[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3461564.3461591acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Co-designing recycling solutions on campus: A case study exploring openness, realism and empowerment of users in a Living Lab

Published: 21 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The Living Lab concept is often distinguished from other user-centered and co-innovation approaches by an aspiration to adhere to principles of openness and empowerment of users, with a focus on innovating ideas that are realistic to the real needs of end-users. However, when it comes to implementing a living lab approach it is sometimes unclear how to put these principles into practice. In this case study, we introduce a framework for mapping three living lab principles to co-design stages within a single co-design framework and describe its use in innovating solutions for solid waste management on a university campus as a pre-cursor to scaling up the approach across the city. We present an evaluation of the framework in use against evidence of adherence to the three living lab principles of openness, empowerment of users, and realism. This work may act as a reference point for researchers to start exploring which concrete co-design activities have better impact in achieving living lab aims.

References

[1]
Asbjørn Følstad. 2008. Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. eJOV Electron. J. Virtual Organ. Networks 10, August (2008)
[2]
K. Feurstein; A. Hesmer; K.A. Hribernik; K.-D. Thoben and J. Schumacher. 2008. Living Labs: a new development strategy. European Living Labs-a new approach for human centric regional innovation, pp.1-14.
[3]
Masayuki Ihara, Mizue Hayashi, Fumiya Akasaka, Atsunobu Kimura, and Hiroshi Watanabe. 2019. How to Co-design with Citizens for Successful Living Lab? Springer International Publishing.
[4]
Nobert Jere, Ebenhezer Kauhonina, and Attlee Gamundani. 2014. A proposed living lab methodological framework for Namibia. 2014 IST-Africa Conf. Exhib. IST-Africa 2014 (2014), 1–11.
[5]
Birgitta Bergvall Kareborn and Anna Stahlbrost. 2009. Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. Int. J. Innov. Reg. Dev. 1, 4 (2009), 356.
[6]
Dimitri Schuurman, Lieven De Marez & Pieter Ballon. 2015. Living Labs: a systematic literature review. In Open Living Lab Days 2015.
[7]
Corinna Ogonowski, Benedikt Ley, Jan Hess, Lin Wan, and Volker Wulf. 2013. Designing for the living room: Long-term user involvement in a Living Lab. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (2013), 1539–1548.
[8]
Elizabeth B.N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2014. Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10, 5–14.
[9]
Alsop, R., & Heinsohn, N. (2005). Measuring empowerment in practice: Structuring analysis and framing indicators. The World Bank.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
C&T '21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech
June 2021
345 pages
ISBN:9781450390569
DOI:10.1145/3461564
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Living Lab
  2. co-design
  3. empowerment
  4. openness
  5. realism
  6. recycling
  7. solid waste management
  8. university campus

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Funded by the European Union, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Finland

Conference

C&T '21
C&T '21: Communities & Technologies 2021
June 20 - 25, 2021
WA, Seattle, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 183 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 138
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media