Portray of student preference on e-learning complex course based on gender
Pages 23 - 27
Abstract
Portray of gender preferences on e-learning complex course can be figured out by way of knowing on how human memory processes information. Aim of this paper is comparison connected knowing and separated knowing correlation coefficient to identify student preference. Methodology is compilation cognitive load theory and attitude toward thinking learning survey (ATTLS) of Moodle survey plugin aids in analyzing evidence. The portrayal can be made a direction that e-learning method must specific to either sex even person by person.
References
[1]
Kaunang, S.,T.,G., Usagawa, T. (2017). A new approach for delivering e-learning complex courses in Indonesia. International journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning. Vol.7, no.2, pp.132--145.
[2]
Chorng-Shyong, O., Jung-Yu, L. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationship among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computer in human behavior, vol.22., pp.816--829.
[3]
Cuadrado-Garcia, M., Ruiz-Molina, M., Montoro-Pons, J., D. (2010). Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe. Procedia social and behavioral sciences. Vol.2., pp.367--371. Elsevier.
[4]
Gonzales-Gomes, F., Guardiola, J., Rodriguez, O.,M., Alonso, M., A., M. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computer and education, vol.58, pp.283--290. Elsevier.
[5]
Thayalan, X., Shanthi, A., Paridi, T. (2012). Gender difference in social presence experienced in e-learning activities. The3rd international conference on e-learning (ICEL2011), Procedia - social and behavioral sciences, vol.67, pp.580--589. Elsevier.
[6]
Zaidi, Z., F. (2010). Gender differences in human brain: A review. The open anatomy journal, vol.2., pp.37--55., Benthem Open.
[7]
Ruigrok, A., N., V., Salimi_Khorsidi, G., Meg_Chuan, L., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M.,V., Tait, R.,J., Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. Vol.39, pp.34--50. Elsevier.
[8]
Marrs, H., Benton, S., L. (2008). Relationships between separate and connected knowing and approaches to learning. Sex Roles, vol.60, pp.57--66., Springer Science.
[9]
Galotti, K., M., Clinchy, B., M., Ainsworth, K., H., Lavin, B., Mansfield, A., F. (1999), A new way of assessing ways of knowing: The attitudes toward thinking and learning survey (ATTLS), Journal Sex Roles, vol.40, nos 9/10.
[10]
Moodle.org. Survey_setting. (2017). https://docs.moodle.org/22/en/Survey_settings
[11]
Dougiamas, M., Taylor, P., C. (2002). Interpretive analysis of an internet-based course constructed using a new courseware tool called Moodle. https://dougiamas.com/archives/herdsa2002/
[12]
Kaunang, S., G., Mangindaan, G., Paturusi, S., D., E., Chisaki, Y., Usagawa, T. (2016). Design and implementation of programming on electrical power system as an e-learning subject course at University of Sam Ratulangi Indonesia. IEICE Technical report, educational technology, vol.115., pp.33--37, Kagawa. http://i-scover.ieice.org/iscover/page/ARTICLE_TECH_79605
[13]
Kaunang, S., T.,G., Mangindaan, G., Sambul, A., Sugiarso, B., Paturusi, S., D., E., Usagawa, T. (2016). Student perception of virtual programming lab on e-learning class at University of Sam Ratulangi. Proceedings of 2016 International conference on information, communication technology and system (ICTS), pp.244--248.
[14]
Thiebaut, D. (2015). Automatic evaluation of computer program using Moodle's virtual programming lab (VPL) plug-in. Journal of computer science in colleges. Vol. 30, no. 6., pp.146--151.
[15]
Zaiontz, C. (2017). Basic Concept of correlation. http://www.real-statistics.com/correlation/basic-concepts-correlation/
[16]
Halpern, D., F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Psychology press, Taylor & Francis group, fourth edition.
[17]
van Merrienboer, J., J., G., Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. ETR&D., Vol.53., No.3., pp.5--13, ISSN.1042-1629.
Index Terms
- Portray of student preference on e-learning complex course based on gender
Recommendations
Optimal self-explanation prompt design in dynamic multi-representational learning environments
Self-explanation prompts are considered to be an important form of scaffolding in the comprehension of complex multimedia materials. However, there is little theoretical understanding to date of self-explaining prompt formats tailored to different ...
Learning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps
In initial skill acquisition in well-structured domains, example-based learning typically leads to better learning outcomes than learning by doing. Cognitive Load Theory explains this result by the worked-example effect: Example-based learning prevents ...
Student learning contribution through e-learning dimension at course "management information systems"
E-learning offers great opportunities for education quality improvement in both - the classical teaching combined with e-learning, and distance learning. Zagreb School of Economics & Management (ZSEM) is one of the few higher education institutions in ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
January 2019
469 pages
Copyright © 2019 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 10 January 2019
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
IC4E 2019
IC4E 2019: 2019 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning
January 10 - 13, 2019
Tokyo, Japan
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 86Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)2
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in