More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Top-down, Non-inclusive and Non-egalitarian

Authors:

Nili Steinfeld,

Azi Lev-OnAuthors Info & Claims

dg.o '19: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

Pages 254 - 264

https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325249

Published: 18 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Social media are relatively new channels of communication between members of parliament and constituents. This study uses automatic analysis to produce a birds-eye-view of the content uploaded to Facebook pages of all MPs during an entire term of parliament. The findings demonstrate that the MP-Facebook sphere is non-egalitarian, in that it follows skewed distributions of post publication and engagement between MP pages; not-inclusive, in that pages of coalition members receive much more engagement in comparison to pages of members of the oppositions; and ‘top-down’, in that posts by pages receive dramatically more engagement then posts by users, suggesting MPs’ ability to set the agenda manifest in their pages, and users’ extremely limited ability to do so. These phenomena occur not just in routine periods but during emergency periods as well, when the scope of posting by users, and engagement with posts, significantly increase.

References

[1]

Ackland, R., & Gibson, R. (2013). Hyperlinks and networked communication: A comparative study of political parties online. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16 (3), 231-244.

[2]

Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Retrieved on June 19, 2018 from www.blogpulse.com/papers/2005/AdamicGlanceBlogWWW.pdf

Digital Library

[3]

Andriani, P., & McKelvey, B. (2009). From Gaussian to Paretian thinking: Causes and implications of power laws in organizations. Organization Science, 20 (6), 1053-1071.

Digital Library

[4]

Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 16 (3), 291-314.

[5]

Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

[6]

Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. science, 286 (5439), 509-512.

[7]

Bürger, T., & Ross, K. (2014). Face to Face(book): Social media, political campaigning and the unbearable lightness of being there. Political Science, 66 (1), 46-62.

[8]

Coleman, S. (2005). New mediation and direct representation: Reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. New Media & Society, 7 (2), 177-198.

[9]

Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge University Press.

[10]

ComScore, (2011) "It's a social world: Top 10 need-to-knows about social networking and where it's headed". Available at: www.comscore.com/it_is_a_social_world.

[11]

Congressional Management Foundation. (2011) Perceptions and use of social media on Capitol Hill. Washington DC.

[12]

Farrell, H., & Drezner, D. W. (2008). The power and politics of blogs. Public choice, 134 (1-2), 15-30.

[13]

Glassman, M. E., Straus, J. R., & Shogan, C. J. (2013). Social networking and constituent communications: Members’ use of Twitter and Facebook during a two-month period in the 112 th congress. In Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, CRS Report for Congress.

[14]

Global Centre for ICT in Parliament (2012). World e-Parliament Report. New York: United

[15]

Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (8), 1612-1621.

Digital Library

[16]

Grant, W. J., Moon, B., & Busby G. J. (2010). Digital dialogue? Australian politicians' use of the social network tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45 (4), 579-604.

[17]

Haleva-Amir, S. (2010). This site's aim is to maintain a useful, stable, ongoing connection with the public": On the Gap between Texts and Applications in Knesset Members' Personal Websites. Paper presented in IPP10 : Internet, Politics, Policy, University of Oxford, UK:"

[18]

Haleva-Amir, S. (2014), "Talking to themselves: Classification of Facebook's political usages and representatives' roles among Israeli members of Knesset." In Forms and Functions of Political Participation in a Digital World Frame (pp. 13-24). New York, NY: Routledge.

[19]

Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J., & Shapiro, M. (2013, February). What's congress doing on Twitter?. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 877-886). ACM.

Digital Library

[20]

Hermann, T., Lebel, Y., & Zaban, H. (2006) The Return of the State. Jerusalem: The Israeli Democracy Institute.

[21]

Hindman, M., Tsioutsiouliklis, K., & Johnson, J. A. (2003, April). Googlearchy: How a few heavily-linked sites dominate politics on the web. In annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 4, 1-33.

[22]

Hoff, J. (2004). The democratic potentials of information technology: Attitudes of European MPs towards new technology. Information Polity, 9 (1/2), 55-66.

Digital Library

[23]

Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., McGowen, S. E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., & Griffith, S. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39 (1), 1–22.

[24]

Huberman, B. A. (2001). The laws of the Web: Patterns in the ecology of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Digital Library

[25]

Larsson, A. O. & Kalsnes, B. (2014). ‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication 29 (6), 653-667.

[26]

Larsson, A. O., & Svensson, J. (2014). Politicians online: Identifying current research opportunities. First Monday, 19 (4). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/ article/view/4897

[27]

Lev-On, A. (2012). Communication, community, crisis: Mapping uses and gratifications in the contemporary media environment. New Media & Society 14 (1), 98-116.

[28]

Lev-On, A. (2018). Perceptions, uses, visual aspects, and consequences of social media campaigning: Lessons from municipal Facebook campaigning, Israel 2013. In M. Zahid Sobaci & İ. Hatipoğlu (Eds.), Sub-national democracy and politics through social media (pp. 149–168). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

[29]

Lev-On, A., & Haleva-Amir, S. (2018). Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning. New Media & Society, 20 (2), 720-739.

[30]

Lev-On, A., & Steinfeld, N. (2015). Local engagement online: Municipal Facebook pages as hubs of interaction. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 299-307.

[31]

Lev-On, A., & Uziel, V (2018). Live, visual, social, and mobile: Media ecology in emergencies and ordinary times. Online Information Review, 42 (4), 545-558.

[32]

Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2013). Online political communication strategies: MEPs, e-representation, and self-representation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10 (2), 190-207.

[33]

Livak, L., Lev-On, A., & Doron, G. (2011). MK websites and the personalization of Israeli politics. Israel Affairs, 17 (3), 445-466.

[34]

Mann, R., & Lev-On, A. (2016). Annual Report: The Media in Israel 2015: Agendas, Uses and Trends. Ariel, Israel: Institute for the Study of New Media, Politics and Society.

[35]

Manning, N. (Ed.). (2015). Political (dis)engagement: The changing nature of the 'political'. London, UK: Policy Press.

[36]

Marques, F. P. A., De Aquino, J. A., & Miola, E. (2014). Congressmen in the age of social net work site: Brazilian representatives and Twitter use. First Monday, 19(5). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5022/4084

[37]

Meyer, T. M., Haselmayer, M., & Wagner, M. (2017). Who gets into the papers? Party campaign messages and the media. British Journal of Political Science, 1-22.

[38]

Pareto, V. (1896). Course of political economy.Lausanne: Rouge Éditeur

[39]

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community.‏New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.

[40]

Ross, K., Fountaine, S., & Comrie, M. (2015). Facing up to Facebook: Politicians, publics and the social media(ted) turn in New Zealand. Media, Culture & Society, 37 (2), 251-269.

[41]

Steinfeld, N. (2016). The F-campaign: a discourse network analysis of party leaders’ campaign statements on Facebook. Israel Affairs, 22 (3-4), 743-759.

[42]

Stromer-Galley, J. (2000). Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50, 111-132.

[43]

Tenscher, J. (2014). MPs and the Internet–an empirically based typology. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20 (3), 305-320.

[44]

The Knesset (2016).

[45]

Van Santen, R., Helfer, L., & Van Aelst, P. (2015). When politics becomes news: An analysis of parliamentary questions and press coverage in three West European countries. Acta Politica, 50 (1), 45-63.

[46]

Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2013). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19 (3), 477-501.

[47]

Vissers, S., & Stolle's, D. (2014). The Internet and new modes of political participation: Online versus offline participation. Information, Communication & Society, 17 (8), 937-955.

[48]

Williamson, A. (2009). MPs online: Connecting with constituents. London: Hansard Society.

[49]

Williamson, A., & Fallon, F. (2011). Transforming the future parliament through the effective use of digital media. Parliamentary Affairs, 64 (4), 781-792.

[50]

Ynet (August 27, 2014). Operation Protective Edge in numbers. Retrieved on 17 May, 2018 from https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4564678,00.html.

[51]

Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Cited By

Yavetz G(2021)Bibi and Mr. Prime Minister: do different Facebook identities imply different messages for political leaders?Online Information Review10.1108/OIR-01-2021-000446:3(464-482)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0004
Liao HZhou ZZhou Y(2020)A Systematic Review of Social Media for Intelligent Human-Computer Interaction Research: Why Smart Social Media is Not EnoughIntelligent Human Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_48(499-510)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_48

Recommendations

MPs on Facebook: Differences between Members of Coalition and Opposition
Special Issue on Government and Social Media and Regular Papers

Social media platforms are today the main spheres in which politicians make political and personal statements, confront other public figures, and interact with the public. In the current study, the Facebook pages of all Israeli Members of Parliament (...
Coalition and opposition MPs on Facebook
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age

Social Media platforms are today the main spheres in which politicians make political and personal statements, confront other public figures and interact with the public. In the current study, the Facebook pages of all Israeli MPs were scraped and ...
Municipal Campaigns on Facebook: What influences the scope of engagement and does it win votes?
dg.o '21: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

The paper examines which variables predict engagement on Facebook pages of candidates running in municipal elections, and whether candidate Facebook activity predicts vote share as much as institutional and population-level variables. Using the Facebook ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

dg.o '19: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

June 2019

533 pages

ISBN:9781450372046

DOI:10.1145/3325112

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

dg.o 2019

dg.o 2019: 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

June 18 - 20, 2019

Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
66
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yavetz G(2021)Bibi and Mr. Prime Minister: do different Facebook identities imply different messages for political leaders?Online Information Review10.1108/OIR-01-2021-000446:3(464-482)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0004
Liao HZhou ZZhou Y(2020)A Systematic Review of Social Media for Intelligent Human-Computer Interaction Research: Why Smart Social Media is Not EnoughIntelligent Human Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_48(499-510)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-68449-5_48

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents