Source Usability(CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3413–3422. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702441

Digital Library

[75]

Justin Reich. 2021. Preregistration and registered reports. Educational Psychologist 56, 2 (2021), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1900851 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1900851

[76]

ResearchGate. 2014. About. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/about

[77]

Yigal Rosen and Rikki Rimor. 2009. Using a Collaborative Database to Enhance Students’ Knowledge Construction. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society 5 (01 2009), 187–195.

[78]

Elisa Rubegni, Nemanja Memarovic, and Marc Langheinrich. 2011. Talking to strangers: Using large public displays to facilitate social interaction. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability. Springer, 195–204.

[79]

Marlene Scardamalia 2002. Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society 97 (2002), 67–98.

[80]

Marlene Scardamalia and Carl Bereiter. 2003. Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. Encyclopedia of distributed learning(2003), 269–272.

[81]

Marlene Scardamalia and Carl Bereiter. 2005. Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (1 ed.), R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.008

[82]

Marlene Scardamalia and Carl Bereiter. 2010. A brief history of knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie 36, 1 (2010).

[83]

Marlene Scardamalia and Carl Bereiter. 2014. Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences 2 (2014), 397–417.

[84]

[84] Google Scholar.2004. Retrieved December 17, 2021 from https://scholar.google.com/

[85]

Google Scholar. 2006. Features of Google Scholar. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://scholar.google.com/intl/de/scholar/about.html

[86]

Semantic Scholar. 2015. A free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://www.semanticscholar.org/

[87]

Gheorghe Scutaru, Elena Cocorada, Mariela Pavalache, Anna Marina Scapolla, Massimo Mustica, and Dominic Kristaly. 2008. Enhanced individualized learning environment. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. 1–6.

Digital Library

[88]

Gerry Stahl. 2000. A model of collaborative knowledge-building. In Fourth international conference of the learning sciences, Vol. 10. 70–77.

[89]

Lily Sun, Shirley Williams, and Kecheng Liu. 2004. Knowledge Construction in e-Learning: designing an e-Learning environment. In Enterprise Information Systems V. Springer, 308–315.

[90]

Daniel Suthers, Ravi Vatrapu, Richard Medina, Sam Joseph, and Nathan Dwyer. 2007. Conceptual Representations Enhance Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 8th Iternational Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA) (CSCL’07). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 705–714.

Digital Library

[91]

Mike Tissenbaum, Michelle Lui, and James D. Slotta. 2012. Co-Designing Collaborative Smart Classroom Curriculum for Secondary School Science. j-jucs 18, 3 (feb 2012), 327–352.

[92]

Jan van Aalst. 2009. Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4, 3 (01 Sep 2009), 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5

[93]

Ruben Vicente-Saez and Clara Martinez-Fuentes. 2018. Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research 88 (2018), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043

[94]

Rebecca Lawrence Vitek Tracz. 2016. Towards an open science publishing platform. F1000Research 5(2016).

[95]

Ernst Von Glasersfeld. 1995. Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning.The Falmer Press. Voloshinov, VN (1973).(1995).

[96]

Qiyun Wang, Huay Lit Woo, and Jianhua Zhao. 2009. Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments 17, 1 (2009), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701706320 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701706320

[97]

Armin Weinberger, Douglas Clark, Gijsbert Erkens, Victor Sampson, Karsten Stegmann, Jeroen Janssen, Jos Jaspers, Gellof Kanselaar, and Frank Fischer. 2006. Argumentative Knowledge Construction in CSCL. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (Bloomington, Indiana) (ICLS ’06). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 1094–1100.

Digital Library

[98]

Armin Weinberger, Karsten Stegmann, and Frank Fischer. 2006. Scripting online discussions: Effects on argumentative discourse, cognitive processes, and knowledge acquisition. In Argumentative Knowledge Construction in CSCL: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences. 1094–1100.

[99]

Xianmin Yang, Jihong Li, and Beibei Xing. 2018. Behavioral patterns of knowledge construction in online cooperative translation activities. The Internet and Higher Education 36 (2018), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.08.003

[100]

Carmen Zahn, Karsten Krauskopf, Friedrich W. Hesse, and Roy Pea. 2009. Participation in Knowledge Building ”Revisited”: Reflective Discussion and Information Design with Advanced Digital Video Technology. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - Volume 1 (Rhodes, Greece) (CSCL’09). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 596–600.

[101]

Heng-Ru Zhang and Fan Min. 2016. Three-way recommender systems based on random forests. Knowledge-Based Systems 91 (2016), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.019

Digital Library

Cited By

Disch LÜberreiter SPammer-Schindler V(2024)Beyond Textbooks: A Study on Supporting Learning of Molecule Naming in a Virtual Reality EnvironmentProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3670668(310-322)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670653.3670668
Shelby RRismani SHenne KMoon ARostamzadeh NNicholas PYilla-Akbari NGallegos JSmart AGarcia EVirk G(2023)Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm ReductionProceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society10.1145/3600211.3604673(723-741)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3600211.3604673
Disch LFessl AFranza SKimmerle JPammer-Schindler V(2023)Using Knowledge Construction Theory to Evaluate Learning Processes: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Showing Gradually Built-up Concept Maps Alongside a Scientific TextInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.228929640:24(8764-8780)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2289296

Index Terms

Designing for Knowledge Construction to Facilitate the Uptake of Open Science: Laying out the Design Space
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI theory, concepts and models

Recommendations

Designing for Preregistration: A User-Centered Perspective
CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The replication crisis---a failure to replicate foundational studies---has sparked a conversation in psychology, HCI, and beyond about scientific reliability. To address the crisis, researchers increasingly adopt preregistration: the practice of ...
Knowledge science - modeling the knowledge creation process
IUKM'11: Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Integrated uncertainty in knowledge modelling and decision making

Knowledge science is a problem-oriented interdisciplinary field that takes as its subject the modeling of the knowledge creation process and its application, and carries out research in such disciplines as knowledge management, management of technology, ...
Enacting open science by D4Science
Abstract
The open science movement is promising to revolutionise the way science is conducted with the goal to make it more fair, solid and democratic. This revolution is destined to remain just a wish if it is not supported by changes in ...
Highlights
- A platform supporting the implementation of open science practices.
- A shared ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2022

10459 pages

ISBN:9781450391573

DOI:10.1145/3491102

Editors:
Simone Barbosa
PUC-Rio, Brazil
,
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan, USA
,
Caroline Appert
Université Paris-Saclay, France
,
David A. Shamma
Toyota Research Institute, USA
,
Steven Drucker
Microsoft Research, USA
,
Julie Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK
,
Koji Yatani
University of Tokyo, Japan

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

European Commission (H2020-INFRAEOSC-02-2019 - Prototyping new innovative services)
FFG ? Austrian Research Promotion Agency
European Commission (H2020-SwafS-2018-2020 - Science with and for Society)

Conference

CHI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 29 - May 5, 2022

LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
439
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)101
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Disch LÜberreiter SPammer-Schindler V(2024)Beyond Textbooks: A Study on Supporting Learning of Molecule Naming in a Virtual Reality EnvironmentProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3670668(310-322)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670653.3670668
Shelby RRismani SHenne KMoon ARostamzadeh NNicholas PYilla-Akbari NGallegos JSmart AGarcia EVirk G(2023)Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm ReductionProceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society10.1145/3600211.3604673(723-741)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3600211.3604673
Disch LFessl AFranza SKimmerle JPammer-Schindler V(2023)Using Knowledge Construction Theory to Evaluate Learning Processes: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Showing Gradually Built-up Concept Maps Alongside a Scientific TextInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.228929640:24(8764-8780)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2289296

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents