[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

How Do Educational Experiences Predict Computing Identity?

Published: 01 November 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Despite increasing demands for skilled workers within the technological domain, there is still a deficit in the number of graduates in computing fields (computer science, information technology, and computer engineering). Understanding the factors that contribute to students’ motivation and persistence is critical to helping educators, administrators, and industry professionals better focus efforts to improve academic outcomes and job placement. This article examines how experiences contribute to a student’s computing identity, which we define by their interest, recognition, sense of belonging, and competence/performance beliefs. In particular, we consider groups underrepresented in these disciplines, women and minoritized racial/ethnic groups (Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx). To delve into these relationships, a survey of more than 1,600 students in computing fields was conducted at three metropolitan public universities in Florida. Regression was used to elucidate which experiences predict computing identity and how social identification (i.e., as female, Black/African American, and/or Hispanic/Latinx) may interact with these experiences. Our results suggest that several types of experiences positively predict a student’s computing identity, such as mentoring others, having a job, or having friends in computing. Moreover, certain experiences have a different effect on computing identity for female and Hispanic/Latinx students. More specifically, receiving academic advice from teaching assistants was more positive for female students, receiving advice from industry professionals was more negative for Hispanic/Latinx students, and receiving help on classwork from students in their class was more positive for Hispanic/Latinx students. Other experiences, while having the same effect on computing identity across students, were experienced at significantly different rates by females, Black/African American students, and Hispanic/Latinx students. The findings highlight experiential ways in which computing programs can foster computing identity development, particularly for underrepresented and marginalized groups in computing.

References

[1]
Asli Yagmur Akbulut and Clayton Arlen Looney. 2007. Inspiring students to pursue computing degrees. Communications of the ACM 50, 10 (2007), 67–71.
[2]
Aylin Alin. 2010. Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2, 3 (2010), 370–374.
[3]
Vicki L. Almstrum. 2003. What is the attraction to computing? Communications of the ACM 46, 9 (2003), 51–55.
[4]
Irving Arevalo, Dominicus So, and Mary McNaughton-Cassill. 2016. The role of collectivism among Latino American college students. Journal of Latinos and Education 15, 1 (2016), 3–11.
[5]
William Aspray. 2016. Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Computing: A Historical and Social Study. Springer.
[6]
M. Bamberg, A. De Fina, and D. Schiffri. 2011. Discourse and identity construction. In Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer, New York, NY, 177–199.
[7]
Mahnaz Behroozi, Chris Parnin, and Titus Barik. 2019. Hiring is broken: What do developers say about technical interviews? In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC’19). IEEE, 1–9.
[8]
Diane Belcher. 1994. The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes 13, 1 (1994), 23–34.
[9]
Philip Bell, Katie Van Horne, and Britte Haugan Cheng. 2017. Special issue: Designing learning environments for equitable disciplinary identification. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26, 3 (2017), 367–375. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336021
[10]
Sylvia Beyer. 2014. Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education 24, 2–3 (2014), 153–192.
[11]
Tom Bramley, C. Rodeiro, and Sylvia Vitello. 2015. Gender differences in GCSE. Cambridge Assessment Research Report.
[12]
United States Census Bureau. 2019. U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US.
[13]
Vivien Burr. 2006. An Introduction to Social Constructionism. Routledge.
[14]
Tracy Camp. 2012. “Computing, we have a problem....” ACM Inroads 3, 4 (2012), 34–40.
[15]
Heidi B. Carlone and Angela Johnson. 2007. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 44, 8 (2007), 1187–1218.
[16]
Jeffrey C. Carver, Lisa Henderson, Lulu He, Julia Hodges, and Donna Reese. 2007. Increased retention of early computer science and software engineering students using pair programming. In 20th Conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET’07). IEEE, 115–122.
[17]
Cheryl A. P. Cass, Zahra Hazari, Jennifer Cribbs, Philip M. Sadler, and Gerhard Sonnert. 2011. Examining the impact of mathematics identity on the choice of engineering careers for male and female students. In 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’11). IEEE, F2H–1.
[18]
LaVar J. Charleston, Phillis L. George, Jerlando F. L. Jackson, Jonathan Berhanu, and Mauriell H. Amechi. 2014. Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of Black women in US computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7, 3 (2014), 166.
[19]
Xianglei Chen. 2013. STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. Statistical analysis report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics.
[20]
Sapna Cheryan and Victoria C. Plaut. 2010. Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles 63, 7–8 (2010), 475–488.
[21]
Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C. Plaut, Caitlin Handron, and Lauren Hudson. 2013. The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles 69, 1–2 (2013), 58–71.
[22]
Paul Cobb and Lynn Liao Hodge. 2010. Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics classroom. In A Journey in Mathematics Education Research. Springer, 179–195.
[23]
Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[24]
J. McGrath Cohoon. 2001. Toward improving female retention in the computer science major. Communications of the ACM 44, 5 (2001), 108–114.
[25]
J. McGrath Cohoon. 2002. Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 48–52.
[26]
John W. Creswell and J. David Creswell. 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
[27]
Jennifer D. Cribbs, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip M. Sadler. 2015. Establishing an explanatory model for mathematics identity. Child Development 86, 4 (2015), 1048–1062.
[28]
Katy Dickinson. 2006. 5 years of mentoring by the numbers. Presented by Katy Dickinson and Carol Gorski at the TechLeaders Workshop Associated with the 2006 Hopper Conference.http://anitaborg.org/initiatives/techleaders/archive/building-and-sustaining-change-intechnology-cultures/. Also http://research.sun.com/SEED/hopper.presentation.oct06.pdf.
[29]
William R. Dillon and Matthew Goldstein. 1984. Multivariate Analysismethods and Applications. Number 519.535 D5.
[30]
Remy Dou, Zahra Hazari, Katherine Dabney, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2019. Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Science Education 103, 3 (2019), 623–637.
[31]
Rowhea Elmesky and Gale Seiler. 2007. Movement expressiveness, solidarity and the (re) shaping of African American students’ scientific identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education 2, 1 (2007), 73–103.
[32]
Rowhea Elmesky and Kenneth Tobin. 2005. Expanding our understandings of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42, 7 (2005), 807–828.
[33]
Nathan Ensmenger. 2015. “Beards, sandals, and other signs of rugged individualism”: Masculine culture within the computing professions. Osiris 30, 1 (2015), 38–65.
[34]
Allan Fisher and Jane Margolis. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: The Carnegie Mellon experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 79–83.
[35]
Allan Fisher, Jane Margolis, and Faye Miller. 1997. Undergraduate women in computer science: Experience, motivation and culture. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 29, 1 (1997), 106–110.
[36]
Cynthia E. Foor, Susan E. Walden, and Deborah A. Trytten. 2007. “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group”: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education 96, 2 (2007), 103–115.
[37]
National Center for Education Statistics. 2011. Table 301. Bachelor’s degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions, by sex, race/ethnicity, and field of study: 2009–10. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d11/tables/dt11_301.asp.
[38]
Karen A. Frenkel. 1990. Women and computing. Communications of the ACM 33, 11 (1990), 34–46.
[39]
J. Frost. 2019. Regression Analysis. An Intuitive Guide for Using and Interpreting Linear Models.ebook.
[40]
Atalie Garcia, M. Ross, Z. Hazari, M. Weiss, Kenneth Christensen, and M. Georgiopoulos. 2018. Examining the computing identity of high-achieving underserved computing students on the basis of gender, field, and year in school. In Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD’18).
[41]
Hubert Gatignon. 2010. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Springer New York, New York, NY, 59–122.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1270-1_4
[42]
James Paul Gee. 2000. Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education 25, 1 (2000), 99–125.
[43]
Allison Godwin and Adam Kirn. 2020. Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students’ engineering role identities and future-time perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education 109, 3 (2020), 362–383.
[44]
Allison Godwin, Geoff Potvin, Zahra Hazari, and Robynne Lock. 2016. Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education 105, 2 (2016), 312–340.
[45]
Debbie Goh, Christine Ogan, Manju Ahuja, Susan C. Herring, and Jean C. Robinson. 2007. Being the same isn’t enough: Impact of male and female mentors on computer self-efficacy of college students in IT-related fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research 37, 1 (2007), 19–40.
[46]
Joanna Goode, Rachel Estrella, and Jane Margolis. 2006. Lost in translation: Gender and high school computer science. In Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation, eds J.M. Cohoon & W. Aspray. MIT Press, 89–114.
[47]
Ananya Goswami and Sraboni Dutta. 2015. Gender differences in technology usage—A literature review. Open Journal of Business and Management 4, 1 (2015), 51–59.
[48]
Virginia Grande, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Mats Daniels, and Matti Tedre. 2018. “Participating under the influence”: How role models affect the computing discipline, profession, and student population. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’18). IEEE, 1–9.
[49]
DeLeon L. Gray, Tamika L. McElveen, Briana P. Green, and Lauren H. Bryant. 2020. Engaging Black and Latinx students through communal learning opportunities: A relevance intervention for middle schoolers in STEM elective classrooms. Contemporary Educational Psychology 60 (2020), 101833.
[50]
Kimberly A. Griffin, David Perez, Annie P. E. Holmes, and Claude E. P. Mayo. 2010. Investing in the future: The importance of faculty mentoring in the development of students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research 2010, 148 (2010), 95–103.
[51]
Cassandra J. Groen, Denise Rutledge Simmons, and Elizabeth D. McNair. 2016. Disciplinary influences on the professional identity of civil engineering students: Starting the conversation. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.
[52]
Mark Guzdial, Barbara J. Ericson, Tom McKlin, and Shelly Engelman. 2012. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: Factors in broadening participation in computing. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research. 143–150.
[53]
Michael Haungs, Christopher Clark, John Clements, and David Janzen. 2012. Improving first-year success and retention through interest-based CS0 courses. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 589–594.
[54]
Stephen N. Haynes, David Richard, and Edward S. Kubany. 1995. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment 7, 3 (1995), 238.
[55]
Zahra Hazari, Cheryl Cass, and Carrie Beattie. 2015. Obscuring power structures in the physics classroom: Linking teacher positioning, student engagement, and physics identity development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52, 6 (2015), 735–762.
[56]
Zahra Hazari, Deepa Chari, Geoff Potvin, and Eric Brewe. 2020. The context dependence of physics identity: Examining the role of performance/competence, recognition, interest, and sense of belonging for lower and upper female physics undergraduates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57, 10 (2020), 1583–1607.
[57]
Zahra Hazari, Philip M. Sadler, and Gerhard Sonnert. 2013. The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching 42, 5 (2013), 82–91.
[58]
Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, Philip M. Sadler, and Marie-Claire Shanahan. 2010. Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47, 8 (2010), 978–1003.
[59]
Daniel Heersink and Barbara M. Moskal. 2010. Measuring high school students’ attitudes toward computing. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 446–450.
[60]
Ronald R. Holden. 2010. Face validity. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1–2.
[61]
Kathryn N. Hosbein and Jack Barbera. 2020. Alignment of theoretically grounded constructs for the measurement of science and chemistry identity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 21 (2020), 371–386. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00193J
[62]
Roxanne Hughes, Jennifer Schellinger, and Kari Roberts. 2021. The role of recognition in disciplinary identity for girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58, 3 (2021), 420–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21665
[63]
P. Jackson. 2013. Better late than never? Identity work, trajectories, and persistence of latecomers to science. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill University. Retrieved from http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R. (2013).
[64]
Phoebe A. Jackson and Gale Seiler. 2013. Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50, 7 (2013), 826–857.
[65]
Betsy James DiSalvo, Sarita Yardi, Mark Guzdial, Tom McKlin, Charles Meadows, Kenneth Perry, and Amy Bruckman. 2011. African American men constructing computing identity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2967–2970.
[66]
Angela C. Johnson. 2007. Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education 91, 5 (2007), 805–821.
[67]
Dawn R. Johnson. 2011. Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). New Directions for Institutional Research 2011, 152 (2011), 75–85.
[68]
Dawn R. Johnson. 2012. Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development 53, 2 (2012), 336–346.
[69]
Caleb Kaiser. 2019. How Kimberly Bryant Started Black Girls CODE With Her 401(k)—And Taught 14,000 Girls. https://angel.co/blog/how-kimberly-bryant-started-black-girls-code-with-her-401k-and-taught-14.
[70]
Mary Allison Kanny, Linda J. Sax, and Tiffani A. Riggers-Piehl. 2014. Investigating forty years of STEM research: How explanations for the gender gap have evolved over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 20, 2 (2014), 127–148.
[71]
Shalonda Kelly and John H. Schweitzer. 1999. Mentoring within a graduate school setting. College Student Journal 33, 1 (1999), 130–130.
[72]
Peter E. J. Kemp, Billy Wong, and Miles G. Berry. 2019. Female performance and participation in computer science: A national picture. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2019), 1–28.
[73]
Samantha Krieger, Meghan Allen, and Catherine Rawn. 2015. Are females disinclined to tinker in computer science? In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 102–107.
[74]
Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger, et al. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
[75]
Robert W. Lent, Frederick G. Lopez, Hung-Bin Sheu, and Antonio M. Lopez Jr. 2011. Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented students. Journal of Vocational Behavior 78, 2 (2011), 184–192.
[76]
Robert W. Lent, Antonio M. Lopez Jr, Frederick G. Lopez, and Hung-Bin Sheu. 2008. Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior 73, 1 (2008), 52–62.
[77]
Colleen Lewis, Paul Bruno, Jonathan Raygoza, and Julia Wang. 2019. Alignment of goals and perceptions of computing predicts students’ sense of belonging in computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 11–19.
[78]
Cissy Li. 2009. The study of disciplinary identity—Some theoretical underpinnings. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies 13, 1 (2009), 80–119.
[79]
Veronica A. Lotkowski, Steven B. Robbins, and Richard J. Noeth. 2004. The role of academic and non-academic factors in improving college retention. ACT Policy Report 1 (2004), 31.
[80]
Jonathan Mahadeo, Zahra Hazari, and Geoff Potvin. 2020. Developing a computing identity framework: Understanding computer science and information technology career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2020), 1–14.
[81]
Kareen Ror Malone and Gilda Barabino. 2009. Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education 93, 3 (2009), 485–510.
[82]
Katerina M. Marcoulides and Tenko Raykov. 2019. Evaluation of variance inflation factors in regression models using latent variable modeling methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement 79, 5 (2019), 874–882.
[83]
Jane Margolis, Allan Fisher, and Faye Miller. 2000. The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women’s Studies Quarterly 28, 1/2 (2000), 104–127.
[84]
Whitney McCormick. 2019. Self-efficacy and STEM career interest in Black and Latino middle school students: A study on the next generation science standards. LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations. 805. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/etd/805
[85]
Marlon Mejias, Ketly Jean-Pierre, Gloria Washington, and Legand Burge. 2019. Underrepresented groups threats to belonging in computing. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT’19). IEEE, 1–4.
[86]
Emma M. Mercier, Brigid Barron, and K. M. O’connor. 2006. Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22, 5 (2006), 335–348.
[87]
Kamla Modi, Judy Schoenberg, and Kimberlee Salmond. 2012. Generation STEM: What girls say about science, technology, engineering, and math. A Report from the Girl Scout Research Institute. Girl Scouts of the USA, New York, NY.
[88]
National Center for Science National Science Foundation and Engineering Statistics. 2019. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
[89]
Ryan Noonan. 2017. STEM Jobs: 2017 update. ESA Issue Brief# 02-17. US Department of Commerce (2017).
[90]
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2021. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/.
[91]
Robert T. Palmer, Dina C. Maramba, and T. Elon Dancy. 2011. A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. Journal of Negro Education 80, 4 (2011), 491–504.
[92]
Richard J. Parker. 2019. Developing software engineers: Investigating the influence of a computer science capstone on professional identity formation. ProQuest LLC.
[93]
Ernest T. Pascarella and Patrick T. Terenzini. 2005. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2.ERIC.
[94]
Anita D. Patrick and Maura Borrego. 2016. A review of the literature relevant to engineering identity. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. American Society for Engineering Education.
[95]
Lori D. Patton. 2009. My sister’s keeper: A qualitative examination of mentoring experiences among African American women in graduate and professional schools. Journal of Higher Education 80, 5 (2009), 510–537.
[96]
Lori D. Patton and Shaun R. Harper. 2003. Mentoring relationships among African American women in graduate and professional schools. New Directions for Student Services 2003, 104 (2003), 67–78.
[97]
Anne-Kathrin Peters, Anders Berglund, Anna Eckerdal, and Arnold Pears. 2014. First year computer science and IT students’ experience of participation in the discipline. In 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering. IEEE, 1–8.
[98]
Rita M. Powell. 2008. Improving the persistence of first-year undergraduate women in computer science. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 518–522. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352308
[99]
Alex Radermacher, Gursimran Walia, and Dean Knudson. 2014. Investigating the skill gap between graduating students and industry expectations. In Companion Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering. 291–300.
[100]
Eric Roberts, John Lilly, and Bryan Rollins. 1995. Using undergraduates as teaching assistants in introductory programming courses: An update on the Stanford experience. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 27. ACM, 48–52.
[101]
Norma Rodriguez, Consuelo Bingham Mira, Hector F. Myers, Julie K Morris, and Desdemona Cardoza. 2003. Family or friends: Who plays a greater supportive role for Latino college students? Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 9, 3 (2003), 236.
[102]
Sarah L. Rodriguez and Jennifer M. Blaney. 2021. “We’re the unicorns in STEM”: Understanding how academic and social experiences influence sense of belonging for Latina undergraduate students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 14, 3 (2021), 441–455.
[103]
Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2020. The intersection of being black and being a woman: Examining the effect of social computing relationships on computer science career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 2 (2020), 1–15.
[104]
Yves Rosseel. 2014. The Lavaan tutorial. Department of Data Analysis: Ghent University.
[105]
Theodore R. Sarbin and John I. Kitsuse (Eds.). 1994. Constructing the social (pp. 213–231).
[106]
Linda J. Sax. 2008. The Gender Gap in College: Maximizing the Developmental Potential of Women and Men.Jossey-Bass.
[107]
Linda J. Sax, Kari L. George, Daniel Harris, and Fay Cobb Payton. 2020. Reframing the representation of black students in undergraduate computing. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 26, 4 (2020), 325–356.
[108]
Thomas P. Schambach and David Kephart. 1997. Do I/S students value internship experiences? Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Academy for Information Management. 236–241.
[109]
George A. F. Seber and Alan J. Lee. 2012. Linear Regression Analysis. Vol. 329. John Wiley & Sons.
[110]
Jessi L. Smith, Carolyn L. Morgan, and Paul H. White. 2005. Investigating a measure of computer technology domain identification: A tool for understanding gender differences and stereotypes. Educational and Psychological Measurement 65, 2 (2005), 336–355.
[111]
Russell Spears. 2011. Group identities: The social identity perspective. In Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer, 201–224.
[112]
Mohsen Taheri, Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Mark Weiss, Michael Georgiopoulos, Ken Christensen, Tiana Solis, Atalie Garcia, and Deepa Chari. 2018. A structural equation model analysis of computing identity sub-constructs and student academic persistence. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE’18). IEEE, IEEE, 1–7.
[113]
Mohsen Taheri, Monique S. Ross, Zahra Hazari, Mark Allen Weiss, Michael Georgiopoulos, Ken Christensen, Tiana Solis, Deepa Chari, and Zahra Taheri. 2019. Exploring computing identity and persistence across multiple groups using structural equation modeling. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education.
[114]
Erika D. Tate and Marcia C. Linn. 2005. How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology 14, 5–6 (2005), 483–493.
[115]
Bruce Thompson. 2004. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications.American Psychological Association.
[116]
Maria Varelas, Danny B. Martin, and Justine M. Kane. 2012. Content learning and identity construction: A framework to strengthen African American students’ mathematics and science learning in urban elementary schools. Human Development 55, 5–6 (2012), 319–339.
[117]
Roli Varma. 2007. Women in computing: The role of geek culture. Science as Culture 16, 4 (2007), 359–376.
[118]
Roli Varma. 2009. Gender differences in factors influencing students towards computing. Computer Science Education 19, 1 (2009), 37–49.
[119]
Roli Varma. 2010. Why so few women enroll in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students’ perception. Computer Science Education 20, 4 (2010), 301–316.
[120]
Nanette Veilleux, Rebecca Bates, Cheryl Allendoerfer, Diane Jones, Joyous Crawford, and Tamara Floyd Smith. 2013. The relationship between belonging and ability in computer science. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 65–70.
[121]
Tammie Visintainer. 2014. What Is and Who Can Do Science? Supporting Practice-linked Identities in Science for Racially/Ethnically Underrepresented Youth. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO.
[122]
Etienne Wenger. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
[123]
Timothy J. Weston, Wendy M. Dubow, and Alexis Kaminsky. 2019. Predicting women’s persistence in computer science-and technology-related majors from high school to college. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2019), 1–16.
[124]
Laurie Williams, Robert R. Kessler, Ward Cunningham, and Ron Jeffries. 2000. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software 17, 4 (2000), 19–25.
[125]
Billy Wong. 2016. “I’m good, but not that good”: Digitally-skilled young people’s identity in computing. Computer Science Education 26, 4 (2016), 299–317.
[126]
Billy Wong and Peter E. J. Kemp. 2018. Technical boys and creative girls: The career aspirations of digitally skilled youths. Cambridge Journal of Education 48, 3 (2018), 301–316.
[127]
Leila Zahedi, Hossein Ebrahiminejad, Monique S. Ross, Matthew W. Ohland, and Stephanie J. Lunn. 2021. Multi-institution study of student demographics and stickiness of computing majors in the USA. Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (CoNECD).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enriching computing identity frameworks: integrating current constructs and unveiling new dimensions for today’s tech-savvy world—a systematic reviewFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2024.13669069Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Causes and consequences of stereotypes: interest stereotypes reduce adolescent girls’ motivation to enroll in computer science classesJournal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2024.2402355(1-28)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Recognition experiences of women of color in chemistry: an intersectional studyChemistry Education Research and Practice10.1039/D3RP00278KOnline publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 22, Issue 2
June 2022
312 pages
EISSN:1946-6226
DOI:10.1145/3494072
  • Editor:
  • Amy J. Ko
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2021
Accepted: 01 August 2021
Revised: 01 August 2021
Received: 01 March 2020
Published in TOCE Volume 22, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Computer science education
  2. computer engineering education
  3. information technology education
  4. computing identity
  5. educational experiences

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • National Science Foundation

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)372
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enriching computing identity frameworks: integrating current constructs and unveiling new dimensions for today’s tech-savvy world—a systematic reviewFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2024.13669069Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Causes and consequences of stereotypes: interest stereotypes reduce adolescent girls’ motivation to enroll in computer science classesJournal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2024.2402355(1-28)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Recognition experiences of women of color in chemistry: an intersectional studyChemistry Education Research and Practice10.1039/D3RP00278KOnline publication date: 2024
  • (2023)Belonging in Engineering for Black, Latinx, and Indigenous Students: Promising Results From an Educational Intervention in an Introductory Programming CourseIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2023.331262867:1(56-64)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2023
  • (2023)(Work in Progress) Mindset in the Computing Classroom and Broadening Participation: A Pilot Study2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343380(1-5)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Prioritizing the development of computing identities through a middle school computer science integration program2022 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)10.1109/RESPECT55273.2022.00074(90-94)Online publication date: 23-May-2022

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media