[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3197026.3203890acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Using Social Media and Scholarly Text to Predict Public Understanding of Science

Published: 23 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

People often struggle to understand scientific texts, which leads to miscommunication and often to inaccurate and even sensationalistic reports of research. Identifying and achieving a better understanding of the factors that affect comprehension would be helpful to analyze what improves public understanding of science. In this study, we generate features from scientific text that represent some common text structures and use them to predict the semantic similarity between the scientific text and the textual content posted by the general public about the same scientific text online. In this endeavor, we built regression models to achieve this purpose and evaluated them based on their R-squared values and mean squared errors. R-squared values as high as 0.73 were observed, indicating a high chance of a relationship between certain textual features and the public's understanding of science.

References

[1]
1985. The Public Understanding of Science - Royal Society. (1985).
[2]
Rebekah Georger Benjamin and Paula J Schwanenflugel. 2010. Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly 45, 4 (2010), 388--404.
[3]
James B. Conant. 1952. Science and Common Sense. The Journal of Philosophy 49, 1 (1952), 11--20.
[4]
Geoffrey Evans and John Durant. 1995. The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science 4, 1 (1995), 57--74.
[5]
Michelle K. McGinn and Wolff-Michael Roth. 1999. Preparing Students for Competent Scientific Practice: Implications of Recent Research in Science and Technology Studies. Educational Researcher 28, 3 (1999), 14--24.
[6]
Jon D. Miller. 1989. Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Daedalus 112, 2 (1989), 29--48.
[7]
Jon D Miller. 1998. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public understanding of science 7, 3 (1998), 203--223.
[8]
Steve Miller. 2001. Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science 10, 1 (2001), 115--120.
[9]
Sanja Stajner, Richard Evans, Constantin Orasan, and Mitkov Ruslan. 2012. What can readability measures really tell us about text complexity. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Improving Textual Accessibility.
[10]
Leland L. Wilson. 1954. A study of opinions related to the nature of science and its purpose in society. Science Education 38, 2 (1954), 159--164.
[11]
G. Udny Yule. 1912. On the Methods of Measuring Association Between Two Attributes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 75, 6 (1912), 579--652.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Public Reaction to Scientific Research via Twitter Sentiment PredictionJournal of Data and Information Science10.2478/jdis-2022-00037:1(97-124)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2021
  • (2020)Measuring the Diversity of Facebook Reactions to ResearchProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33751924:GROUP(1-17)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2020
  • (2018)Anatomy of scholarly information behavior patterns in the wake of academic social media platformsInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-018-0255-9Online publication date: 3-Nov-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
JCDL '18: Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
May 2018
453 pages
ISBN:9781450351782
DOI:10.1145/3197026
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 May 2018

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. altmetrics
  2. public understanding of science
  3. societal impact
  4. text comprehension

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

JCDL '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

JCDL '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 26 of 71 submissions, 37%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 415 of 1,482 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Public Reaction to Scientific Research via Twitter Sentiment PredictionJournal of Data and Information Science10.2478/jdis-2022-00037:1(97-124)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2021
  • (2020)Measuring the Diversity of Facebook Reactions to ResearchProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33751924:GROUP(1-17)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2020
  • (2018)Anatomy of scholarly information behavior patterns in the wake of academic social media platformsInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-018-0255-9Online publication date: 3-Nov-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media