More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Enhancing the Feature Retrieval Process with Scoping and Tool Support: PAxSPL_v2

Authors:

Luciano Marchezan,

João Carbonell,

Elder Rodrigues,

Maicon Bernardino,

Fábio Paulo Basso,

Wesley K. G. AssunçãoAuthors Info & Claims

SPLC '20: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B

Pages 29 - 36

https://doi.org/10.1145/3382026.3425767

Published: 27 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Software Product Lines (SPLs) are commonly adopted with an extractive approach, by performing a reengineering process in legacy systems, when dealing with variability and reuse became challenging. As a starting activity of the process, the legacy systems are analyzed to retrieve, categorize, and group their features in terms of commonality and variability. Due to the importance of this feature retrieving, we proposed the Prepare, Assemble, and Execute framework for SPL reengineering (PAxSPL). PAxSPL aims at guiding users to customize the feature retrieval for their scenario. In an initial evaluation of the PAxSPL in a real-world scenario, we could observe the need for including scoping activities and implementing a tool to make the framework more adoptable in practice. In this paper, we describe how we performed these improvements. We performed the evolution of PAxSPL by including SPL scoping concepts and activities into our framework as well as developing a supporting tool. We also conducted a pilot study to evaluate how PAxSPL allows instantiating a scenario where the SPL reengineering were conducted. The results show that all artifacts, activities, and techniques from the scenario could be properly represented. However, we also identified a potential limitation during the assembly of techniques regarding parallel activities. The main contribution is PAxSPL_v2 that makes the framework more adherent to industries performing the reengineering of legacy systems into SPLs.

References

[1]

M. Acher, A. Cleve, P. Collet, P. Merle, L. Duchien, and P. Lahire. 2013. Extraction and evolution of architectural variability models in plugin-based systems. Software & Systems Modeling 13, 4 (2013), 1367--1394.

Digital Library

[2]

Mathieu Acher, Anthony Cleve, Gilles Perrouin, Patrick Heymans, Charles Vanbeneden, Philippe Collet, and Philippe Lahire. 2012. On Extracting Feature Models from Product Descriptions. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems (Leipzig, Germany) (VaMoS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45--54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2110147.2110153

Digital Library

[3]

Hamad I. Alsawalqah, Sungwon Kang, and Jihyun Lee. 2014. A method to optimize the scope of a software product platform based on end-user features. Journal of Systems and Software 98 (2014), 79--106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.034

Digital Library

[4]

W. Assunção, R. Lopez-Herrejon, L. Linsbauer, S. Vergilio, and A. Egyed. 2017. Reengineering legacy applications into software product lines: a systematic mapping. Empirical Software Engineering 22, 6 (2017), 1--45.

Digital Library

[5]

Colin Atkinson, Joachim Bayer, and Dirk Muthig. 2000. Component-Based Product Line Development: The KobrA Approach. Springer US, Boston, MA, 289--309. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4339-8_16

[6]

Guillaume Bécan, Mathieu Acher, Benoit Baudry, and Sana Ben Nasr. 2013. Breathing Ontological Knowledge Into Feature Model Management. Technical Report RT-0441. 15 pages. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00874867

[7]

Paul Clements and Linda Northrop. 2001. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.

[8]

J. deBaud and K. Schmid. 1999. A systematic approach to derive the scope of software product lines. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering (IEEE Cat. No.99CB37002). 34--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/302405.302409

Digital Library

[9]

H. Eyal-Salman, D. Seriai, and C. Dony. 2013. Feature-to-code traceability in a collection of software variants: Combining formal concept analysis and information retrieval. In 14th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration. IEEE, 209--216.

[10]

Stefan Fischer, Lukas Linsbauer, Roberto Erick Lopez-Herrejon, and Alexander Egyed. 2014. Enhancing clone-and-own with systematic reuse for developing software variants. In Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 391--400.

Digital Library

[11]

K. C. Kang, S. G. Cohen, J. A. Hess, W. E. Novak, and A. S. Peterson. 1990. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report. Carnegie-Mellon University Software Engineering Institute.

[12]

Charles W. Krueger. 1992. Software Reuse. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 24, 2 (June 1992), 131--183. https://doi.org/10.1145/130844.130856

Digital Library

[13]

Miguel A Laguna and Yania Crespo. 2013. A systematic mapping study on software product line evolution: From legacy system reengineering to product line refactoring. Science of Computer Programming 78, 8 (2013), 1010--1034.

Digital Library

[14]

Luciano Marchezan, Elder Macedo Rodrigues, Maicon Bernardino, and Fábio Paulo Basso. 2019. PAxSPL: A feature retrieval process for software product line reengineering. Software: Practice and Experience 49, 8 (2019), 1278--1306. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2707

[15]

Jabier Martinez, Wesley K. G. Assunção, and Tewfik Ziadi. 2017. ESPLA: A Catalog of Extractive SPL Adoption Case Studies. In Proceedings of the 21st International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B (Sevilla, Spain) (SPLC '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 38--41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3109729.3109748

Digital Library

[16]

Jabier Martinez, Tewfik Ziadi, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Jacques Klein, and Yves Le Traon. 2015. Bottom-up Adoption of Software Product Lines: A Generic and Extensible Approach. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line (Nashville, Tennessee) (SPLC '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 101--110.

Digital Library

[17]

Muhammad Asim Noor, Paul Grünbacher, and Christopher Hoyer. 2008. A Collaborative Method for Reuse Potential Assessment in Reengineering-Based Product Line Adoption. In Balancing Agility and Formalism in Software Engineering, Bertrand Meyer, Jerzy R. Nawrocki, and Bartosz Walter (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 69--83.

[18]

Juliana Alves Pereira, Kattiana Constantino, and Eduardo Figueiredo. 2015. A systematic literature review of software product line management tools. In International Conference on Software Reuse. Springer, 73--89.

[19]

K. Pohl, G. Böckle, and F. van Der Linden. 2005. Software product line engineering: foundations, principles and techniques. Springer Science & Business Media.

[20]

P. Runeson and M. Höst. 2009. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical software engineering 14, 2 (2009), 131.

[21]

Klaus Schmid. 2002. A Comprehensive Product Line Scoping Approach and Its Validation. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering (Orlando, Florida) (ICSE '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 593--603.

Digital Library

[22]

F. Van der Linden, K. Schmid, and E. Rommes. 2007. Software product lines in action: the best industrial practice in product line engineering. Springer Science & Business Media.

[23]

Karina Villela, Jörg Dörr, and Isabel John. 2010. Evaluation of a Method for Proactively Managing the Evolving Scope of a Software Product Line. In Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, Roel Wieringa and Anne Persson (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 113--127.

[24]

C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, MC. Ohlsson, and R Björn. 2012. Experimentation in Software Engineering (2012th ed.). Springer. 236 pages.

Cited By

Marchezan LAssunção WCarbonell JRodrigues EBernardino MBasso F(2021)SPLReePlan - Automated Support for Software Product Line Reengineering PlanningProceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures, and Reuse10.1145/3483899.3483902(1-10)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3483899.3483902
Marchezan LRodrigues ECarbonell JBernardino MBasso FAssunção W(2012)PAxSPL: A Framework for Aiding SPL Reengineering PlanningHandbook of Re-Engineering Software Intensive Systems into Software Product Lines10.1007/978-3-031-11686-5_13(319-353)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2012
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11686-5_13

Index Terms

Enhancing the Feature Retrieval Process with Scoping and Tool Support: PAxSPL_v2
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development techniques
      1. Reusability
        Software product lines

Recommendations

SPLReePlan - Automated Support for Software Product Line Reengineering Planning
SBCARS '21: Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures, and Reuse

The extractive adoption of Software Product Lines (SPL) relies on the reuse of the already developed systems, employing a reengineering process. However, due to the diversity of options found in the daily practice of SPL development, rigorous planning ...
VML* – a family of languages for variability management in software product lines
SLE'09: Proceedings of the Second international conference on Software Language Engineering

Managing variability is a challenging issue in software-product-line engineering. A key part of variability management is the ability to express explicitly the relationship between variability models (expressing the variability in the problem space, for ...
REVE 2018: 6th international workshop on reverse variability engineering
SPLC '18: Proceedings of the 22nd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume 1

Software Product Line (SPL) migration remains a challenging endeavour. From organizational issues to purely technical challenges, there is a wide range of barriers that complicates SPL adoption. The workshop REverse Variability Engineering (REVE) aims ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SPLC '20: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B

October 2020

139 pages

ISBN:9781450375702

DOI:10.1145/3382026

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

SPLC '20

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT

SPLC '20: 24th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference

October 19 - 23, 2020

QC, Montreal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 167 of 463 submissions, 36%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
53
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Marchezan LAssunção WCarbonell JRodrigues EBernardino MBasso F(2021)SPLReePlan - Automated Support for Software Product Line Reengineering PlanningProceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures, and Reuse10.1145/3483899.3483902(1-10)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3483899.3483902
Marchezan LRodrigues ECarbonell JBernardino MBasso FAssunção W(2012)PAxSPL: A Framework for Aiding SPL Reengineering PlanningHandbook of Re-Engineering Software Intensive Systems into Software Product Lines10.1007/978-3-031-11686-5_13(319-353)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2012
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11686-5_13

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents