[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3478384.3478418acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesamConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Understanding Cross-Genre Rhythmic Audio Compatibility: A Computational Approach

Published: 15 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Rhythmic similarity, a fundamental task within Music Information Retrieval, has recently been applied in creative music contexts to retrieve musical audio or guide audio-content transformations. However, there is still very little knowledge of the typical rhythmic similarity values between overlapping musical structures per instrument, genre, and time scales, which we denote as rhythmic compatibility. This research provides the first steps towards the understanding of rhythmic compatibility from the systematic analysis of MedleyDB, a large multi-track musical database composed and performed by artists. We apply computational methods to compare database stems using representative rhythmic similarity metrics – Rhythmic Histogram (RH) and Beat Spectrum (BS) – per genre and instrumental families and to understand whether RH and BS are prone to discriminate genres at different time scales. Our results suggest that 1) rhythmic compatibility values lie between [.002,.354] (RH) and [.1,.881] (BS), 2) RH outperforms BS in discriminating genres, and 3) different time scale in RH and BS impose significant differences in rhythmic compatibility.

References

[1]
Adam Berenzweig, Beth Logan, Daniel P.W. Ellis, and Brian Whitman. 2004. A Large-Scale Evaluation of Acoustic and Subjective Music-Similarity Measures. Computer Music Journal 28, 2 (2004), 63–76.
[2]
Rachel Bittner, Justin Salamon, Mike Tierney, Matthias Mauch, Chris Cannam, and Juan Bello. 2014. MedleyDB: A Multitrack Dataset for Annotation-Intensive MIR Research. In Proc. 15th ISMIR. 155–160.
[3]
Rachel Bittner, Justin Salamon, Mike Tierney, Matthias Mauch, Chris Cannam, and Juan Bello. 2014. MedleyDB Instrument Taxonomy. https://github.com/marl/medleydb/blob/master/medleydb/resources/taxonomy.yaml.
[4]
F Alton Everest and Ken C Pohlmann. 2015. Master Handbook of Acoustics, Sixth Edition (6th ed. ed.). McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
[5]
Arthur Flexer. 2014. On Inter-rater Agreement in Audio Music Similarity. In Proc. 15th ISMIR. Taipei, Taiwan, 245–250.
[6]
J. Foote and Shingo Uchihashi. 2001. The beat spectrum: a new approach to rhythm analysis. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). IEEE, Tokyo, JP, 881–884.
[7]
Masataka Goto. 2012. Grand Challenges in Music Information Research. In Multimodal Music Processing, Meinard Müller, Masataka Goto, and Markus Schedl(Eds.). Dagstuhl Follow-Ups, Vol. 3. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, 217–226.
[8]
Garth Griffin, Youngmoo E. Kim, and Douglas Turnbull. 2010. Beat-Sync-Mash-Coder: A web application for real-time creation of beat-synchronous music mashups. In IEEE ICASSP. IEEE, Dallas, USA, 437–440.
[9]
TU Wien MIR Group. 2015. Rhythm Pattern Audio Feature Extractor for Music Similarity, Classification and Recommendation. https://github.com/tuwien-musicir/rp_extract.
[10]
Peter Knees and Markus Schedl. 2013. A Survey of Music Similarity and Recommendation from Music Context Data. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 10, 1 (2013), 21 pages.
[11]
Thomas Lidy. 2006. Evaluation of New Audio Features and Their Utilization in Novel Music Retrieval Applications. Ph.D. Dissertation.
[12]
Thomas Lidy and Andreas Rauber. 2005. Evaluation of Feature Extractors and Psycho-Acoustic Transformations for Music Genre Classification. In Proc. 6th ISMIR. ISMIR, London, UK, 34–41.
[13]
Lie Lu, Hao Jiang, and HongJiang Zhang. 2001. A Robust Audio Classification and Segmentation Method. In Proc. of the 9th ACM Int. Conf. on Multimedia(MULTIMEDIA ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, Ottawa, CA, 203–211.
[14]
Elias Pampalk, Andreas Rauber, and Dieter Merkl. 2002. Content-based Organization and Visualization of Music Archives. In Proc. 10th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, NY, USA, 570–579.
[15]
Zafar Rafii. 2020. REPeating Pattern Extraction Technique. https://github.com/zafarrafii/REPET-Python.
[16]
Andreas Rauber, Elias Pampalk, and Dieter Merkl. 2003. The SOM-enhanced JukeBox: Organization and Visualization of Music Collections Based on Perceptual Models. Journal of New Music Research 32 (06 2003), 193–210.

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Cross-Genre Rhythmic Audio Compatibility: A Computational Approach
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AM '21: Proceedings of the 16th International Audio Mostly Conference
      September 2021
      283 pages
      ISBN:9781450385695
      DOI:10.1145/3478384
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 October 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Compatibility
      2. Musical rhythm
      3. Musicology
      4. Retrieval
      5. Similarity

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      AM '21
      AM '21: Audio Mostly 2021
      September 1 - 3, 2021
      virtual/Trento, Italy

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 177 of 275 submissions, 64%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 40
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media