More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Teachers' Disappointment: Theoretical Perspective on the Inclusion of Ambivalent Emotions in Human-Robot Interactions in Education

Authors:

Anna Dobrosovestnova,

Glenda HannibalAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Pages 471 - 480

https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374816

Published: 09 March 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Following affective turn in cognitive science, recent decades have witnessed an increasing interest toward the role of emotions in education. Ample evidence suggests that learners and teachers experience a variety of emotions, ranging from joy and pride to anger and frustration. However, when it comes to the design of affective behavior in robotic systems for education purposes, the emphasis has been predominantly on communication of positive emotions. While we recognize that positive emotions are fundamental to successful learning, in this paper we wish to make the case for the consideration of ambivalent emotions for the design of social robots for tutoring. To ground this proposal, we focus on the emotion of teachers' disappointment. First, we discuss under which conditions communicated teachers' disappointment, while it may be experienced as emotionally ambivalent by teachers and students, functions as an affiliating pedagogical strategy. We proceed to sketch out the methodological suggestions we consider relevant for future studies of communicated disappointment in human-robot interactions within learning contexts. We conclude with critical reflections about the ethics of responsible designs of such studies.

References

[1]

Patr'icia Alves-Oliveira, Pedro Sequeira, and Ana Paiva. 2016. The role that an educational robot plays. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 817--822.

Digital Library

[2]

Ivon Arroyo, Carole Beal, Tom Murray, Rena Walles, and Beverly P Woolf. 2004. Web-based intelligent multimedia tutoring for high stakes achievement tests. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 468--477.

[3]

James R Averill. 1980. A constructivist view of emotion. Theories of emotion . Elsevier, 305--339.

[4]

Albert Bandura. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Vol. 1986 (1986).

[5]

Eva Susann Becker, Thomas Goetz, Vinzenz Morger, and John Ranellucci. 2014. The importance of teachers' emotions and instructional behavior for their students' emotions--An experience sampling analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 43 (2014), 15--26.

[6]

Tony Belpaeme, James Kennedy, Aditi Ramachandran, Brian Scassellati, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2018. Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, Vol. 3, 21 (2018), eaat5954.

[7]

Tanya N Beran, Alejandro Ramirez-Serrano, Roman Kuzyk, Meghann Fior, and Sarah Nugent. 2011. Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child--robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 69, 7--8 (2011), 539--550.

Digital Library

[8]

Lykke Brogaard Bertel and Glenda Hannibal. 2016. Tema 2: The NAO robot as a Persuasive Educational and Entertainment Robot (PEER)--a case study on children's articulation, categorization and interaction with a social robot for learning. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), Vol. 8, 14 (2016).

[9]

Lykke Brogaard Bertel, Dorte Malig Rasmussen, and Ellen Christiansen. 2013. Robots for real: Developing a participatory design framework for implementing educational robots in real-world learning environments. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 437--444.

[10]

Elin A Björling and Emma Rose. 2019. Participatory research principles in human-centered design: engaging teens in the co-design of a social robot. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, Vol. 3, 1 (2019), 8.

[11]

Cynthia Breazeal. 2002. Designing Sociable Robots .MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

[12]

Cynthia Breazeal. 2003. Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 42, 3 (2003), 167 -- 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921--8890(02)00373--1

[13]

Brené Brown. 2015. Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead .Penguin.

[14]

Judith Butler. 2002. Gender trouble .routledge.

[15]

Catherine C Chase, Doris B Chin, Marily A Oppezzo, and Daniel L Schwartz. 2009. Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 18, 4 (2009), 334--352.

[16]

Eunji Cho, Kyunghwa Lee, Shara Cherniak, and Sung Eun Jung. 2017. Heterogeneous associations of second-graders' learning in robotics class. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, Vol. 22, 3 (2017), 465--483.

[17]

Mark Coeckelbergh. 2011. Are emotional robots deceptive? IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, Vol. 3, 4 (2011), 388--393.

Digital Library

[18]

Mark Coeckelbergh. 2013. Human being@ risk: Enhancement, technology, and the evaluation of vulnerability transformations . Vol. 12. Springer Science & Business Media.

[19]

Mark Coeckelbergh. 2016. Care robots and the future of ICT-mediated elderly care: a response to doom scenarios. AI & society, Vol. 31, 4 (2016), 455--462.

