[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3486622.3493972acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Analyzing the Preferences and Personal Needs of Teenage Readers to Make Book Recommendations

Published: 13 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Reading is one of the main sources of learning, especially for young readers such as teens. Promoting good reading habits among teens is essential, given the enormous influence of reading on teenagers’ development as learners and members of society. For this reason, it is imperative to motivate young readers to read by offering them appealing books to read so that they can enjoy reading and gradually establish a reading habit during their formative years that can aid in enhancing their learning attitude. Books, which provide an indispensable source of reading materials, broaden the horizons of teenagers and allow them to learn from different disciplines, expand their perspective in decision making, and gain knowledge. These days there are a wide variety of books available on the market for teenagers, parents, and librarians to choose from. Due to the diversity of books, choosing a desirable book from a set of unfamiliar books to read is time-consuming and there is no guarantee of the satisfaction of its content. Existing book recommender systems, however, either focus on general audience or very young readers, such as children, and thus might not meet the specific needs of the particular group of users whom we target, i.e., teenagers. To make appropriate recommendations on books that are appealing to teenagers, we propose a book recommender system, called TBRec. TBRec recommends books to teenagers based on their personal preferences and needs that are determined by using various book features. These features, which include book genres, topic relevance, predicted user ratings, and readability levels, have significant impact on the readers’ preference and satisfaction on a book. These distinguished parts of a book identify the type, subject area, (un)likeness, and complexity of the book content. Experimental results reveal that TBRec outperforms Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and LibraryThing in making book recommendations for teenagers, and the results are statistically significant.

References

[1]
Z. Ali, S. Khusro, and I. Ullah. 2016. A Hybrid Book Recommender System Based on Table of Contents (TOC) and Association Rule Mining. In Intl. Conf. on Informatics & Systems. ACM, New York, 68–74.
[2]
T. Anwar and V. Uma. 2020. Book Recommendation for eLearning Using Collaborative Filtering and Sequential Pattern Mining. In ICDABI. IEEE, 1–6.
[3]
D. Bhelawe, S. Dhurat, J. Gharat, and S. Shinde. 2021. Enhanced Book Recommendation System using Collaborative Filtering. SSRN.
[4]
G. Cormack, C. Clarke, and S. Buettcher. 2009. Reciprocal Rank Fusion Outperforms Condorcet and Individual Rank Learning Methods. In ACM SIGIR. ACM, New York, 758–759.
[5]
J. Denning, M. Pera, and Y.-K. Ng. 2016. A Readability Level Prediction Tool for K-12 Books. Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 67, 3(2016), 550–565.
[6]
A. Garrido, M. Pera, and S. Ilarri. 2014. SOLE-R: A semantic and linguistic Approach for Book Recommendations. In ICALT. IEEE, New York, 524–528.
[7]
A. Gelfand. 2000. Gibbs Sampling. American Statistical Association 95, 452 (2000), 1300–1304.
[8]
R. Hopper. 2005. What Are Teenagers Reading? Adolescent Fiction Reading Habits and Reading Choices. Literacy 39, 3 (2005), 113–120.
[9]
P. Jomsri. 2014. Book Recommendation System for Digital Library Based on User Profiles by Using Association Rule. In INTECH). IEEE, New York, 130–134.
[10]
B. Jones and M. Kenward. 2003. Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials, 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall.
[11]
L. Kazmier. 2003. Schaum’s Outline of Business Statistics. McGraw-Hill.
[12]
D. Kingma and M. Welling. 2013. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114.
[13]
C. Kwan, M. Koh, and M. Jasser. 2020. Comparison Study Between Content-Based and Popularity-Based Filtering Via Implementing a Book Recommendation System. IJARET 11, 12 (December 2020), 1121–1135.
[14]
J. Li, T. Xu, and J. Zhou. 2020. A Personalized Recommendation Algorithm for College Books based on User Interest. In IEEE CSEI. IEEE, New York, 144–149.
[15]
N. Manouselis, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, and E. Duval. 2013. Recommender Systems for Learning. Springer Briefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering.
[16]
S. McGeown, L. Duncan, Y. Griffiths, and Sue. Stothard. 2015. Exploring the Relationship Between Adolescent’s Reading Skills, Reading Motivation and Reading Habits. Reading and Writing 28(2015), 514–569.
[17]
M. Merga. 2019. Reading Engagement for Tweens and Teens: What Would Make Them Read More?ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, California.
[18]
A. Milton, M. Green, A. Keener, J. Ames, M. Ekstrand, and M. Pera. 2019. StoryTime: Eliciting Preferences from Children for Book Recommendations. In RecSys). ACM, New York, 544–545.
[19]
T. Minka. 2013. Expectation Propagation for Approximate Bayesian Inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.2294.
[20]
M. Pera. 2009. Improving Library Searches Using Word-Correlation Factors and Folksonomies. Master’s thesis. BYU.
[21]
M. Pera. 2014. Using Online Data Sources to Make Recommendations on Reading Material for K-12 and Advanced Readers. Ph.D. Dissertation. BYU.
[22]
R. Plutchik. 1997. Circumplex Models of Personality and Emotions. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., Chapter The Circumplex as a General Model of the Structure of Emotions and Personality, 17–45.
[23]
I. Porteous, D. Newman, A. Ihler, A. Asuncion, P. Smyth, and M. Welling. 2008. Fast Collapsed Gibbs Sampling for Latent Dirichlet Allocation. In SIGKDD. ACM, New York, 569–577.
[24]
K. Reuter. 2007. Assessing Aesthetic Relevance: Children’s book Selection in a Digital Library. JASIST 58, 12 (2007), 1745–1763.
[25]
K. Roskos, J. Christie, and D. Richgels. 2003. The Essentials of Early Literacy Instruction. Young Children 58, 2 (2003), 52–60.
[26]
L. Rozakis. 2002. Test Taking Strategies and Study Skills for the Utterly Confused. McGraw Hill.
[27]
H. Singh and A. Jain. 2020. Recommendation of Books in Online Book Store Using KNN. JAC XIV, VI (December 2020), 4.
[28]
S. Sohail, J. Siddiqui, and R. Ali. 2013. Book Recommendation System Using Opinion Mining Technique. In ICACCI. IEEE, 1609–1614.
[29]
G. Spache. 1953. A New Readability Formula for Primary-Grade Reading Materials. Elementary School 53, 7 (1953), 410–413.
[30]
M. Yuan, S. Yang, M. Gu, and H. Gu. 2020. Analysis and Research on Book Recommendation Model Based on Big Data. In EITCE. ACM, New York, 21–25.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WI-IAT '21: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology
December 2021
698 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Teenagers
  2. books
  3. metadata
  4. recommender systems

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WI-IAT '21
Sponsor:
WI-IAT '21: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence
December 14 - 17, 2021
VIC, Melbourne, Australia

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 69
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media