[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3298689.3347032acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Predicting online performance of job recommender systems with offline evaluation

Published: 10 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

At Indeed, recommender systems are used to recommend jobs. In this context, implicit and explicit feedback signals we can collect are rare events, making the task of evaluation more complex. Online evaluation (A/B testing) is usually the most reliable way to measure the results from our experiments, but it is a slow process. In contrast, the offline evaluation process is faster, but it is critical to make it reliable as it informs our decision to roll out new improvements in production. In this paper, we review the comparative offline and online performances of three recommendations models, we describe the evaluation metrics we use and analyze how the offline performance metrics correlate with online metrics to understand how an offline evaluation process can be leveraged to inform the decisions.

References

[1]
Nazanin Alipourfard, Peter G. Fennell, and Kristina Lerman. 2018. Can you Trust the Trend? Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining - WSDM '18 (2018).
[2]
Paolo Cremonesi, Yehuda Koren, and Roberto Turrin. 2010. Performance of Recommender Algorithms on Top-n Recommendation Tasks. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--46.
[3]
Leidy Esperanza MOLINA FERNÁNDEZ. 2018. Recommendation System for Netflix.
[4]
Mihajlo Grbovic and Haibin Cheng. 2018. Real-time Personalization Using Embeddings for Search Ranking at Airbnb. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 311--320.
[5]
Asela Gunawardana and Guy Shani. 2009. A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks. J. Mack. Learn. Res. 10 (Dec. 2009), 2935--2962. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1577069.1755883
[6]
Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, Loren G. Terveen, and John T. Riedl. 2004. Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22, 1 (Jan. 2004), 5--53.
[7]
Andrii Maksai, Florent Garcin, and Boi Faltings. 2015. Predicting Online Performance of News Recommender Systems Through Richer Evaluation Metrics. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 179--186.
[8]
Christopher D. Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Hinrich Schütze. 2008. Evaluation in information retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 139--161.
[9]
Sean M. McNee, John Riedl, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2006. Being Accurate is Not Enough: How Accuracy Metrics Have Hurt Recommender Systems. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1097--1101.
[10]
Mukaka MM. 2012. Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 24(3) (2012), 69--71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3576830/
[11]
Humberto Jesùs Corona Pampin, Houssem Jerbi, and Michael P. O'Mahony. 2015. Evaluating the Relative Performance of Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. Journal of Universal Computer Science 21, 13 (dec 2015), 1849--1868.
[12]
Jeonghee Yi, Ye Chen, Jie Li, Swaraj Sett, and Tak W. Yan. 2013. Predictive Model Performance: Offline and Online Evaluations. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1294--1302.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)An Exploration of Sentence-Pair Classification for Algorithmic RecruitingProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3604915.3610657(1175-1179)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Comparison of Real-Time and Batch Job RecommendationsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.324935611(20553-20559)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2021)A qualitative study of large-scale recommendation algorithms for biomedical knowledge basesInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-021-00300-3Online publication date: 19-Apr-2021

Index Terms

  1. Predicting online performance of job recommender systems with offline evaluation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    RecSys '19: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    September 2019
    635 pages
    ISBN:9781450362436
    DOI:10.1145/3298689
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 September 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. accuracy metrics
    2. comparative studies
    3. evaluation
    4. statistical analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    RecSys '19
    RecSys '19: Thirteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    September 16 - 20, 2019
    Copenhagen, Denmark

    Acceptance Rates

    RecSys '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 189 submissions, 19%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)An Exploration of Sentence-Pair Classification for Algorithmic RecruitingProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3604915.3610657(1175-1179)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Comparison of Real-Time and Batch Job RecommendationsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.324935611(20553-20559)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2021)A qualitative study of large-scale recommendation algorithms for biomedical knowledge basesInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-021-00300-3Online publication date: 19-Apr-2021

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media