[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3394885.3431517acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaspdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Facilitating the Efficiency of Secure File Data and Metadata Deletion on SMR-based Ext4 File System

Published: 29 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The efficiency of secure deletion is highly dependent on the data layout of underlying storage devices. In particular, owing to the sequential-write constraint of the emerging Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) technology, an improper data layout could lead to serious write amplification and hinder the performance of secure deletion. The performance degradation of secure deletion on SMR drives is further aggravated with the need to securely erase the file system metadata of deleted files due to the small-size nature of file system metadata. Such an observation motivates us to propose a secure-deletion and SMR-aware space allocation (SSSA) strategy to facilitate the process of securely erasing both the deleted files and their metadata simultaneously. The proposed strategy is integrated within the widely-used extended file system 4 (ext4) and is evaluated through a series of experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. The evaluation results show that the proposed strategy can reduce the secure deletion latency by 91.3% on average when compared with naive SMR-based ext4 file system.

References

[1]
Abutalib Aghayev and Peter Desnoyers. 2015. Skylight---A Window on Shingled Disk Operation. In 13th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST 15). Santa Clara, CA, 135--149.
[2]
Abutalib Aghayev, Theodore Ts'o, Garth Gibson, and Peter Desnoyers. 2017. Evolving ext4 for shingled disks. In 15th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies FAST 17). 105--120.
[3]
Steven Bauer and Nissanka Priyantha. 2001. Secure Data Deletion for Linux File Systems.
[4]
Daniel Campello, Hector Lopez, Ricardo Koller, Raju Rangaswami, and Luis Useche. 2015. FIU Filesystem SysCall Traces. http://iotta.snia.org/tracetypes/1.
[5]
Yuval Cassuto, Marco A. A. Sanvido, Cyril Guyot, David R. Hall, and Zvonimir Z. Bandic. 2010. Indirection systems for shingled-recording disk drives. In 2010 IEEE 26th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST). 1--14.
[6]
Shuo-Han Chen, Ming-Chang Yang, Yuan-Hao Chang, and Chun-Feng Wu. 2019. Enabling File-Oriented Fast Secure Deletion on Shingled Magnetic Recording Drives. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Design Automation Conference 2019 (Las Vegas, NV, USA) (DAC '19). New York, NY, USA, Article 103, 6 pages.
[7]
Dave Chinner. 2015. SMR Layout Optimization for XFS. https://xfs.org/images/f/f6/Xfs-smr-structure-0.2.pdf.
[8]
Peter Gutmann. 1996. Secure deletion of data from magnetic and solid-state memory. In Proceedings of the Sixth USENIX Security Symposium, San Jose, CA, Vol. 14. 77--89.
[9]
Chao Jin, Wei-Ya Xi, Zhi-Yong Ching, Feng Huo, and Chun-Teck Lim. 2014. HiSMRfs: A high performance file system for shingled storage array. In 2014 30th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST). 1--6.
[10]
Adrian Palmer. 2015. SMRFFS-EXT4---SMR Friendly File System. https://github.com/Seagate/SMR_FS-EXT4.
[11]
Joel Reardon, Srdjan Capkun, and David Basin. 2012. Data Node Encrypted File System: Efficient Secure Deletion for Flash Memory. In Presented as part of the 21st USENIX Security Symposium. USENIX, Bellevue, WA, 333--348.
[12]
Shred-it. 2020. Destruction Service for Hard Disk. [Online accessed: 2020--06--07].
[13]
Roger Wood, Mason Williams, Aleksandar Kavcic, and Jim Miles. 2009. The Feasibility of Magnetic Recording at 10 Terabits Per Square Inch on Conventional Media. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 45, 2 (2009), 917--923.
[14]
Ming-Chang Yang, Yuan-Hao Chang, Fenggang Wu, Tei-Wei Kuo, and David H. C. Du. 2019. On Improving the Write Responsiveness for Host-Aware SMR Drives. IEEE Trans. Comput. 68, 1 (2019), 111--124.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)ZoneTrace: Zone Monitoring Tool for F2FS on ZNS SSDsACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/365617229:5(1-15)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Is Garbage Collection Overhead Gone? Case study of F2FS on ZNS SSDsProceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Storage and File Systems10.1145/3599691.3603409(102-108)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • (2023)FSD: File-related Secure Deletion to Prolong the Lifetime of Solid-State Drives2023 IEEE 12th Non-Volatile Memory Systems and Applications Symposium (NVMSA)10.1109/NVMSA58981.2023.00015(19-24)Online publication date: Aug-2023
  1. Facilitating the Efficiency of Secure File Data and Metadata Deletion on SMR-based Ext4 File System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASPDAC '21: Proceedings of the 26th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
    January 2021
    930 pages
    ISBN:9781450379991
    DOI:10.1145/3394885
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ext4
    2. metadata
    3. secure deletion
    4. shingled magnetic recording

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ASPDAC '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ASPDAC '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 111 of 368 submissions, 30%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 466 of 1,454 submissions, 32%

    Upcoming Conference

    ASPDAC '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)ZoneTrace: Zone Monitoring Tool for F2FS on ZNS SSDsACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems10.1145/365617229:5(1-15)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2024
    • (2023)Is Garbage Collection Overhead Gone? Case study of F2FS on ZNS SSDsProceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Storage and File Systems10.1145/3599691.3603409(102-108)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
    • (2023)FSD: File-related Secure Deletion to Prolong the Lifetime of Solid-State Drives2023 IEEE 12th Non-Volatile Memory Systems and Applications Symposium (NVMSA)10.1109/NVMSA58981.2023.00015(19-24)Online publication date: Aug-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media