[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3486622.3493932acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Climbing Route Difficulty Grade Prediction and Explanation

Published: 13 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This article focuses on sport climbing and on the design of innovative tools for supporting climbers to browse and search routes to climb. The difficulty of a route, its grade, is normally assessed by expert climbers, named route setters. A regular climber, after trying a route, may perceive it more or less difficult than the route setter. It is important to estimate this climber’s perceived difficulty of the routes in order to suggest the routes that have a target perceived difficulty as expected by the climber. We develop a knowledge-based approach that uses domain-specific features to train a predictive model. Additionally, the problem is modeled as a rating prediction task in a recommender system, using a matrix factorization approach with a custom normalization solution. The knowledge-based approach enables us to develop a grade prediction explanation functionality. In off-line experiments, we demonstrate improvements over a baseline. Moreover, we show how the proposed techniques can be exploited in an app developed by a major company offering information services to the sport climbing market.

References

[1]
2021. 8a.nu | Climbing Areas & Crags. https://www.8a.nu.
[2]
2021. Mountain Project. https://www.mountainproject.com/mobile-app
[3]
2021. Outdooractive. https://www.outdooractive.com/
[4]
2021. Rock Climbing Guide. https://www.mountainproject.com/route-guide.
[5]
2021. Vertical-Life App. https://gym.vertical-life.info
[6]
Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Simon Martin, Davide Calvaresi, and Alexandre Cotting. 2021. A Platform for Difficulty Assessment and Recommendation of Hiking Trails. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2021. Springer, 109–122.
[7]
Rose Catherine, Kathryn Mazaitis, Maxine Eskenazi, and William Cohen. 2017. Explainable entity-based recommendations with knowledge graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05254(2017).
[8]
Janez Demšar. 2006. Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7, 1 (2006), 1–30.
[9]
Alejandro Dobles, Juan Carlos Sarmiento, and Peter Satterthwaite. 2017. Machine learning methods for climbing route classification. (2017). http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2017/final-reports/5232206.pdf
[10]
Nick Draper. 2016. Climbing grades: Systems and subjectivity. 227–243.
[11]
Nick Draper 2015. Comparative grading scales, statistical analyses, climber descriptors and ability grouping: International Rock Climbing Research Association position statement. Sports Technology 8, 3-4 (2015), 88–94.
[12]
Yi-Shiou Duh and Ray Chang. 2021. Recurrent Neural Network for MoonBoard Climbing Route Classification and Generation. CoRR abs/2102.01788(2021). arxiv:2102.01788https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01788
[13]
André Ebert, Kyrill Schmid, Chadly Marouane, and Claudia Linnhoff-Popien. 2018. Automated Recognition and Difficulty Assessment of Boulder Routes. In Internet of Things (IoT) Technologies for HealthCare. Cham, 62–68.
[14]
Asela Gunawardana and Guy Shani. 2015. Evaluating recommender systems. In Recommender systems handbook. Springer, 265–308.
[15]
Iustina Ivanova, Marina Andric, Andrea Janes, Francesco Ricci, and Floriano Zini. 2020. Climbing Activity Recognition and Measurement with Sensor Data Analysis. In ICMI Companion, Virtual Event, The Netherlands. ACM, 245–249.
[16]
Iustina Ivanova, Marina Andric, and Francesco Ricci. 2021. Knowledge-Based Recommendations for Climbers (Short paper). In Joint Workshop Proceedings of the 3rd Edition of Knowledge-aware and Conversational Recommender Systems (KaRS) co-located with 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2021)(CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2960). CEUR-WS.org.
[17]
Iustina Ivanova, Marina Andric, and Francesco Ricci. 2022. Content-Based Recommendations for Crags and Climbing Routes. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2022, ENTER 2022, Proceedings of the International Conference in Nankai, China, January 11-January 14, 2022. To appear.
[18]
Lindsay Kempen. 2018. A Fair Grade: Assessing Difficulty of Climbing Routes Through Machine Learning. (2018).
[19]
Yehuda Koren and Robert Bell. 2015. Advances in collaborative filtering. (2015), 77–118.
[20]
Pantelis Linardatos, Vasilis Papastefanopoulos, and Sotiris Kotsiantis. 2021. Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods. Entropy 23, 1 (2021).
[21]
Benedikt Loepp and Jürgen Ziegler. 2018. Recommending running routes: framework and demonstrator. In Workshop on Recommendation in Complex Scenarios.
[22]
Xia Ning, Christian Desrosiers, and George Karypis. 2015. A comprehensive survey of neighborhood-based recommendation methods. Recommender systems handbook(2015), 37–76.
[23]
Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2015. Recommender systems: Introduction and challenges. In Recommender systems handbook. Springer, 1–34.
[24]
Dean Scarff. 2020. Estimation of Climbing Route Difficulty using Whole-History Rating. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05388(2020).
[25]
Cheng Tai, Aaron Wu, and Rafael Hinojosa. 2020. Graph Neural Networks in Classifying Rock Climbing Difficulties. In Student project report, CS 230 Machine Learning, University of Stanford.
[26]
Cheng-Hao Tai, Aaron Wu, and Rafael Hinojosa. 2020. Graph Neural Networks in Classifying Rock Climbing Difficulties. (2020).
[27]
Yongfeng Zhang and Xu Chen. 2018. Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.11192(2018).

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Addressing grading bias in rock climbing: machine and deep learning approachesFrontiers in Sports and Active Living10.3389/fspor.2024.15120106Online publication date: 30-Jan-2025
  • (2024)A Survey on Trustworthy Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36528913:2(1-68)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WI-IAT '21: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology
December 2021
698 pages
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. climbing
  2. machine learning
  3. recommender systems
  4. regression
  5. sports technologies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • EFRE-FESR programme 2014-2020

Conference

WI-IAT '21
Sponsor:
WI-IAT '21: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence
December 14 - 17, 2021
VIC, Melbourne, Australia

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Addressing grading bias in rock climbing: machine and deep learning approachesFrontiers in Sports and Active Living10.3389/fspor.2024.15120106Online publication date: 30-Jan-2025
  • (2024)A Survey on Trustworthy Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36528913:2(1-68)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media