[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3357384.3357959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tracking Top-k Influential Users with Relative Errors

Published: 03 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Tracking influential users in a dynamic social network is a fundamental step in fruitful applications, such as social recommendation, network topology optimization, and blocking rumour spreading. The major obstacle in mining top influential users is that estimating users' influence spreads is \#P-hard under most influence propagation models. Previous studies along this line either seek heuristic solutions or may return meaningless results due to the lack of prior knowledge about users' influence in the dynamic network. In this paper, we tackle the problem of tracking top-k influential individuals in a dynamic social network. When a top-k query is issued, our algorithm returns a set S of more than k users. With high probability, our algorithm guarantees that S contains all real top-k influential users and there exists a relative error ε < 1$ such that the least influential user in S has influence at least $(1-ε) I^k$, where $I^k$ is the influence of the k-th most influential user and we can adjust ε via parameter settings. Controlling such a relative error enables us to obtain meaningful results even when we know nothing about the value of $I^k$ or $I^k$ changes over time in the dynamic network. In addition to the thorough theoretical results, our experimental results on large real networks clearly demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our algorithm.

References

[1]
B. Bahmani, A. Chowdhury, and A. Goel. Fast incremental and personalized pagerank. PVLDB, 4(3):173--184, 2010.
[2]
C. Borgs, M. Brautbar, J. Chayes, and B. Lucier. Maximizing social influence in nearly optimal time. In SODA, pages 946--957. SIAM, 2014.
[3]
C. Chen, H. Tong, B. A. Prakash, C. E. Tsourakakis, T. Eliassi-Rad, C. Faloutsos, and D. H. Chau. Node immunization on large graphs: Theory and algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 28(1):113--126, 2015.
[4]
W. Chen. An issue in the martingale analysis of the influence maximization algorithm imm. In International Conference on Computational Social Networks, pages 286--297. Springer, 2018.
[5]
W. Chen, C. Wang, and Y. Wang. Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. In SIGKDD, pages 1029--1038. ACM, 2010.
[6]
W. Chen, Y. Yuan, and L. Zhang. Scalable influence maximization in social networks under the linear threshold model. In ICDM, pages 88--97. IEEE, 2010.
[7]
F. Chung and L. Lu. Concentration inequalities and martingale inequalities: a survey. Internet Mathematics, 3(1):79--127, 2006.
[8]
G. Cormode and M. Hadjieleftheriou. Finding frequent items in data streams. PVLDB, 1(2):1530--1541, 2008.
[9]
P. Dagum, R. Karp, M. Luby, and S. Ross. An optimal algorithm for monte carlo estimation. SIAM Journal on computing, 29(5):1484--1496, 2000.
[10]
A. Epasto, S. Lattanzi, and M. Sozio. Efficient densest subgraph computation in evolving graphs. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 300--310. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2015.
[11]
T. Hayashi, T. Akiba, and Y. Yoshida. Fully dynamic betweenness centrality maintenance on massive networks. PVLDB, 9(2):48--59, 2015.
[12]
K. Huang, S. Wang, G. Bevilacqua, X. Xiao, and L. V. Lakshmanan. Revisiting the stop-and-stare algorithms for influence maximization. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 10(9):913--924, 2017.
[13]
D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In SIGKDD, pages 137--146. ACM, 2003.
[14]
E. B. Khalil, B. Dilkina, and L. Song. Scalable diffusion-aware optimization of network topology. In SIGKDD, pages 1226--1235. ACM, 2014.
[15]
P. Lagrée, O. Cappé, B. Cautis, and S. Maniu. Algorithms for online influencer marketing. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 13(1):3, 2018.
[16]
X. Liu, X. Liao, S. Li, S. Zheng, B. Lin, J. Zhang, L. Shao, C. Huang, and L. Xiao. On the shoulders of giants: incremental influence maximization in evolving social networks. Complexity, 2017, 2017.
[17]
N. Ohsaka, T. Akiba, Y. Yoshida, and K.-i. Kawarabayashi. Dynamic influence analysis in evolving networks. PVLDB, 9(12):1077--1088, 2016.
[18]
Y. Pan, F. Cong, K. Chen, and Y. Yu. Diffusion-aware personalized social update recommendation. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 69--76. ACM, 2013.
[19]
T. Shogenji. A condition for transitivity in probabilistic support. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(4):613--616, 2003.
[20]
G. Song, Y. Li, X. Chen, X. He, and J. Tang. Influential node tracking on dynamic social network: An interchange greedy approach. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(2):359--372, 2016.
[21]
Y. Tang, Y. Shi, and X. Xiao. Influence maximization in near-linear time: A martingale approach. In SIGMOD. ACM, 2015.
[22]
Y. Tang, X. Xiao, and Y. Shi. Influence maximization: Near-optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency. In SIGMOD, pages 75--86. ACM, 2014.
[23]
Y. Wang, Q. Fan, Y. Li, and K.-L. Tan. Real-time influence maximization on dynamic social streams. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 10(7):805--816, 2017.
[24]
Z. Wang, W. Dong, W. Zhang, and C. W. Tan. Rumor source detection with multiple observations: Fundamental limits and algorithms. In ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, volume 42, pages 1--13. ACM, 2014.
[25]
V. K. Yalavarthi and A. Khan. Fast influence maximization in dynamic graphs: A local updating approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.00574, 2018.
[26]
R. Yan, Y. Li, W. Wu, D. Li, and Y. Wang. Rumor blocking through online link deletion on social networks. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 13(2):16, 2019.
[27]
Y. Yang, Z. Wang, J. Pei, and E. Chen. Tracking influential individuals in dynamic networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2017.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Benchmark Study of Deep-RL Methods for Maximum Coverage Problems over GraphsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3681954.368202917:11(3666-3679)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2021)DeepPick: A Deep Learning Approach to Unveil Outstanding Users Ranking with Public Attainable FeaturesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2021.3091503(1-1)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2020)An Algorithm Based on Influence to Predict Invisible RelationshipWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2020/88298452020Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020

Index Terms

  1. Tracking Top-k Influential Users with Relative Errors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '19: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    November 2019
    3373 pages
    ISBN:9781450369763
    DOI:10.1145/3357384
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 November 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. sample complexity
    2. social influence
    3. top-k ranking

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CIKM '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 202 of 1,031 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Benchmark Study of Deep-RL Methods for Maximum Coverage Problems over GraphsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3681954.368202917:11(3666-3679)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2021)DeepPick: A Deep Learning Approach to Unveil Outstanding Users Ranking with Public Attainable FeaturesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2021.3091503(1-1)Online publication date: 2021
    • (2020)An Algorithm Based on Influence to Predict Invisible RelationshipWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2020/88298452020Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media