[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3323503.3349550acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An ergonomic evaluation method using a mobile depth sensor and pose estimation

Published: 29 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

An ergonomic evaluation is an observation of a person in order to identify musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) caused by prolonged or repeated harmful poses that a person adopts during work tasks. Nowadays, an ergonomist or other health professional perform such evaluations based on a set of posture rules and checklists, which can be subjective and thus lead to erroneous risk classifications. Moreover, this professional usually perform such evaluation in the patient work environment. In order to make those evaluations more objective and concise we propose a evaluation method using a mobile depth sensor. Different from other methods based in fixed depth sensors (e.g. Kinect), our method enable professionals easily perform it in the patient work environment. More precisely, we present an experiment that uses a smartphone from Google's Tango project and the Ovako Working Posture Analysing System (OWAS) method. To evaluate our approach, we also perform the ergonomic assessment using the Kinect sensor, a device that has a good reliability in the automated ergonomic evaluation. Both evaluations involved a set of 34 poses performed by 3 volunteers and annotated by an ergonomist. The Kinect has achieved accuracy of 57,08% on torso classification, 58,33% for arms and 25,00% for legs positions. While the approach using the mobile depth sensor has achieved 35,41% on torso classification, 93,05% for arms and 66,23% for legs positions on the same set of poses. Although the small sample, the achieved results may indicate that our mobile depth sensor approach can be as viable as methods based fixed depth sensor.

References

[1]
Bryan Buchholz, Victor Paquet, Laura Punnett, Diane Lee, and Susan Moir. 1996. PATH: a work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. Applied ergonomics 27, 3 (1996), 177--187.
[2]
Alex Burdorf, Guido Govaert, and Leo Elders. 1991. Postural load and back pain of workers in the manufacturing of prefabricated concrete elements. Ergonomics 34, 7 (1991), 909--918.
[3]
Zhe Cao, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. 2017. Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fields. In CVPR.
[4]
Zhe Cao, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. 2018. OpenPose v1.3.0. https://github.com/CMU-Perceptual-Computing-Lab/openpose/releases/tag/v1.3.0 Accessed September 18, 2019.
[5]
Edyla Maria Porto de Freitas Camelo, Douglas Matias Uchôa, Francisco Fleury Uchoa Santos-Junior, Thiago Brasileiro de Vasconcelos, and Raimunda Hermelinda Maia Macena. 2015. Use of Softwares for Posture Assessment: Integrative Review, Vol. 14. Coluna/Columna.
[6]
Jose Antonio Diego-Mas and Jorge Alcaide-Marzal. 2013. Using Kinect sensor in observational methods for assessing postures at work. Applied Ergonomics 45 (2013), 976--985.
[7]
RJ Dzeng, HH Hsueh, and CW Ho. 2017. Automated Posture Assessment for construction workers. In Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2017 40th International Convention on. IEEE, 1027--1031.
[8]
JA Engels, JA Landeweerd, and Y Kant. 1994. An OWAS-based analysis of nurses' working postures. Ergonomics 37, 5 (1994), 909--919.
[9]
Santiago Gerling Konrad, Mao Shan, Favio Masson, Stewart Worrall, and Eduardo Nebot. 2018. Pedestrian Dynamic and Kinematic Information Obtained from Vision Sensors. (06 2018).
[10]
David P Gilkey, Thomas J Keefe, Philip L Bigelow, Robin E Herron, Kirby Duvall, Jacob E Hautaluoma, John S Rosecrance, and Richard Sesek. 2007. Low back pain among residential carpenters: ergonomic evaluation using OWAS and 2D compression estimation. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 13, 3 (2007), 305--321.
[11]
Sue Hignett and Lynn McAtamney. 2000. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Applied ergonomics 31, 2 (2000), 201--205.
[12]
Moacyr Machado Cardoso Junior. 2006. Avaliação ergonômica: Revisão dos métodos para avaliação postural. Revista produção online 6, 3 (2006).
[13]
Osmo Karhu, Reino Härkönen, Pentti Sorvali, and Pentti Vepsäläinen. 1981. Observing working postures in industry: Examples of OWAS application. Applied Ergonomics.
[14]
Osmo Karhu, Pekka Kansi, and Iikka Kuorinka. 1977. Correcting Working Postures in Industry: A Practical Method for Analysis. Applied Ergonomics.
[15]
Dohyung Kee and Waldemar Karwowski. 2001. LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time. Applied Ergonomics 32, 4 (2001), 357--366.
[16]
P Kivi and M Mattila. 1991. Analysis and improvement of work postures in the building industry: application of the computerised OWAS method. Applied ergonomics 22, 1 (1991), 43--48.
[17]
Tzu-Hsien Lee and Chia-Shan Han. 2013. Analysis of working postures at a construction site using the OWAS method. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 19, 2 (2013), 245--250.
[18]
João Ademar de Andrade Lima. 2004. Bases teóricas para uma metodologia de análise ergonômica. In IV PUC-Rio Ergodesign - Congresso Internacional de Ergonomia e Usabilidade de Interfaces Humano-Tecnologia: Produtos, Programas, informação e Ambiente Construido.
[19]
Markku Mattila, Waldemar Karwowski, and Mika Vilkki. 1993. Analysis of working postures in hammering tasks on building construction sites using the computerized OWAS method. Applied ergonomics 24, 6 (1993), 405--412.
[20]
Lynn McAtamney and E Nigel Corlett. 1993. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied ergonomics 24, 2 (1993), 91--99.
[21]
Olibario Neto, Amanda Polin Pereira, Valeria Elui, and Maria da Graça C. Pimentel. 2016. Posture Monitoring via Mobile Devices: SmartVest Case Study. 55--61.
[22]
Tor-Arne Schmidt Nordmo. 2018. Arctic HARE. A Machine Learning-based System for Performance Analysis of Cross-country Skiers. Master's thesis. UiT Norges arktiske universitet.
[23]
Aye Su Phyo, Hisato Fukuda, Antony Lam, Yoshinori Kobayashi, and Yoshinori Kuno. 2018. Natural Calling Gesture Recognition in Crowded Environments. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing. Springer, 8--14.
[24]
Graham B Scott and Nicola R Lambe. 1996. Working practices in a perchery system, using the OVAKO Working posture Analysing System (OWAS). Applied Ergonomics 27, 4 (1996), 281--284.
[25]
FBF Sistemas. 2018. ErgoFellow Software 3.0. Accessed in: https://www.fbfsistemas.com/ergonomics.html.
[26]
Te-Hsiu Sun, Rong-He Lin, Fang-Chin Tien Mei-Lin Liu, and Yi-Tsong Pan. 2014. Automation Musculoskeletal Disorders Assessment using OWAS and Kinect. Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors: Part II 20 (2014), 36--43. 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics.
[27]
Chinchu Thomas. 2018. Multimodal Teaching and Learning Analytics for Classroom and Online Educational Settings. In Proceedings of the 2018 on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 542--545.
[28]
Janaine Vosniak, Eduardo da Silva Lopes, Mario Takao Inoue, and Adriano Batista. 2011. Evaluation of working postures in workers at planting and fertilizing activities in forest plantations, Vol. 58. Revista Ceres.
[29]
Jarrett Webb and James Ashley. 2012. Beginning Kinect Programming with the Microsoft Kinect SDK. Apress.
[30]
Win-OWAS. 1990. Manual software for OWAS analysis. (1990). http://home.spin.net.au/safehands/reference%20documents/software%20for%20owas%20analysis.pdf Accessed September 18, 2019.
[31]
EJ Wright and RA Haslam. 1999. Manual handling risks and controls in a soft drinks distribution centre. Applied Ergonomics 30, 4 (1999), 311--318.
[32]
Zhengyou Zhang. 2012. Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect. IEEE multimedia 19, 2 (2012), 4--10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Evaluating the Ergonomics of Surgical Residents During Laparoscopic Simulation: A Novel Computerized ApproachThe American Surgeon™10.1177/0003134821104750589:5(1622-1628)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Automatic real-time occupational posture evaluation and select corresponding ergonomic assessmentsScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-022-05812-912:1Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WebMedia '19: Proceedings of the 25th Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
October 2019
537 pages
ISBN:9781450367639
DOI:10.1145/3323503
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. OWAS
  2. augmented reality
  3. ergonomic assessment
  4. kinect
  5. pose estimation
  6. posture analysis
  7. tango project

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WebMedia '19
WebMedia '19: Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
October 29 - November 1, 2019
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 270 of 873 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Evaluating the Ergonomics of Surgical Residents During Laparoscopic Simulation: A Novel Computerized ApproachThe American Surgeon™10.1177/0003134821104750589:5(1622-1628)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Automatic real-time occupational posture evaluation and select corresponding ergonomic assessmentsScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-022-05812-912:1Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media