More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

The Effect of Field-of-View Restriction on Sex Bias in VR Sickness and Spatial Navigation Performance

Authors:

Majed Al Zayer,

Isayas B. Adhanom,

Paul MacNeilage,

Eelke FolmerAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Paper No.: 354, Pages 1 - 12

https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300584

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Recent studies show that women are more susceptible to visually-induced VR sickness, which might explain the low adoption rate of VR technology among women. Reducing field-of-view (FOV) during locomotion is already a widely used strategy to reduce VR sickness as it blocks peripheral optical flow perception and mitigates visual/vestibular conflict. Prior studies show that men are more adept at 3D spatial navigation than women, though this sex bias can be minimized by providing women with a larger FOV. Our study provides insight into the relationship between sex and FOV restriction with respect to VR sickness and spatial navigation performance which seem to conflict. We find the use of an FOV restrictor to be effective in mitigating VR sickness in both sexes while we did not find a negative effect of FOV restriction on spatial navigation performance.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (paper354p.mp4)

Preview video

Download
4.45 MB

MP4 File (pn1252.mp4)

Supplemental video

Download
48.39 MB

References

[1]

2017. Daydream Elements, VR guidelines, https://developers.google. com/vr/elements/overview#locomotion. (June 2017).

[2]

2017. Entertainment Software Association. Distribution of computer and video gamers in the United States from 2006 to 2017, by gender. https://www.statista.com/statistics/232383/ gender-split-of-us-computer-and-video-gamers/. (2017).

[3]

2017. HTC Vive Survey. http://u3915321.viewer.maka.im/pcviewer/ R1HEHKCZ. (2017).

[4]

2017. Oculus Best Practices: Motion, https://developer.oculus.com/ design/latest/concepts/book-bp/. (June 2017).

[5]

2018. Google Earth VR. https://vr.google.com/earth/. (2018).

[6]

Nicoletta Adamo-Villani and David Jones. 2007. Travel in SMILE: A study of two immersive motion control techniques. In Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on Computer Graphics and Visualization. 43--49. 8https://www.starvr.com/

[7]

Sanjay Asrani, Shazhou Zou, Salvatore d'Anna, Susan Vitale, and Ran Zeimer. 1999. Noninvasive mapping of the normal retinal thickness at the posterior pole. Ophthalmology 106, 2 (1999), 269--273.

[8]

Robert S Astur, Maria L Ortiz, and Robert J Sutherland. 1998. A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task:: A large and reliable sex difference. Behavioural brain research 93, 1--2 (1998), 185--190.

[9]

Frank Biocca. 1992. Will simulation sickness slow down the diffusion of virtual environment technology? Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 3 (1992), 334--343.

Digital Library

[10]

Mark Bolas, J Adam Jones, Ian McDowall, and Evan Suma. 2017. Dynamic field of view throttling as a means of improving user experience in head mounted virtual environments. (May 9 2017). US Patent 9,645,395.

[11]

Frederick Bonato, Andrea Bubka, and Stephen Palmisano. 2009. Combined pitch and roll and cybersickness in a virtual environment. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 80, 11 (2009), 941--945.

[12]

Jelte E Bos, Sjoerd C de Vries, Martijn L van Emmerik, and Eric L Groen. 2010. The effect of internal and external fields of view on visually induced motion sickness. Applied ergonomics 41, 4 (2010), 516--521.

[13]

Doug Bowman, David Koller, and Larry F. Hodges. 1997. Travel in immersive virtual environments: An evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1997., IEEE 1997. IEEE, 45--52.

Digital Library

[14]

Dana Boyd. {n. d.}. Is the Oculus Rift sexist? https://qz.com/192874/ is-the-oculus-rift-designed-to-be-sexist/. ({n. d.}).

[15]

Chih-Hui Chang, Wu-Wen Pan, Li-Ya Tseng, and Thomas A Stoffregen. 2012. Postural activity and motion sickness during video game play in children and adults. Experimental brain research 217, 2 (2012), 299--309.

[16]

Stacy A Clemes and Peter A Howarth. 2005. The menstrual cycle and susceptibility to virtual simulation sickness. Journal of biological rhythms 20, 1 (2005), 71--82.

[17]

Mary Czerwinski, Desney S Tan, and George G Robertson. 2002. Women take a wider view. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 195--202.

Digital Library

[18]

James M Dabbs, E-Lee Chang, Rebecca A Strong, and Rhonda Milun. 1998. Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior 19, 2 (1998), 89--98.

[19]

Simon Davis, Keith Nesbitt, and Eugene Nalivaiko. 2014. A systematic review of cybersickness. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment. ACM, 1--9.

Digital Library

[20]

Ira Driscoll, Derek A Hamilton, Ronald A Yeo, William M Brooks, and Robert J Sutherland. 2005. Virtual navigation in humans: the impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Hormones and behavior 47, 3 (2005), 326--335.

[21]

Henry Been-Lirn Duh, Donald E Parker, and Thomas A Furness. 2004. An independent visual background reduced simulator sickness in a driving simulator. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 13, 5 (2004), 578--588.

Digital Library

[22]

Sheldon M Ebenholtz. 1992. Motion sickness and oculomotor systems in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 3 (1992), 302--305.

Digital Library

[23]

Jamie Feltham. 2015. VRFocus: HTC: People Will Use 'A Smaller Space' For Vive's Room Scale Tracking. https://www.vrfocus.com/2015/11/ htc-people-will-use-a-smaller-space-for-vives-room-scale-tracking/. (2015).

[24]

Ajoy S Fernandes and Steven K Feiner. 2016. Combating VR sickness through subtle dynamic field-of-view modification. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 201--210.

[25]

Moira B Flanagan, James G May, and Thomas G Dobie. 2005. Sex differences in tolerance to visually-induced motion sickness. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 76, 7 (2005), 642--646.

[26]

Sebastian Freitag, Benjamin Weyers, and Torsten W Kuhlen. 2017. Assisted travel based on common visibility and navigation meshes. In Virtual Reality (VR), 2017 IEEE. IEEE, 369--370.

[27]

Andre Garcia, Carryl Baldwin, and Matt Dworsky. 2010. Gender differences in simulator sickness in fixed-versus rotating-base driving simulator. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 54. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1551--1555.

[28]

Grover C Gilmore, Heidi E Wenk, Luke A Naylor, and Traci A Stuve. 1992. Motion perception and aging. Psychology and aging 7, 4 (1992), 654.

[29]

John F Golding. 2006. Motion sickness susceptibility. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 129, 1 (2006), 67--76.

[30]

David A Graeber and Kay M Stanney. 2002. Gender differences in visually induced motion sickness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 46. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2109--2113.

[31]

David B Henson. 2000. Visual fields. Butterworth-Heinemann Medical.

[32]

KJ Hill and Peter A Howarth. 2000. Habituation to the side effects of immersion in a virtual environment. Displays 21, 1 (2000), 25--30.

[33]

Peter A Howarth and Simon G Hodder. 2008. Characteristics of habituation to motion in a virtual environment. Displays 29, 2 (2008), 117--123.

[34]

Eelke Folmer Jiwan Bhandari, Paul MacNeilage. 2018. Teleportation without Spatial Disorientation using Optical Flow Cues. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2018 (GI'18).

[35]

Andras Kemeny, Paul George, Frédéric Mérienne, and Florent Colombet. 2017. New VR Navigation Techniques to Reduce Cybersickness. Electronic Imaging 2017, 3 (2017), 48--53.

[36]

Robert S Kennedy and Ashton Graybiel. 1965. The Dial test: A standardized procedure for the experimental production of canal sickness symptomatology in a rotating environment. Technical Report. NAVAL SCHOOL OF AVIATION MEDICINE PENSACOLA FL.

[37]

Robert S Kennedy, Norman E Lane, Kevin S Berbaum, and Michael G Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203--220.

[38]

B Keshavarz, H Hecht, and BD Lawson. 2014. Visually induced motion sickness: characteristics, causes, and countermeasures. Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications (2014), 648--697.

[39]

Behrang Keshavarz, Heiko Hecht, and Lisa Zschutschke. 2011. Intravisual conflict in visually induced motion sickness. Displays 32, 4 (2011), 181--188.

[40]

Eugenia M Kolasinski. 1995. Simulator Sickness in Virtual Environments. Technical Report. DTIC Document.

[41]

J-F Lapointe and Norman G Vinson. 2002. Effects of joystick mapping and field-of-view on human performance in virtual walkthroughs. In 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission, 2002. Proceedings. First International Symposium on. IEEE, 490--493.

[42]

Steven M LaValle. 2016. Virtual reality. Cambridge University Press.

[43]

Joseph J LaViola Jr. 2000. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 32, 1 (2000), 47--56.

Digital Library

[44]

Ben D Lawson and Bernhard E Riecke. 2014. The perception of body motion. Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications 2 (2014), 163--196.

[45]

JJ-W Lin, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, Donald E Parker, Habib Abi-Rached, and Thomas A Furness. 2002. Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In Virtual Reality, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE. IEEE, 164--171.

Digital Library

[46]

Gerard Llorach, Alun Evans, and Josep Blat. 2014. Simulator sickness and presence using HMDs: comparing use of a game controller and a position estimation system. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, 137--140.

Digital Library

[47]

J M Loomis, R L Klatzky, and R G Golledge. 2001. Navigating without vision: basic and applied research. Optometry and Vision Science 78, 5 (May 2001), 282--289.

[48]

Jack M Loomis, Roberta L Klatzky, Reginald G Golledge, Joseph G Cicinelli, James W Pellegrino, and Phyllis A Fry. 1993. Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122, 1 (1993), 73.

[49]

Omar Merhi, Elise Faugloire, Moira Flanagan, and Thomas A Stoffregen. 2007. Motion sickness, console video games, and head-mounted displays. Human Factors 49, 5 (2007), 920--934.

[50]

Betty J Mohler, William B Thompson, Sarah H Creem-Regehr, Herbert L Pick, and William H Warren. 2007. Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Experimental brain research 181, 2 (2007), 221--228.

[51]

Justin Munafo, Meg Diedrick, and Thomas A Stoffregen. 2016. The virtual reality head-mounted display Oculus Rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects. Exp. Brain Research (2016), 1--13.

[52]

Noah Nelson. 2015. NPR: All Tech Considered. Virtual Reality's Next Hurdle: Overcoming 'Sim Sickness' http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2014/08/05/ 338015854/virtual-realitys-next-hurdle-overcoming-sim-sickness. (August 2015).

[53]

Tao Ni, Doug A Bowman, and Jian Chen. 2006. Increased display size and resolution improve task performance in information-rich virtual environments. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2006. Canadian Information Processing Society, 139--146.

Digital Library

[54]

Guangyu Nie, Yue Liu, and Yongtian Wang. 2017. Prevention of Visually Induced Motion Sickness Based on Dynamic Real-Time ContentAware Non-salient Area Blurring. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct), 2017 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 75--78.

[55]

George D Park, R Wade Allen, Dary Fiorentino, Theodore J Rosenthal, and Marcia L Cook. 2006. Simulator sickness scores according to symptom susceptibility, age, and gender for an older driver assessment study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 50. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2702--2706.

[56]

Nicholas F Polys, Seonho Kim, and Doug A Bowman. 2007. Effects of information layout, screen size, and field of view on user performance in information-rich virtual environments. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 18, 1 (2007), 19--38.

[57]

Jerrold D Prothero, Mark H Draper, DE Parker, MJ Wells, et al. 1999. The use of an independent visual background to reduce simulator side-effects. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 70, 3 Pt 1 (1999), 277--283.

[58]

James T Reason and Joseph John Brand. 1975. Motion sickness. Academic press.

[59]

Lisa Rebenitsch and Charles Owen. 2014. Individual variation in susceptibility to cybersickness. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 309--317.

Digital Library

[60]

Gary E Riccio and Thomas A Stoffregen. 1991. An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological psychology 3, 3 (1991), 195--240.

[61]

John J Rieser, D Guth, and E Hill. 1982. Mental processes mediating independent travel: Implications for orientation and mobility. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness (1982).

[62]

Roy A Ruddle and Simon Lessels. 2009. The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 16, 1 (2009), 5.

Digital Library

[63]

Noah J Sandstrom, Jordy Kaufman, and Scott A Huettel. 1998. Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research 6, 4 (1998), 351--360.

[64]

A Fleming Seay, David M Krum, Larry Hodges, and William Ribarsky. 2001. Simulator sickness and presence in a high FOV virtual environment. In Virtual Reality, 2001. Proceedings. IEEE. IEEE, 299--300.

Digital Library

[65]

Kay M Stanney, Kelly S Hale, Isabelina Nahmens, and Robert S Kennedy. 2003. What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: Influences of gender, body mass index, and past experience. Human Factors 45, 3 (2003), 504--520.

[66]

Kay M Stanney and Robert S Kennedy. 1997. The psychometrics of cybersickness. Commun. ACM 40, 8 (1997), 66--68.

Digital Library

[67]

Laura Sydell. {n. d.}. NPR: All Tech Considered. In Google's Vision Of The Future, Computing Is Immersive, http: //www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/05/20/529146185/ in-googles-vision-of-the-future-computing-is-immersive. ({n. d.}).

[68]

Desney S Tan, Mary P Czerwinski, and George G Robertson. 2006. Large displays enhance optical flow cues and narrow the gender gap in 3-D virtual navigation. Human Factors 48, 2 (2006), 318--333.

[69]

Nobuhisa Tanaka and Hideyuki Takagi. 2004. Virtual reality environment design of managing both presence and virtual reality sickness. Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science 23, 6 (2004), 313--317.

[70]

Michel Treisman. 1977. Motion sickness: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science 197, 4302 (1977), 493--495.

[71]

Robert J van Beers, Anne C Sittig, and Jan J Denier van Der Gon. 1999. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J. of neurophysiology 81, 3 (1999), 1355--1364.

[72]

John E Vanston and Lars Strother. 2017. Sex differences in the human visual system. Journal of Neuroscience Research 95, 1--2 (2017), 617--625.

[73]

Daniel Voyer, Susan Voyer, and M Philip Bryden. 1995. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. (1995).

[74]

Maxwell J Wells and Michael Venturino. 1990. Performance and head movements using a helmet-mounted display with different sized fieldsof-view. Optical Engineering 29, 8 (1990), 870--878.

[75]

David Matthew Whittinghill, Bradley Ziegler, T Case, and B Moore. 2015. Nasum virtualis: A simple technique for reducing simulator sickness. In Games Developers Conference (GDC).

Cited By

Biswas NMukherjee ABhattacharya S(2024)“Are you feeling sick?” – A systematic literature review of cybersickness in virtual realityACM Computing Surveys10.1145/367000856:11(1-38)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670008
Prithul ALynam HFolmer E(2024)Performance and Navigation Behavior of using Teleportation in VR First-Person Shooter GamesGames: Research and Practice10.1145/3661133Online publication date: 24-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661133
Ang SQuarles J(2024)SmoothRide: A Versatile Solution to Combat Cybersickness in Elevation-Altering EnvironmentsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345619430:11(7152-7161)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456194
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The Effect of Field-of-View Restriction on Sex Bias in VR Sickness and Spatial Navigation Performance
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Computer graphics
    1. Graphics systems and interfaces
      1. Virtual reality
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Virtual reality

Recommendations

Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness for Cyclists in VR Bicycle Simulators
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Virtual Reality (VR) bicycle simulations aim to recreate the feeling of riding a bicycle and are commonly used in many application areas. However, current solutions still create mismatches between the visuals and physical movement, which causes VR ...
Field-of-View Restriction to Reduce VR Sickness Does Not Impede Spatial Learning in Women

Women are more likely to experience virtual reality (VR) sickness than men, which could pose a major challenge to the mass market success of VR. Because VR sickness often results from a visual-vestibular conflict, an effective strategy to mitigate ...
Effect of VR technology matureness on VR sickness
Abstract
In this paper relationship of perceived virtual reality (VR) sickness phenomenon with different generations of virtual reality head mounted displays (VR HMD) is presented. Action content type omnidirectional video clip was watched by means of four ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2019

9077 pages

ISBN:9781450359702

DOI:10.1145/3290605

General Chairs:
Stephen Brewster
University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
,
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
TU Wien, Austria
,
Program Chairs:
Anna Cox
University College London, UK
,
Vassilis Kostakos
University of Melbourne, Australia

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '19

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '19: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 4 - 9, 2019

Glasgow, Scotland Uk

Acceptance Rates

CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 703 of 2,958 submissions, 24%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

59
Total Citations
View Citations
1,397
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)151
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19

Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Biswas NMukherjee ABhattacharya S(2024)“Are you feeling sick?” – A systematic literature review of cybersickness in virtual realityACM Computing Surveys10.1145/367000856:11(1-38)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670008
Prithul ALynam HFolmer E(2024)Performance and Navigation Behavior of using Teleportation in VR First-Person Shooter GamesGames: Research and Practice10.1145/3661133Online publication date: 24-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3661133
Ang SQuarles J(2024)SmoothRide: A Versatile Solution to Combat Cybersickness in Elevation-Altering EnvironmentsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345619430:11(7152-7161)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456194
Pöhlmann KLi GWilson GMcGill MPollick FBrewster S(2024)Is Video Gaming a Cure for Cybersickness? Gamers Experience Less Cybersickness Than Non-Gamers in a VR Self-Motion TaskIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345617630:11(7225-7233)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456176
Noh SPark JKim G(2024)Effect of Synchronized Vehicle Motion to Mitigating Sickness for On-Vehicle VR During Active Task PerformanceIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.348572712(157822-157837)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3485727
Qi SMenozzi M(2024)Effects of cybersickness mitigation methods on behavior: a comparative study based on the skill–rule–knowledge modelVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-01071-328:4Online publication date: 15-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-024-01071-3
Bannigan Gde Sousa AScheller MFinnegan DProulx M(2024)Potential factors contributing to observed sex differences in virtual-reality-induced sicknessExperimental Brain Research10.1007/s00221-023-06760-0242:2(463-475)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06760-0
Delgado Rodriguez SRivu RMäkelä VAlt FWard JMcGill MMarky K(2023)Challenges in Virtual Reality Studies: Ethics and Internal and External ValidityProceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 202310.1145/3582700.3582716(105-111)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3582700.3582716
Winkle KLagerstedt ETorre IOffenwanger A(2023)15 Years of (Who)man Robot Interaction: Reviewing the H in Human-Robot InteractionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/357171812:3(1-28)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571718
Jicol CClarke CTor EDakin RLancaster TChang SPetrini KO'Neill EProulx MLutteroth C(2023)Realism and Field of View Affect Presence in VR but Not the Way You ThinkProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581448(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581448
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents