[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3361242.3361244acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinternetwareConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring the Relationship Between Developer Activities and Profile Images on GitHub

Published: 28 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In the GitHub platform, social media profile images are one of many visual components of developers. Besides, developer activities such as reporting issues or following other developers are regarded as important development and self-expression behaviors. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has yet been conducted to study the relationship between GitHub developer activities and profile images. In this paper, we aim to investigate the relationship between developer activities and profile images to gain some insights into the developers' internal properties. During our experiments, we manually classify profile images into seven categories. Next, we investigate the relationship between developer's demographic information and developer activity. Further, using logistic regression analysis, when controlled for various variables, we statistically identify and quantify the relationships between developer activities and profile image categories. We find that several profile image categories significantly correlate with developer's demographic information and activities. We also provide a rich resource of research ideas for further study. Our examination and analysis provide insights into the developers' internal properties when using different profile images. Moreover, this study is the first step in understanding the relationship between developer activities and profile images on GitHub.

References

[1]
Kelly Blincoe, Jyoti Sheoran, Sean Goggins, Eva Petakovic, and Daniela Damian. 2016. Understanding the popular users: Following, affiliation influence and leadership on GitHub. Information and Software Technology 70 (2016), 30--39.
[2]
Rebecca J Brand, Abigail Bonatsos, Rebecca D'Orazio, and Hilary DeShong. 2012. What is beautiful is good, even online: Correlations between photo attractiveness and text attractiveness in men's online dating profiles. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 1 (2012), 166--170.
[3]
Norman Breslow. 1970. A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Biometrika 57, 3 (1970), 579--594.
[4]
Laura Dabbish, Colleen Stuart, Jason Tsay, and Jim Herbsleb. 2012. Social Coding in GitHub: Transparency and Collaboration in an Open Software Repository. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 1277--1286.
[5]
Laura Dabbish, Colleen Stuart, Jason Tsay, and Jim Herbsleb. 2012. Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, 1277--1286.
[6]
Ikram El Asri and Noureddine Kerzazi. 2019. Where Are Females in OSS Projects? Socio Technical Interactions. In Collaborative Networks and Digital Transformation, Luis M. Camarinha-Matos, Hamideh Afsarmanesh, and Dario Antonelli (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 308--319.
[7]
David Garcia, Marcelo Serrano Zanetti, and Frank Schweitzer. 2013. The role of emotions in contributors activity: A case study on the Gentoo community. In 2013 International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing. IEEE, 410--417.
[8]
Edmund A Gehan. 1965. A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 52, 1-2 (1965), 203--224.
[9]
Erving Goffman. 2002. The presentation of self in everyday life. 1959. Garden City, NY (2002), 259.
[10]
Alkharusi H. 2012. Categorical variables in regression analysis: A comparison of dummy and effect coding. International Journal of Education 4, 2 (2012), 202--210.
[11]
Dongyang Hu, Tao Wang, Junsheng Chang, Gang Yin, and Yang Zhang. 2018. Multi-Discussing across Issues in GitHub: A Preliminary Study. In 2018 25th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC). IEEE, 406--415.
[12]
Jing Jiang, David Lo, Jiahuan He, Xin Xia, Pavneet Singh Kochhar, and Li Zhang. 2017. Why and how developers fork what from whom in GitHub. Empirical Software Engineering 22, 1 (2017), 547--578.
[13]
Jing Jiang, David Lo, Yun Yang, Jianfeng Li, and Li Zhang. 2018. A first look at unfollowing behavior on GitHub. Information and Software Technology (2018).
[14]
Peter Kampstra et al. 2008. Beanplot: A boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions. (2008).
[15]
Sanja Kapidzic. 2013. Narcissism as a Predictor of Motivations Behind Facebook Profile Picture Selection. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16, 1 (2013), 14--19.
[16]
J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics (1977), 159--174.
[17]
Leqi Liu, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Zahra Riahi Samani, Mohsen E Moghaddam, and Lyle Ungar. 2016. Analyzing personality through social media profile picture choice. In Tenth international AAAI conference on web and social media. 211--220.
[18]
Guillermo Macbeth, Eugenia Razumiejczyk, and Rubén Daniel Ledesma. 2011. Cliff's Delta Calculator: A non-parametric effect size program for two groups of observations. Universitas Psychologica 10, 2 (2011), 545--555.
[19]
Robert R McCrae and Paul T Costa. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology 52, 1 (1987), 81.
[20]
Neil J Salkind. 2010. Encyclopedia of research design. Vol. 1. Sage.
[21]
Jyoti Sheoran, Kelly Blincoe, Eirini Kalliamvakou, Daniela Damian, and Jordan Ell. 2014. Understanding watchers on GitHub. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), ACM, 336--339.
[22]
Michele M Strano. 2008. User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook profile images. Cyberpsychology: journal of psychosocial research on cyberspace 2, 2 (2008).
[23]
Josh Terrell, Andrew Kofink, Justin Middleton, Clarissa Rainear, Emerson Murphy-Hill, Chris Parnin, and Jon Stallings. 2017. Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Computer Science 3 (2017), e111.
[24]
Tomu Tominaga and Yoshinori Hijikata. 2015. Study on the relationship between profile images and user behaviors on twitter. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 825--828.
[25]
Bogdan Vasilescu, Andrea Capiluppi, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2014. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study. Interacting with Computers 26, 5 (2014), 488--511.
[26]
Shaojung Sharon Wang, Shin-Il Moon, Kyounghee Hazel Kwon, Carolyn A Evans, and Michael A Stefanone. 2010. Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 2 (2010), 226--234.
[27]
Tao Wang, Yang Zhang, Gang Yin, Yue Yu, and Huaimin Wang. 2018. Who Will Become a Long-Term Contributor?: A Prediction Model based on the Early Phase Behaviors. In Proceedings of the Tenth Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware. ACM, 9.
[28]
Ingmar Weber and Yelena Mejova. 2016. Crowdsourcing health labels: inferring body weight from profile pictures. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Digital Health Conference. ACM, 105--109.
[29]
Xingjie Wei and David Stillwell. 2017. How smart does your profile image look?: Estimating intelligence from social network profile images. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 33--40.
[30]
Yang Zhang, Huaimin Wang, Gang Yin, Tao Wang, and Yue Yu. 2015. Exploring the use of @-mention to assist software development in github. Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware (Internetware), ACM, 83--92.
[31]
Yang Zhang, Huaimin Wang, Gang Yin, Tao Wang, and Yue Yu. 2017. Social media in GitHub: the role of@-mention in assisting software development. Science China Information Sciences 60, 3 (2017), 032102.
[32]
Yang Zhang, Yue Yu, Huaimin Wang, Bogdan Vasilescu, and Vladimir Filkov. 2018. Within-ecosystem issue linking: a large-scale study of rails. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Software Mining. ACM, 12--19.
[33]
Chen Zhao and Gonglue Jiang. 2011. Cultural differences on visual self-presentation through social networking site profile images. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1129--1132.
[34]
Minghui Zhou and Audris Mockus. 2012. What make long term contributors: Willingness and opportunity in OSS community. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE Press, 518--528.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Developers Need Protection, Too: Perspectives and Research Challenges for Privacy in Social Coding Platforms2023 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)10.1109/CHASE58964.2023.00019(105-110)Online publication date: May-2023
  • (2022)Research on internetware: Review and prospectChinese Science Bulletin10.1360/TB-2022-058567:32(3782-3792)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
Internetware '19: Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware
October 2019
179 pages
ISBN:9781450377010
DOI:10.1145/3361242
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Developer activity
  2. GitHub
  3. Internal property
  4. Profile image

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

Internetware '19

Acceptance Rates

Internetware '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 35 submissions, 57%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 111 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Developers Need Protection, Too: Perspectives and Research Challenges for Privacy in Social Coding Platforms2023 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)10.1109/CHASE58964.2023.00019(105-110)Online publication date: May-2023
  • (2022)Research on internetware: Review and prospectChinese Science Bulletin10.1360/TB-2022-058567:32(3782-3792)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media