More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Use Of ICT To Promote And Analyze Argumentative And Metacognitive Processes In Higher Education

Authors:

Nancy MacCann-Alfaro,

Ana García-Valcárcel,

Erla Mariela Morales-MorgaAuthors Info & Claims

TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

Pages 1028 - 1034

https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362927

Published: 16 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The main objectives of the research is to explain and analyze the processes of argumentation and metacognitive thinking that activate university students when they undergo a process of systematic discussion to solve a problem and evaluate the effectiveness of the software Digalo2 for the development of argumentative and metacognitive competences. The research has characteristics of a mixed study, qualitative predominant method (Cuanti + CUALI). Through a quantitative methodology, instruments of measurement of the aforementioned competences will be applied and statistical analysis will be carried out. Through the qualitative methodology, the development process of the aforementioned skills will be analyzed from each student's individual self-records and the argumentative discussions of the student teams. The original study corresponding to the Doctoral Thesis used a sample of 250 students distributed in 6 courses who study the subject, ICT in Education from the Education Department of the University of Salamanca. However, for the purposes of this paper, the results of a single course consisting of 56 students will be presented. The main results are the characterization of the sample in terms of their argumentative, motivational and learning strategies, showing an average level reached. Likewise, it was possible to carry out within the framework of a curriculum subject to pedagogical activity supported by software and oriented towards the development of argumentative and metacognitive skills.

References

[1]

UNESCO. 1998. Conferencia Mundial sobre la Educación Superior, La educación superior en el siglo XXI Visión y acción. París 5-9 de octubre de 1998. Retrieved from: http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/principal/staff-s.html

[2]

European Commission. 2010. Focus on Higher Education in Europe 2010. The Impact of the Bologna Process, Brussels, EACEA P9 Eurydice

[3]

A. García-Valcárcel. 2007. Herramientas tecnológicas para mejorar la docencia universitaria. Una reflexión desde la experiencia y la investigación. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia 10, 2, 125--148.

[4]

Europeo, Parlamento. "Informe sobre la alfabetización de los medios de comunicacion en un mundo digital (2008/2129 (INI)). Comisión de Cultura y Educación Ponente: Christa Prets.[on line]. Retrieve from https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:045E:0009:0014:ES:PDF

[5]

D. Kuhn, W. Goh, K. Iordanou & D. Shaenfield. 2008. Arguing on the Computer: A Microgenetic Study of Developing Argument Skills in a Computer-Supported Environment. Child Development. 79, 5, 1310--1328.

[6]

D. Kuhn and A. Crowell. 2011. Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents' Thinking. Psychological Science. 22, 545.

[7]

S. Leitão and M.C. Damianovic 2011. Argumentação na escola: o conhecimento em construção. Elementos para o Desenho de um Modelo de Debate Crítico na Escola Campinas: Pontes, 225--250

[8]

E. Reyes and A. González. 2007. "¿ Por qué enseñar Pensamiento crítico?." PENSAR, RAZONAR Y ARGUMENTAR: ENSEÑAR LÓGICA: The title of book one (1st. ed.). The name of the series one, Vol. 9. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

[9]

L. Krawczyk and C. Padilla. 2015. Relación entre pensamiento crítico y complejidad discursiva en estudiantes universitarios. Onomázein, 32, 184--197.

[10]

E. López and C. Padilla. 2017. Grados de complejidad argumentativa en escritos de estudiantes universitarios de humanidades. Praxis, 20, 61--90.

[11]

M. A. Tuzinkievicza, N. Peraltab, M. Castellarob, C. Santibáñez. 2018. Complejidad argumentativa individual escrita en estudiantes universitarios ingresantes y avanzados. Liberabit 24, 2, 231--247.

[12]

M. C. Errázuriz and L. Fuentes. 2010. Evaluación y desarrollo de una propuesta centrada en la producción de textos en estudiantes de primer año de Pedagogía en Educación General Básica. Sembrando ideas. Revista Educativa, 4, 38--53. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/9867447/EVALUACI%C3%93N_Y_DESARROLLO_DE_UNA_PROPUESTA_CENTRADA_EN_LA_PRODUCCI%C3%93N_DE_TEXTOS_EN_ESTUDIANTES_DE_PRIMER_A%C3%91O_DE_PEDAGOG%C3%8DA_EN_EDUCACI%C3%93N_GENERAL_B%C3%81SICA?auto=download

[13]

A. García-Berbén. "Proceso de enseñanza/aprendizaje en Educación Superior." (2008) Doctoral dissertation, Universidad De Granada.

[14]

C. Coll. 2008. Aprender y enseñar con las TIC: expectativas, realidad y potencialidades. Boletín de la institución libre de enseñanza, 72, 1, 7--40.

[15]

L. Mason and M. Santi. 1994. Argumentation Structure and Metacognition in Constructing Shared Knowledge at School. In Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association New Orleans, LA, (April, 1994). Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED371041/page/n3

[16]

M. Carmona and M. Cruz. 2015. Competencias argumentativas y creencias epistemológicas en universitarios. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. 1,1, 485--494

[17]

S. De Chiaro and K. Da Silva. 2017. Argumentação na sala de aula e seu potencial metacognitivo como caminho para um enfoque CTS no ensino de química: uma proposta analítica. Educação e Pesquisa, 43, 2, 411--426.

[18]

J. Sánchez-Castaño, O. Castaño-Mejía & O. Tamayo-Alzate. 2015. La argumentación metacognitiva en el aula de ciencias. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13, 2, 1153--1168. Retrieved from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77340728042

[19]

R. Johnson. 2012. Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://books.google.es/books?id=0zmYkWa3LWQC&pg=PT3&lpg=PT3&dq=Ralph+Johnson.+2009.+Manifest+rationality:+A+pragmatic+theory+of+argument.+Taylor+%26+Francis+e-Library.&source=bl&ots=9pr7Ha9Cs0&sig=ACfU3U2611E3lkQq69nbSW3gcdAfdcAx0Q&hl=es&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiV4szzicfjAhV55OAKHYPhAn0Q6AEwAnoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

[20]

D. Kuhn, N. Zillmer, A. Crowell and J. Zavala. 2013. Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentative competence. Cognition and Instruction 31, 4, 456--496.

[21]

Adelino Catani, 2011. ARGOMENTARE LE PROPRIE RAGIONI. Organizzare, condurre e valutare un dibattito. Diseñando debates: preliminares para un enfoque dialógico y crítico. Casoria (NA) [i.e. Naples, Italy]: Loffredo University Press.

[22]

M. Monsalve. 2015. Estado del arte de la investigación sobre argumentación y escritura multimodal desde una perspectiva didáctica. Revista Lasallista de Investigación 12, 2, 215--224. Retrieved from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=69542291022

[23]

O. Noroozi, A. Weinberger, H. Biemans, M. Mulder & M. Chizari. 2012. Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review 7, 2, 79--106.

[24]

B. B. Schwarz, and R. De-Groot. (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2,2-3, 297--313.

[25]

M. H. Hoffmann. 2018. Stimulating reflection and self-correcting reasoning through argument mapping: Three approaches. Topoi, 37,1, 185--199.

[26]

N. Mirza, V. Tartas, A. Perret-Clermont and J. F. De Pietro. 2007. Using graphical tools in a phased activity for enhancing dialogical skills: An example with Digalo. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2, 2-3, 247--272.

[27]

L. Maldonado, R. De-Groot, D. Landazábal, L. Leal, M. Montenegro, L. Becerra, and R. Drachman. 2008. Dígalo: Argumentation in digital educational environments. An experience with reintegrates to the civil life. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD

[28]

E. Lotan-Kochan, R. Drachman, B. Schwarz and A. Glassner. 2006. Moderation of students' activities in co-located computer-supported collaborative learning using Digalo. In Proceedings of the EC-TEL06 Workshops, Crete, Greece, October 1.2, 2006. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221549874_Moderation_of_Students_Activities_in_Colocated_Computersupported_Collaborative_Learning_using_Digalo

[29]

J. C. Hernández AÑO Argumentación apoyada en TIC como proceso integrador en el desarrollo de competencias en una educación pertinente. Subtítulo: Aporte a la construcción de un modelo de innovación educativa en el oriente colombiano. Villavicencio, Meta, 2015. ISBN: 978-958-8927-14-5

[30]

E. Lotan. 2006. Analysing Graphic-Based Electronic Discussions: Evaluation of Students' Activity on Digalo. EC-TEL, 652--659

[31]

R. Johnson and A. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 33, 7, 14--26. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3700093

[32]

J. Creswell and V. Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2a. ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

[33]

C. Fuentes. 2010. Prueba de Pensamiento Crítico de Halpern, versión adaptada a contexto chileno. Manuscrito inédito. Universidad Diego Portales, Chile.

[34]

M. Ramírez. 2016. Modelo causal de los factores asociados al aprendizaje autorregulado como mediador del rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. UMI Order Number: AAT 8506171. Retrieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/40522/1/T38161.pdf

[35]

M. Ramírez, J. Canto y Rodríguez, J. A. Bueno, A. Echazarreta. 2013 Validación psicométrica del Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire en universitarios mexicanos. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 11, 1, 193--214.

[36]

F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2015. Engineering contributions to a Knowledge Society multicultural perspective. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje (IEEE RITA) 10, 1, 17--18.

Cited By

García-Peñalvo FGarcía-Holgado ARamírez-Montoya M(2019)Track 16Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3362789.3362958(920-924)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3362789.3362958

Index Terms

Use Of ICT To Promote And Analyze Argumentative And Metacognitive Processes In Higher Education
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Model curricula

Recommendations

Metacognitive and Collaborative Arguing through Computers by University Students
TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

The main objective of the research is to promote the development of argumentative skills in university students from the Social Work degree programme, through the promotion of metacognitive skills and collaborative work in a digital context. The ...
Integrating ICT to higher education in China: From the perspective of Activity Theory

This paper is based on a study that explored the relationship between the implementation of ICT pedagogy and the factors that influenced seven teachers of English for Business Purposes in Chinese higher education concerning their adoption of ICT into ...
Learning How to Learn through Experiential Learning Promoting Metacognitive Skills to Improve Knowledge Co-creation Ability

The development of metacognitive skills is important to train people to work in the knowledge society, which requires the creation of value. However, within the limited period of university education, it is not reasonable to teach metacognitive skills ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

October 2019

1085 pages

ISBN:9781450371919

DOI:10.1145/3362789

Editors:
Miguel Ángel Conde González
Universidad de León
,
Francisco Jesús Rodríguez Sedano
Universidad de León
,
Camino Fernández Llamas
Universidad de León
,
Francisco José García-Peñalvo
Universidad de Salamanca

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

TEEM'19

TEEM'19: Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

October 16 - 18, 2019

León, Spain

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
93
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)6
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

García-Peñalvo FGarcía-Holgado ARamírez-Montoya M(2019)Track 16Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3362789.3362958(920-924)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3362789.3362958

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents