More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Cache-tries: concurrent lock-free hash tries with constant-time operations

Author:

Aleksandar ProkopecAuthors Info & Claims

ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 53, Issue 1

Pages 137 - 151

https://doi.org/10.1145/3200691.3178498

Published: 10 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Concurrent non-blocking hash tries have good cache locality, and horizontally scalable operations. However, operations on most existing concurrent hash tries run in O(log n) time.

In this paper, we show that the concurrent hash trie operations can run in expected constant time. We present a novel lock-free concurrent hash trie design that exerts less pressure on the memory allocator. This hash trie is augmented with a quiescently consistent cache, which permits the basic operations to run in expected O(1) time. We show a statistical analysis for the constant-time bound, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first such proof for hash tries. We also prove the safety, lock-freedom and linearizability properties. On typical workloads, our implementation demonstrates up to 5X performance improvements with respect to the previous hash trie variants.

Supplementary Material

Artifacts Available (reactors-topic-cachetrie.zip)

Concurrent non-blocking hash tries have good cache locality, and horizontally scalable operations. However, operations on most existing concurrent hash tries run in O (log n) time. This artifact contains present a novel lock-free concurrent hash trie implementation that exerts less pressure on the memory allocator. This hash trie is augmented with a quiescently consistent cache, which permits the basic operations to run in expected O (1) time. On typical workloads, our implementation demonstrates up to 5× performance improvements with respect to the previous hash trie variants.

Download
5.63 MB

References

[1]

Miguel Areias and Ricardo Rocha. 2014. On the Correctness and Efficiency of Lock-Free Expandable Tries for Tabled Logic Programs. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages - Volume 8324 (PADL 2014). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 168--183.

Digital Library

[2]

Miguel Areias and Ricardo Rocha. 2016. A Lock-Free Hash Trie Design for Concurrent Tabled Logic Programs. Int. J. Parallel Program. 44, 3 (June 2016), 386--406.

Digital Library

[3]

Phil Bagwell. 2000. Fast And Space Efficient Trie Searches. Technical Report.

[4]

Phil Bagwell. 2001. Ideal Hash Trees. (2001).

[5]

Dmitry Basin, Edward Bortnikov, Anastasia Braginsky, Guy Golan-Gueta, Eshcar Hillel, Idit Keidar, and Moshe Sulamy. 2017. KiWi: A Key-Value Map for Scalable Real-Time Analytics. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (PPoPP '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 357--369.

Digital Library

[6]

Douglas Baskins. 2000. The Judy Array Implementation. http://judy.sourceforge.net/. (2000).

[7]

Anastasia Braginsky and Erez Petrank. 2011. Locality-conscious Lock-free Linked Lists. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking (ICDCN'11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 107--118. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id= 1946143.1946153

Digital Library

[8]

Anastasia Braginsky and Erez Petrank. 2012. A Lock-free B+Tree. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 58--67.

Digital Library

[9]

Nathan G. Bronson, Jared Casper, Hassan Chafi, and Kunle Olukotun. 2010. A Practical Concurrent Binary Search Tree. SIGPLAN Not. 45, 5 (Jan. 2010), 257--268.

Digital Library

[10]

Cliff Click. 2007. Towards a Scalable Non-Blocking Coding Style. (2007). http://www.azulsystems.com/events/javaone_2007/2007_LockFreeHash.pdf

[11]

Rene De La Briandais. 1959. File Searching Using Variable Length Keys. In Papers Presented at the the March 3--5, 1959, Western Joint Computer Conference (IRE-AIEE-ACM '59 (Western)). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 295--298.

Digital Library

[12]

Faith Ellen, Panagiota Fatourou, Eric Ruppert, and Franck van Breugel. 2010. Non-blocking Binary Search Trees. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--140.

Digital Library

[13]

Edward Fredkin. 1960. Trie Memory. Commun. ACM 3, 9 (Sept. 1960), 490--499.

Digital Library

[14]

Andy Georges, Dries Buytaert, and Lieven Eeckhout. 2007. Statistically Rigorous Java Performance Evaluation. SIGPLAN Not. 42, 10 (Oct. 2007), 57--76.

Digital Library

[15]

Timothy L. Harris, Keir Fraser, and Ian A. Pratt. 2002. A Practical Multi-word Compare-and-Swap Operation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing (DISC '02). Springer-Verlag, London, UK, UK, 265--279. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm7id=645959.676137

Digital Library

[16]

Maurice Herlihy, Yossi Lev, Victor Luchangco, and Nir Shavit. 2006. A Provably Correct Scalable Concurrent Skip List. (2006).

[17]

Maurice Herlihy and Nir Shavit. 2008. The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Morgan Kaufmann Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.

Digital Library

[18]

P.G. Jensen, K.G. Larsen, and J. Srba. 2017. PTrie: Data Structure for Compressing and Storing Sets via Prefix Sharing. In Proceedings of the 14th International Colloquium on Theoretical Aspects of Computing (ICTAC'17) (LNCS). Springer, 1--18. To appear.

[19]

Pramod G. Joisha. 2014. Sticky Tries: Fast Insertions, Fast Lookups, No Deletions for Large Key Universes. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Memory Management (ISMM '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--46.

Digital Library

[20]

Charles Knessl and Wojciech Szpankowski. 2000. A Note on the Asymptotic Behavior of the Heights in b-Tries for b Large. Electr. J. Comb. 7 (2000). http://www.combinatorics.org/Volume_7/Abstracts/v7i1r39.html

[21]

H. T. Kung and Philip L. Lehman. 1980. Concurrent Manipulation of Binary Search Trees. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 5, 3 (Sept. 1980), 354--382.

Digital Library

[22]

Doug Lea. 2014. Doug Lea's Workstation. (2014). http://g.oswego.edu/

[23]

Franklin Mark Liang. 1983. Word Hy-phen-a-tion by Com-pu-ter. Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. Also available as Stanford University, Department of Computer Science Report No. STAN-CS-83-977.

[24]

Ralph C. Merkle. 1988. A Digital Signature Based on a Conventional Encryption Function. In A Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques on Advances in Cryptology (CRYPTO '87). Springer-Verlag, London, UK, UK, 369--378. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=646752.704751

Digital Library

[25]

Maged M. Michael. 2002. High Performance Dynamic Lock-free Hash Tables and List-based Sets. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 73--82.

Digital Library

[26]

Rotem Oshman and Nir Shavit. 2013. The SkipTrie: Low-depth Concurrent Search Without Rebalancing. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23--32.

Digital Library

[27]

Aleksandar Prokopec. 2014. Data Structures and Algorithms for Data-Parallel Computing in a Managed Runtime. Ph.D. Dissertation. IC, Lausanne.

[28]

Aleksandar Prokopec. 2014. ScalaMeter Website. (2014). http://scalameter.github.io

[29]

Aleksandar Prokopec. 2015. SnapQueue: Lock-free Queue with Constant Time Snapshots. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Scala (SCALA 2015). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--12.

Digital Library

[30]

Aleksandar Prokopec. 2016. Pluggable Scheduling for the Reactor Programming Model. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Programming Based on Actors, Agents, and Decentralized Control (AGERE 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--50.

Digital Library

[31]

Aleksandar Prokopec. 2017. Analysis of Concurrent Lock-Free Hash Tries with Constant-Time Operations. ArXiv e-prints (Dec. 2017). arXiv:cs.DS/1712.09636

[32]

Aleksandar Prokopec. 2017. Encoding the Building Blocks of Communication. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward! 2017). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 104--118.

Digital Library

[33]

Aleksandar Prokopec, Phil Bagwell, and Martin Odersky. 2011. Cache-Aware Lock-Free Concurrent Hash Tries. Technical Report.

[34]

Aleksandar Prokopec, Phil Bagwell, and Martin Odersky. 2011. Lock-Free Resizeable Concurrent Tries. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 156--170.

[35]

Aleksandar Prokopec, Phil Bagwell, Tiark Rompf, and Martin Odersky. 2011. A Generic Parallel Collection Framework. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Parallel processing - Volume Part II (Euro-Par'11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 136--147. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2033408.2033425

Digital Library

[36]

Aleksandar Prokopec, Nathan Grasso Bronson, Phil Bagwell, and Martin Odersky. 2012. Concurrent Tries with Efficient Non-blocking Snapshots. (2012), 151--160.

Digital Library

[37]

Aleksandar Prokopec, Heather Miller, Philipp Haller, Tobias Schlatter, and Martin Odersky. 2012. FlowPools: A Lock-Free Deterministic Concurrent Dataflow Abstraction, Proofs. Technical Report.

[38]

Aleksandar Prokopec, Heather Miller, Tobias Schlatter, Philipp Haller, and Martin Odersky. 2012. FlowPools: A Lock-Free Deterministic Concurrent Dataflow Abstraction. In LCPC. 158--173.

[39]

Aleksandar Prokopec and Martin Odersky. 2015. Isolates, Channels, and Event Streams for Composable Distributed Programming. In 2015 ACM International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward!) (Onward! 2015). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 171--182.

Digital Library

[40]

Aleksandar Prokopec and Martin Odersky. 2016. Conc-Trees for Functional and Parallel Programming. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 254--268.

Digital Library

[41]

A. Prokopec, D. Petrashko, and M. Odersky. 2015. Efficient Lock-Free Work-Stealing Iterators for Data-Parallel Collections. In 2015 23rd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing. 248--252.

Digital Library

[42]

William Pugh. 1990. Concurrent Maintenance of Skip Lists. Technical Report. College Park, MD, USA.

Digital Library

[43]

N. Shafiei. 2013. Non-blocking Patricia Tries with Replace Operations. In 2013 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 216--225.

Digital Library

[44]

Michael J. Steindorfer and Jurgen J. Vinju. 2015. Optimizing Hash-array Mapped Tries for Fast and Lean Immutable JVM Collections. SIGPLAN Not. 50, 10 (Oct. 2015), 783--800.

Digital Library

[45]

Michael J. Steindorfer and Jurgen J. Vinju. 2016. Towards a Software Product Line of Trie-based Collections. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Generative Programming: Concepts and Experiences (GPCE 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 168--172.

Digital Library

Cited By

Basso MProkopec ARosà ABinder W(2023)Optimization-Aware Compiler-Level Event ProfilingACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems10.1145/3591473Online publication date: 10-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1145/3591473
Moreno PAreias MRocha R(2020)A Compression-Based Design for Higher Throughput in a Lock-Free Hash MapEuro-Par 2020: Parallel Processing10.1007/978-3-030-57675-2_29(458-473)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57675-2_29
Wang HOu JZhao MQiu SJiao YWang YMao QYang ZLiu YZhang JHu JZhang JLiu JChen JShen YCao LZhang HLi HLi MMa YZhang LLiu JZhang GLiu FChen J(2024)LavaStore: ByteDance's Purpose-Built, High-Performance, Cost-Effective Local Storage Engine for Cloud ServicesProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3685800.368580717:12(3799-3812)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.14778/3685800.3685807
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Cache-tries: concurrent lock-free hash tries with constant-time operations
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Concurrent computing methodologies
    1. Concurrent algorithms
2. Theory of computation
  1. Design and analysis of algorithms
    1. Concurrent algorithms
    2. Parallel algorithms
      1. Shared memory algorithms

Recommendations

Cache-tries: concurrent lock-free hash tries with constant-time operations
PPoPP '18: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming

Concurrent non-blocking hash tries have good cache locality, and horizontally scalable operations. However, operations on most existing concurrent hash tries run in O(log n) time.

In this paper, we show that the concurrent hash trie operations can run ...
LOFT: lock-free transactional data structures
PPoPP '19: Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming

Concurrent data structures are widely used in modern multicore architectures, providing atomicity (linearizability) for each concurrent operation. However, it is often desirable to execute several operations on multiple data structures atomically. We ...
Transactional Lock Elision Meets Combining
PODC '17: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing

Flat combining (FC) and transactional lock elision (TLE) are two techniques that facilitate efficient multi-thread access to a sequentially implemented data structure protected by a lock. FC allows threads to delegate their operations to another (...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGPLAN Notices

ACM SIGPLAN Notices Volume 53, Issue 1

PPoPP '18

January 2018

426 pages

ISSN:0362-1340

EISSN:1558-1160

DOI:10.1145/3200691

Editor:
Matthew Fluet
Rodchester Institude of Technology

Issue’s Table of Contents

PPoPP '18: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming
February 2018
442 pages
ISBN:9781450349826
DOI:10.1145/3178487
General Chair:
Andreas Krall
Vienna University of Technology, Austria
,
Program Chair:
Thomas R. Gross
ETH Zürich, Switzerland

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 February 2018

Published in SIGPLAN Volume 53, Issue 1

Check for updates

Badges

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

14
Total Citations
View Citations
577
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)36
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Basso MProkopec ARosà ABinder W(2023)Optimization-Aware Compiler-Level Event ProfilingACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems10.1145/3591473Online publication date: 10-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1145/3591473
Moreno PAreias MRocha R(2020)A Compression-Based Design for Higher Throughput in a Lock-Free Hash MapEuro-Par 2020: Parallel Processing10.1007/978-3-030-57675-2_29(458-473)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57675-2_29
Wang HOu JZhao MQiu SJiao YWang YMao QYang ZLiu YZhang JHu JZhang JLiu JChen JShen YCao LZhang HLi HLi MMa YZhang LLiu JZhang GLiu FChen J(2024)LavaStore: ByteDance's Purpose-Built, High-Performance, Cost-Effective Local Storage Engine for Cloud ServicesProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3685800.368580717:12(3799-3812)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.14778/3685800.3685807
Areias MRocha R(2022)On the correctness of a lock-free compression-based elastic mechanism for a hash trie designComputing10.1007/s00607-022-01085-2104:10(2279-2305)Online publication date: 21-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-022-01085-2
Natarajan ARamachandran AMittal N(2020)FEASTACM Transactions on Parallel Computing10.1145/33914387:2(1-64)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3391438
Kang JJung JDonaldson ATorlak E(2020)A marriage of pointer- and epoch-based reclamationProceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation10.1145/3385412.3385978(314-328)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3385412.3385978
Brown TProkopec AAlistarh DGupta RShen X(2020)Non-blocking interpolation search trees with doubly-logarithmic running timeProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming10.1145/3332466.3374542(276-291)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3332466.3374542
Prokopec ADuboscq GLeopoldseder DWürthinger TKandemir MJimborean AMoseley T(2019)An optimization-driven incremental inline substitution algorithm for just-in-time compilersProceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization10.5555/3314872.3314893(164-179)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3314872.3314893
Prokopec ARosà ALeopoldseder DDuboscq GTůma PStudener MBulej LZheng YVillazón ASimon DWürthinger TBinder WMcKinley KFisher K(2019)Renaissance: benchmarking suite for parallel applications on the JVMProceedings of the 40th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation10.1145/3314221.3314637(31-47)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3314221.3314637
Prokopec ADuboscq GLeopoldseder DWirthinger T(2019)An Optimization-Driven Incremental Inline Substitution Algorithm for Just-in-Time Compilers2019 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization (CGO)10.1109/CGO.2019.8661171(164-179)Online publication date: Feb-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/CGO.2019.8661171
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents