[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3372177.3373088acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesspbpu-ideConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Knowledge Sharing Model for Competitive Ecosystem on Gig Economy

Published: 28 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Digital business with gig economy scheme had no culture to share knowledge since strictly competition among gig workers. It affects gig workers' limited ability and knowledge to accomplish projects and reduce their performance. This study proposed a knowledge-sharing model to articulate insightful knowledge from scattered tacit and explicit knowledge by keep personal data and copyright. It performed Soft System Methodology to facilitate conceptualization process from founded problem until strategies formulation. It generated artifacts to clarify problems and elaborates their solutions. By decomposing the problems into fishbone analysis, this study has identified who are the involved stakeholders and how the knowledge management should run. It became root cause as baseline to conceptualize a knowledge sharing model among gig workers. As the result, this study delivered a knowledge sharing model which relied on point system to engage gig workers' participation to externalize their knowledge in knowledge repository and expert should validate them before knowledge storing. To achieve more qualified model, this study relied on validation by representative gig workers and platform applications. This model contributes to mediate knowledge circulation among gig workers by encourage their extrinsic motivation. Hence, it can deliver innovative solution to enhance digital business on modern society through gig worker empowerment.

References

[1]
F.M. Córdova, F.A. Gutiérrez (2018). Knowledge management system in service companies. Comp. Science 139, 392--400.
[2]
M. Al-Emran, V. Mezhuyev, A. Kamaludin, K. Shaalan (2018). The impact of knowledge management processes on information systems: A systematic review. International Journal of Inform. Management 43, 173--187.
[3]
P. Akhavan, N.A. Ebrahim, M.A. Fetrati, A. Pezeshkan. (2016). Major trends in knowledge management research: a bibliometric study. Scientometrics 107, 1249--1264.
[4]
A.A. Alawneh, R. Aouf. (2016). A proposed knowledge management framework for boosting the success of information systems projects. International Conference on Engineering & MIS.
[5]
L. Fuentes-Ardeo, J.R. Otegi-Olaso, M.E. Aguilar-Fernandez. (2017). How the project knowledge management and the sustainability in project management affect the project success. 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications.
[6]
M. Sedighi, F. Zand. (2012). Knowledge management: Review of the critical success factors and development of a conceptual classification model. Tenth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering.
[7]
T. Gao, Y. Chai, Y. Liu. (2017). A review of knowledge management and future research trend. 2nd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering.
[8]
M. Graham, V. Lehdonvirta, A. Wood, H. Barnard, I. Hjorth, D.P. Simon. 2017. The Risks and Rewards of Online Gig Work At the Global Margins, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
[9]
A. Gandhi, A.N. Hidayanto, Y.G. Sucahyo, Y. Ruldeviyani. (2018). Exploring people's intention to become platform-based gig workers: An empirical qualitative study. ICITSI.
[10]
M. Sağsan. (2006). A new life cycle model for processing of knowledge management. 2nd International Conference on Business, Management, and Economics.
[11]
M. Graham, I. Hjorth, V. Lehdonvirta. (2017a). Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23 (2), 135--162.
[12]
J. Riley. (2017) Chapter Title: Brand New 'Sharing' or Plain Old 'Sweating'? A Proposal for Regulating the New 'Gig Economy'. New Directions for Law in Australia.
[13]
D. Stenholm, J. Landahl, D. Bergsjö. (2014). Knowledge management life cycle: An individual's perspective. International Conference Design.P.T Carreteiro P, J.B. de Vasconcelos, A. Barão, A.A. Rocha. (2016). Knowledge management approach for software engineering projects development. New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies 59.
[14]
O. Sabri, F. Alfifi. (2017). Integrating knowledge life cycle within software development process to produce a quality software product. ICET.
[15]
A.R. Balle, M. Oliveira. (2018). The life cycle process of knowledge sharing in free software communities: Sharing profiles and motivations. Knowl Process Management 1--10.
[16]
S.N. Husain, Y.S. Husain. (2013). Mediating effect of OCB on relationship between job attitudes and knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(1), 1008--1015.
[17]
M. Oliveira, C. Curado, A.C.G. Maçada, F. Nodari. (2015). Using alternative scales to measure knowledge sharing behaviour: Are there any differences? Comp. in Human Behaviour 44, 132--140.
[18]
L.H.M. Wong, R.M. Davison. (2018). Knowledge sharing in a global logistics provider: An action research project. Information & Management 55, 547--557.
[19]
G. Cox. (2010). Defining innovation: Using soft system methodology to approach complexity of innovation in educational technology. International Journal of Education and Develoment using ICT.
[20]
P. Hanafizadeh, M. Mehrabioun. (2018). Application of SSM in tackling problematical situations from academicians' viewpoints. System Pratice Action Research 31, 179--220.
[21]
P. Checkland, J. Poulter. (2010). Soft Systems Methodology, Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide.
[22]
D. Zlatanović, M. Mulej. (2015). Soft-systems approaches to knowledge-cum-values management as innovation drivers. Baltic Journal of Management 10 (4), pp. 497--518.
[23]
L.O. Cezarino, M.F.R. Alves, A.C.F. Caldana, L.B. Liboni. (2019). Dynamic Capabilities for Sustainability: Revealing the Systemic Key Factors. Syst Pract Action Res. 32, 93--112.
[24]
M. Jafari, P. Akhavan, R. Hesamamiri, A. Bourouni. (2011).VA new management approach to knowledge-creating strategic decision-making in organisations. International Journal Management and Enterprise Development, Vol. 10 (4).
[25]
R. Shankar, S. Acharia, A. Baveja. (2009). Soft-system knowledge management framework for new product development. Journal of Knowledge Management Vol. 13 (1), 135--153.
[26]
R. Sargent. (2011). Verification and validation of simulation models. Winter Simulation Conference.
[27]
I. Becerra-Fernandez, R. Sabherwal. 2010. Knowledge Management: Systems and Processes, M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Knowledge Management in the Gig EconomyKnowledge Management in Organisations10.1007/978-3-031-63269-3_2(16-31)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: A systematic literature reviewJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.24868Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SPBPU IDE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 International SPBPU Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy
October 2019
396 pages
ISBN:9781450372442
DOI:10.1145/3372177
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 February 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Gig economy
  2. Gig worker
  3. Knowledge management
  4. Knowledge sharing
  5. Point system
  6. Soft System Methodology

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SPBPU IDE '19

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Knowledge Management in the Gig EconomyKnowledge Management in Organisations10.1007/978-3-031-63269-3_2(16-31)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: A systematic literature reviewJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.24868Online publication date: 8-Jan-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media