[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3351108.3351138acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of students with and without disabilities in an e-learning setting

Published: 17 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The Internet and ultimately websites should be accessible and usable so that they can provide timely and accurate information in an effective, efficient and satisfactory way. Accessible and usable websites will help with academic activities, such as accessing study material or contacting lecturers and other teaching and learning processes, that are challenging to accomplish at an ODeL (open distance learning) institution. This paper examines and reports on the average time taken by groups of students with and without disabilities to complete certain tasks, using the University of South Africa (Unisa) website and myUnisa, the e-learning website of Unisa. The people for whom a website is intended, in this case, students with disabilities, have to be involved in the development of the websites, that is the e-learning websites. In this qualitative study, quantitative data analysis is used to support qualitative data analysis. The findings of this study show that groups of participants or students with disabilities are having problems working on this e-learning website. The study endorses that well-developed e-learning platforms must be efficiently, effectively and satisfactorily used by all students, including those with disabilities. The study recommends that it is significant for all the applicable stakeholders to be part of the development of websites to guarantee that accessibility and usability are appropriately adhered to. The intention is to reduce marginalisation, as well as digital and social divides of students with disabilities. In order to obtain improved learning accomplishments, technologies such as the Internet should be used.

References

[1]
Munro, M. and McMullin, B., 2009. E-Learning for all? Maximizing the impact of multimedia resources for learners with disabilities, used e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. London: Information Science Reference. R@Abou-Zahra, S. 2012. How people with disabilities use the Web: W3C working draft {online}. Available from: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/> {Accessed 9 June 2012}.
[2]
Nicolle, C. and Abascal, J., 2001. Inclusive design guidelines for HCI. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[3]
Abou-Zahra, S., 2012. How people with disabilities use the Web: W3C working draft {online}. Available from: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/> {Accessed 9 June 2012}.
[4]
Cavender, A. and Ladner, R.E., 2008. 'Hearing impairments', Web accessibility, 25--35.
[5]
Hanson, V.L., 2009. 'Computing technologies for deaf and hard of hearing users'. In: Sears, A. and Jacko, J.A. eds. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 885--893.
[6]
National Institute of the Deaf. 2009. Deaf affairs {online}. Available from: <http://www.deafnet.co.za/deafaffairs/faq.html> {Accessed 12 March 2012}.
[7]
Dix, A.J., Finlay J., Abowd G. and Beale R., 2004. Human-computer interaction. New York: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[8]
Räihä, K.J. and Ovaska, S., 2012. An exploratory study of eye typing fundamentals: dwell time, text entry rate, errors, and workload, proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), Austin, Texas, May 5-10, 2012. ACM.
[9]
Sears, A. and Young, M., 2008. Physical Disabilities and computing technologies: an analysis of impairments {online}. Available from: <https://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/590w/06au/resou rces/PhysicalDisabilitiesandComputingTechnologies. pdf> {Accessed 9 June 2012}.
[10]
National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities (NICHCY). 2008. Blindness/visual impairments {online}. Available from: <www.nichcy.org/Disabilities/Specific/Pages/VisualImpairments.aspx> {Accessed 12 April 2012}.
[11]
Braille Plus Incorporation. 2011. Partially sighted {online}. Available from: <http://brailleplus.net/?s=partially+sighted> {Accessed 15 March 2012}.
[12]
Evers, V. and Hillen, H., 2007. 'Online redesign of a website's information architecture to improve accessibility for users who are blind'. In Lazar, J. Ed. Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 93--139.
[13]
Borodin, Y., Bigham, J.P., Dausch, G., and Ramakrishnan, I.V., 2010. More than meets the eye: A survey of screen-reader browsing strategies: Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), Raleigh, April 26-27, 2010. ACM.
[14]
Ruey-Shyy Shieh, Kuo-Ming hung and Yao-Ming Yeh, 2016. Examination of a Digital Learning System for Users with Disabilities. Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 12(3).
[15]
Nielsen, J., 2006. Quantitative studies: How many users to test. Alertbox {online}. Available from: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/quantitative_testing.html. {Accessed 14 July 2012}.
[16]
Nielsen, J., 2000. Why you only need to test with 5 users. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox {online}. Available from: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html. {Accessed 14 July 2012}.
[17]
Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H., 2011. Interaction design: Beyond human computer interaction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
[18]
Makri, S., Blandford, A. and Cox, A.L., 2010. This is what I'm doing and why: reflections on a think-aloud study of dl users' information behaviour: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, June 21-25, 2010. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Promoting Inclusive Learning Environments: Leveraging University Websites for Digital Empowerment in the Post-COVID-19 EraHealthcare10.3390/healthcare1212121212:12(1212)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A Scoping Review on Online Assessment Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: Findings and Recommendations for Curricular Design in Higher EducationDigital Assessment in Higher Education10.1007/978-981-97-6136-4_7(145-175)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Reconceptualising Disabilities and Inclusivity for the Postdigital Era: Recommendations to Educational LeadersEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1301005113:1(51)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of students with and without disabilities in an e-learning setting

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SAICSIT '19: Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2019
      September 2019
      352 pages
      ISBN:9781450372657
      DOI:10.1145/3351108
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 17 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Accessibility
      2. ICT
      3. e-learning
      4. observations
      5. types of disabilities
      6. usability

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      SAICSIT '19

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 187 of 439 submissions, 43%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Promoting Inclusive Learning Environments: Leveraging University Websites for Digital Empowerment in the Post-COVID-19 EraHealthcare10.3390/healthcare1212121212:12(1212)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
      • (2024)A Scoping Review on Online Assessment Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: Findings and Recommendations for Curricular Design in Higher EducationDigital Assessment in Higher Education10.1007/978-981-97-6136-4_7(145-175)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2024
      • (2023)Reconceptualising Disabilities and Inclusivity for the Postdigital Era: Recommendations to Educational LeadersEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1301005113:1(51)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2023
      • (2022)Making the invisible, visible: disability in South African distance educationDistance Education10.1080/01587919.2022.214413943:4(489-507)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
      • (2022)ConclusionDisability in the Workplace10.1007/978-3-031-19340-8_10(239-252)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2022

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media