Interface Cœur-Ordinateur : une piste pour l’étude des erreurs humaines ?
Authors: 
Frédéric Vanderhaegen, Marion Wolff, Adèle Buey, Weronika Sawicki, Régis MollardAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 8, Pages 1 - 9
Abstract
Des études antérieures ont montré qu'il semblerait exister un lien entre la synchronicité cardiaque et l'incapacité attentionnelle à détecter des alarmes lorsque la charge mentale de travail augmente lors de tâches de contrôle. Cet article fait suite à ces études et propose une interface cœur-ordinateur afin de comparer à nouveau deux groupes de sujets devant réagir à des événements visuels et sonores répartis selon 4 niveaux de difficulté croissante menées sous contrainte temporelle, mais cette fois dans un contexte où l'attention du sujet est distribuée : un groupe dont l'apparition des alarmes est rendue synchrone avec le rythme cardiaque du sujet et un autre asynchrone. Les résultats quantitatifs et qualitatifs corroborent ceux obtenus antérieurement : les événements synchronisés avec le rythme cardiaque des sujets induisent bien une perturbation non consciente des capacités attentionnelles. Toutefois il semblerait que dans un contexte où l'attention est distribuée sur plusieurs écrans, la synchronicité des alarmes avec le rythme cardiaque du sujet pourrait avoir un plus grand impact sur la détection d’événements que lorsque l'attention est focalisée sur un seul. Cette nouvelle étude montre ainsi l'intérêt de développer de futures méthodes d'évaluation de la fiabilité humaine pour le contrôle de situations à risques.
References
[1]
Aladino Amantini, Michał Choraś, Salvatore D'Antonio, Elyoenai Egozcue, Daniel Germanus, and Reinhard Hutter. 2012. The human role in tools for improving robustness and resilience of critical infrastructures. Cogn. Technol. Work 14, 2 (June 2012), 143–155.
[2]
Margaret M. Bradley and Peter J. Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25, 1 (March 1994), 49–59.
[3]
James C. Byers, Alyah C. Bittner, and Susan G. Hill. 1989. Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: are paired comparisons necessary? In Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety, A. Mital (ed.). Taylor & Francis, London, 481–485.
[4]
Pietro Carlo Cacciabue. 2004. Human error risk management for engineering systems: a methodology for design, safety assessment, accident investigation and training. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 83, 2 (February 2004), 229–240.
[5]
Stéphane Caid, Daniel Hauret, Marion Wolff, and Régis Mollard. 2016. Fatigue study and discourse analysis of french uninhabited aerial vehicle (UAV) operators to understand operational issues. In Proceedings of the 15th Ergo'IA “Ergonomie Et Informatique Avancé” Conference on - Ergo'IA ’16, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–8.
[6]
Oliver Carsten and Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2015. Situation awareness: Valid or fallacious? Cogn. Technol. Work 17, 2 (May 2015), 157–158.
[7]
Julien Cegarra and Nicolas Morgado. 2009. Etude des propriétés de la version francophone du NASA-TLX.
[8]
Alexis Clay, Marion Wolff, and Régis Mollard. 2014. User-designed movement interactions: An exploratory study for natural interactions. J. Eur. des Systèmes Autom. 4-5–6, (2014), 453–447.
[9]
J. Raymond Comstock and Ruth J. Arnegard. 1992. The MultiAttribute Task Battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research. Hampton, VA.
[10]
Nicola Crichton. 2001. Visual analog scale (VAS). J. Clin. Nurs. 10, 5 (2001), 706.
[11]
Dirk Cysarz and Arndt Büssing. 2005. Cardiorespiratory synchronization during Zen meditation. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 95, 1 (September 2005), 88–95.
[12]
Sidney W. A. Dekker. 2015. The danger of losing situation awareness. Cogn. Technol. Work 17, 2 (May 2015), 159–161.
[13]
Arindam Dey, Hao Chen, Chang Zhuang, Mark Billinghurst, and Robert W. Lindeman. 2018. Effects of Sharing Real-Time Multi-Sensory Heart Rate Feedback in Different Immersive Collaborative Virtual Environments. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), IEEE, 165–173.
[14]
Simon Enjalbert and Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2017. A hybrid reinforced learning system to estimate resilience indicators. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 64, (September 2017), 295–301.
[15]
Leon Festinger. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
[16]
Frederic Vanderhaegen and Victor Jimenez. 2018. The amazing human factors and their dissonances for autonomous Cyber-Physical&Human Systems. In 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), IEEE, 597–602.
[17]
Fay C.M. Geisler, Nadja Vennewald, Thomas Kubiak, and Hannelore Weber. 2010. The impact of heart rate variability on subjective well-being is mediated by emotion regulation. Pers. Individ. Dif. 49, 7 (November 2010), 723–728.
[18]
Rodolphe Ghiglione, Agnès Landré, Marcel Bromberg, and Pierre Molette. 1998. L'analyse automatique des contenus. Dunod, Paris.
[19]
Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Human mental workload, P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (eds.). North Holland, Amsterdam, 139–183.
[20]
Apit Hemakom, Valentin Goverdovsky, Lisa Aufegger, and Danilo P. Mandic. 2016. Quantifying cooperation in choir singing: Respiratory and cardiac synchronisation. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 719–723.
[21]
Apit Hemakom, Katarzyna Powezka, Valentin Goverdovsky, Usman Jaffer, and Danilo P. Mandic. 2017. Quantifying team cooperation through intrinsic multi-scale measures: respiratory and cardiac synchronization in choir singers and surgical teams. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 12 (December 2017), 170853.
[22]
E. M. Hickling and J. E. Bowie. 2013. Applicability of human reliability assessment methods to human–computer interfaces. Cogn. Technol. Work 15, 1 (February 2013), 19–27.
[23]
Antonio R. Hidalgo-Muñoz, Damien Mouratille, Nadine Matton, Mickaël Causse, Yves Rouillard, and Radouane El-Yagoubi. 2018. Cardiovascular correlates of emotional state, cognitive workload and time-on-task effect during a realistic flight simulation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 128, (June 2018), 62–69.
[24]
Erik Hollnagel. 1998. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method, CREAM (Amsterdam ed.). Elsevier.
[25]
Erik Hollnagel. 2006. Resilience – the challenge of the unstable. In Resilience Engineering – Concepts and precepts, E. Hollnagel, D. Woods and N. Leveson (eds.). Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 9–17.
[26]
Debra G. Jones and Mica R. Endsley. 1996. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviat. Space. Environ. Med. 67, 6 (1996), 507–512. of situation awareness errors in aviation
[27]
Georges-Yves Kervern. 1994. Latest advances in cindynics. Economica, Paris.
[28]
Jeffrey E. Kottemann, Fred D. Davis, and William E. Remus. 1994. Computer-Assisted Decision Making: Performance, Beliefs, and the Illusion of Control. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 57, 1 (January 1994), 26–37.
[29]
Kiswendsida Abel Ouedraogo, Simon Enjalbert, and Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2013. How to learn from the resilience of Human–Machine Systems? Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 26, 1 (January 2013), 24–34.
[30]
James Reason. 1990. Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[31]
Roy Salomon, Roberta Ronchi, Jonathan Dönz, Javier Bello-Ruiz, Bruno Herbelin, Remi Martet, Nathan Faivre, Karl Schaller, and Olaf Blanke. 2016. The Insula Mediates Access to Awareness of Visual Stimuli Presented Synchronously to the Heartbeat. J. Neurosci. 36, 18 (May 2016), 5115–5127.
[32]
Daniel J Simons and Christopher F Chabris. 1999. Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events. Perception 28, 9 (September 1999), 1059–1074.
[33]
George W. Torrance, David Feeny, and William Furlong. 2001. Visual Analog Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States? Med. Decis. Mak. 21, 4 (August 2001), 329–334.
[34]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 1999. Toward a model of unreliability to study error prevention supports. Interact. Comput. 11, 5 (May 1999), 575–595.
[35]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2001. A non-probabilistic prospective and retrospective human reliability analysis method — application to railway system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71, 1 (January 2001), 1–13.
[36]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2003. Analyse et contrôle de l'erreur humaine. Hermès Sciences, Paris.
[37]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2010. Autonomy control of human-machine systems. IFAC Proc. Vol. 43, 13 (2010), 398–403.
[38]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2010. Human-error-based design of barriers and analysis of their uses. Cogn. Technol. Work 12, 2 (June 2010), 133–142.
[39]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2014. Dissonance Engineering: A New Challenge to Analyse Risky Knowledge When using a System. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 9, 6 (December 2014), 776.
[40]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2016. A rule-based support system for dissonance discovery and control applied to car driving. Expert Syst. Appl. 65, (December 2016), 361–371.
[41]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2017. Towards increased systems resilience: New challenges based on dissonance control for human reliability in Cyber-Physical&Human Systems. Annu. Rev. Control 44, (2017), 316–322.
[42]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen. 2021. Weak Signal-Oriented Investigation of Ethical Dissonance Applied to Unsuccessful Mobility Experiences Linked to Human–Machine Interactions. Sci. Eng. Ethics 27, 1 (February 2021), 2.
[43]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen and Oliver Carsten. 2017. Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems? Cogn. Technol. Work 19, 1 (February 2017), 1–12.
[44]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen and Patrice Caulier. 2011. A multi-viewpoint system to support abductive reasoning. Inf. Sci. (Ny). 181, 24 (December 2011), 5349–5363.
[45]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen, Marion Wolff, and Régis Mollard. 2019. Synchronization of stimuli with heart rate: a new challenge to control attentional dissonances. In Automation Challenges of Socio-technical Systems: Paradoxes and Conflicts, Frédéric Vanderhaegen, C. Maaoui, M. Sallak and D. Berdjag (eds.). Wiley, 3–28.
[46]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen, Marion Wolff, and Régis Mollard. 2020. Non-conscious errors in the control of dynamic events synchronized with heartbeats: A new challenge for human reliability study. Saf. Sci. 129, (September 2020), 104814.
[47]
Frédéric Vanderhaegen and Stéphane Zieba. 2014. Reinforced learning systems based on merged and cumulative knowledge to predict human actions. Inf. Sci. (Ny). 276, (August 2014), 146–159.
[48]
Willemien Visser and Marion Wolff. 2003. A cognitive approach to spatial discourse production: combining manual and automatic analyses of route descriptions. In Proceedings of EuroCogSci 03, September, Osnabrück, Germany, 355–360.
[49]
Joost C. F. de Winter, Yke Bauke Eisma, Christopher Cabrall, Peter A. Hancock, and Neville A. Stanton. 2019. Situation awareness based on eye movements in relation to the task environment. Cogn. Technol. Work 21, 1 (February 2019), 99–111.
[50]
Marion Wolff. 2020. Compréhension de l'activité et des besoins: l'incontournable recours aux entretiens, aux questionnaires et à leur analyse. In Pratiques de l'ergonomie: de la méthode aux applications, M. Wolff and R. Mollard (eds.). Octarès, Toulouse, 16–44.
[51]
Marion Wolff, Maria Pilar Gattegno, Jean-Louis Adrien, Carole Gabeau, and Pascale Isnard. 2014. Contribution of tablets to the support of children and adolescents with autistic disorders. J. Eur. des systèmes Autom. 4-5–6, (2014), 261–282.
[52]
Marion Wolff, Frédéric Vanderhaegen, Marion Brethault, Héléna Brisson, and Régis Mollard. 2018. Towards a contribution to understanding “the tunnel effect.” In Proceedings of the 16th Ergo'IA “Ergonomie Et Informatique Avancée” Conference on - Ergo'IA ’18, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–10.
[53]
Andreas Simskar Wulvik, Henrikke Dybvik, and Martin Steinert. 2020. Investigating the relationship between mental state (workload and affect) and physiology in a control room setting (ship bridge simulator). Cogn. Technol. Work 22, 1 (February 2020), 95–108.
[54]
Heenam Yoon, Sang Ho Choi, Sang Kyong Kim, Hyun Bin Kwon, Seong Min Oh, Jae-Won Choi, Yu Jin Lee, Do-Un Jeong, and Kwang Suk Park. 2019. Human Heart Rhythms Synchronize While Co-sleeping. Front. Physiol. 10, (March 2019).
- Interface Cœur-Ordinateur : une piste pour l’étude des erreurs humaines ?
Recommendations
Connected human to study attention with heart-computer interfaces
Ergo'IA '23: Proceedings of the 18th "Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée" ConferenceCet article se base sur des études antérieures concernant l'impact sur les ressources attentionnelles de la synchronie entre événements dynamiques et la fréquence cardiaque. Il présente deux interfaces cœur-ordinateur et exploite en temps réel une mesure ...
Contribution à l'étude des ondes gravito-capillaires forcées d'amplitude finie
RésuméDans ce travail, on expose une méthode de perturbation régulière permettant de calculer une solution au 3° ordre des équations de propagation des ondes gravito-capillaires forcées induites à la surface libre d'un liquide. La solution est présentée ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2021
74 pages
ISBN:9781450385121
DOI:10.1145/3486812
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
© 2021 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 25 August 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
ErgoIA'2021
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 22Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)3
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format