Multiobjective Trajectory Planning of a 6D Robot based on Multiobjective Meta Heuristic Search
Pages 352 - 356
Abstract
In this work, several established multiobjective meta-heuristics (MOMHs) were employed for solving multiobjective time-jerk robot trajectory planning. The optimisation problem is posed to minimise travelling time and jerk subject to velocity, acceleration and jerk constraints. The design variables include joint position and velocity at intermediate positions (passing position), and moving time from the initial position to the intermediate position and from the intermediate position to the final position. Several MOMHs are used to solve the trajectory multiobjective optimisation problem of robot manipulators while their performances are investigated. Based on this study, the best MOMH for multiobjective time-jerk robot trajectory planning is found while the results obtained from such a method are set as the baseline for further study of robot trajectory planning multiobjective optimisation.
References
[1]
Tangpattanakul, P., and Artrit, P. 2009. Minimum-time trajectory of robot manipulator using Harmony Search algorithm. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON 2009), pp. 354--7.
[2]
Garg, D. P., and Kumar, M. 2002. Optimization techniques applied to multiple manipulators for path planning and torque minimization. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 15, (3--4), 241--252.
[3]
Piazzi, A., and Visioli, A. 2000. Global minimum-jerk trajectory planning of robot manipulators. IEEE T. Ind. Electron. 47, (1), 140--149.
[4]
Mac, T. T., Copot, C., Tran, D. T., and Keyser, R. D. 2016. Heuristic approaches in robot path planning: A survey. Robot. Auton. Syst. 86, 13--28.
[5]
Savsani, P., Jhala, R. L., and Savsani, J. V. 2013. Optimized trajectory planning of a robotic arm using teaching learning based optimization (TLBO) and artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization techniques. In Proceedings of IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon 2013), pp. 381--386.
[6]
Wichapong, K., Bureerat, S., and Pholdee, N. 2018. Trajectory planning of a 6D robot based on Meta Heuristic algorithms. MATEC web of conference, 220, 06004.
[7]
Pholdee, N., and Bureerat, S. 2013. Hybridisation of real-code population-based incremental learning and differential evolution for multiobjective design of trusses. Inform. Sciences. 223, 136--152.
[8]
Aittokoski, T., and Miettinen, K. 2010. Efficient evolutionary approach to approximate the Pareto-optimal set in multiobjective optimization, UPS-EMOA. Optim. Meth. Soft. 25, (6), 841--858.
[9]
Qingfu, Z., and Hui, L. 2007. MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition. IEEE T. Evolut. Comput. 11, (6), 712--731.
[10]
Zhang, X., Tian, Y. and Jin, Y. 2015. A Knee Point-Driven Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization. IEEE T. Evolut. Comput. 19, (6), 761--776.
[11]
Wang, H., Jiao, L., and Yao, X. 2015. Two_Arch2: An improved two-archive algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE T. Evolut. Comput. 19, (4), 524--541.
[12]
Wang, R., R. C. Purshouse, and P. J. Fleming. 2013. Preference-Inspired Coevolutionary Algorithms for Many-Objective Optimization. IEEE T. Evolut. Comput. 17 (4):474--494.
[13]
Babu, B. V., and Jehan, M. M. L. 2003. Differential evolution for multi-objective optimization. In Proceedings of The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '03), 8--12 Dec. 2003. pp. 2696--2703 Vol.4.
[14]
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE T. Evolut. Comput. 6, (2), 182--197.
[15]
Pires, E. J. Solteiro, P. B. de Moura Oliveira, and J. A. Tenreiro Machado. 2007. Manipulator trajectory planning using a MOEA. Applied Soft Computing 7 (3):659--667.
[16]
Huang, J., Hu, P., Wu, K., and Zeng, M. 2018. Optimal time-jerk trajectory planning for industrial robots. Mech. Mach. Theory. 121, 530--544.
[17]
Mac, T. T., Copot, C., Tran, D. T., and Keyser, R. D. 2017. A hierarchical global path planning approach for mobile robots based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Appl. Soft. Comput. 59, 68--76.
[18]
Xu, Z., Li, S., Chen, Q., and Hou, B. 2015. MOPSO Based Multi-objective Trajectory Planning for Robot Manipulators. In Proceedings of 20152nd International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering, 24--26 April 2015, pp. 824--828.
[19]
Pholdee, N., Bureerat, S., Jaroenapibal, P., and Radpukdee, Th. 2017. Many-Objective Optimisation of Trusses Through Meta-Heuristics Lect. Notes. Comput. Sc. 10261, 143--152.
[20]
Pholdee, N., and Bureerat, S. 2014. Comparative performance of meta-heuristic algorithms for mass minimisation of trusses with dynamic constraints. Adv. Eng. Softw. 75, (0), 1--13.
Index Terms
- Multiobjective Trajectory Planning of a 6D Robot based on Multiobjective Meta Heuristic Search
Recommendations
Self-adaptive MRPBIL-DE for 6D robot multiobjective trajectory planning
Highlights- Efficient self-adaptive multiobjective meta-heuristic (MOMH) algorithm.
- Use of ...
AbstractThis work presents self-adaptive multiobjective real-code population-based incremental learning hybridised with differential evolution (MRPBIL-DE) for solving a 6D robot trajectory planning multiobjective optimisation problem. The ...
A preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: the weighting achievement scalarizing function genetic algorithm
When solving multiobjective optimization problems, preference-based evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) algorithms introduce preference information into an evolutionary algorithm in order to focus the search for objective vectors towards the ...
Hybrid sampling strategy-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for process planning and scheduling problem
Process planning and scheduling (PPS) is an important and practical topic but very intractable problem in manufacturing systems. Many research studies used multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) to solve such problems; however, they cannot achieve ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2018
372 pages
ISBN:9781450365536
DOI:10.1145/3301326
Copyright © 2018 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 14 December 2018
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
ICNCC 2018
ICNCC 2018: 2018 VII International Conference on Network, Communication and Computing
December 14 - 16, 2018
Taipei City, Taiwan
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 65Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)4
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in