[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3382734.3405718acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Sleeping is Efficient: MIS in O(1)-rounds Node-averaged Awake Complexity

Published: 31 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Maximal Independent Set (MIS) is one of the fundamental problems in distributed computing. The round (time) complexity of distributed MIS has traditionally focused on the worst-case time for all nodes to finish. The best-known (randomized) MIS algorithms take O(log n) worst-case rounds on general graphs (where n is the number of nodes). Breaking the O(log n) worst-case bound has been a longstanding open problem, while currently the best-known lower bound is [EQUATION] rounds.
Motivated by the goal to reduce total energy consumption in energy-constrained networks such as sensor and ad hoc wireless networks, we take an alternative approach to measuring performance. We focus on minimizing the total (or equivalently, the average) time for all nodes to finish. It is not clear whether the currently best-known algorithms yield constant-round (or even o(log n)) node-averaged round complexity for MIS in general graphs. We posit the sleeping model, a generalization of the traditional model, that allows nodes to enter either "sleep" or "waking" states at any round. While waking state corresponds to the default state in the traditional model, in sleeping state a node is "offline", i.e., it does not send or receive messages (and messages sent to it are dropped as well) and does not incur any time, communication, or local computation cost. Hence, in this model, only rounds in which a node is awake are counted and we are interested in minimizing the average as well as the worst-case number of rounds a node spends in the awake state, besides the traditional worst-case round complexity (i.e., the rounds for all nodes to finish including both the awake and sleeping rounds).
Our main result is that we show that MIS can be solved in (expected) O(1) rounds under node-averaged awake complexity measure in the sleeping model. In particular, we present a randomized distributed algorithm for MIS that has expected O(1)-rounds node-averaged awake complexity and, with high probability1 has O(log n)-rounds worst-case awake complexity and O(log3.41 n)-rounds worst-case complexity.
Our work is a step towards understanding the node-averaged complexity of MIS both in the traditional and sleeping models, as well as designing energy-efficient distributed algorithms for energy-constrained networks.

References

[1]
Yehuda Afek, Noga Alon, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Alejandro Cornejo, Bernhard Haeupler, and Fabian Kuhn. 2013. Beeping a maximal independent set. Distributed Computing 26, 4 (2013), 195--208.
[2]
Noga Alon, László Babai, and Alon Itai. 1986. A fast and simple randomized parallel algorithm for the maximal independent set problem. Journal of Algorithms 7, 4 (1986), 567--583.
[3]
Baruch Awerbuch, Andrew V. Goldberg, Michael Luby, and Serge A. Plotkin. 1989. Network decomposition and locality in distributed computation (FOCS). 364--369.
[4]
Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Juho Hirvonen, Dennis Olivetti, Mikaël Rabie, and Jukka Suomela. 2019. Lower Bounds for Maximal Matchings and Maximal Independent Sets (FOCS). 481--497.
[5]
Leonid Barenboim, Michael Elkin, Seth Pettie, and Johannes Schneider. 2016. The Locality of Distributed Symmetry Breaking. Journal of the ACM 63, 3, Article Article 20 (June 2016), 45 pages.
[6]
Leonid Barenboim and Yaniv Tzur. 2019. Distributed Symmetry-Breaking with Improved Vertex-Averaged Complexity (ICDCN). New York, NY, USA, 31--40.
[7]
Guy E. Blelloch, Jeremy T. Fineman, and Julian Shun. 2012. Greedy Sequential Maximal Independent Set and Matching Are Parallel on Average (SPAA). 308--317.
[8]
Don Coppersmith, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Martin Tompa. 1989. Parallel graph algorithms that are efficient on average. Information and Computation 81, 3 (1989), 318--333.
[9]
Laura Marie Feeney and Martin Nilsson. 2001. Investigating the energy consumption of a wireless network interface in an ad hoc networking environment (IEEE INFOCOM), Vol. 3. 1548--1557 vol.3.
[10]
Laurent Feuilloley. 2020. How long it takes for an ordinary node with an ordinary id to output? Theoretical Computer Science 811 (2020), 42--55.
[11]
Manuela Fischer and Andreas Noever. 2018. Tight Analysis of Parallel Randomized Greedy MIS (SODA). USA, 2152--2160.
[12]
Mohsen Ghaffari. 2016. An Improved Distributed Algorithm for Maximal Independent Set (SODA). USA, 270--277.
[13]
Mohsen Ghaffari. 2019. Distributed Maximal Independent Set Using Small Messages (SODA). USA, 805--820.
[14]
Richard M. Karp and Avi Wigderson. 1985. A Fast Parallel Algorithm for the Maximal Independent Set Problem. Journal of the ACM 32, 4 (October 1985), 762--773.
[15]
Maleq Khan, Gopal Pandurangan, and V. S. Anil Kumar. 2009. Distributed Algorithms for Constructing Approximate Minimum Spanning Trees in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 20, 1 (January 2009), 124--139.
[16]
Valerie King, Cynthia A. Phillips, Jared Saia, and Maxwell Young. 2011. Sleeping on the Job: Energy-Efficient and Robust Broadcast for Radio Networks. Algorithmica 61, 3 (2011), 518--554.
[17]
Fabian Kuhn, Thomas Moscibroda, and Roger Wattenhofer. 2016. Local Computation: Lower and Upper Bounds. Journal of the ACM 63, 2, Article Article 17 (March 2016), 44 pages.
[18]
Michael Luby. 1986. A Simple Parallel Algorithm for the Maximal Independent Set Problem. SIAM J. Comput. 15, 4 (1986), 1036--1053.
[19]
Michael Luby. 1993. Removing randomness in parallel computation without a processor penalty. J. Comput. System Sci. 47, 2 (1993), 250--286.
[20]
Michael Mitzenmacher and Eli Upfal. 2017. Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom. http://www.cambridge.org/9781107154889
[21]
Chebiyyam Siva Ram Murthy and Balakrishnan Manoj. 2004. Ad Hoc Wireless Networks: Architectures and Protocols. Prentice Hall PTR, USA.
[22]
Shreyas Pai, Gopal Pandurangan, Sriram V. Pemmaraju, Talal Riaz, and Peter Robinson. 2017. Symmetry Breaking in the Congest Model: Time- and Message-efficient Algorithms for Ruling Sets (DISC). 38:1--38:16.
[23]
Alessandro Panconesi and Aravind Srinivasan. 1992. Improved Distributed Algorithms for Coloring and Network Decomposition Problems (STOC). 581--592.
[24]
Gopal Pandurangan. [n.d.]. Distributed Network Algorithms. https://sites.google.com/site/gopalpandurangan/dna
[25]
David Peleg. 2000. Distributed Computing: A Locality-sensitive Approach. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
[26]
Václav Rozhon and Mohsen Ghaffari. 2020. Polylogarithmic-Time Deterministic Network Decomposition and Distributed Derandomization (STOC).
[27]
Qin Wang, Mark Hempstead, and Woodward Yang. 2006. A Realistic Power Consumption Model for Wireless Sensor Network Devices (SECON), Vol. 1. 286--295.
[28]
Ou Yang and Wendi Heinzelman. 2013. An Adaptive Sensor Sleeping Solution Based on Sleeping Multipath Routing and Duty-Cycled MAC Protocols. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 10, 1, Article Article 10 (December 2013), 30 pages.
[29]
Rong Zheng and Robin Kravets. 2005. On-demand power management for ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks 3, 1 (2005), 51--68.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Near-Optimal Low-Energy Deterministic Distributed SSSP with Ramifications on Congestion and APSPProceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3662158.3662812(401-411)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Awake Complexity of Distributed Minimum Spanning TreeStructural Information and Communication Complexity10.1007/978-3-031-60603-8_3(45-63)Online publication date: 23-May-2024
  • (2023)Near-Optimal Time–Energy Tradeoffs for Deterministic Leader ElectionACM Transactions on Algorithms10.1145/361442919:4(1-23)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Sleeping is Efficient: MIS in O(1)-rounds Node-averaged Awake Complexity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PODC '20: Proceedings of the 39th Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
    July 2020
    539 pages
    ISBN:9781450375825
    DOI:10.1145/3382734
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. MIS
    2. awake complexity
    3. energy-efficiency
    4. energy-efficient algorithm
    5. maximal independent set
    6. node-averaged round complexity
    7. resource-efficient algorithm
    8. sleeping model

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    PODC '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 740 of 2,477 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)138
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Near-Optimal Low-Energy Deterministic Distributed SSSP with Ramifications on Congestion and APSPProceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3662158.3662812(401-411)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Awake Complexity of Distributed Minimum Spanning TreeStructural Information and Communication Complexity10.1007/978-3-031-60603-8_3(45-63)Online publication date: 23-May-2024
    • (2023)Near-Optimal Time–Energy Tradeoffs for Deterministic Leader ElectionACM Transactions on Algorithms10.1145/361442919:4(1-23)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Distributed MIS with Low Energy and Time ComplexitiesProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3583668.3594587(146-156)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Distributed MIS in O(log log n) Awake ComplexityProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3583668.3594574(135-145)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Node and edge averaged complexities of local graph problemsDistributed Computing10.1007/s00446-023-00453-136:4(451-473)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Energy-Efficient Distributed Algorithms for Synchronous NetworksStructural Information and Communication Complexity10.1007/978-3-031-32733-9_21(482-501)Online publication date: 25-May-2023
    • (2023)The Energy Complexity of Diameter and Minimum Cut Computation in Bounded-Genus NetworksStructural Information and Communication Complexity10.1007/978-3-031-32733-9_12(262-296)Online publication date: 25-May-2023
    • (2022)Brief Announcement: Distributed MST Computation in the Sleeping Model: Awake-Optimal Algorithms and Lower BoundsProceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3519270.3538459(51-53)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2022
    • (2022)Node and Edge Averaged Complexities of Local Graph ProblemsProceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3519270.3538419(4-14)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media