More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

abstract

Where is the Human?: Bridging the Gap Between AI and HCI

Authors:

Stevie Chancellor,

Munmun De Choudhury,

Eric P. S. BaumerAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Paper No.: W09, Pages 1 - 9

https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299002

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, AI systems have become both more powerful and increasingly promising for integration in a variety of application areas. Attention has also been called to the social challenges these systems bring, particularly in how they might fail or even actively disadvantage marginalised social groups, or how their opacity might make them difficult to oversee and challenge. In the context of these and other challenges, the roles of humans working in tandem with these systems will be important, yet the HCI community has been only a quiet voice in these debates to date. This workshop aims to catalyse and crystallise an agenda around HCI's engagement with AI systems. Topics of interest include explainable and explorable AI; documentation and review; integrating artificial and human intelligence; collaborative decision making; AI/ML in HCI Design; diverse human roles and relationships in AI systems; and critical views of AI.

References

[1]

Eric P. S. Baumer. 2015. Usees. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM Press, Seoul, 3295--3298.

Digital Library

[2]

Eric P. S. Baumer. 2017. Toward Human-Centered Algorithm Design. Big Data & Society 4, 2 (2017).

[3]

Eric P. S. Baumer and Jed R. Brubaker. 2017. Post-Userism. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, Denver, CO, 6291--6303.

Digital Library

[4]

Richard Berk. 2012. Criminal justice forecasts of risk: A machine learning approach. Springer Science & Business Media. Where is the Human? Bridging the Gap Between AI and HCI CHI 2019, May 2019, Glasgow UK

Digital Library

[5]

Adam Bermingham and Alan Smeaton. 2011. On using Twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment Analysis where AI meets Psychology (SAAIP 2011). 2--10.

[6]

Peter Brusilovski, Alfred Kobsa, and Wolfgang Nejdl. 2007. The adaptive web: methods and strategies of web personalization. Vol. 4321. Springer Science & Business Media.

Digital Library

[7]

Stevie Chancellor, Zhiyuan Lin, Erica L Goodman, Stephanie Zerwas, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. Quantifying and Predicting Mental Illness Severity in Online Pro-Eating Disorder Communities. In CSCW'16. ACM, 1171--1184.

Digital Library

[8]

Hsinchun Chen, Roger HL Chiang, and Veda C Storey. 2012. Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS quarterly (2012), 1165--1188.

Digital Library

[9]

Angèle Christin. 2016. The Hidden Story of How Metrics Are Being Used in Courtrooms and Newsrooms to Make More Decisions. http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2016/06/20/the-hidden-story-of-how-metrics-are-being-used-incourtrooms-and-newsrooms-to-make-more-decisions/.

[10]

Angèle Christin. 2017. Algorithms in Practice: Comparing Web Journalism and Criminal Justice. Big Data & Society 4, 2 (Dec. 2017), 2053951717718855.

[11]

Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Gamon, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Predicting depression via social media. ICWSM 13 (2013), 1--10.

[12]

Munmun De Choudhury and Emre Kiciman. 2018. Integrating Artificial and Human Intelligence in Complex, Sensitive Problem Domains: Experiences from Mental Health. AI Magazine 39, 3 (2018).

[13]

Munmun De Choudhury, Emre Kiciman, Mark Dredze, Glen Coppersmith, and Mrinal Kumar. 2016. Discovering shifts to suicidal ideation from mental health content in social media. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2098--2110.

Digital Library

[14]

Thomas G Dietterich. 2009. Machine learning in ecosystem informatics and sustainability. In IJCAI. 8--13.

Digital Library

[15]

Graham Dove, Kim Halskov, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2017. UX Design Innovation: Challenges for Working with Machine Learning As a Design Material. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, Denver, CO, 278--288.

Digital Library

[16]

Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012. Fairness through awareness. In ITCS'12. 214--226.

Digital Library

[17]

Hamid Ekbia, Michael Mattioli, Inna Kouper, Gary Arave, Ali Ghazinejad, Timothy Bowman, Venkata Ratandeep Suri, Andrew Tsou, Scott Weingart, and Cassidy R Sugimoto. 2015. Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, 8 (2015), 1523--1545.

Digital Library

[18]

Jorge Galindo and Pablo Tamayo. 2000. Credit risk assessment using statistical and machine learning: basic methodology and risk modeling applications. Computational Economics 15, 1--2 (2000), 107--143.

Digital Library

[19]

J Gama, Indre Zliobaite, A Bifet, M Pechenizkiy, and A Bouchachia. 2013. A survey on concept drift adaptation. Comput. Surveys 1, 1 (2013).

Digital Library

[20]

Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumeé Iii, and Kate Crawford. 2018. Datasheets for Datasets. In Presented at FAT/ML 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010

[21]

Tarleton Gillespie and Nick Seaver. 2015--11-05. Critical Algorithm Studies: A Reading List. https://socialmediacollective. org/reading-lists/critical-algorithm-studies/.

[22]

Sara Hajian and Josep Domingo-Ferrer. 2012. Direct and indirect discrimination prevention methods. In Discrimination and privacy in the information society. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 241--254.

[23]

Jiazhen He, James Bailey, Benjamin IP Rubinstein, and Rui Zhang. 2015. Identifying At-Risk Students in Massive Open Online Courses. In AAAI. 1749--1755.

Digital Library

[24]

Xinran He, Junfeng Pan, Ou Jin, Tianbing Xu, Bo Liu, Tao Xu, Yanxin Shi, Antoine Atallah, Ralf Herbrich, and Stuart Bowers. 2014. Practical lessons from predicting clicks on ads at facebook. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Data Mining for Online Advertising. ACM, 1--9. Where is the Human? Bridging the Gap Between AI and HCI CHI 2019, May 2019, Glasgow UK

Digital Library

[25]

Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Ji Lucas, Patrick Meier, and Sarah Vieweg. 2014. AIDR: Artificial intelligence for disaster response. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 159--162.

Digital Library

[26]

Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, Michael Xie, W Matthew Davis, David B Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. 2016. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 353, 6301 (2016), 790--794.

[27]

Hian Chye Koh and Gerald Tan. 2011. Data mining applications in healthcare. J. Healthcare. Info. Manag. 19, 2 (2011), 65.

[28]

Bjoern Krollner, Bruce Vanstone, and Gavin Finnie. 2010. Financial time series forecasting with machine learning techniques: A survey. (2010).

[29]

David Lazer, Ryan Kennedy, Gary King, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2014. The parable of Google Flu: traps in big data analysis. Science 343, 6176 (2014), 1203--1205.

[30]

Wei-Yang Lin, Ya-Han Hu, and Chih-Fong Tsai. 2012. Machine learning in financial crisis prediction: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 42, 4 (2012), 421--436.

Digital Library

[31]

Zachary C Lipton. 2017. The Doctor Just Won't Accept That! arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08037 (2017).

[32]

Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa D Raji, and Timnit Gebru. 2019. Model Cards for Model Reporting. In ACM FAT*'19. arxiv.org/abs/1810.03993

Digital Library

[33]

Grégoire Montavon, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Alexander Binder, Wojciech Samek, and Klaus-Robert Müller. 2017. Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep Taylor decomposition. Pattern Recognition 65 (2017), 211--222.

Digital Library

[34]

Alexandra Olteanu, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Emre Kiciman. 2016. Social data: Biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries. (2016).

[35]

Dino Pedreschi, Salvatore Ruggieri, and Franco Turini. 2008. Discrimination-aware data mining. In ACM KDD'08. ACM, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Digital Library

[36]

John Pestian, Henry Nasrallah, Pawel Matykiewicz, Aurora Bennett, and Antoon Leenaars. 2010. Suicide note classification using natural language processing: A content analysis. Biomedical informatics insights 3 (2010), BII--S4706.

[37]

Harry Surden. 2014. Machine learning and law. Wash. L. Rev. 89 (2014), 87.

[38]

Deepak Vasisht, Zerina Kapetanovic, Jongho Won, Xinxin Jin, Ranveer Chandra, Sudipta N Sinha, Ashish Kapoor, Madhusudhan Sudarshan, and Sean Stratman. 2017. FarmBeats: An IoT Platform for Data-Driven Agriculture. In NSDI. 515--529.

Digital Library

[39]

Michael Veale and Reuben Binns. 2017. Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data. Big Data & Society 4, 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10/gdcfnz

[40]

Michael Veale, Max Van Kleek, and Reuben Binns. 2018. Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making. In CHI'18. https://doi.org/10/ct4s

Digital Library

[41]

Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz. 2004. Prediction markets. Journal of economic perspectives 18, 2 (2004), 107--126.

[42]

Qian Yang, Alex Scuito, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Aaron Steinfeld. 2018. Investigating How Experienced UX Designers Effectively Work with Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). ACM, Hong Kong, 585--596.

Digital Library

[43]

Qian Yang, John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, Lisa Carey, and James F. Antaki. 2016. Investigating the Heart Pump Implant Decision Process: Opportunities for Decision Support Tools to Help. In CHI 2016. 4477--4488.

Digital Library

[44]

Jiaming Zeng, Berk Ustun, and Cynthia Rudin. 2017. Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 180, 3 (2017), 689--722.

Cited By

Alkahlout OÇetin Karabat B(2024)DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM SÜRECİNİN İŞE ALIM İŞLEVİNE ETKİLERİ: BİR KAMU KURULUŞUNDA DİJİTAL İŞE ALIM UYGULAMALARININ İNCELENMESİYönetim Bilimleri Dergisi10.35408/comuybd.144733122:54(2117-2143)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1447331
Hussain MIacovides ILawton TSharma VPorter ZCunningham AHabli IHickey SJia YMorgan PWong N(2024)Development and translation of human-AI interaction models into working prototypes for clinical decision-makingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660697(1607-1619)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660697
Saßmannshausen SOntika NPinatti De Carvalho ARouncefield MPipek V(2024)Amplifying Human Capabilities in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: An Empirical Study of Current Practices and AI Potentials in RadiologyProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642362(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642362
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Where is the Human?: Bridging the Gap Between AI and HCI
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Bringing Humans at the Epicenter of Artificial Intelligence: A Confluence of AI, HCI and Human Centered Computing
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Human Computer Interaction (HCI) often intersect under the purview of different technologies in a plethora of application areas, wherein it becomes pivotal to identify and interpret the exact roles of both the ...
Interactive Human Centered Artificial Intelligence: A Definition and Research Challenges
AVI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become the buzzword of the last decade. Advances so far have been largely technical with a focus on machine learning (ML). Only recently have we begun seeing a shift towards focusing on the human aspects of artificial ...
Questioning ‘what makes us human’: How audiences react to an artificial intelligence–driven show
Abstract
I am Echoborg is promoted as ‘a show created afresh each time by the audience in conversation with an artificial intelligence (AI)’. The show demonstrates how AI in a creative and performance context can raise questions about the technology’s ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2019

3673 pages

ISBN:9781450359719

DOI:10.1145/3290607

General Chairs:
Stephen Brewster
University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
,
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
TU Wien, Austria
,
Program Chairs:
Anna Cox
University College London, UK
,
Vassilis Kostakos
University of Melbourne, Australia

Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Abstract

Conference

CHI '19

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '19: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 4 - 9, 2019

Glasgow, Scotland Uk

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

30
Total Citations
View Citations
2,141
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)293
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25

Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Alkahlout OÇetin Karabat B(2024)DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM SÜRECİNİN İŞE ALIM İŞLEVİNE ETKİLERİ: BİR KAMU KURULUŞUNDA DİJİTAL İŞE ALIM UYGULAMALARININ İNCELENMESİYönetim Bilimleri Dergisi10.35408/comuybd.144733122:54(2117-2143)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1447331
Hussain MIacovides ILawton TSharma VPorter ZCunningham AHabli IHickey SJia YMorgan PWong N(2024)Development and translation of human-AI interaction models into working prototypes for clinical decision-makingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660697(1607-1619)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3660697
Saßmannshausen SOntika NPinatti De Carvalho ARouncefield MPipek V(2024)Amplifying Human Capabilities in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: An Empirical Study of Current Practices and AI Potentials in RadiologyProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642362(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642362
Barth CBernard JHuang E(2024)"It's like a glimpse into the future": Exploring the Role of Blood Glucose Prediction Technologies for Type 1 Diabetes Self-ManagementProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642234(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642234
Murray-Rust DLupetti MNicenboim IHoog W(2024)Grasping AI: experiential exercises for designersAI & Society10.1007/s00146-023-01794-y39:6(2891-2911)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00146-023-01794-y
Weitz K(2024)Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt: Einblick in die Gestaltung Menschenzentrierter Künstlicher IntelligenzVertrauen in Künstliche Intelligenz10.1007/978-3-658-43816-6_14(257-271)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43816-6_14
McCosker AKamstra PFarmer J(2023)Moderating mental health: Addressing the human–machine alignment problem through an adaptive logic of careNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448231186800Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231186800
Goel TShaer ODelcourt CGu QCooper A(2023)Preparing Future Designers for Human-AI Collaboration in Persona CreationProceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3596671.3598574(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3596671.3598574
Wright ANemere PGalvin AChau DDavidoff S(2023)Lessons from the Development of an Anomaly Detection Interface on the Mars Perseverance Rover using the ISHMAP FrameworkProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581641.3584036(91-105)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3581641.3584036
Chancellor S(2023)Toward Practices for Human-Centered Machine LearningCommunications of the ACM10.1145/353098766:3(78-85)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3530987
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents