abstract

Automating Continuous Planning in SAFe

Authors:

Darius Foo,

Jonah Dela Cruz,

Subashree Sekar,

Asankhaya SharmaAuthors Info & Claims

ICSEW'20: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops

Page 504

https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3391536

Published: 25 September 2020 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a popular realisation of the agile methodology for large organisations. It is widely adopted but challenging to implement. We describe a new tool which automates aspects of the SAFe PI Planning process to enable continuous planning and facilitate collaboration between remote teams.

References

[1]

[n.d.]. State of Agile Survey. https://www.stateofagile.com. Accessed: 2019-12-26.

Google Scholar

[2]

Mashal Alqudah and Rozilawati Razali. 2016. A review of scaling agile methods in large software development. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 6, 6 (2016), 828--837.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[3]

Barry Boehm and Richard Turner. 2005. Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations. IEEE software 22, 5 (2005), 30--39.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Breno Bernard Nicolau De França, Rachel Vital Simões, Valéria Silva, and Guilherme Horta Travassos. 2017. Escaping from the time box towards continuous planning: an industrial experience. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering (RCoSE). IEEE, 43--49.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

Martin Gebser, Benjamin Kaufmann, Roland Kaminski, Max Ostrowski, Torsten Schaub, and Marius Schneider. 2011. Potassco: The Potsdam answer set solving collection. Ai Communications 24, 2 (2011), 107--124.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Deepti Mishra and Alok Mishra. 2011. Complex software project development: agile methods adoption. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 23, 8 (2011), 549--564.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Maria Paasivaara and Casper Lassenius. 2016. Scaling scrum in a large globally distributed organization: A case study. In 2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE). IEEE, 74--83.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

Abheeshta Putta, Maria Paasivaara, and Casper Lassenius. 2018. Benefits and challenges of adopting the scaled agile framework (safe): Preliminary results from a multivocal literature review. In International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Springer, 334--351.

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Putta APaasivaara MLassenius C(2023)SAFe transformation in a large financial corporationEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-023-10420-w29:1Online publication date: 16-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10420-w
Dugdale JMoghaddam MMuccini H(2021)IoT4EmergencyACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3437479.343748946:1(33-36)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437479.3437489
Marijan DZimmermann THam MSelic B(2021)Bridging Software Engineering Research and Industrial PracticeACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3437479.343748846:1(30-32)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437479.3437488
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Automating Continuous Planning in SAFe
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Project and people management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development process management

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Defining Continuous Planning Through a Multiple-Case Study
PROFES 2015: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement - Volume 9459

New and innovative approaches that support continuous development and planning throughout organisations are needed. Continuity is required in all levels of an organisation, from business strategy and planning to software development and operational ...
Epsilon-safe planning
UAI'94: Proceedings of the Tenth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence

We introduce an approach to high-level conditional planning we call ε-safe planning. This probabilistic approach commits us to planning to meet some specified goal witch a probability of success of at least 1 - ε for some user-supplied ε. We describe ...
Classical Planning Model‐Based Approach to Automating Construction Planning on Earthwork Projects
Abstract
Extensive research in automated operation planning has led to significant advances in the area of robotics. Theories and methods resulting from robotics have yet to be adapted to enable automated project planning in construction engineering. ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ICSEW'20: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops

June 2020

831 pages

ISBN:9781450379632

DOI:10.1145/3387940

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 September 2020

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Abstract
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

ICSE '20

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT
KIISE

ICSE '20: 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering

June 27 - July 19, 2020

Seoul, Republic of Korea

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
78
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)11
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Putta APaasivaara MLassenius C(2023)SAFe transformation in a large financial corporationEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-023-10420-w29:1Online publication date: 16-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10420-w
Dugdale JMoghaddam MMuccini H(2021)IoT4EmergencyACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3437479.343748946:1(33-36)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437479.3437489
Marijan DZimmermann THam MSelic B(2021)Bridging Software Engineering Research and Industrial PracticeACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3437479.343748846:1(30-32)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437479.3437488
Konersmann MFitzgerald BGoedicke MHolmström Olsson HBosch JKrusche S(2021)Rapid Continuous Software Engineering - State of the Practice and Open Research QuestionsACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3437479.343748646:1(25-27)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437479.3437486
Shihab EWagner SAurélio Gerosa M(2021)Summary of the 2nd International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE 2020)ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3437479.343748446:1(20-22)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437479.3437484
Soldani J(2021)Pains and Gains of Peer-Reviewing in Software Engineering (4)ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3437479.343748046:1(8-8)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3437479.3437480

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Defining Continuous Planning Through a Multiple-Case Study

Epsilon-safe planning

Classical Planning Model‐Based Approach to Automating Construction Planning on Earthwork Projects