[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3448139.3448203acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Evaluating a Learning Analytics Dashboard to Visualize Student Self-Reports of Time-on-task: A Case Study in a Latin American University

Published: 12 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, instructional design has become even more challenging for teaching staff members in higher education institutions. If instructional design causes student overload, it could lead to superficial learning and decreased student well-being. A strategy to avoid overload is reflecting upon the effectiveness of teaching practices in terms of time-on-task. This article presents a Work-In-Progress conducted to provide teachers with a dashboard to visualize student self-reports of time-on-task regarding subject activities. A questionnaire was applied to 15 instructors during a set trial period to evaluate the perceived usability and usefulness of the dashboard. Preliminary findings reveal that the dashboard helped instructors became aware about the number of hours spent outside of class time. Furthermore, data visualizations of time-on-task evidence enabled them to redesign subject activities. Currently, the dashboard has been adopted by 106 engineering instructors. Future work involves the development of a framework to incorporate user-based improvements.

References

[1]
A. Bennett and P. J. Burke. 2018. Reconceptualising time and temporality: an exploration of time in higher education, Discourse, vol. 39, no. 6, 913–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1312285
[2]
J. R. Ruiz-Gallardo, J. L. González-Geraldo, and S. Castaño, 2016. What are our students doing? Workload, time allocation and time management in PBL instruction. A case study in Science Education, Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 53, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.10.005
[3]
V. Kovanovic, D. Gašević, S. Dawson, S. Joksimovic, and R. Baker. 2016. Does Time-on-task Estimation Matter? Implications on Validity of Learning Analytics Findings. J. Learn. Anal., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 81–110. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2015.23.6
[4]
Q. Nguyen. 2020. Rethinking time-on-task estimation with outlier detection accounting for individual, time, and task differences. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375538
[5]
R. Pérez-Álvarez, J. Maldonado-Mahauad, and M. Pérez-Sanagustín, “Tools to Support Self-Regulated Learning in Online Environments: Literature Review,” in EC-TEL, 2018, pp. 16–30.
[6]
D. Jamieson-Noel and P. H. Winne. 2002. Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 27, no. 4, 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00006-1
[7]
I. Hilliger 2020. For learners, with learners: Identifying indicators for an academic advising dashboard for students. In: Alario-Hoyos C., Rodríguez-Triana M.J., Scheffel M., Arnedillo-Sánchez I., Dennerlein S.M. (eds) Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education. EC-TEL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_9
[8]
Q. Nguyen, B. Rienties, L. Toetenel, R. Ferguson, and D. Whitelock. 2017. Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Comput. Human Behav., vol. 76, 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028.
[9]
D. Gašević, S. Dawson, T. Rogers, and D. Gasevic. 2016 Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High. Educ., vol. 28, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
[10]
E. J. Maloney and J. Kim. 2020. The Challenge of Equity in Higher Education Under COVID-19. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/learning-innovation/challenge-equity-higher-education-under-covid-19
[11]
M. V. Zelkowitz and D. R. Wallace. 1998. Experimental Models for Validating Technology. Comput. Pract., vol. May, 23–31.
[12]
C. Miranda, J. I. Goñi, I. Hilliger, and J. Lugo. 2020. Assessing the work of geographically distributed teams in engineering-design: Time allocation in the design process as a form of in-class analytics. Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 1 B, 399–410.
[13]
A. Häggaman, T. Honda, and M. C. Yang. 2013. The influence of timing in exploratory prototyping and other activities in design projects. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 55928, p. V005T06A023). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2013-12700
[14]
J. Barlett. 2018. Chile protests: state of emergency declared in Santiago as violence escalates. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/19/chile-protests-state-of-emergency-declared-in-santiago-as-violence-escalates.
[15]
L. Ali, M. Asadi, D. Gašević, J. Jovanović, and M. Hatala. 2013. Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study. Comput. Educ., vol. 62, 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.023
[16]
M. Scheffel. 2017. The Evaluation Framework for Learning Analytics. SIKS Dissertation Series No. 2017-34.
[17]
T. Broos, K. Verbert, G. Langie, C. Van Soom, and T. De Laet. 2018. Multi-institutional Positioning Test Feedback Dashboard for Aspiring Students Lessons Learnt from a Case Study in Flanders. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on learning Analytics and Knowledge, 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170419
[18]
O. Viberg, M. Hatakka, O. Bälter, and A. Mavroudi. 2018. The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Comput. Human Behav., vol. 89, no. July, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027
[19]
T. Munzner. 2009. A nested model for visualization design and validation. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 15, no. 6, 921–928. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.111.
[20]
I. H. Hsiao, J. Guerra, D. Parra, F. Bakalov, B. König-Ries, and P. Brusilovsky. 2012. Comparative social visualization for personalized E-learning, In Proc. Work. Adv. Vis. Interfaces AVI, no. May, 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1145/2254556.2254614

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evidence‐based multimodal learning analytics for feedback and reflection in collaborative learningBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1349855:5(1900-1925)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2023)A checklist to guide the planning, designing, implementation, and evaluation of learning analytics dashboardsInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education10.1186/s41239-023-00394-620:1Online publication date: 3-May-2023
  • (2023)A contextualized assessment of reliability and validity of student-initiated momentary self-reports during lecturesEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-023-10304-272:2(503-539)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Evaluating a Learning Analytics Dashboard to Visualize Student Self-Reports of Time-on-task: A Case Study in a Latin American University

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    LAK21: LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference
    April 2021
    645 pages
    ISBN:9781450389358
    DOI:10.1145/3448139
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 April 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Higher Education
    2. Instructional Design
    3. Learning Analytics Dashboards
    4. Time-on-task

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    LAK21

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Evidence‐based multimodal learning analytics for feedback and reflection in collaborative learningBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1349855:5(1900-1925)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
    • (2023)A checklist to guide the planning, designing, implementation, and evaluation of learning analytics dashboardsInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education10.1186/s41239-023-00394-620:1Online publication date: 3-May-2023
    • (2023)A contextualized assessment of reliability and validity of student-initiated momentary self-reports during lecturesEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-023-10304-272:2(503-539)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
    • (2023)A learning analytics dashboard for data-driven recommendations on influences of non-cognitive factors in introductory programmingEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12125-529:8(9221-9256)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media