[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3397271.3401051acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs

Published: 25 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

There has been growing attention on fairness considerations recently, especially in the context of intelligent decision making systems. For example, explainable recommendation systems may suffer from both explanation bias and performance disparity. We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendations due to their insufficient training data, and that their recommendations may be biased by the training records of active users due to the nature of collaborative filtering, which leads to unfair treatment by the system. In this paper, we analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups. Empirically, we find that such performance gap is caused by the disparity of data distribution, specifically the knowledge graph path distribution in this work. We propose a fairness constrained approach via heuristic re-ranking to mitigate this unfairness problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs. We experiment on several real-world datasets with state-of-the-art knowledge graph-based explainable recommendation algorithms. The promising results show that our algorithm is not only able to provide high-quality explainable recommendations, but also reduces the recommendation unfairness in several aspects.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3397271.3401051.mp4)
Presentation video

References

[1]
Qingyao Ai, Vahid Azizi, Xu Chen, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2018. Learning Heterogeneous Knowledge Base Embeddings for Explainable Recommendation. Algorithms (2018).
[2]
Solon Barocas and Andrew D Selbst. 2016. Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review 104 (2016), 671.
[3]
Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Tulsee Doshi, Hai Tao Qian, Li Hao Wei, Yi Wu, Lukasz Heldt, Zhe Zhao, Lichan Hong, Ed Huai hsin Chi, and Cristos Goodrow. 2019. Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisons. In ACM SIGKDD. 2212--2220.
[4]
Asia J. Biega, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Gerhard Weikum. 2018. Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankings. In ACM SIGIR. 405--414.
[5]
Robin D. Burke. 2017. Multisided Fairness for Recommendation. ArXiv abs/1707.00093 (2017).
[6]
L. Elisa Celis, Sayash Kapoor, Farnood Salehi, and Nisheeth K. Vishnoi. 2019. Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework. In ACM Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 160--169.
[7]
Chong Chen, Min Zhang, Weizhi Ma, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2020. Jointly Non-Sampling Learning for Knowledge Graph Enhanced Recommendation. In SIGIR.
[8]
Jiahao Chen. 2018. Fair lending needs explainable models for responsible recommendation. ArXiv abs/1809.04684 (2018).
[9]
Jiahao Chen, Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao, Geoffry Svacha, and Madeleine Udell. 2019. Fairness Under Unawareness: Assessing Disparity When Protected Class Is Unobserved. In FAT*.
[10]
Xu Chen, Hanxiong Chen, Hongteng Xu, Yongfeng Zhang, Yixin Cao, Zheng Qin, and Hongyuan Zha. 2019. Personalized Fashion Recommendation with Visual Explanations based on Multimodal Attention Network: Towards Visually Explainable Recommendation. In SIGIR. 765--774.
[11]
Xu Chen, Hongteng Xu, Yongfeng Zhang, Jiaxi Tang, Yixin Cao, Zheng Qin, and Hongyuan Zha. 2018. Sequential recommendation with user memory networks. In ACM WSDM. 108--116.
[12]
Xu Chen, Yongfeng Zhang, and Zheng Qin. 2019. Dynamic Explainable Recommendation based on Neural Attentive Models. In AAAI.
[13]
Sam Corbett-Davies, Emma Pierson, Avi Feller, Sharad Goel, and Aziz Huq. 2017. Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. In SIGKDD.
[14]
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012. Fairness Through Awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference.
[15]
Cynthia Dwork and Christina Ilvento. 2018. Group fairness under composition. In FAT*.
[16]
Michael D Ekstrand, Mucun Tian, Ion Madrazo Azpiazu, Jennifer D Ekstrand, Oghenemaro Anuyah, David McNeill, and Maria Soledad Pera. 2018. All the cool kids, how do they fit in?: Popularity and demographic biases in recommender evaluation and effectiveness. In FAT*.
[17]
Golnoosh Farnadi, Pigi Kouki, Spencer K. Thompson, Sriram Srinivasan, and Lise Getoor. 2018. A Fairness-aware Hybrid Recommender System. at the 2nd FATRec Workshop on Responsible Recommendation held at RecSys (2018).
[18]
Michael Feldman, Sorelle A Friedler, John Moeller, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2015. Certifying and removing disparate impact. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD.
[19]
Jingyue Gao, Xiting Wang, Yasha Wang, and Xing Xie. 2019. Explainable recommendation through attentive multi-view learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI.
[20]
Yingqiang Ge, Shuyuan Xu, Shuchang Liu, Zuohui Fu, Fei Sun, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2020. Learning Personalized Risk Preferences for Recommendation. SIGIR (2020).
[21]
Sahin Cem Geyik, Stuart Ambler, and Krishnaram Kenthapadi. 2020. FairnessAware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search. In SIGKDD.
[22]
Corrado Gini. 1921. Measurement of inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal 31, 121 (1921), 124--126.
[23]
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nathan Srebro. 2016. Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning. In Proceedings of the 30th NeurIPS (Barcelona, Spain).
[24]
Ruining He and Julian McAuley. 2016. Ups and downs: Modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering. In WWW.
[25]
Binbin Hu, Chuan Shi, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Philip S Yu. 2018. Leveraging meta-path based context for top-n recommendation with a neural co-attention model. In ACM SIGKDD.
[26]
Jon M. Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan. 2017. Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores. In ITCS.
[27]
Matt J. Kusner, Joshua R. Loftus, Chris Russell, and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counterfactual Fairness. In Proceedings of the 31st NeurIPS.
[28]
Preethi Lahoti, Gerhard Weikum, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2018. iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Making. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01059 (2018).
[29]
Xiao Lin, Min Zhang, Yongfeng Zhang, Zhaoquan Gu, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2017. Fairness-aware group recommendation with pareto-efficiency. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 107--115.
[30]
Rishabh Mehrotra, James McInerney, Hugues Bouchard, Mounia Lalmas, and Fernando Diaz. 2018. Towards a Fair Marketplace: Counterfactual Evaluation of the Trade-off Between Relevance, Fairness & Satisfaction in Recommendation Systems. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM CIKM (Torino, Italy). New York, NY, USA, 2243--2251.
[31]
Dino Pedreshi, Salvatore Ruggieri, and Franco Turini. 2008. Discrimination-aware Data Mining. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD (Las Vegas, Nevada, USA). 560--568.
[32]
Zhaochun Ren, Shangsong Liang, Piji Li, Shuaiqiang Wang, and Maarten de Rijke. 2017. Social collaborative viewpoint regression with explainable recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM WSDM.
[33]
Tobias Schnabel, Adith Swaminathan, Ashudeep Singh, Navin Chandak, and Thorsten Joachims. 2016. Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluation. In ICML.
[34]
Edward H Simpson. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 4148 (1949).
[35]
Ashudeep Singh and Thorsten Joachims. 2018. Fairness of Exposure in Rankings. In ACM SIGIR. 2219--2228.
[36]
Mengting Wan, Jianmo Ni, Rishabh Misra, and Julian J. McAuley. 2020. Addressing Marketing Bias in Product Recommendations. In WSDM.
[37]
Hongwei Wang, Fuzheng Zhang, Jialin Wang, Miao Zhao, Wenjie Li, Xing Xie, and Minyi Guo. 2018. Ripplenet: Propagating user preferences on the knowledge graph for recommender systems. In CIKM. 417--426.
[38]
Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Yixin Cao, Meng Liu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. KGAT: Knowledge Graph Attention Network for Recommendation. In KDD.
[39]
Yongkai Wu, Lu Zhang, and Xintao Wu. 2018. On Discrimination Discovery and Removal in Ranked Data Using Causal Graph. In SIGKDD. 2536--2544.
[40]
Yikun Xian, Zuohui Fu, Qiaoying Huang, Shan Muthukrishnan, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2020. Neural-Symbolic Reasoning over Knowledge Graph for Multi-Stage Explainable Recommendation. AAAI DLGMA Workshop (2020).
[41]
Yikun Xian, Zuohui Fu, S. Muthukrishnan, Gerard de Melo, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2019. Reinforcement knowledge graph reasoning for explainable recommendation. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR (Paris, France).
[42]
Longqi Yang, Yin Cui, Yuan Xuan, Chenyang Wang, Serge Belongie, and Deborah Estrin. 2018. Unbiased offline recommender evaluation for missing-not-atrandom implicit feedback. In RecSys. 279--287.
[43]
Meike Zehlike, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo, Sara Hajian, Mohamed Megahed, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2017. FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on CIKM (Singapore, Singapore). 1569--1578.
[44]
Wei Zhang, Quan Yuan, Jiawei Han, and Jianyong Wang. 2016. Collaborative Multi-Level Embedding Learning from Reviews for Rating Prediction. In IJCAI.
[45]
Yongfeng Zhang and Xu Chen. 2020. Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectives. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 14, 1 (2020), 1--101. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000066
[46]
Yongfeng Zhang, Guokun Lai, Min Zhang, Yi Zhang, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2014. Explicit Factor Models for Explainable Recommendation Based on Phraselevel Sentiment Analysis. In ACM SIGIR (Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia). 83--92.
[47]
Jieyu Zhao, Tianlu Wang, Mark Yatskar, Vicente Ordonez, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2017. Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraints. In EMNLP.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Explainable Session-Based Recommendation via Path ReasoningIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.348632637:1(278-290)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)Explaining Recommendation Fairness from a User/Item PerspectiveACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/369887743:1(1-30)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Leveraging User History with Transformers for News Clicking: The DArgk ApproachProceedings of the Recommender Systems Challenge 202410.1145/3687151.3687161(48-52)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR '20: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
July 2020
2548 pages
ISBN:9781450380164
DOI:10.1145/3397271
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 July 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. explainable recommendation
  2. fairness
  3. knowledge graphs

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGIR '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)359
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Explainable Session-Based Recommendation via Path ReasoningIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.348632637:1(278-290)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)Explaining Recommendation Fairness from a User/Item PerspectiveACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/369887743:1(1-30)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Leveraging User History with Transformers for News Clicking: The DArgk ApproachProceedings of the Recommender Systems Challenge 202410.1145/3687151.3687161(48-52)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Fairness and Diversity in Recommender Systems: A SurveyACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/366492816:1(1-28)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2024)XLORE 3: A Large-Scale Multilingual Knowledge Graph from Heterogeneous Wiki Knowledge ResourcesACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/366052142:6(1-47)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2024
  • (2024)A Survey on Trustworthy Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36528913:2(1-68)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Distributional Fairness-aware RecommendationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/365285442:5(1-28)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Counterfactual Explanation for Fairness in RecommendationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/364367042:4(1-30)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Mitigating Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems—A Comparative Analysis of Discrete Choice ModelsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36412913:2(1-37)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2024
  • (2024)FairCRS: Towards User-oriented Fairness in Conversational Recommendation SystemsProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688150(126-136)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media