[20]

Filipa Correia, Patr'icia Alves-Oliveira, Nuno Maia, Tiago Ribeiro, Sofia Petisca, Francisco S Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2016. Just follow the suit! trust in human-robot interactions during card game playing. In 2016 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 507--512.

Digital Library

[21]

Dionne I Cross and Ji Y Hong. 2012. An ecological examination of teachers' emotions in the school context. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 28, 7 (2012), 957--967.

[22]

Oliver Damm, Karoline Dreier, Frank Hegel, Petra Jaecks, Prisca Stenneken, Britta Wrede, and Martina Hielscher-Fastabend. 2011. Communicating emotions in robotics: Towards a model of emotional alignment. In Proceedings of the workshop" Expectations in intuitive interaction" on the 6th HRI International conference on Human-Robot Interaction .

[23]

Kerstin Dautenhahn. 1998. The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop. Applied Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 12, 7--8 (1998), 573--617. https://doi.org/10.1080/088395198117550

[24]

Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2018. Some brief thoughts on the past and future of human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Vol. 7, 1 (2018), 4.

[25]

Maartje De Graaf, Somaya Ben Allouch, and Jan Van Dijk. 2017. Why do they refuse to use my robot?: Reasons for non-use derived from a long-term home study. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 224--233.

Digital Library

[26]

Pierre Dillenbourg. 2016. The evolution of research on digital education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 26, 2 (2016), 544--560.

[27]

Sidney D'mello and Art Graesser. 2012. AutoTutor and affective AutoTutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), Vol. 2, 4 (2012), 23.

[28]

Sidney D'Mello and Art Graesser. 2012. Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 22, 2 (2012), 145--157.

[29]

Paul Ekman. 1999. Basic emotions. Handbook of cognition and emotion (1999), 45--60.

[30]

Stephanie Embgen, Matthias Luber, Christian Becker-Asano, Marco Ragni, Vanessa Evers, and Kai O Arras. 2012. Robot-specific social cues in emotional body language. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 1019--1025.

[31]

Martha Albertson Fineman. 2010. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Transcending the Boundaries of Law . Routledge-Cavendish, 177--191.

[32]

Carlton J Fong, Diane L Schallert, Kyle M Williams, Zachary H Williamson, Jayce R Warner, Shengjie Lin, and Young Won Kim. 2018. When feedback signals failure but offers hope for improvement: A process model of constructive criticism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, Vol. 30 (2018), 42--53.

[33]

Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots: Concepts, Design, and Applications. Robotics and autonomous systems, Vol. 42, 3--4 (2003), 143--166.

[34]

Anne C Frenzel, Thomas Goetz, Elizabeth J Stephens, and Barbara Jacob. 2009. Antecedents and effects of teachers' emotional experiences: An integrated perspective and empirical test. Advances in teacher emotion research . Springer, 129--151.

[35]

Nico H Frijda. 1986. The emotions .Cambridge University Press.

[36]

Nico H Frijda. 1987. Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and emotion, Vol. 1, 2 (1987), 115--143.

[37]

Nico H Frijda, Peter Kuipers, and Elisabeth Ter Schure. 1989. Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 57, 2 (1989), 212.

[38]

Goren Gordon, Samuel Spaulding, Jacqueline Kory Westlund, Jin Joo Lee, Luke Plummer, Marayna Martinez, Madhurima Das, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2016. Affective personalization of a social robot tutor for children's second language skills. In Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence .

Digital Library

[39]

Paulo A Graziano, Rachael D Reavis, Susan P Keane, and Susan D Calkins. 2007. The role of emotion regulation in children's early academic success. Journal of school psychology, Vol. 45, 1 (2007), 3--19.

[40]

Glenda Hannibal. 2014. 'Dynamic'Categorization and Rationalized Ascription: A Study on NAO. In Sociable Robots and the Future of Social Relations - Proceedings of Robo-Philosophy 2014, (Eds.) J. Seibt, R. Hakli, M. Nørskov, Publication Series: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 273, Aarhus, Denmark: IOS Press . 343--347.

[41]

Shlomo Hareli and Brian Parkinson. 2008. What's social about social emotions? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 38, 2 (2008), 131--156.

[42]

Andy Hargreaves. 1998. The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and teacher education (1998).

[43]

Andy Hargreaves. 2001. Emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers college record, Vol. 103, 6 (2001), 1056--1080.

[44]

Sue Ellen Henry. 2013. Vulnerability and emotional risk in an educational philosophy. Emotion, Space and Society, Vol. 8 (2013), 11--17.

[45]

Arlie Russell Hochschild. 2012. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling .Univ of California Press.

[46]

Aidan Jones, Ginevra Castellano, and Susan Bull. 2014. Investigating the effect of a robotic tutor on learner perception of skill based feedback. In International conference on social robotics. Springer, 186--195.

[47]

Aidan Jones, Dennis Küster, Christina Anne Basedow, Patricia Alves-Oliveira, Sofia Serholt, Helen Hastie, Lee J Corrigan, Wolmet Barendregt, Arvid Kappas, Ana Paiva, et almbox. 2015. Empathic robotic tutors for personalised learning: A multidisciplinary approach. In International conference on social robotics. Springer, 285--295.

[48]

Malte Jung and Pamela Hinds. 2018. Robots in the wild: A time for more robust theories of human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Vol. 7, 1 (2018), 2.

[49]

Malte F Jung. 2017. Affective grounding in human-robot interaction. In 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI. IEEE, 263--273.

Digital Library

[50]

Daphne Karreman, Geke Ludden, and Vanessa Evers. 2015. Visiting cultural heritage with a tour guide robot: A user evaluation study in-the-wild. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 317--326.

[51]

Csaba Kertész and Markku Turunen. 2017. What Can We Learn from the Long-Term Users of a Social Robot?. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 657--665.

[52]

S. Kitayama and H.R. Markus. 1994. The social roles and functions of emotions. Emotion and culture. Empirical studies of mutual influence. American Psychological Association, 51--87.

[53]

Jonathan Klein, Youngme Moon, and Rosalind W Picard. 2002. This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with computers, Vol. 14, 2 (2002), 119--140.

[54]

Kheng Lee Koay, Dag Sverre Syrdal, Michael L Walters, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2007. Living with robots: Investigating the habituation effect in participants' preferences during a longitudinal human-robot interaction study. In RO-MAN 2007-The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 564--569.

[55]

Richard D Lane and Lynn Nadel. 2002. Cognitive neuroscience of emotion .Oxford University Press.

[56]

Richard S Lazarus. 1991. Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American psychologist, Vol. 46, 8 (1991), 819.

[57]

Hee Rin Lee, Selma vS abanović, Wan-Ling Chang, David Hakken, Shinichi Nagata, Jen Piatt, and Casey Bennett. 2017. Steps toward participatory design of social robots: mutual learning with older adults with depression. In 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI. IEEE, 244--253.

Digital Library

[58]

Bas Levering. 2000. Disappointment in teacher-student relationships. Journal of curriculum studies, Vol. 32, 1 (2000), 65--74.

[59]

Michael Lewis, Katia Sycara, and Phillip Walker. 2018. The role of trust in human-robot interaction. Foundations of trusted autonomy . Springer, Cham, 135--159.

[60]

Martin L Maehr. 2008. Culture and achievement motivation. International journal of psychology, Vol. 43, 5 (2008), 917--918.

[61]

Maya B Mathur and David B Reichling. 2009. An uncanny game of trust: social trustworthiness of robots inferred from subtle anthropomorphic facial cues. In 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 313--314.

Digital Library

[62]

Carolyn McLeod. 2015. Trust. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy fall 2015 ed.), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

[63]

Debra K Meyer and Julianne C Turner. 2002. Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational psychologist, Vol. 37, 2 (2002), 107--114.

[64]

Omar Mubin, Catherine J Stevens, Suleman Shahid, Abdullah Al Mahmud, and Jian-Jie Dong. 2013. A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, Vol. 1, 209-0015 (2013), 13.

[65]

Eunil Park, Ki Joon Kim, and Angel P Del Pobil. 2011. The effects of a robot instructor's positive vs. negative feedbacks on attraction and acceptance towards the robot in classroom. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 135--141.

Digital Library

[66]

Reinhard Pekrun. 1992. The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, Vol. 41, 4 (1992), 359--376.

[67]

Reinhard Pekrun and Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia. 2014. Introduction to emotions in education. International handbook of emotions in education. Routledge, 11--20.

[68]

Simona Prosen, H Smrtnik Vitulić, and O Poljvs ak-vS kraban. 2013. Observing teachers' emotional expression in their interaction with students. The new educational review, Vol. 31, 1 (2013), 75--85.

[69]

Raquel Ros, Marco Nalin, Rachel Wood, Paul Baxter, Rosemarijn Looije, Yannis Demiris, Tony Belpaeme, Alessio Giusti, and Clara Pozzi. 2011. Child-robot interaction in the wild: advice to the aspiring experimenter. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces. ACM, 335--342.

Digital Library

[70]

Maha Salem, Gabriella Lakatos, Farshid Amirabdollahian, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2015. Towards safe and trustworthy social robots: ethical challenges and practical issues. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 584--593.

[71]

Tamie Salter, Iain Werry, and Francois Michaud. 2008. Going into the wild in child--robot interaction studies: issues in social robotic development. Intelligent Service Robotics, Vol. 1, 2 (2008), 93--108.

[72]

PA Schutz, JY Hong, DI Cross, and JN Osbon. 2006. Reflections on investigating emotions among social-historical contexts. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 18 (2006), 343--360.

[73]

Markus Schwenk and Kai O Arras. 2014. R2-D2 reloaded: a flexible sound synthesis system for sonic human-robot interaction design. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 161--167.

[74]

Johanna Seibt, Malene Flensborg Damholdt, and Christina Vestergaard. 2018. Five Principles of Integrative Social Robotics. Robophilosophy/TRANSOR . 28--42.

[75]

Rachel L Severson and Stephanie M Carlson. 2010. Behaving as or behaving as if? Children's conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category. Neural Networks, Vol. 23, 8--9 (2010), 1099--1103.

Digital Library

[76]

Amanda Sharkey and Noel Sharkey. 2012. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and information technology, Vol. 14, 1 (2012), 27--40.

[77]

Elaine Short, Katelyn Swift-Spong, Jillian Greczek, Aditi Ramachandran, Alexandru Litoiu, Elena Corina Grigore, David Feil-Seifer, Samuel Shuster, Jin Joo Lee, Shaobo Huang, et almbox. 2014. How to train your dragonbot: Socially assistive robots for teaching children about nutrition through play. In The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE, 924--929.

[78]

Rosemary E Sutton and Karl F Wheatley. 2003. Teachers' emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational psychology review, Vol. 15, 4 (2003), 327--358.

[79]

Andrea Thomaz, Guy Hoffman, Maya Cakmak, et almbox. 2016. Computational human-robot interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Robotics, Vol. 4, 2--3 (2016), 105--223.

Digital Library

[80]

Scott Titsworth, Timothy P McKenna, Joseph P Mazer, and Margaret M Quinlan. 2013. The bright side of emotion in the classroom: Do teachers' behaviors predict students' enjoyment, hope, and pride? Communication Education, Vol. 62, 2 (2013), 191--209.

[81]

Julianne C Turner, Debra K Meyer, and Amy Schweinle. 2003. The importance of emotion in theories of motivation: Empirical, methodological, and theoretical considerations from a goal theory perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 39, 4--5 (2003), 375--393.

[82]

Jonathan H Turner and Jan E Stets. 2005. The sociology of emotions .Cambridge University Press.

[83]

Wilco W Van Dijk and Marcel Zeelenberg. 2002 a. Investigating the appraisal patterns of regret and disappointment. Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 26, 4 (2002), 321--331.

[84]

Wilco W Van Dijk and Marcel Zeelenberg. 2002 b. What do we talk about when we talk about disappointment? Distinguishing outcome-related disappointment from person-related disappointment. Cognition & Emotion, Vol. 16, 6 (2002), 787--807.

[85]

Gerben A Van Kleef and Paul AM Van Lange. 2008. What other's disappointment may do to selfish people: Emotion and social value orientation in a negotiation context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 34, 8 (2008), 1084--1095.

[86]

Anouk van Maris, Hagen Lehmann, Lorenzo Natale, and Beata Grzyb. 2017. The influence of a robot's embodiment on trust: A longitudinal study. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction . ACM, 313--314.

Digital Library

[87]

Weiyi Wang, Georgios Athanasopoulos, Selma Yilmazyildiz, Georgios Patsis, Valentin Enescu, Hichem Sahli, Werner Verhelst, Antoine Hiolle, Matthew Lewis, and Lola Ca namero. 2014. Natural emotion elicitation for emotion modeling in child-robot interactions. In WOCCI . 51--56.

[88]

J Kory Westlund, Cynthia Breazeal, and A Story. 2015. Deception, secrets, children, and robots: What's acceptable. In Workshop on The Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction, held in conjunction with the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction .

[89]

CA Wong and SM Dornbusch. 2000. Adolescent engagement in school and problem behaviors: The role of perceived teacher caring. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA .

[90]

Maarten JJ Wubben, David De Cremer, and Eric Van Dijk. 2009. How emotion communication guides reciprocity: Establishing cooperation through disappointment and anger. Journal of experimental social psychology, Vol. 45, 4 (2009), 987--990.

[91]

Marcel Zeelenberg, Wilco W Van Dijk, Antony SR Manstead, and Joop vanr de Pligt. 2000. On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment. Cognition & Emotion, Vol. 14, 4 (2000), 521--541.

[92]

Michalinos Zembylas. 2016. Making sense of the complex entanglement between emotion and pedagogy: Contributions of the affective turn. Cultural Studies of Science Education, Vol. 11, 3 (2016), 539--550.

Cited By

Sun XLiao W(2025)“Lying flat” not involuting: An ethnographic case study on teacher disappointment in Chinese rural contextTeaching and Teacher Education10.1016/j.tate.2024.104918155(104918)Online publication date: Mar-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104918
Mouta ATorrecilla-Sánchez EPinto-Llorente A(2024)Design of a future scenarios toolkit for an ethical implementation of artificial intelligence in educationEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12229-y29:9(10473-10498)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10639-023-12229-y
Mouta APinto-Llorente ATorrecilla-Sánchez E(2023)Uncovering Blind Spots in Education Ethics: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence in EducationInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/s40593-023-00384-934:3(1166-1205)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Teachers' Disappointment: Theoretical Perspective on the Inclusion of Ambivalent Emotions in Human-Robot Interactions in Education
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design theory, concepts and paradigms

Recommendations

The Essence of Powerful Teaching

Empowering learners and using powerful techniques are prominent elements in the discourse of adult and vocational education. But what constitutes the elements of what might be considered as powerful teaching? This paper begins by examining the way ...
Conceptions or Misconceptions? Primary Teachers‘ Perceptions and Use of Computers in the Classroom

Why should computers be used in primary schools and what roles have they come to play in the classroom? This paper describes an investigation into UK primary teachers‘ perceptions and use of computers in the classroom. The responses collected illustrate ...
Strategies for Enhancing and Evaluating Interactivity in Web-Based Learning and Teaching

Interactivity is often discussed in constructivist approaches to education, which enable the student to evolve, understand, or construct new ideas from existing concepts. Constructivist approaches rely on active participation in the learning situation. ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 2020

690 pages

ISBN:9781450367462

DOI:10.1145/3319502

General Chairs:
Tony Belpaeme
Ghent University, Belgium
,
James Young
University of Manitoba, Canada
,
Program Chairs:
Hatice Gunes
University of Cambridge, UK
,
Laurel Riek
UC San Diego, USA

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
IEEE-RAS: Robotics and Automation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 March 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

HRI '20

Sponsor:

SIGAI
SIGCHI
IEEE-RAS

HRI '20: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 23 - 26, 2020

Cambridge, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
358
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)26
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sun XLiao W(2025)“Lying flat” not involuting: An ethnographic case study on teacher disappointment in Chinese rural contextTeaching and Teacher Education10.1016/j.tate.2024.104918155(104918)Online publication date: Mar-2025
Mouta ATorrecilla-Sánchez EPinto-Llorente A(2024)Design of a future scenarios toolkit for an ethical implementation of artificial intelligence in educationEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12229-y29:9(10473-10498)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
Mouta APinto-Llorente ATorrecilla-Sánchez E(2023)Uncovering Blind Spots in Education Ethics: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence in EducationInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/s40593-023-00384-934:3(1166-1205)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
Elbeleidy SMott TWilliams TSakamoto DWeiss AHiatt LShiomi M(2022)Practical, Ethical, and OverlookedProceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3523760.3523836(577-587)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
Nunes Vilaza GDoherty KMcCashin DCoyle DBardram JBarry M(2022)A Scoping Review of Ethics Across SIGCHIProceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3532106.3533511(137-154)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
Elbeleidy SMott TWilliams T(2022)Practical, Ethical, and Overlooked: Teleoperated Socially Assistive Robots in the Quest for Autonomy2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889573(577-587)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
Tian LOviatt SMuszynski MChamberlain BHealey JSano A(2022)Applied Affective ComputingundefinedOnline publication date: 25-Jan-2022

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents