More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Deliberating Data-Driven Societies Through Live Action Role Play

Authors:

Kruakae Pothong,

Georgia Newmarch,

Daniel Richards,

Leon CruickshankAuthors Info & Claims

DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Pages 1726 - 1738

https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462028

Published: 28 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

People’s data practices and their supporting personal informatics are imbued with a wide range of concepts of value that are central to their data imaginaries. They inform how individuals adopt particular products and services. This elusiveness of value creates a challenge for designers to gauge users’ value preferences, which are personal, contextual and abstract. We propose deliberation as a process to operationalise design for elicitation, reflection and value formation, using Live Action Role Play (LARP). The paper demonstrates how our deliberative LARP precipitates the otherwise ethereal data values to unfold in a social setting. We argue that engaging people in reflecting on and playing out their own value formation offers designers more powerful insights to address complex challenges of data-driven societies. We report on our findings that agency and negotiability are key to transcend the politics of preferences in data practices and thus enhance acceptability.

References

[1]

1979. Introduction. In Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal, Milton Rokeach (Ed.). The Free Press, New York, 1–11.

[2]

Veronica Barassi. 2019. Datafied Citizens in the Age of Coerced Digital Participation. Sociological Research Online 24, 3 (Sept. 2019), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419857734 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.

[3]

Ethan Baron. 2018. Peter Thiel-founded floating-island plan sunk by the government of paradise?https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03/15/peter-thiel-founded-floating-island-plan-sunk-by-the-government-of-paradise/

[4]

David Beer. 2018. The Data Gaze: Capitalism, Power and Perception. SAGE. Google-Books-ID: tVxmDwAAQBAJ.

[5]

Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, Boriana Koleva, Stefan Rennick Egglestone, Gabriella Giannachi, Matt Adams, 2013. Performance-led research in the wild. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 3(2013), 1–22.

Digital Library

[6]

Frank Bentley, Konrad Tollmar, Peter Stephenson, Laura Levy, Brian Jones, Scott Robertson, Ed Price, Richard Catrambone, and Jeff Wilson. 2013. Health Mashups: Presenting Statistical Patterns between Wellbeing Data and Context in Natural Language to Promote Behavior Change. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 5 (Nov. 2013), 30:1–30:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2503823

Digital Library

[7]

Laurens Boer and Jared Donovan. 2012. Provotypes for participatory innovation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318014

Digital Library

[8]

Eva Brandt and Camilla Grunnet. 2000. Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference (PDC 2000). 11–20.

[9]

Richard Buchanan. 1992. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues 8, 2 (1992), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637 Publisher: The MIT Press.

[10]

Richard Buchanan. 2001. Design Research and the New Learning. Design Issues 17, 4 (Oct. 2001), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056

[11]

Richard Buchanan. 2015. Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 1, 1 (Sept. 2015), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2015.09.003

[12]

Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. 424–433.

Digital Library

[13]

Bruce Burton, Margret Lepp, Morag Morrison, and John O’Toole. 2015. Acting to manage conflict and bullying through evidence-based strategies. Springer.

[14]

Stuart Candy and Jake Dunagan. 2016. The experiential turn. Human Futures 1, 1 (2016), 26–29.

[15]

Stuart Candy and Jeff Watson. 2015. The thing from the future. The APF methods anthologyLondon: Association of Professional Futurists (2015).

[16]

Cornelius Castoriadis. 1997. The Imaginary Institution of Society. MIT Press.

[17]

Kennedy Chinyowa. 2012. A question of difference: Understanding conflict management through applied drama. Drama Research: International Journal of Drama in Education 3, 1(2012), 1–15.

[18]

Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372

Digital Library

[19]

Stephen Coleman and John Gøtze. 2001. Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. Hansard Society London.

[20]

Stephen Coleman, Kruakae Pothong, and Sarah Weston. 2018. Dramatizing Deliberation: A method for encouraging young people to think about their rights. Journal of Public Deliberation 14, 1 (June 2018). https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol14/iss1/art2

[21]

Ella Dagan, Elena Márquez Segura, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Miguel Flores, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Designing’True Colors’ A Social Wearable that Affords Vulnerability. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.

Digital Library

[22]

Sebastian Deterding and José Zagal. 2018. Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations. Routledge.

[23]

DGOV Foundation. [n.d.]. Distributed Governance Network (#dgov). https://dgov.foundation

[24]

John S. Dryzek. 2009. Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building. Comparative Political Studies 42, 11 (Nov. 2009), 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[25]

Chris Elsden, David Chatting, Abigail C Durrant, Andrew Garbett, Bettina Nissen, John Vines, and David S Kirk. 2017. On speculative enactments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 5386–5399.

Digital Library

[26]

Chris Elsden, Abigail C. Durrant, David Chatting, and David S. Kirk. 2017. Designing Documentary Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064714

Digital Library

[27]

Chris Elsden, David Kirk, Mark Selby, and Chris Speed. 2015. Beyond Personal Informatics: Designing for Experiences with Data. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2341–2344. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702632

Digital Library

[28]

Chris Elsden, Mark Selby, Abigail Durrant, and David Kirk. 2016. Fitter, happier, more productive: what to ask of a data-driven life. Interactions 23, 5 (Aug. 2016), 45. https://doi.org/10.1145/2975388

Digital Library

[29]

Kim Fortun and Mike Fortun. 2005. Scientific Imaginaries and Ethical Plateaus in Contemporary U.S. Toxicology. American Anthropologist 107, 1 (2005), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2005.107.1.043 _eprint: https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/aa.2005.107.1.043.

[30]

Batya Friedman and David G. Hendry. 2019. Value Sensitive Design. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/value-sensitive-design

[31]

Batya Friedman and Peter H. Kahn. 1992. Human agency and responsible computing: Implications for computer system design. Journal of Systems and Software 17, 1 (Jan. 1992), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(92)90075-U

Digital Library

[32]

D. Graeber. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. Springer.

[33]

Jamie Harper. 2019. Meaningful play: applying game and play design practices to promote agency in participatory performance. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 15, 3 (Sept. 2019), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2019.1633148 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2019.1633148.

[34]

HDI. 2018. What is Human-Data Interaction?https://hdi-network.org/intro_to_hdi/

[35]

Dorothy Heathcote. 1970. How does drama serve thinking, talking, and writing?Elementary English 47, 8 (1970), 1077–1081.

[36]

Dorothy Heathcote and Phyl Herbert. 1985. A drama of learning: Mantle of the expert. Theory into practice 24, 3 (1985), 173–180.

[37]

Giulio Iacucci, Kari Kuutti, and Mervi Ranta. 2000. On the move with a magic thing: role playing in concept design of mobile services and devices. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. 193–202.

Digital Library

[38]

Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47, 2 (June 2009), 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4

[39]

Staffan Jonsson, Markus Montola, Annika Waern, and Martin Ericsson. 2006. Prosopopeia: experiences from a pervasive Larp. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology(ACE ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, Hollywood, California, USA, 23–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178850

Digital Library

[40]

Jesper Juul. 2005. Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. MIT Press.

Digital Library

[41]

Eminegül Karababa and Dannie Kjeldgaard. 2013. Value in marketing: Toward sociocultural perspectives. Marketing Theory (Aug. 2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593113500385 Publisher: SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England.

[42]

Rob Kitchin. 2014. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. SAGE. Google-Books-ID: GfOICwAAQBAJ.

[43]

Rob Kitchin and Tracey Lauriault. 2014. Towards Critical Data Studies: Charting and Unpacking Data Assemblages and Their Work. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2474112

[44]

Laura M. Koesten, Emilia Kacprzak, Jenifer F. A. Tennison, and Elena Simperl. 2017. The Trials and Tribulations of Working with Structured Data: -a Study on Information Seeking Behaviour. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025838

Digital Library

[45]

LARPtronics. 2014. Gauntlet at Stage Three. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZMgy1YSkmU

[46]

LARPtronics. 2016. LARPtronics Monocle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lOE2z_hW8w

[47]

Susan Leigh Star. 2010. This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35, 5 (Sept. 2010), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[48]

Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409

Digital Library

[49]

Simon Lindgren. 2017. Digital Media and Society. Sage Publications Ltd.

[50]

Deborah Lupton. 2016. The Quantified Self. John Wiley & Sons. Google-Books-ID: GWdNDwAAQBAJ.

[51]

Deborah Lupton. 2020. Data mattering and self-tracking: what can personal data do?Continuum 34, 1 (Jan. 2020), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2019.1691149 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2019.1691149.

[52]

David Lyon. 2015. Surveillance After Snowden. John Wiley & Sons.

[53]

James Mansbridge, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis F. Thompson, and Mark E. Warren. 2012. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge (Eds.). Cambridge University Press. Google-Books-ID: uIUhAwAAQBAJ.

[54]

Elena Márquez Segura, James Fey, Ella Dagan, Samvid Niravbhai Jhaveri, Jared Pettitt, Miguel Flores, and Katherine Isbister. 2018. Designing future social wearables with live action role play (larp) designers. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.

Digital Library

[55]

Elena Márquez Segura, Katta Spiel, Karin Johansson, Jon Back, Z O Toups, Jessica Hammer, Annika Waern, Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Larping (Live Action Role Playing) as an Embodied Design Research Method. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion. 389–392.

Digital Library

[56]

Phoebe Moore and Andrew Robinson. 2016. The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society 18, 11 (Dec. 2016), 2774–2792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604328 Publisher: SAGE Publications.

[57]

Phoebe V. Moore. 2017. The Quantified Self in Precarity: Work, Technology and What Counts. Routledge. Google-Books-ID: de80DwAAQBAJ.

[58]

Morag Morrison, Elin Nilsson, and Margret Lepp. 2013. Bringing the personal to the professional: Pre-service teaching students explore conflict through an applied drama approach. Applied Theatre Research 1, 1 (2013), 63–76.

[59]

William Odom, John Zimmerman, Scott Davidoff, Jodi Forlizzi, Anind K Dey, and Min Kyung Lee. 2012. A fieldwork of the future with user enactments. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 338–347.

Digital Library

[60]

John O’Toole, Bruce Burton, and Anna Plunkett. 2004. Cooling conflict: A new approach to managing bullying and conflict in schools. Pearson Education Australia.

[61]

Kruakae Pothong. 2020. Youth Jury Policy Deliberation: Towards a Fair and Responsible Internet - Pothong - 2020 - Children & Society - Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/chso.12359

[62]

Larissa Pschetz, Billy Dixon, Kruakae Pothong, Arlene Bailey, Allister Glean, Luis LourenÃ§o Soares, and Jessica A. Enright. 2020. Designing Distributed Ledger Technologies for Social Change: The Case of CariCrop. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376364

Digital Library

[63]

Larissa Pschetz, Kruakae Pothong, and Chris Speed. 2019. Autonomous Distributed Energy Systems | Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300617

Digital Library

[64]

Stuart Reeves, Christian Greiffenhagen, Martin Flintham, Steve Benford, Matt Adams, Ju Row Farr, and Nicholas Tandavantij. 2015. I’d Hide You: Performing live broadcasting in public. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2573–2582.

Digital Library

[65]

John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039

Digital Library

[66]

Elena Márquez Segura, Katherine Isbister, Jon Back, and Annika Waern. 2017. Design, appropriation, and use of technology in larps. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1–4.

Digital Library

[67]

Jagdish N. Sheth, Bruce I. Newman, and Barbara L. Gross. 1991. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research 22, 2 (March 1991), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8

[68]

David Simkins. 2015. The Arts of LARP: Design, Literacy, Learning and Community in Live-Action Role Play.

[69]

Chris Speed and Deborah Maxwell. 2015. Designing through value constellations. Interactions 22, 5 (Aug. 2015), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807293

Digital Library

[70]

Chris Speed, Bettina Nissen, Larissa Pschetz, Dave Murray-Rust, Hadi Mehrpouya, and Shaune Oosthuizen. 2019. Designing New Socio-Economic Imaginaries. The Design Journal 22, sup1 (April 2019), 2257–2261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595023

[71]

Susan Leigh Star and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19, 3 (Aug. 1989), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.

[72]

Jürg Steiner. 2012. The foundations of deliberative democracy: Empirical research and normative implications. Cambridge University Press.

[73]

Jaakko Stenros and Markus Montola (Eds.). 2010. Nordic LARP (1st print ed.). Fea Livia, Stockholm.

[74]

Unlock Blockchain. 2020. Web3 Foundation launches its Flagship Polkadot protocol. https://www.unlock-bc.com/news/2020-05-28/web3-foundation-launches-its-flagship-polkadot-protocol

[75]

Loïs Vanhée, Elena Márquez Segura, and Katherine Isbister. 2018. Firefly: A social wearable to support physical connection of larpers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–4.

Digital Library

[76]

Annika Waern, Paulina Rajkowska, Karin B Johansson, Jon Bac, Jocelyn Spence, and Anders Sundnes Løvlie. 2020. Sensitizing Scenarios: Sensitizing Designer Teams to Theory. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[77]

Jayne Wallace, John McCarthy, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Making design probes work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, Paris, France, 3441–3450. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466473

Digital Library

[78]

Etienne Wenger. 2010. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems: the Career of a Concept. In Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, Chris Blackmore (Ed.). Springer, London, 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11

[79]

Bo Westerlund and Katarina Wetter-Edman. 2017. Dealing with wicked problems, in messy contexts, through prototyping. The Design Journal 20, sup1 (July 2017), S886–S899. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353034 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353034.

[80]

Nick K T Yip. 2012. Making qualitative decisions from quantitative cues: Understanding the customers’ willingness to pay. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 11, 5 (Sept. 2012), 562–566. https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2012.18

[81]

Professor Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power(main edition ed.). Profile Books, London.

Cited By

Johansson KRobinson RBack JBowman SFey JMárquez Segura EWaern AIsbister K(2024)Why Larp? A Synthesis Article on Live Action Roleplay in Relation to HCI Research and PracticeACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368904531:5(1-35)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689045
Hanschke VRees DAlanyali MHopkinson DMarshall P(2024)Data Ethics Emergency Drill: A Toolbox for Discussing Responsible AI for Industry TeamsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642402(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642402

Recommendations

Designing Future Social Wearables with Live Action Role Play (Larp) Designers
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Designing wearable technology that supports physical and social engagement in a collocated setting is challenging. In this research, we reached out to an expert community of crafters of social experiences: larpers (live action role players). Larpers and ...
A Short History of Table-Talk and Live-Action Role-Playing in Japan: Replays and the Horror Genre as Drivers of Popularity

Background. The history of larp, live-action role-play, in Japan may be rather short but documents exponential growth in the entertainment sector as well as in educational gaming. Following trends of related forms of analog role-playing games, the horror ...
Why Larp? A Synthesis Article on Live Action Roleplay in Relation to HCI Research and Practice
Live action roleplay (larp) has a wide range of applications and can be relevant in relation to HCI. While there has been research about larp in relation to topics such as embodied interaction, playfulness, and futuring published in HCI venues since the ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

June 2021

2082 pages

ISBN:9781450384766

DOI:10.1145/3461778

Editors:
Wendy Ju
Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech
,
Lora Oehlberg
University of Calgary
,
Sean Follmer
Stanford University
,
Sarah Fox
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Stacey Kuznetsov
Arizona State University

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

EPSRC

Conference

DIS '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

DIS '21: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021

June 28 - July 2, 2021

Virtual Event, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

DIS '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

Designing Interactive Systems Conference

July 5 - 9, 2025

Funchal , Portugal

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
275
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)27
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Johansson KRobinson RBack JBowman SFey JMárquez Segura EWaern AIsbister K(2024)Why Larp? A Synthesis Article on Live Action Roleplay in Relation to HCI Research and PracticeACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368904531:5(1-35)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689045
Hanschke VRees DAlanyali MHopkinson DMarshall P(2024)Data Ethics Emergency Drill: A Toolbox for Discussing Responsible AI for Industry TeamsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642402(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642402

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten