[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3107411.3107443acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Cophenetic Median Trees Under the Manhattan Distance

Published: 20 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Computing median trees from gene trees using path-difference metrics has provided several credible species tree estimates. Similar to these metrics is the cophenetic family of metrics that originates from a dendrogram comparison metric introduced more than 50 years ago. Despite the tradition and appeal of the cophenetic metrics, the problem of computing median trees under this family of metrics has not been analyzed. Like other standard median tree problems relevant in practice, as we show here, this problem is also NP-hard. NP-hard median tree problems have been successfully addressed by local search heuristics that are solving thousands of instances of a corresponding local search problem. For the local search problem under a cophenetic metric the best known (naive) algorithm has a time complexity that is typically prohibitive for effective heuristic searches. Focusing on the Manhattan norm (Manhattan cophenetic metric), we describe an efficient algorithm for this problem that improves on the naive solution by a factor of n, where n is the size of the input trees. We demonstrate the performance of our local search algorithm in a comparative study using published empirical data sets.

References

[1]
Benjamin L. Allen and Mike Steel 2001. Subtree transfer operations and their induced metrics on evolutionary trees. Annals of Combinatorics Vol. 5 (2001), 1--15.
[2]
Mukul S. Bansal, J. Gordon Burleigh, and Oliver Eulenstein. 2010. Efficient genome-scale phylogenetic analysis under the duplication-loss and deep coalescence cost models. BMC Bioinformatics Vol. 11 Suppl 1 (2010), S42.
[3]
Mukul S. Bansal, J. Gordon Burleigh, Oliver Eulenstein, and David Fernández-Baca 2010. Robinson-Foulds Supertrees. Algorithms for Molecular Biology Vol. 5, 1 (2010), 1--12.
[4]
Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds, and John L. Gittleman. 2005. A complete phylogeny of the whales, dolphins and even-toed hoofed mammals (Cetartiodactyla). Biological Reviews, Vol. 80, 3 (2005), 445--473. 1469--185X
[5]
Mark A Ragan. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution Vol. 1, 1 (1992), 53--58.
[6]
Johannes J. Le Roux, Ania M. Wieczorek, Mohsen M. Ramadan, and Carol T. Tran 2006. Resolving the native provenance of invasive fireweed (Senecio madagascariensis Poir.) in the Hawaiian Islands as inferred Poir.) in the Hawaiian Islands as inferred from phylogenetic analysis. Diversity and Distributions Vol. 12 (2006), 694--702.
[7]
Charles Semple and Mike A. Steel 2003. Phylogenetics. University Press, Oxford.
[8]
S. Snir and S. Rao. 2010. Quartets MaxCut: A Divide and Conquer Quartets Algorithm. IEEE/ACM TCBB, Vol. 7, 4 (2010), 704--718. 1545--5963
[9]
Robert R. Sokal and F. James Rohlf 1962. The Comparison of Dendrograms by Objective Methods. Taxon, Vol. 11, 2 (1962), 33--40. 00400262 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1217208
[10]
M. A. Steel. 1992. The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees. Journal of Classification Vol. 9 (1992), 91--116.
[11]
David L. Swofford. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. Molecular Systematics (1990), 411--501.
[12]
David L. Swofford. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. (2002).
[13]
Cuong Than and Luay Nakhleh 2009. Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. PLoS Comput Biol, Vol. 5, 9 (2009), e1000501.
[14]
Martin F Wojciechowski, Michael J Sanderson, Kelly P Steele, and Aaron Liston 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the "temperate herbaceous tribes" of papilionoid legumes: a supertree approach. Advances in legume systematics Vol. 9 (2000), 277--298.
[15]
Louxin Zhang. 2011. From gene trees to species trees II: species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescence events. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform Vol. 8, 6 (2011), 1685--91.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Intrinsic Interleaving Distance for Merge TreesLa Matematica10.1007/s44007-024-00143-9Online publication date: 16-Dec-2024
  • (2018)Cophenetic Distances: A Near-Linear Time Algorithmic FrameworkComputing and Combinatorics10.1007/978-3-319-94776-1_15(168-179)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ACM-BCB '17: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology,and Health Informatics
August 2017
800 pages
ISBN:9781450347228
DOI:10.1145/3107411
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 August 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. SP
  2. cophenetic distance
  3. local search
  4. median trees
  5. phylogenetics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

BCB '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ACM-BCB '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 42 of 132 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 885 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Intrinsic Interleaving Distance for Merge TreesLa Matematica10.1007/s44007-024-00143-9Online publication date: 16-Dec-2024
  • (2018)Cophenetic Distances: A Near-Linear Time Algorithmic FrameworkComputing and Combinatorics10.1007/978-3-319-94776-1_15(168-179)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2018

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media