More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

short-paper

A mixed-methods ethnographic approach to participatory budgeting in Scotland

Authors:

Jonathan Davies,

Miguel Arana-Catania,

Felix-Anselm van Lier,

Yulan HeAuthors Info & Claims

GoodIT '21: Proceedings of the Conference on Information Technology for Social Good

Pages 317 - 320

https://doi.org/10.1145/3462203.3475891

Published: 09 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Participatory budgeting (PB) is already well established in Scotland in the form of community led grant-making yet has recently transformed from a grass-roots activity to a mainstream process or embedded 'policy instrument'. An integral part of this turn is the use of the Consul digital platform as the primary means of citizen participation. Using a mixed method approach, this ongoing research paper explores how each of the 32 local authorities that make up Scotland utilise the Consul platform to engage their citizens in the PB process and how they then make sense of citizens' contributions. In particular, we focus on whether natural language processing (NLP) tools can facilitate both citizen engagement, and the processes by which citizens' contributions are analysed and translated into policies.

References

[1]

Rebecca Abers, Robin King, Daniely Votto and Igor Brandao. 2018. Porto Alegre: Participatory Budgeting and the Challenge of Sustaining Transformative Change. World Resources Unit Report Case Study, Washington DC.

[2]

Miguel Arana-Catania, Felix-Anselm van Lier, Rob Procter, Nataliya Tkachenko, Yulan He, Arkaitz Zubiaga and Maria Liakata. 2021. Citizen participation and machine learning for a better democracy. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(3): 1--22.

Digital Library

[3]

Yves Cabannes. 2015. The impact of participatory budgeting on basic services: municipal practices and evidence from the field. Environment and Urbanisation, 21(1): 257--284.

[4]

Yves Cabannes and Barbara Lipietz. 2017. Revisiting the democratic promise of participatory budgeting in light of competing political, good governance and technocratic logics. Environment and Urbanisation, 30(1): 67--84.

[5]

Kaiping Chen, and Tanja Aitamurto. 2019. Barriers for Crowd's Impact in Crowdsourced Policymaking: Civic Data Overload and Filter Hierarchy. International Public Management Journal 22, no. 1: 99--126.

[6]

Democratic Society (2016). Digital tools and Scotland's Participatory Budgeting Programme. Available at: https://www.demsoc.org/uploads/store/mediaupload/67/file/DS-Digital-Tools-paper.pdf

[7]

Nelson Dias, Sahsil Enríquez and Simone Júlio 2019. Participatory Budgeting World Atlas 2019. Portugal: Epopeia and Oficina

[8]

Oliver Escobar. 2021. 'Transforming lives, communities, and systems? Co-production through participatory budgeting'. In: E. Loeffler & T. Bovaird (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Co-production of Public Services and Outcomes. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

[9]

Oliver Escobar, Fiona Garven, Chris Harkins, Kathleen Glazik, Simon Cameron, and Ali Stoddart. 2018. 'Participatory budgeting in Scotland: The interplay of public service reform, community empowerment and social justice'. In: N. Dias (org.) Hope for Democracy: 30 years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide. Faro: Epopeia Records & Oficina.

[10]

Enzo Falco, and Reinout Kleinhans. 2018. Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement. International Journal of Information Management 40: 17--20.

Digital Library

[11]

Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1): 80--92.

[12]

Clifford Geertz. 1983. Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. USA: Basic Books.

[13]

Chris Harkins and James Egan. 2012. The role of participatory budgeting in promoting localism and mobilising community assets. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health.

[14]

Chris Harkins, Katie Moore, and Oliver Escobar. 2016. Review of 1st Generation Participatory Budgeting in Scotland. Edinburgh: What Works Scotland.

[15]

Felix-Anselm van Lier and Katrin Seidel. 2021. 'Constitution Making'. In: M. Foblets, M. Goodale, M. Sapignoli & O. Zenker (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology.

[16]

Ipsos MORI (2014). Attitudes to local democracy in Scotland. Available at: https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/attitudes-local-democracy-scotland

[17]

Anna Marcinkiewicz, Ian Montagu, and Susan Reid. 2016. Scottish Social Attitudes Survey 2015: Attitudes to social networks, civic participation and co-production. Edinburgh: Scottish Government & Social Research.

[18]

Scott Menard. 2002. Handbook of Longitudinal Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

[19]

Angela O'Hagan, Clementine Hill-O'Connor, Claire MacRae, Jennifer Broadhurst, Paul Teedon. 2017. Evaluating Participatory Budgeting Activity in Scotland - Interim Report Year 2. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

[20]

Angela O'Hagan, Clementine Hill-O'Connor, Claire MacRae, Paul Teedon. 2019. Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting Activity in Scotland 2016-2018. Scottish Government.

[21]

Oren Perez. 2008. Complexity, Information Overload, and Online Deliberation. ISJLP, 5, 43.

[22]

Graham Smith. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cited By

Faganello CLuciano E(2024)Inclusive Democracy in the Digital AgeEmerging Developments and Technologies in Digital Government10.4018/979-8-3693-2363-2.ch016(333-354)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2363-2.ch016
Yang JHausladen CPeters DPournaras EHnggli Fricker RHelbing D(2024)Designing Digital Voting Systems for Citizens: Achieving Fairness and Legitimacy in Participatory BudgetingDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/36653325:3(1-30)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3665332
Shin BRask MTuominen PRuijer EPiotrowski S(2022)Learning through online participationInformation Polity10.3233/IP-21155127:4(517-538)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3233/IP-211551

Index Terms

A mixed-methods ethnographic approach to participatory budgeting in Scotland
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
    1. Natural language processing
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing

Recommendations

Embedding digital participatory budgeting within local government: motivations, strategies and barriers faced
ICEGOV '22: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

The challenging task of embedding innovative participatory processes and technologies within local government often falls upon local council officers. Using qualitative data collection and analysis, we investigate the ongoing work of Scottish local ...
Evaluating the application of NLP tools in mainstream participatory budgeting processes in Scotland
ICEGOV '21: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

In recent years participatory budgeting (PB) in Scotland has grown from a handful of community-led processes to a movement supported by local and national government. This is epitomized by an agreement between the Scottish Government and the Convention ...
Case studies of digital participatory budgeting in Latin America: models for citizen engagement
ICEGOV '10: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

This article presents the study of the relationship between information and communication technologies (ICTs) and local governance in Latin America, mainly using the internet for participatory processes, such as the experiences of Digital Participatory ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

GoodIT '21: Proceedings of the Conference on Information Technology for Social Good

September 2021

345 pages

ISBN:9781450384780

DOI:10.1145/3462203

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCAS: ACM Special Interest Group on Computers and Society

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 September 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Short-paper
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

GoodIT '21

Sponsor:

SIGCAS

GoodIT '21: Conference on Information Technology for Social Good

September 9 - 11, 2021

Roma, Italy

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
136
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)18
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Faganello CLuciano E(2024)Inclusive Democracy in the Digital AgeEmerging Developments and Technologies in Digital Government10.4018/979-8-3693-2363-2.ch016(333-354)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2363-2.ch016
Yang JHausladen CPeters DPournaras EHnggli Fricker RHelbing D(2024)Designing Digital Voting Systems for Citizens: Achieving Fairness and Legitimacy in Participatory BudgetingDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/36653325:3(1-30)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3665332
Shin BRask MTuominen PRuijer EPiotrowski S(2022)Learning through online participationInformation Polity10.3233/IP-21155127:4(517-538)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3233/IP-211551

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents