More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Open Data Portals Development in City Councils. An Empirical Analysis based on Structural Factors in Spain

Authors:

J. Ignacio Criado,

Carlos Jimenez,

Laura Alcaide-MunozAuthors Info & Claims

dg.o '21: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

Pages 132 - 141

https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463737

Published: 09 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Open data portals (ODP) in government are promoting new insights about differences in public sector organizations regarding the interplay of technology and transparency of data. This paper focuses on the growing reality of ODP deployment at the local level of government, regarding the case of the largest cities in Spain. We analyze structural factors of Spanish municipalities with more than 50,000 inhabitants to explain the development of their ODP (58 cases out of 148 municipalities). Based on existing literature on structural factors, we have defined a set of 28 indicators, grouped into four categories, to seize their level of development, resulting in a synthetic index. From here, we carry out an statistical analysis (a nonparametric difference test – U de Mann-Whitney) of the city councils. This empirical study takes into account a set of structural factors, organized in two contexts: socio-demographic and economic. The results of the study suggest some key findings about differences in the level of evolution in ODP at the local level of government, and different open areas for future research.

References

[1]

Daniel Albalate del Sol. 2013. The institutional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency. Journal of economic policy reform 16, 1 (January 2013), 90-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2012.759422

[2]

Laura Alcaide Muñoz, Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar and Francisco José Alcaraz-Quiles. 2016. Policies and strategies for digital inclusion: Regional governments in Spain. In Handbook of Research on Race, Gender, and the Fight for Equality. IGI Global, 1-29.

[3]

Laura Alcaide Muñoz, Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, Manuel Jesús Cobo and Enrique Herrera–Viedma. 2017. Analyzing the scientific evolution of e-government using a science mapping approach. Government Information Quarterly 34, 3 (September 2017), 545-555.

[4]

José Caamaño-Alegre, Santiago Lago-Peñas, Francisco Reyes-Santias and Aurora Santiago-Boubeta. 2012. Budget transparency in local governments: an empirical analysis. Local government studies 39, 2 (August 2012), 182-207.

[5]

Agustí Cerrillo-Martínez. 2018. Datos masivos y datos abiertos para una gobernanza inteligente. El Profesional de la Información 27, 5 (June 2018), 1128-1135.

[6]

Juan Ignacio Criado and Julian Villodre. 2020. Delivering public services through social media in European local governments. An interpretative framework using semantic algorithms. Local Government Studies 47, 2 (March 2020), 253-275.

[7]

Juan Ignacio Criado, Ariana Guevara-Gómez and Julian Villodre. 2020. Using collaborative technologies and social media to engage citizens and governments during the COVID-19 Crisis. The case of Spain. Digital Government: Research and Practice 1, 4 (September 2020), 1-7.

Digital Library

[8]

Ricardo Curto-Rodríguez. 2020. Operational transparency of the Spanish Autonomous Communities through their open data portals. El Profesional de la Información 29, 1 (February 2020).

[9]

Alejandro Esteller-Moré and José Polo Otero. 2012. Fiscal Transparency: (Why) does your local government respond?. Public management review 14, 8 (July 2012), 1153-1173.

[10]

Joaquin Filipe Ferraz Esteves Araujo and Francisca Tejedo-Romero. 2017. Does gender equality affect municipal transparency: the case of spain. Public Performance and Management Review 41, 1 (October 2017), 69-99.

[11]

Jesús García-García and Ricardo Curto-Rodríguez. 2018. Determinantes de la apertura de datos y rendición de cuentas en los gobiernos regionales españoles. Revista del CLAD reforma y democracia 70, (2018) 163-198.

[12]

Benedetta Gesuele, Concetta Metallo and Sergio Longobardi. 2018. The determinants of e-disclosure attitude: empirical evidences form Italian and Spanish Municipalities. International Journal of Public Administration 41, 11 (April 2017), 921-934.

[13]

Government of Spain. 2020a. Fourth National Action Plan of Spain 2020-2024 of The Open Government Partnership. Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Secretaría General Técnica. Centro de Publicaciones Available at: https://transparencia.gob.es/transparencia/dam/jcr:d306cd62-cc0f-40a1-9be8-fe24eeeee10d/IVPlanGobiernoAbierto-ES_2020-2024.pdf.

[14]

Government of Spain. 2020b. Digital Spain 2025. Available at: https://www.mineco.gob.es/stfls/mineco/prensa/ficheros/noticias/2018/200723_np_agenda.pdf

[15]

Ruhua Huang, Tong Lai and Lihong Zhou. 2017. Proposing a framework of barriers to opening government data in China. Library Hi Tech. Emerald Publishing Limited 35, 3 (July 2017), 421-438.

[16]

Agustí Cerrillo i Martínez. 2014. Los principios de los datos abiertos en la legislación Española. Revista de Internet, derecho y política 19, 5 (October 2014) 62-77.

[17]

Marijn Janssen,Yannis Charalabidis and Anneke Zuiderwijk. 2012. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information systems management 29, 4 (October 2012), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

[18]

Vijay Khatri and Carol V. Brown. 2010. Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM 53, 1 (January 2010), 148-152.

Digital Library

[19]

Jan Kucera and Dusan Chlapek. 2014. Benefits and risks of open government data. Journal of Systems Integration 5, 1 (2014), 30-41.

[20]

María Dolores Guillamón López, Ana María Ríos Martínez and Cristina Vicente Oliva. 2011. Transparencia financiera de los municipios españoles. Utilidad y factores relacionados. Auditoría Pública 55, (2011), 109-116.

[21]

Rui Pedro Lourenço. 2015. An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly 32,3 (June 2015), 323-332.

[22]

Renata Máchová and Martin Lnénicka. 2017. Evaluating the quality of open data portals on the national level. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research 12,1 (January 2017), 21-41.

[23]

Henry Berthold Mann and Donald Ransom Whitney. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically largen than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18, 1 (March 1947), 50-60.

[24]

Albert Meijer and Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar. 2016. Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences 82, 2 (April 2015), 392-408.

[25]

Christine Oliver. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review 16, 1 (January 1991) 145-179.

[26]

Arie Purwanto, Anneke Zuiderwijk and Marijn Janssen. 2020. Citizen engagement with open government data: A systematic literature review of drivers and inhibitors. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 16, 3 (January 2020), 1-25.

[27]

Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar, Laura Alcaide Muñoz and Antonio Manuel López Hernández. 2013. Determinants of financial transparency in government. International public management journal 16, 4 (November 2013), 557-602.

[28]

Manuel Pedro Rodriguez Bolívar. 2018. Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science 17, 1 (January-April 2018), 57-80.

[29]

Sonia Royo-Montañés and Alberto Benítez-Gómez. 2019. Portales de datos abiertos. Metodología de análisis y aplicación a municipios españoles. El profesional de la información 28, 6 (December 2019), 1-13.

[30]

Jose Manuel Ruano de la Fuente. 2013. E-Government strategies in Spanish Local Governments. Local Government Studies 40, 4 (July 2013), 600-620.

[31]

Erna Ruijer, Francoise Détienne, Michael Baker, Jonathan Groff and Albert Meijer. 2020. The politics of open government data: Understanding organizational responses to pressure for more transparency. The American Review of Public Administration 50, 3 (December 2019), 260-274.

[32]

Erna Ruijer, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen and Albert Meijer. 2017. Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Government Information Quarterly 34, 1 (January 2017), 45-52.

[33]

Edgar Alejandro Ruvalcaba-Gómez, Juan Ignacio Criado and Juan Ramón Gil-García. 2020. Analyzing open government policy adoption through the multiple streams framework: The roles of policy entrepreneurs in the case of Madrid. Public Policy and Administration (August 2020), 1-32.

[34]

Alejandro Saez-Martin, Carmen Caba-Perez and Antonio Lopez-Hernandez. 2016. Freedom of information in local government: rhetoric or reality?. Local Government Studies 43, 2 (December 2016), 245-273.

[35]

Alejandro Sáez-Martín, Antonio Manuel López-Hernández and Carmen Caba-Pérez. 2019. Municipal size and institutional support as differential elements in the implementation of freedom of information legislation by Spanish local governments. Public Management Review 23, 1 (October 2019), 70-90.

[36]

Igbal Safarov, Albert Meijer and Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen. 2017. Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity 22, 1 (May 2017), 1-24.

Digital Library

[37]

Stuti Saxena and Marijn Janssen. 2017. Examining open government data (OGD) usage in India through UTAUT framework. Foresight 19, 4 (August 2014), 421-436.

[38]

Michael Arthur Stephens. 1992. Introduction to Kolmogorov (1933) On the Empirical Determination of a Distribution. In Breakthroughs in Statistics. Springer. 93-105.

[39]

Antonio Tavares and Nuno Ferreira da Cruz. 2017. Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framewok. Government Information Quarterly 37, 3 (August 2017), 1-13.

[40]

Francisca Tejedo-Romero and Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de Araujo. 2018. Determinants of local governments’ transparency in times of crisis: evidence from municipality-level panel data. Administration & society 50, 4 (September 2015), 527-554.

[41]

Francisca Tejedo-Romero and Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de Araujo. 2015. Determinants of local governments’ transparency in times of crisis: evidence from municipality-level panel data. Administration & society 50, 4 (September 2015), 527-554.

[42]

Jeffrey Thorsby. Genie N.L.Stowers, Kristen Wolslegel and EllieTumbuan. 2017. Understanding the content and features of open data portals in American cities. Government Information Quarterly 34,1 (August 2016), 53-61.

[43]

Laura van Knippenberg. 2020. Open Data Maturity. Report 2020. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg.

[44]

Gabriela Viale Pereira, Marie Anne Macadar, Edimara Mezzomo Luciano and Maurício Gregianin Testa. 2017. Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers 19, 2 (April 2017), 213-229.

Digital Library

[45]

Victoria Wang, David Shepherd and Mark Button. 2019. The barriers to the opening of government data in the UK: A view from the bottom. Information Polity 24, 1 (March 2019), 59-74. 10.3233/IP-180107

Digital Library

[46]

Xiao Hua, Zhu Mark and Antony Freeman. 2019. An evaluation of US municipal open data portals: A user interaction framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70, 1 (November 2018), 27-37.

Digital Library

Cited By

Ekundayo TBhaumik AChinoperekweyi JKhan Z(2024)Examining the impact of national open data initiatives on human development: A comparative study between Latin America and AfricaRussian Journal of Economics10.32609/j.ruje.10.10750010:1(84-102)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.10.107500
Syerov YKlynina TSokil MSverdlyk ZShepitchak VKravets RPuha OBilyk O(2023)Information Management Processes: Review of the State Open Data Web PortalDevelopments in Information and Knowledge Management Systems for Business Applications10.1007/978-3-031-27506-7_8(189-210)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27506-7_8

Recommendations

Citizen engagement in an open election data initiative: a case study of Indonesian's "Kawal Pemilu"
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age

Citizen engagement is key to the successful and sustainable use of Open Government Data (OGD), involving multiple activities ranging from the retrieval and conversion of raw data to OGD based applications, to the use of these applications to solve ...
Open Government Data Portals Analysis: The Brazilian Case
dg.o '16: Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research

Governments and public agencies are publishing data on the Web, called Open Government Data (OGD), without restrictions for its sharing and reuse. This growing interest has motivated Brazilian Government Administrations to launch Open Data initiatives. ...
From Open Government to Open City: Lessons Learnt from Institutionalizing Open Government Practices in Bahía Blanca, Argentina
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

Bahía Blanca is an Argentinean medium-sized city located in the south of Buenos Aires Province, pioneering the implementation and institutionalizing the practice of Open Government (OG). Through dedicated efforts, the local Government has been ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

dg.o '21: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

June 2021

600 pages

ISBN:9781450384926

DOI:10.1145/3463677

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

Conference

DG.O'21

DG.O'21: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

June 9 - 11, 2021

NE, Omaha, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
123
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)14
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ekundayo TBhaumik AChinoperekweyi JKhan Z(2024)Examining the impact of national open data initiatives on human development: A comparative study between Latin America and AfricaRussian Journal of Economics10.32609/j.ruje.10.10750010:1(84-102)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.10.107500
Syerov YKlynina TSokil MSverdlyk ZShepitchak VKravets RPuha OBilyk O(2023)Information Management Processes: Review of the State Open Data Web PortalDevelopments in Information and Knowledge Management Systems for Business Applications10.1007/978-3-031-27506-7_8(189-210)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27506-7_8

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents