[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3328243.3328263acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiuxidConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Applying User-Centered Techniques in the Design of a Usable Mobile Musical Composition Tool

Published: 01 April 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In this study, we present the music composition tool Flow and how an interaction was designed that led towards introducing balance in the work of musicians across all stages in musical composition. Observation and user research led to having a deeper understanding of the various needs, gains and pain points musicians encounter when composing. Musicians and composers who participated in the study, came from varying levels of expertise from beginner (those with less than 7 years) and veteran (those with beyond 10 years experience). An iterative process of design and development was continuously employed which led to improving the interaction design within the prototype. The processes described in this study show how insights were uncovered from a comprehensive set of usability tests and inspections done. These insights led to the development of a more usable and acceptable musical composition tool as seen from the results in the user tests. It can be observed that varying levels of expertise in music composition leads to different expectations and needs with regards to a music composition prototype. Results of the user tests show that Flow achieved a level of satisfaction and usability at par with the industry-standard tools.

References

[1]
Stan Bennett. 1976. The process of musical creation: Interviews with eight composers. Journal of research in music education 24, 1 (1976), 3--13.
[2]
Dom Brown, Chris Nash, and Tom Mitchell. 2017. A user experience review of music interaction evaluations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression 2017.
[3]
Christine Cheng. 2016. On approaching a performance of Paul Hindemith's Der Schwanendreher. (2016).
[4]
David Collins. 2005. A synthesis process model of creative thinking in music composition. Psychology of music 33, 2 (2005), 193--216.
[5]
Dave Collins. 2016. The Act of Musical Composition: Studies in the creative process. Routledge.
[6]
Jordan Aiko Deja, Patrick Arceo, Darren Goldwin David, Patrick Lawrence Gan, and Ryan Christopher Roque. 2018a. MyoSL: A Framework for Measuring Usability of Two-Arm Gestural Electromyography for Sign Language. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 146--159.
[7]
Jordan Aiko Deja, Kevin Gray Chan, Migo Andres Dancel, Allen Vincent Gonzales, and John Patrick Tobias. 2018b. Flow: A Musical Composition Tool Using Gesture Interactions and Musical Metacreation. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 169--176.
[8]
Kevin Donnelly. 2005. The spectre of sound: Music in film and television. British Film Institute; University of California Press.
[9]
Andrew Gartland-Jones and Peter Copley. 2003. The suitability of genetic algorithms for musical composition. Contemporary Music Review 22, 3 (2003), 43--55.
[10]
Max Graf. 2013. From Beethoven To Shostakovich-The Psychology Of The Composing Process. Read Books Ltd.
[11]
Stan Hawkins and Lori Burns. 2013. From Pac-Man to pop music: interactive audio in games and new media. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
[12]
D. Herremans and E. Chew. 2016. MorpheuS: Automatic music generation with recurrent pattern constraints and tension profiles. In IEEE TENCON. IEEE, IEEE, Singapore.
[13]
H. H. S. Ip, K. C. K. Law, and B. Kwong. 2005. Cyber Composer: Hand Gesture-Driven Intelligent Music Composition and Generation. In 11th International Multimedia Modelling Conference. 46--52.
[14]
Junki Kikuchi, Hidekatsu Yanagi, and Yoshiaki Mima. 2016. Music Composition with Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 137--138.
[15]
David A Levitt. 1992. A representation for musical dialects. In Machine models of music. MIT Press, 455--469.
[16]
Carolyn R Miller. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 2 (1984), 151--167.
[17]
Philippe Pasquier, Arne Eigenfeldt, Oliver Bown, and Shlomo Dubnov. 2017. An Introduction to Musical Metacreation. Comput. Entertain. 14, 2, Article 2 (jan 2017), 14 pages.
[18]
John Rothgeb. 1975. Strict counterpoint and tonal theory. Journal of Music Theory 19, 2 (1975), 260--284.
[19]
Valerio Velardo and Steven Jan. 2016. Study Day on Computer Simulation of Musical Creativity.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A Systematic Review of User-Centered Design Techniques Applied to the Design of Mobile Application User InterfacesDesign, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research and Design10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_7(100-114)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2021

Index Terms

  1. Applying User-Centered Techniques in the Design of a Usable Mobile Musical Composition Tool

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CHIuXiD'19: Proceedings of the 5th International ACM In-Cooperation HCI and UX Conference
    April 2019
    205 pages
    ISBN:9781450361873
    DOI:10.1145/3328243
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 April 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Gestural Input
    2. Human Centric Computing
    3. Human Computer Interaction
    4. Interaction Design
    5. Interaction Techniques
    6. User Interface Design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CHIuXiD'19
    CHIuXiD'19: The 5th International HCI and UX Conference
    April 1 - 9, 2019
    Surabaya, Bali, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 22 of 50 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)A Systematic Review of User-Centered Design Techniques Applied to the Design of Mobile Application User InterfacesDesign, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research and Design10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_7(100-114)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media