Article

Free access

Indirect threats to freedom and privacy: governance of the Internet and the WWW

Author:

Harry HochheiserAuthors Info & Claims

CFP '00: Proceedings of the tenth conference on Computers, freedom and privacy: challenging the assumptions

Pages 249 - 254

https://doi.org/10.1145/332186.332294

Published: 01 April 2000 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

Agre, R (1998) The Internet and Public Discourse. First Monday, 3(3), http://www.firstmonday.dk/ issues/issue3_3/agre/.]]

Google Scholar

[2]

Agre, P. (1999).Designing the New Information Services. Educom Review 34(5) http:// www. ed u cause, ed u/Jr/lib rary/h tml/e rm 9953 .h tml.]]

Google Scholar

[3]

Bradner, S. (1996) RFC 2026: The Internet Standards Process- Revision 3. http://www.ietLorg/rfc/ rfc2026.txt.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Catlett, J. (1999) Open Letter 9/13 to P3P Developers. http://www.junkbusters.com/standards.html]]

Google Scholar

[5]

Fielding, R., et al. (1997) RFC 2616: Hypertext Transfer Protocol- HTTP/1.1http://www.ietf.org/ rfc/rfc2616.txt]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Garfinkel, S. The Web's Unelected Government. Technology Review, Nov/Dec. 1998, http:// www.techreview.com/articles/nov98/garfinkel.htm.]]

Google Scholar

[7]

Hovey, R. & Bradner, S. (1996) RFC 2028" The Organizations involved in the IETF Standards Process. http://www.ietf.org/ffc/ffc2028.txt]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Huitema, C., Postel, J., & Crocker, S. (1995) RFC 1796. Not all RFCs are Standards. http:// www.ietf, org/ffc/rfc 1796.txt.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Internet Architecture Board and Internet Engineering Steering Group (1996) RFC 1984: IAB and IESG Statement on Cryptographic Technology and the Internet. http://www.ietf.org/ffc/ffc1984.txt]]

Google Scholar

[10]

IESG Secretary (1999) The IETF's position on technology to support legal intercept. h ttp://www, i e tf. o rg/mail- arc hi v e/i e tf- anno un c e/m s g05435.h tml .]]

Google Scholar

[11]

IETF Secretariat & Malkin, G. (1994). RFC 1718: The Tao of IETF- A Guide for new Attendees of the Internet Engineering Task Force http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc 1718.txt]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

Internet Society (1999) Internet Society Mission Statement. http://www.isoc.org/isoc/mission/]]

Google Scholar

[13]

Lemmey, T, Klein, S., Neumann, T. (1999) "Architecture is Policy Case Study: Cooperative Development as a Means for Standards-based Implementation for Privacy on the Internet" http:// www. eft. org/pub/Privacy/19990406_E FF_M S_P3 P_Paper/index. html.]]

Google Scholar

[14]

Lessig, L. (1998) The Architecture of Privacy http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/ architecture_priv.pdf]]

Google Scholar

[15]

Mueller, M. (1999) ICANN and Internet Governance Info 1(6), December 1999, 497-520.]]

Google Scholar

[16]

Reagle, J. & Cranor, L. (1999) The Platform for Privacy Preferences. Communications of the ACM 42(2), February 1999. pg. 39-41.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[17]

Reagle, J. (1999). Why The Internet is Good: Community Governance that Works Well. http:// cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/reagle/regulation-19990326.html.]]

Google Scholar

[18]

Resnick, P. & Miller, J. (1996) PICS: Access Controls Without Censorship. Communications of the ACM 39(10) pp. 87-93.]]

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[19]

Schoechle, T. (1999) Towards a Theory of Standards. International Center for Standards. Research. http://www.standardsresearch.org/resources.html]]

Google Scholar

[20]

Schoechle, T. (1995) The Emerging Role of Standards Bodies in the Formation of Public Policy. IEEE Standards Bearer 9(2), p 1,10.]]

Google Scholar

[21]

Slashdot (2000) Slashdot: News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://www.slashdot.org]]

Google Scholar

[22]

Smith. R. (1999) Problems with Web Anonymizing Services. http://www.tiac.net/users/smiths/ anon/anonprob.htm]]

Google Scholar

[23]

World Wide Web Consortium (1999) World Wide Web Consortium Process Document. http:// www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Process- 19991111/]]

Google Scholar

[24]

World Wide Web Consortium (1999) How Do We Join? http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Prospectus/ Joining?]]

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Yusif SHafeez-Baig AAnachanser C(2023)Internet governance and cyber-security: a systematic literature reviewInformation Security Journal: A Global Perspective10.1080/19393555.2023.226860833:2(158-171)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2023.2268608
DeNardis L(2015)The Internet Design Tension between Surveillance and SecurityIEEE Annals of the History of Computing10.1109/MAHC.2015.2937:2(72-83)Online publication date: Apr-2015
https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2015.29
Bartow A(undefined)Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy, Propertization, and GenderSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.374101
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.374101

Index Terms

Indirect threats to freedom and privacy: governance of the Internet and the WWW

Recommendations

Indirect content privacy surveys: measuring privacy without asking about it
SOUPS '11: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security

The strong emotional reaction elicited by privacy issues is well documented (e.g., [12, 8]). The emotional aspect of privacy makes it difficult to evaluate privacy concern, and directly asking about a privacy issue may result in an emotional reaction ...
Freedom of Privacy: Anonymous Data Collection with Respondent-Defined Privacy Protection

The massive amount of sensitive survey data about individuals that agencies collect and share through the Internet is causing a great deal of privacy concerns. These concerns may discourage individuals from revealing their sensitive information. ...
Snowden's revelations led to more informed and shocked German citizens
Special Issue on Ethicomp

This study investigates the attitudes towards and social impacts of Edward Snowden's revelations in Germany through a questionnaire survey with German youngsters as part of the worldwide cross-cultural analyses. However due to Snowden's revelations a ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

CFP '00: Proceedings of the tenth conference on Computers, freedom and privacy: challenging the assumptions

April 2000

351 pages

ISBN:1581132565

DOI:10.1145/332186

Chairman:
Lorrie Faith Cranor
AT&T Labs-Research, Florham Park, NJ

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CFP00

Sponsor:

CFP00: The 10th Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy

April 4 - 7, 2000

Ontario, Toronto, Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
1,381
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)16
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Yusif SHafeez-Baig AAnachanser C(2023)Internet governance and cyber-security: a systematic literature reviewInformation Security Journal: A Global Perspective10.1080/19393555.2023.226860833:2(158-171)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2023.2268608
DeNardis L(2015)The Internet Design Tension between Surveillance and SecurityIEEE Annals of the History of Computing10.1109/MAHC.2015.2937:2(72-83)Online publication date: Apr-2015
https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2015.29
Bartow A(undefined)Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy, Propertization, and GenderSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.374101
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.374101

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Indirect content privacy surveys: measuring privacy without asking about it

Freedom of Privacy: Anonymous Data Collection with Respondent-Defined Privacy Protection

Snowden's revelations led to more informed and shocked German citizens