[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3328320.3328372acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participative evaluation with children in educational maker projects: Experiences from a pilot action

Published: 03 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The European project DOIT follows the maker pedagogy approach to develop an early entrepreneurial education program for children between the age of six and sixteen. In this program, children work collaboratively on solutions for challenges that they know from their personal environments with the aim to aspire to the entrepreneurial spirit and social innovation at the same time. The DOIT program involves 1,000 children in two pilot phases at 11 pilot sites in ten different European countries. A comprising evaluation design has been set-up that comprises not only conventional evaluation tools such as questionnaires and tests but also participative instruments. Being aware of that conventional evaluation tools are somewhat in contrast with the innovative setting of a maker project where children are the agents for change, we tried to incorporate participative evaluation instruments where possible. The latter ones have an empowering function as children are not only the 'object' of research but they themselves take over the role of co-researchers. The paper describes some of these instruments and shares some first-hand experiences with the tools and preliminary results, as the project will still be ongoing at the time.

References

[1]
K. B. Akhilesh. 2017. Co-Creation and Learning: Concepts and Cases. Springer.
[2]
Caroline Bradbury-Jones and Julie Taylor. 2015. Engaging with children as co-researchers: challenges, counter-challenges and solutions. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18, 2 (2015), 161--173.
[3]
Gwen Snyder Kaltman. 2010. Hands-on learning. Childhood Education 87, 2 (2010), S7--S7.
[4]
Martin Lackéus. 2015. Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how. Background Paper (2015).
[5]
Laura Lundy, Lesley McEvoy, and Bronagh Byrne. 2011. Working with young children as co-researchers: An approach informed by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Early education & development 22, 5 (2011), 714--736.
[6]
T. Shen, Dezhi Wu, V. Archhpiliya, M. Bierbert, and Roxanne Hiltz. 2004. Participatory learning approach: A research agenda. Information Systems Department (2004).
[7]
Elisabeth Unterfrauner, Christian Voigt, and Sandra Schön. 2018. Towards a model of early entrepreneurial education: appreciation, facilitation and evaluation. In Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 8th International Conference, 139--146.
[8]
Klaus K. Urban and Hans G. Jellen. 1995. Test zum Schöpferischen Denken-Zeichnerisch (TSD-Z). Swets.
[9]
Fionnuala Waldron. 2006. CHILDREN AS CO-RESEARCHERS. Research Methods in Social Studies Education: Contemporary Issues and Perspectives (2006), 85.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Reimagining Assessment for Maker Education in Elementary Education: Findings from a Values-led Co-Design Workshop with TeachersProceedings of FabLearn / Constructionism 2023: Full and Short Research Papers10.1145/3615430.3615435(1-6)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2023
  • (2023)“We were proud of our idea”International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.10055235:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
C&T '19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities
June 2019
375 pages
ISBN:9781450371629
DOI:10.1145/3328320
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • OCG: Oesterreichische Computer Gesellschaft
  • TU Wien: TU Wien
  • EUSSET: European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Participative evaluation
  2. early entrepreneurial education
  3. maker education

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

C&T 2019

Acceptance Rates

C&T '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 59 submissions, 49%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 183 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Reimagining Assessment for Maker Education in Elementary Education: Findings from a Values-led Co-Design Workshop with TeachersProceedings of FabLearn / Constructionism 2023: Full and Short Research Papers10.1145/3615430.3615435(1-6)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2023
  • (2023)“We were proud of our idea”International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.10055235:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media