[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3449726.3463139acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards the landscape rotation as a perturbation strategy on the quadratic assignment problem

Published: 08 July 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Recent work in combinatorial optimisation have demonstrated that neighbouring solutions of a local optima may belong to more favourable attraction basins. In this sense, the perturbation strategy plays a critical role on local search based algorithms to kick the search of the algorithm into more prominent areas of the space. In this paper, we investigate the landscape rotation as a perturbation strategy to redirect the search of an stuck algorithm. This technique rearranges the mapping of solutions to different objective values without altering important properties of the problem's landscape such as the number and quality of optima, among others. Particularly, we investigate two rotation based perturbation strategies: (i) a profoundness rotation method and (ii) a broadness rotation method. These methods are applied into the stochastic hill-climbing heuristic and tested and compared on different instances of the quadratic assignment problem against other algorithm versions. Performed experiments reveal that the landscape rotation is an efficient perturbation strategy to shift the search in a controlled way. Nevertheless, an empirical investigation of the landscape rotation demonstrates that it needs to be cautiously manipulated in the permutation space since a small rotation does not necessarily mean a small disturbance in the fitness landscape.

References

[1]
Joan Alza, Mark Bartlett, Josu Ceberio, and John McCall. 2019. On the Definition of Dynamic Permutation Problems under Landscape Rotation. In Proceedings of the GECCO (Prague, Czech Republic). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1518--1526.
[2]
Mayowa Ayodele, John Mccall, Olivier Regnier-Coudert, and Liam Bowie. 2017. A Random Key based Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for the Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problem. In Proceedings in GECCO. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, 2364--2371.
[3]
R. Burkard and J. Offermann. 1977. Entwurf von Schreibmaschinentastaturen mittels quadratischer Zuordnungsprobleme. Zeitschrift für Operations Research 21 (1977), B121--B132.
[4]
Josu Ceberio, Alexander Mendiburu, and Jose A. Lozano. 2015. The linear ordering problem revisited. European Journal of Operational Research 241, 3 (2015), 686--696.
[5]
Zvi Drezner. 2019. Taking advantage of symmetry in some quadratic assignment problems. Information Systems and Operational Research 57, 4 (2019), 623--641.
[6]
L. Hernando, A. Mendiburu, and J. A. Lozano. 2019. Anatomy of the Attraction Basins: Breaking with the Intuition. Evolutionary Computation 27 (2019), 435--466.
[7]
Ekhine Irurozki. 2014. Sampling and learning distance-based probability models for permutation spaces. Ph.D. Dissertation. UPV/EHU.
[8]
R. Johnson and M. G. Pilcher. 1989. The traveling salesman problem, edited by E. L. Lawler, J. K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, and D.B. Shmoys, John Wiley & sons, chichester, 1985, 463 pp. Networks 19, 5 (1989), 615--616.
[9]
S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science 220, 4598 (1983), 671--680.
[10]
Tjalling C. Koopmans and Martin Beckmann. 1957. Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities. Econometrica 25, 1 (1957), 53--76.
[11]
Changhe Li, Shengxiang Yang, TT Nguyen, E Ling Yu, Xin Yao, Yaochu Jin, HG Beyer, and PN Suganthan. 2008. Benchmark generator for CEC 2009 competition on dynamic optimization. Technical Report. CEC competition.
[12]
Yong Li, Panos M. Pardalos, and Mauricio G.C. Resende. 1994. A Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure For The Quadratic Assignment Problem.
[13]
Helena R. Lourenço, Olivier C. Martin, and Thomas Stützle. 2003. Iterated Local Search. Springer US, Boston, MA, 320--353.
[14]
Katherine M. Malan and Andries P. Engelbrecht. 2013. A survey of techniques for characterising fitness landscapes and some possible ways forward. Information Sciences 241 (2013), 148--163.
[15]
Rafael Martí and Gerhard Reinelt. 2011. The linear ordering problem: exact and heuristic methods in combinatorial optimization. Vol. 175. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[16]
Michalis Mavrovouniotis, Shengxiang Yang, and Xin Yao. 2012. A Benchmark Generator for Dynamic Permutation-Encoded Problems. In PPSN. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 508--517.
[17]
N. Mladenović and P. Hansen. 1997. Variable neighborhood search. Computers & Operations Research 24, 11 (1997), 1097--1100.
[18]
Erik Pitzer and Michael Affenzeller. 2012. A Comprehensive Survey on Fitness Landscape Analysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 161--191.
[19]
E. Taillard. 1991. Robust taboo search for the quadratic assignment problem. Parallel Comput. 17, 4 (1991), 443--455.
[20]
M. Tayarani-N. and A. Prügel-Bennett. 2014. On the Landscape of Combinatorial Optimization Problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 18, 3 (2014), 420--434.
[21]
Renato Tinós and Shengxiang Yang. 2010. An Analysis of the XOR Dynamic Problem Generator Based on the Dynamical System. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XI. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 274--283.
[22]
Renato Tinós and Shengxiang Yang. 2014. Analysis of fitness landscape modifications in evolutionary dynamic optimization. Information Sciences 282 (2014), 214--236.
[23]
Shengxiang Yang and Xin Yao. 2003. Dual population-based incremental learning for problem optimization in dynamic environments. Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, 49 -- 56.
[24]
Shengxiang Yang and Xin Yao. 2005. Experimental Study on Population-Based Incremental Learning Algorithms for Dynamic Optimization Problems. Soft Comput. 9 (2005), 815--834.
[25]
Abdunnaser Younes, Paul Calamai, and Otman Basir. 2005. Generalized Benchmark Generation for Dynamic Combinatorial Problems. In Proceedings in GECCO. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, 25--31.
[26]
Éric D. Taillard. 1995. Comparison of iterative searches for the quadratic assignment problem. Location Science 3, 2 (1995), 87--105.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)On the elusivity of dynamic optimisation problemsSwarm and Evolutionary Computation10.1016/j.swevo.2023.10128978(101289)Online publication date: Apr-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '21: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
July 2021
2047 pages
ISBN:9781450383516
DOI:10.1145/3449726
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 July 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. landscape rotation
  2. quadratic assignment problem

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO '21
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)On the elusivity of dynamic optimisation problemsSwarm and Evolutionary Computation10.1016/j.swevo.2023.10128978(101289)Online publication date: Apr-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media