[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

The Perceptual Consequences of Curved Screens

Published: 06 October 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Flat panels are by far the most common type of television screen. There are reasons, however, to believe that curved screens create a greater sense of immersion, reduce distracting reflections, and minimize some perceptual distortions that are commonplace with large televisions. To examine these possibilities, we calculated how curving the screen affects the field of view and the probability of seeing reflections of ambient lights. We find that screen curvature has a small beneficial effect on field of view and a large beneficial effect on the probability of seeing reflections. We also collected behavioral data to characterize perceptual distortions in various viewing configurations. We find that curved screens can in fact reduce problematic perceptual distortions on large screens, but that the benefit depends on the geometry of the projection on such screens.

References

[1]
Maneesh Agrawala, Denis Zorin, and Tamara Munzner. 2000. Artistic multiprojection rendering. In Rendering Techniques 2000. Springer, 125--136.
[2]
John Archer. 2016. Curved TVs: The Pros and Cons. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/curved-tvs-the-pros-and-cons.
[3]
Blender. 2017. Home Page. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from https://www.blender.org.
[4]
ITU-R BT.2022. 2012. General viewing conditions for subjective assessment of quality of SDTV and HDTV television pictures on flat panel displays. International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BT.2022-0-201208-I/en.
[5]
ITU-R BT.2246-1. 2012. The present state of ultra high definition television. International Telecommunication Union. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from https://www.itu/int/pub/R-REP-BT.2246-1-2012.
[6]
Emily A. Cooper, Elise A. Piazza, and Martin S. Banks. 2012. The perceptual basis of common photographic practice. Journal of Vision 12, 5, 1--14.
[7]
Gary Edgerton. 2010. The Columbia History of American Television. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
[8]
Paul Hands, Tom V. Smulders, and Jenny C. A. Read. 2015. Stereoscopic 3-D content appears relatively veridical when viewed from an oblique angle. Journal of Vision 15, 5, 1--21.
[9]
Toyohiko Hatada, Haruo Sakata, and Hideo Kusaka. 1980. Psychophysical analysis of the sensation of reality induced by a visual wide-field display. SMPTE Journal 89, 8, 560--569.
[10]
L. L. Holladay. 1926. The fundamentals of glare and visibility. Journal of the Optical Society of America 12, 4, 271--319.
[11]
David Katzmaier. 2014. Trouble With the Curve: What You Need to Know About Curved TVs. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from https://www.cnet.com/news/trouble-with-the-curve-what-you-need-to-know-about -curved-tvs/.
[12]
Rudolf Kingslake. 1963. Lenses in Photography: The Practical Guide to Optics for Photographers. Barnes.
[13]
Matthew Lombard, Robert D. Reich, Maria E. Grabe, Cheryl C. Bracken, and Theresa B. Ditton. 2000. Presence and television. Human Communication Research 26, 1, 75--98.
[14]
Barbara London, Jim Stone, and John Upton. 2010. Photography. Prentice Hall.
[15]
L. E. Paulsson and J. Sjöstrand. 1980. Contrast sensitivity in the presence of a glare light. Theoretical concepts and preliminary clinical studies. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 19, 4, 401--406.
[16]
Maurice Henri Pirenne. 1970. Optics, Painting and Photography. JSTOR.
[17]
D. Regan and S. J. Hamstra. 1992. Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research 32, 10, 1845--1864.
[18]
Richard R. Rosinski, Timothy Mulholland, Douglas Degelman, and James Farber. 1980. Picture perception: An analysis of visual compensation. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 28, 6, 521--526.
[19]
W. S. Stiles. 1929. The scattering theory of the effect of glare on the brightness difference threshold. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character 105, 735, 131--146.
[20]
Tom Troscianko, Timothy S. Meese, and Stephen Hinde. 2012. Perception while watching movies: Effects of physical screen size and scene type. i-Perception 3, 7, 414--425.
[21]
Dhanraj Vishwanath, Ahna R. Girshick, and Martin S. Banks. 2005. Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place. Nature Neuroscience 8, 10, 1401--1410.
[22]
Hans Wallach and Frederick J. Marshall. 1986. Shape constancy in pictorial representation. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 39, 4, 233--235.
[23]
Denis Zorin and Alan H. Barr. 1995. Correction of geometric perceptual distortions in pictures. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. ACM, New York, NY, 257--264.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Impact of Display Field-of-view and Display Type on Text Readability and Visual Text Search on Large Displays in Virtual Reality: Impact of Display Field-of-view and Type on Text Readability and Search in Large VR DisplaysProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670984(1-11)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2021)Comparing immersiveness and perceptibility of spherical and curved displaysApplied Ergonomics10.1016/j.apergo.2020.10327190(103271)Online publication date: Jan-2021
  • (2020)Curved TVs improved watching experience when display curvature radii approached viewing distances: Effects of display curvature radius, viewing distance, and lateral viewing position on TV watching experiencePLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.022843715:2(e0228437)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 15, Issue 1
January 2018
122 pages
ISSN:1544-3558
EISSN:1544-3965
DOI:10.1145/3128284
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 October 2017
Accepted: 01 June 2017
Received: 01 April 2017
Published in TAP Volume 15, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Television screen
  2. field of view
  3. focal length
  4. perceptual distortions
  5. reflections

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • Samsung Display

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Impact of Display Field-of-view and Display Type on Text Readability and Visual Text Search on Large Displays in Virtual Reality: Impact of Display Field-of-view and Type on Text Readability and Search in Large VR DisplaysProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670984(1-11)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2021)Comparing immersiveness and perceptibility of spherical and curved displaysApplied Ergonomics10.1016/j.apergo.2020.10327190(103271)Online publication date: Jan-2021
  • (2020)Curved TVs improved watching experience when display curvature radii approached viewing distances: Effects of display curvature radius, viewing distance, and lateral viewing position on TV watching experiencePLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.022843715:2(e0228437)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2020
  • (2020)Curved Versus Flat Monitors: Interactive Effects of Display Curvature Radius and Display Size on Visual Search Performance and Visual FatigueHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society10.1177/001872082092271763:7(1182-1195)Online publication date: 6-May-2020
  • (2020)Immersive screens change attention width but not perception or decision-making performance in natural and basic tasksApplied Ergonomics10.1016/j.apergo.2019.10296182(102961)Online publication date: Jan-2020
  • (2019)Immersiveness and Perceptibility of Convex and Concave DisplaysProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting10.1177/107118131963114163:1(396-400)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2019
  • (2018)Effects of Display Curvature, Presbyopia, and Task Duration on Visual Fatigue, Task Performance, and User SatisfactionHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society10.1177/001872081880140761:2(273-287)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2018

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media