[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3325112.3325241acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Potential Use of Digital Assistants by Governments for Citizen Services: The Case of Germany

Published: 18 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The German government has recently announced a national strategy for making Germany one of the leading locations for artificial intelligence (AI) worldwide. While the AI technology has been around since 1950s, the rise of it has been inescapable over the past decades. Current developments and widespread applications of intelligent technologies show signs that they will become even more prevalent in our lives. In public administrations, AI can support faster decision-making and increase responsiveness leading to higher citizen satisfaction. Digital assistants can carry out a wide range of functions ranging from checking applications against fraud to approval of state benefits or other claims. Yet, no matter how groundbreaking the technology is, its acceptance by citizens is the ultimate criterion of success, as in the case of all services offered by governments. We argue careful consideration needs to be given to citizen perspective as AI projects have high deployment and maintenance costs. Based on a nationwide representative survey, this research aims to provide some initial insights on the perspective of citizens towards the potential use of digital assistants by the German government for citizen services.

References

[1]
E. Guizzo. IBM's Watson Jeopardy computer shuts down humans in final game. https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/artificial-intelligence/ibm-watson-jeopardy-computer-shuts-down-humans.
[2]
P. Gentsch. 2018. (Chat)bots meet AI – wie Conversational Customer Service die Kommunikation und Interaktion verändert. Marketing Resultant GmbH, Mainz, Germany.
[3]
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland. Artificial Intelligence Programme. https://tem.fi/en/artificial-intelligence-programme.
[4]
Federal Republic of Germany. 2018. Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa, eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland, ein neuer Zusammenhalt für unser Land. Berlin, Germany.
[5]
Geschäftsstelle IT-Planungsrat im Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat. Digitalisierungsprogramm des IT-Planungsrats: Blaupausen für die Verwaltungsdigitalisierung. https://www.it-planungsrat.de/DE/Projekte/Koordinierungsprojekte/Digitalisierungsprogramm/DigPro_node.html.
[6]
EUR-Lex. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.119.01.0001.01.ENG.
[7]
Bundesministerium der Finanzen. Fragen und Antworten zur Modernisierung des Besteuerungsverfahrens. https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/FAQ/2015-12-09-Mod-Besteuerungsverfahren.html.
[8]
C. Akkaya, P. Wolf and H. Krcmar. Factors influencing citizen adoption of e-government services: a cross-cultural comparison (Research in progress). In Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Washington, DC, 2531-2540.
[9]
V. Kumar, 2007. Factors for Successful e-Government Adoption: A Conceptual Framework. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 5(1), 63-76.
[10]
J. McCarthy, 1955. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
[11]
S. R. Peter Norvig. 2010. Artificial Intelligence. A Modern Approach. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[12]
J. Frank. Artificial intelligence and intrusion detection: Current and future directions. In Proceedings of the 17th national computer security conference. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gathersburg, MD, 1-12.
[13]
J. Haugeland. 1985. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[14]
R. Bellman. 1978. An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence: Can Computers Think? Boyd & Fraser, San Francisco, CA.
[15]
G. Boole. 1854. An investigation of the laws of thought: on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. Dover Publications, New York, NY.
[16]
J. H. Fetzer. 1990. What is Artificial Intelligence? In: Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 3-27.
[17]
P. H. Winston. 1992. Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
[18]
E. Charniak and D. McDermott. 1985. Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA.
[19]
R. Kurzweil. 1990. The Age of Intelligent Machines. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[20]
E. Rich and K. Knight. 1991. Artificial Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
[21]
W. Sesink. 1993. Menschliche und künstliche Intelligenz: Der kleine Unterschied. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, Germany.
[22]
M. Minsky. 1968. Semantic Information Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[23]
A. M. Turing. 1937. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London mathematical society, 2 (1), 230-265.
[24]
R. M. French. 1990. Subcognition and the limits of the Turing test. Mind, 99 (393), 53-65.
[25]
D. L. Poole, A. K. Mackworth and R. Goebel. 1998. Computational Intelligence: A Logical Approach. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY.
[26]
N. J. Nilsson. 1998. Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.
[27]
H. Leonhard, 2018. DFKI NEWS 02 2018. Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany.
[28]
K. A. Desouza. 2018. Delivering Artificial Intelligence in Government: Challenges and Opportunities. Arizona State University, Washington, DC.
[29]
N. Nilsson. 2010. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[30]
C. Djeffal. 2018. Künstliche Intelligenz in der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Berichte des NEGZ3), 1-32.
[31]
M. H. Shane Legg. 2007. A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 157, 17-24.
[32]
D. Althaus, 2015. Artificial Intelligence. Opportunities and Risks. Policy Papers of the Effective Altruism Foundation, 2, 1-16.
[33]
M. Daum. 2008. Chancen und Risiken der systemischen Kontingenz Künstlicher Intelligenz in einer postindustriellen Weltgesellschaft. Dr. rer. pol Dissertation, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
[34]
M. Mitchell. Artificial Intelligence Hits the Barrier of Meaning. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/opinion/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning.html.
[35]
O. Schwartz. You thought fake news was bad? Deep fakes are where truth goes to die https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/12/deep-fakes-fake-news-truth.
[36]
A. Smith and J. Anderson. AI, Robotics, and the Future of Jobs. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/06/future-of-jobs/.
[37]
P. Skagestad. 1993. Thinking with machines: Intelligence augmentation, evolutionary epistemology, and semiotic. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 16 (2), 157-180.
[38]
S. Makridakis. 2017. The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90 (6), 46-60.
[39]
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. Main focus in 2018: artificial intelligence. https://www.de.digital/DIGITAL/Navigation/EN/Digital-Summit/digital-summit.html.
[40]
H.-J. Tenhagen. Steuererklärung 2017: Was neu ist - und wie Sie sich eine Erstattung vom Finanzamt sichern. http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/service/steuererklaerung-2017-was-ist-neu-was-wird-erstattet-a-1195079.html.
[41]
Federal Office for Migration and Refugees. Digitale Unterstützer im Asylverfahren: Wie Sprachbiometrie Asylentscheidungen auf eine noch breitere Grundlage stellt. http://www.bamf.de/DE/Service/Top/Presse/Interviews/20181008-interview-cyber-security-report/interview-cyber-security-report-node.html.
[42]
A. Geschonneck. "Precobs": Super-Software gegen Einbrecher. https://home.kpmg.com/de/de/home/themen/2017/03/precobs-mit-neuer-super-software-gegen-einbrecher.html.
[43]
H. Heine. Videoüberwachung am Berliner Südkreuz: Technik erkennt "abweichendes Verhalten". https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/videoueberwachung-am-berliner-suedkreuz-technik-erkennt-abweichendes-verhalten/22856332.html.
[44]
F. Plantera. "Artificial Intelligence is the next step for e-governance in Estonia", State adviser reveals. https://e-estonia.com/artificial-intelligence-is-the-next-step-for-e-governance-state-adviser-reveals/.
[45]
S. Goel, 2017. One Person, One Vote: Estimating the Prevalence of Double Voting in US Presidential Elections. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
[46]
M. Hölterhoff, 2016. Trendreport Effizienter Staat. Behörden Spiegel, Prognos AG, Berlin, Germany.
[47]
H. Mehr. 2017. Artificial intelligence for citizen services and government. Harvard Kennedy School - Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Cambridge, MA.
[48]
Stadt Ludwigsburg. Serviceroboter „L2B2“ begrüßt zukünftig im Bürgerbüro der Stadt Ludwigsburg. https://www.ludwigsburg.de/,Lde/start/stadt_buerger/serviceroboter+_l2b2_+begruesst+zukuenftig+im+buergerbuero+der+stadt+ludwigsburg.html.
[49]
BerlinOnline Stadtportal GmbH. Virtueller Bürger-Service-Assistent. https://service.berlin.de/virtueller-assistent/virtueller-assistent-606279.php.
[50]
Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. ElterngeldDigital. https://www.elterngeld-digital.de/ams/Elterngeld/wizardng/FFE7CD;jsessionid=1uapGcSAW002idyOgQY18CHSz0-6hN38gNJ0ISHy.anton-FS-01?dswid=2252&dsrid=167&v=1545307681298&st=1.
[51]
Landkreis Lüneburg. Govii Lüneburg. https://www.landkreis-lueneburg.de/Home-Landkreis-Lueneburg/Unser-Service-fuer-Sie/govii-lueneburg.aspx.
[52]
Stadt Bonn. GovBot Bonn. https://govbot.bonn.de.
[53]
Stadtverwaltung Krefeld. Online-Services der Stadt Krefeld. https://www.krefeld.de/de/allgemein/online-service-der-stadt-krefeld/.
[54]
Ministerium für Landesentwicklung und Verkehr des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt. Radverkehr. https://verkehr.sachsen-anhalt.de/strassenverkehr/radverkehr/#c151288.
[55]
Landeshauptstadt Kiel. Verwaltungsleistungen A-Z. https://www.kiel.de/de/politik_verwaltung/service/.
[56]
Studentenwerk Niederbayern/Oberpfalz. BAföG Online. https://www.bafoeg-bayern.de/BAfoeGOnline/bafoeg/Formblatt1View.aspx.
[57]
Federal Police of Germany. EasyPASS - What is EasyPASS? https://www.easypass.de/EasyPass/EN/What_is_EasyPASS/home_node.html.
[58]
Bundeswehr Karriere. Jobbot. https://www.messenger.com/t/bundeswehr.karriere.
[59]
Federal Employment Agency. KgOnline. https://con.arbeitsagentur.de/prod/opal/kgo-antraggeburt-ui/.
[60]
Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. Elterngeldrechner. https://familienportal.de/familienportal/rechner-antraege/elterngeldrechner.
[61]
Deutscher Bundestag. Adler. https://adler.bundestag.de/nmIQ/frage.jsp.
[62]
Bayerisches Landesamt für Steuern - Dienststelle München. ELIAS - ElsterInformationsAssistent. https://elias.elster.de/nmIQServer/index.html.
[63]
H. Krcmar, 2018. eGovernment MONITOR 2018: Nutzung und Akzeptanz digitaler Verwaltungsangebote - Deutschland, Österreich und Schweiz im Vergleich. Initiative D21, fortiss gGmbH.
[64]
R. A. Singleton and B. C. Straits. 2010. Approaches to Social Research. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
[65]
D. L. Paulhus. 1991. Measurement and control of response bias. In: Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 17-59.
[66]
C. Akkaya, R. Zepic and H. Krcmar. 2018. Mehr E-Government, mehr Nutzung? Warum die Inanspruchnahme digitaler Verwaltungsangebote in Deutschland gering bleibt. AWV-Informationen, 1
[67]
H. Krcmar, 2017. eGovernment MONITOR 2017: Nutzung und Akzeptanz digitaler Verwaltungsangebote - Deutschland, Österreich und Schweiz im Vergleich. Initiative D21, fortiss GmbH.
[68]
C. Akkaya, P. Wolf and H. Krcmar. A comprehensive analysis of e-Government adoption in the German household. In Proceedings of the Wirtschaftsinformatik 2013. University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 1525-1539.
[69]
C. Akkaya. 2016. A Comprehensive Analysis on Citizen Adoption of E-Government Services: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. Dr. rer. nat. Dissertation, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)AI in Public Governance: An Expert Survey on the Impact of Data Driven Decision Making in PoliticsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4787049Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Enhancing Government Service Delivery: A Case Study of ACQAR Implementation and Lessons Learned from ChatGPT Integration in a Singapore Government AgencyProceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3657054.3657130(645-653)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
  • (2024)The Decision-Making by Citizens: Evaluating the Effects of Rule-driven and Learning-driven Automated Responders on Citizen-Initiated ContactComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108413(108413)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '19: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 2019
533 pages
ISBN:9781450372046
DOI:10.1145/3325112
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Artificial Intelligence
  2. Digital Assistants
  3. E-government
  4. G2C Citizen Services
  5. Germany
  6. Public administration

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

dg.o 2019

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)101
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)AI in Public Governance: An Expert Survey on the Impact of Data Driven Decision Making in PoliticsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4787049Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Enhancing Government Service Delivery: A Case Study of ACQAR Implementation and Lessons Learned from ChatGPT Integration in a Singapore Government AgencyProceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3657054.3657130(645-653)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
  • (2024)The Decision-Making by Citizens: Evaluating the Effects of Rule-driven and Learning-driven Automated Responders on Citizen-Initiated ContactComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108413(108413)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2022)Learnings from a Pilot Hybrid Question Answering System: CQASProceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research10.1145/3543434.3543661(437-439)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Artificial Intelligence Use in e-Government Services: A Systematic Interdisciplinary Literature ReviewFuture Data and Security Engineering. Big Data, Security and Privacy, Smart City and Industry 4.0 Applications10.1007/978-981-19-8069-5_37(547-559)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2022
  • (2022)AI Technologies for Delivering Government Services to Citizens: Benefits and ChallengesThe Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_4(38-57)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Shing: A Conversational Agent to Alert Customers of Suspected Online-payment Fraud with Empathetical Communication SkillsProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445129(1-11)Online publication date: 6-May-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media