[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3341981.3344242acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Investigating the Reliability of Click Models

Published: 26 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Click models aim to extract accurate relevance feedback from the noisy and biased user clicks. Previous work focuses on reducing the systematic bias between click and relevance but few studies have examined the reliability and precision of click models' relevance estimation. So in this study, we propose to investigate the reliability of relevance estimation derived by click models. Instead of getting a point estimate of relevance, a variational Bayesian method is used to infer the posterior distribution of relevance parameters. Based on the posterior distribution, we define measures for the reliability of pointwise and pairwise relevance estimation. With experiments on both real and synthetic query logs, we show that: 1) the proposed method effectively captures the uncertainty in relevance estimation; 2) the reliability of click models' relevance estimation is affected by the size of training data, the average ranking position of documents, and the ranking strategy of search engines.

References

[1]
Matthew James Beal et almbox. 2003. Variational algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference .university of London London.
[2]
Alexey Borisov, Ilya Markov, Maarten de Rijke, and Pavel Serdyukov. 2016. A neural click model for web search. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 531--541.
[3]
Olivier Chapelle and Ya Zhang. 2009. A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking. In WWW '09. ACM, 1--10.
[4]
Aleksandr Chuklin, Ilya Markov, and Maarten de Rijke. 2015. Click models for web search. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, Vol. 7, 3 (2015), 1--115.
[5]
Nick Craswell, Onno Zoeter, Michael Taylor, and Bill Ramsey. 2008. An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In WSDM'08. ACM, 87--94.
[6]
Georges E Dupret and Benjamin Piwowarski. 2008. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 331--338.
[7]
Arjun K Gupta and Saralees Nadarajah. 2004. Handbook of beta distribution and its applications .CRC press.
[8]
Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, and Geri Gay. 2005. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In SIGIR'05. Acm, 154--161.
[9]
Xiangsheng Li, Jiaxin Mao, Chao Wang, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2019. Teach Machine How to Read: Reading Behavior Inspired Relevance Estimation. In SIGIR'19 .
[10]
Chao Liu, Fan Guo, and Christos Faloutsos. 2009. Bbm: bayesian browsing model from petabyte-scale data. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 537--546.
[11]
Cheng Luo, Yukun Zheng, Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2017. Training deep ranking model with weak relevance labels. In Australasian Database Conference . Springer, 205--216.
[12]
Jiaxin Mao, Cheng Luo, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2018. Constructing Click Models for Mobile Search. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 775--784.
[13]
Chao Wang, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, Meihong Zheng, Jing Qian, and Kuo Zhang. 2013. Incorporating vertical results into search click models. In SIGIR'13. ACM, 503--512.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unbiased Learning-to-Rank Needs Unconfounded Propensity EstimationProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657772(1535-1545)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Validating Synthetic Usage Data in Living Lab EnvironmentsJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/3623640Online publication date: 24-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Approximated Doubly Robust Search Relevance EstimationProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3511808.3557145(3756-3765)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICTIR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval
September 2019
273 pages
ISBN:9781450368810
DOI:10.1145/3341981
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 September 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. bayesian analysis
  2. click model
  3. web search

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
  • Natural Science Foundation of China

Conference

ICTIR '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ICTIR '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 41 submissions, 49%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 235 of 527 submissions, 45%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unbiased Learning-to-Rank Needs Unconfounded Propensity EstimationProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657772(1535-1545)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Validating Synthetic Usage Data in Living Lab EnvironmentsJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/3623640Online publication date: 24-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Approximated Doubly Robust Search Relevance EstimationProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3511808.3557145(3756-3765)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2022
  • (2022)External Evaluation of Ranking Models under Extreme Position-BiasProceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3488560.3498420(252-261)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2022
  • (2021)Beyond Relevance Ranking: A General Graph Matching Framework for Utility-Oriented Learning to RankACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/346430340:2(1-29)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Unbiased Learning to RankACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/343986139:2(1-29)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media