[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3234695.3241014acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Movement Characteristics and Effects of GUI Design on How Older Adults Swipe in Mid-Air

Published: 08 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We conducted a study with 25 older adults that aimed to investigate how older users interact with swipe-based interactions in mid-air and how menu sizes may affect swipe characteristics. Our findings suggest that currently-implemented motion-based interaction parameters may not be very well-aligned with the expectations and physical abilities of the older population. In addition, we find that GUI design can shape how older users produce a swipe gesture in mid-air, and that appropriate GUI design can lead to higher success rates for users with little familiarity with this novel input method.

References

[1]
3D Carousel Using TweenMax.js & jQuery. Available at: https://codepen.io/johnblazek/pen/nceyw
[2]
Anna Dickinson, Roos Eisma, and Peter Gregor. 2011. The barriers that older novices encounter to computer use. Universal Access in the Information Society. 10, 3, 261--266.
[3]
Arthur Theil Cabreira and Faustina Hwang. 2015. An analysis of mid-air gestures used across three platforms. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference (British HCI '15), 257--258.
[4]
Arthur Theil Cabreira and Faustina Hwang. 2016. How Do Novice Older Users Evaluate and Perform Mid-Air Gesture Interaction for the First Time?. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '16), 122--128.
[5]
Caroline J. Ketcham and George E. Stelmach. 2001. Age-Related Declines in Motor Control. In Birren, J. E. & Schaie, K.W. (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. Academic Press.
[6]
Christian Stößel. 2009. Familiarity as a factor in designing finger gestures for elderly users. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '09), Article 78.
[7]
Darren Guinness, G. Michael Poor, and Alvin Jude. 2014. Gestures with speech for hand-impaired persons. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility (ASSETS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 259--260.
[8]
Donald A. Norman and Jakob Nielsen. 2010. Gestural interfaces: a step backward in usability. interactions 17, 5 (September 2010), 46--49.
[9]
Gözel Shakeri, John H. Williamson, and Stephen Brewster. 2017. Novel Multimodal Feedback Techniques for In-Car Mid-Air Gesture Interaction. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 84--93.
[10]
Jan Bobeth, Susanne Schmehl, Ernst Kruijff, Stephanie Deutsch, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2012. Evaluating performance and acceptance of older adults using freehand gestures for TV menu control. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (EuroITV '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--44.
[11]
Kathrin Gerling, Ian Livingston, Lennart Nacke, Regan Mandryk. 2012. Full-body motion-based game interaction for older adults. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 1873--1882.
[12]
Leah Findlater, Jon E. Froehlich, Kays Fattal, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Tanya Dastyar. 2013. Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 343--346.
[13]
Robert Walter, Gilles Bailly, Nina Valkanova, and Jörg Müller. 2014. Cuenesics: using mid-air gestures to select items on interactive public displays. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services (MobileHCI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 299--308.
[14]
Sara J. Czaja and Chin Chin Lee. 2007. Information technology and older adults. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The Human Computer-Interaction Handbook (2nd ed., 777--792. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.
[15]
Swipe Gesture -- Leap Motion Documentation. Available at: https://developer-archive.leapmotion.com/documentation/v2/python/api/Leap.SwipeGesture.html?proglang=python
[16]
Wei Lu, Zheng Tong, Jinghui Chu. 2016. Dynamic Hand Gesture Recognition With Leap Motion Controller. IEEE Signal Processing Letters. 23, 9: 1188--1192.
[17]
Ying Chih Wang, Richard W. Bohannon, Jay Kapellusch, Arun Garg, Richard C. Gershon. 2015. Dexterity as measured with the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) across the age span. Journal of Hand Therapy. 28, 1, 53--60.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Multimodal Gaze-Based Interaction in Cars: Are Mid-Air Gestures with Haptic Feedback Safer Than Buttons?Design, User Experience, and Usability10.1007/978-3-031-35702-2_24(333-352)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023

Index Terms

  1. Movement Characteristics and Effects of GUI Design on How Older Adults Swipe in Mid-Air

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASSETS '18: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
    October 2018
    508 pages
    ISBN:9781450356503
    DOI:10.1145/3234695
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 October 2018

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. aging
    2. freehand
    3. gesture-based interaction
    4. in-air gestures
    5. leap motion
    6. motion sensors
    7. user-defined gestures

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ASSETS '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ASSETS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 108 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Multimodal Gaze-Based Interaction in Cars: Are Mid-Air Gestures with Haptic Feedback Safer Than Buttons?Design, User Experience, and Usability10.1007/978-3-031-35702-2_24(333-352)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media