More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Free access

Online Misinformation: Challenges and Future Directions

Authors:

Miriam Fernandez,

Harith AlaniAuthors Info & Claims

WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018

Pages 595 - 602

https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3188730

Published: 23 April 2018 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Misinformation has become a common part of our digital media environments and it is compromising the ability of our societies to form informed opinions. It generates misperceptions, which have affected the decision making processes in many domains, including economy, health, environment, and elections, among others. Misinformation and its generation, propagation, impact, and management is being studied through a variety of lenses (computer science, social science, journalism, psychology, etc.) since it widely affects multiple aspects of society. In this paper we analyse the phenomenon of misinformation from a technological point of view. We study the current socio-technical advancements towards addressing the problem, identify some of the key limitations of current technologies, and propose some ideas to target such limitations. The goal of this position paper is to reflect on the current state of the art and to stimulate discussions on the future design and development of algorithms, methodologies, and applications.

References

[1]

Michelle A Amazeen. 2013. A Critical Assessment of Fact-checking in 2012. (2013).

[2]

Sotirios Antoniadis, Iouliana Litou, and Vana Kalogeraki. 2015. A model for identifying misinformation in online social networks. In OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems". Springer, 473--482.

Digital Library

[3]

Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130--1132.

[4]

Larry M Bartels. 2002. Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior 24, 2 (2002), 117--150.

[5]

Alessandro Bessi, Fabio Petroni, Michela Del Vicario, Fabiana Zollo, Aris Anagnostopoulos, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015. Viral misinformation: The role of homophily and polarization. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 355--356.

Digital Library

[6]

Leticia Bode and Emily K Vraga. 2015. In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication 65, 4 (2015), 619--638.

[7]

Christina Boididou, Symeon Papadopoulos, Yiannis Kompatsiaris, Steve Schifferes, and Nic Newman. 2014. Challenges of computational verification in social multimedia. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 743--748.

Digital Library

[8]

Yazan Boshmaf, Ildar Muslukhov, Konstantin Beznosov, and Matei Ripeanu. 2011. The socialbot network: when bots socialize for fame and money. In Proceedings of the 27th annual computer security applications conference. ACM, 93--102.

Digital Library

[9]

Ceren Budak, Divyakant Agrawal, and Amr El Abbadi. 2011. Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 665--674.

Digital Library

[10]

Carlos Carvalho, Nicholas Klagge, and Emanuel Moench. 2011. The persistent effects of a false news shock. Journal of Empirical Finance 18, 4 (2011), 597--615.

[11]

Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. 2011. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 675--684.

Digital Library

[12]

Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. 2013. Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media. Internet Research 23, 5 (2013), 560--588.

[13]

Xinran Chen and Sei-Ching Joanna Sin. 2013. --Misinformation What of it--Motivations and individual differences in misinformation sharing on social media. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 50, 1 (2013), 1--4.

Digital Library

[14]

Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2015. The production of information in the attention economy. Scientific reports 5 (2015).

[15]

Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Prashant Shiralkar, Luis M Rocha, Johan Bollen, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2015. Computational fact checking from knowledge networks. PloS one 10, 6 (2015), e0128193.

[16]

Michael D Cobb, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2013. Beliefs dont always persevere: How political figures are punished when positive information about them is discredited. Political Psychology 34, 3 (2013), 307--326.

[17]

Michael Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew R Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. Political polarization on twitter. ICWSM 133 (2011), 89--96.

[18]

Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2016. The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 3 (2016), 554--559.

[19]

Manuel Egele, Gianluca Stringhini, Christopher Kruegel, and Giovanni Vigna. 2013. Compa: Detecting compromised accounts on social networks. In NDSS.

[20]

Rob Ennals, Beth Trushkowsky, and John Mark Agosta. 2010. Highlighting disputed claims on the web. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 341--350.

Digital Library

[21]

Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59, 7 (2016), 96--104.

Digital Library

[22]

Andrew J Flanagin and Miriam J Metzger. 2000. Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77, 3 (2000), 515--540.

[23]

DJ Flynn, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2017. The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology 38, S1 (2017), 127--150.

[24]

Gary L Freed, Sarah J Clark, Amy T Butchart, Dianne C Singer, and Matthew M Davis. 2010. Parental vaccine safety concerns in 2009. Pediatrics 125, 4 (2010), 654--659.

[25]

Carlos Freitas, Fabricio Benevenuto, Saptarshi Ghosh, and Adriano Veloso. 2015. Reverse engineering socialbot infiltration strategies in twitter. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015. ACM, 25--32.

Digital Library

[26]

Adrien Friggeri, Lada A Adamic, Dean Eckles, and Justin Cheng. 2014. Rumor Cascades. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Web and Social Media. ICWSM 2014.

[27]

R Kelly Garrett, Erik C Nisbet, and Emily K Lynch. 2013. Undermining the corrective effects of media-based political fact checking The role of contextual cues and naïve theory. Journal of Communication 63, 4 (2013), 617--637.

[28]

R Kelly Garrett and Brian E Weeks. 2013. The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 1047--1058.

Digital Library

[29]

Tarleton Gillespie. 2014. The relevance of algorithms. Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society 167 (2014).

[30]

LUCAS Graves and FEDERICA Cherubini. 2016. The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe. (2016).

[31]

Aditi Gupta, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Carlos Castillo, and Patrick Meier. 2014. Tweetcred: A real-time Web-based system for assessing credibility of content on Twitter. In Proc. 6th International Conference on Social Informatics (SocInfo). Barcelona, Spain.

[32]

Naeemul Hassan, Fatma Arslan, Chengkai Li, and Mark Tremayne. 2017. Toward automated fact-checking: Detecting check-worthy factual claims by ClaimBuster. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1803--1812.

Digital Library

[33]

Naeemul Hassan, Afroza Sultana, You Wu, Gensheng Zhang, Chengkai Li, Jun Yang, and Cong Yu. 2014. Data in, fact out: automated monitoring of facts by FactWatcher. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 7, 13 (2014), 1557--1560.

Digital Library

[34]

Marianne E Jaeger, Susan Anthony, and Ralph L Rosnow. 1980. Who hears what from whom and with what effect: A study of rumor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6, 3 (1980), 473--478.

[35]

Anna Kata. 2010. A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine 28, 7 (2010), 1709--1716.

[36]

Per Kristensson, Jonas Matthing, and Niklas Johansson. 2008. Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technologybased services. International journal of service industry management 19, 4 (2008), 474--491.

[37]

Steven Kull, Clay Ramsay, and Evan Lewis. 2003. Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly 118, 4 (2003), 569--598.

[38]

Ziva Kunda. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological bulletin 108, 3 (1990), 480.

[39]

Tom Lauricella, Christopher S. Stewart, and Shira Ovide. 2013. Twitter hoax sparks swift stock swoon. The Wall Street Journal 23 (2013).

[40]

Kyumin Lee, Prithivi Tamilarasan, and James Caverlee. 2013. Crowdturfers, Campaigns, and Social Media: Tracking and Revealing Crowdsourced Manipulation of Social Media. In ICWSM.

[41]

Sangho Lee and Jong Kim. 2014. Early filtering of ephemeral malicious accounts on Twitter. Computer Communications 54 (2014), 48--57.

Digital Library

[42]

Thomas C Leonard. 2008. Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Constitutional Political Economy 19, 4 (2008), 356--360.

[43]

Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich KH Ecker, Colleen M Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook. 2012. Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13, 3 (2012), 106--131.

[44]

Aaron M McCright and Riley E Dunlap. 2011. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001--2010. The Sociological Quarterly 52, 2 (2011), 155--194.

[45]

Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology 27, 1 (2001), 415--444.

[46]

Panagiotis Takas Metaxas, Samantha Finn, and Eni Mustafaraj. 2015. Using twittertrails. com to investigate rumor propagation. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 69--72.

Digital Library

[47]

Dung T Nguyen, Nam P Nguyen, and My T Thai. 2012. Sources of misinformation in online social networks: Who to suspect. In Military Communications Conference, 2012-MILCOM 2012. IEEE, 1--6.

[48]

Nam P Nguyen, Guanhua Yan, My T Thai, and Stephan Eidenbenz. 2012. Containment of misinformation spread in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference. ACM, 213--222.

Digital Library

[49]

Dimitar Nikolov, Diego FM Oliveira, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2015. Measuring online social bubbles. PeerJ Computer Science 1 (2015), e38.

[50]

Brendan Nyhan. 2010. Why the" Death Panel" Myth Wouldnt Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate. In The Forum, Vol. 8.

[51]

Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler. 2013. Which Corrections Work Research results and practice recommendations. New America Foundation Media Policy Initiative Research Paper (2013).

[52]

Brendan Nyhan and Jason Reifler. 2015. Displacing misinformation about events: An experimental test of causal corrections. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2, 1 (2015), 81--93.

[53]

Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.

Digital Library

[54]

Gordon Pennycook, T Cannon, and D Rand. 2017. Implausibility and Illusory Truth: Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News but Has No Effect on Entirely Implausible Statements. Unpublished Paper Manuscript, December 11 (2017), 2017.

[55]

Vahed Qazvinian, Emily Rosengren, Dragomir R Radev, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2011. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1589--1599.

Digital Library

[56]

Xiaoyan Qiu, Diego FM Oliveira, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2017. Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information. Nature Human Behaviour 1, 7 (2017), 0132.

[57]

Jacob Ratkiewicz, Michael Conover, Mark Meiss, Bruno Gonçalves, Snehal Patil, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2011. Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web. ACM, 249--252.

Digital Library

[58]

Paul Resnick, Samuel Carton, Souneil Park, Yuncheng Shen, and Nicole Zeffer. 2014. Rumorlens: A system for analyzing the impact of rumors and corrections in social media. In Proc. Computational Journalism Conference.

[59]

Eunsoo Seo, Prasant Mohapatra, and Tarek Abdelzaher. 2012. Identifying rumors and their sources in social networks. SPIE defense, security, and sensing (2012), 83891I--83891I.

[60]

Chengcheng Shao, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. 2016. Hoaxy: A platform for tracking online misinformation. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 745--750.

Digital Library

[61]

Baoxu Shi and Tim Weninger. 2015. Fact checking in large knowledge graphs: A discriminative predict path mining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.05911 (2015).

[62]

Jieun Shin, Lian Jian, Kevin Driscoll, and François Bar. 2017. Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. new media & society 19, 8 (2017), 1214--1235.

[63]

Marcella Tambuscio, Diego FM Oliveira, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, and Giancarlo Ruffo. 2016. Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact checking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.04170 (2016).

[64]

Emily Thorson. 2016. Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication 33, 3 (2016), 460--480.

[65]

Sander van der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz, Seth Rosenthal, and Edward Maibach. 2017. Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges 1, 2 (2017).

[66]

William H Voorberg, Viktor JJM Bekkers, and Lars G Tummers. 2015. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review 17, 9 (2015), 1333--1357.

[67]

Claudia Wagner, Silvia Mitter, Christian Körner, and Markus Strohmaier. 2012. When social bots attack: Modeling susceptibility of users in online social networks. Making Sense of Microposts (# MSM2012) 2, 4 (2012), 1951--1959.

[68]

Gang Wang, Christo Wilson, Xiaohan Zhao, Yibo Zhu, Manish Mohanlal, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y Zhao. 2012. Serf and turf: crowdturfing for fun and profit. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 679--688.

Digital Library

[69]

Steve Webb, James Caverlee, and Calton Pu. 2008. Social Honeypots: Making Friends With A Spammer Near You. In CEAS.

[70]

Huiyuan Zhang, Huiling Zhang, Xiang Li, and My T Thai. 2015. Limiting the spread of misinformation while effectively raising awareness in social networks. In International Conference on Computational Social Networks. Springer, 35--47.

[71]

Bi Zhu, Chuansheng Chen, Elizabeth F Loftus, Chongde Lin, Qinghua He, Chunhui Chen, He Li, Robert K Moyzis, Jared Lessard, and Qi Dong. 2010. Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Personality characteristics and their interactions with cognitive abilities. Personality and Individual Differences 48, 8 (2010), 889--894.

[72]

Melissa Zimdars. 2016. False, misleading, clickbait-y, and satirical news sources. https://docs.google.com/document/d/ 10eA5-mCZLSS4MQY5QGb5ewC3VAL6pLkT53V_81ZyitM/preview. (2016).

[73]

Arkaitz Zubiaga, Maria Liakata, Rob Procter, Kalina Bontcheva, and Peter Tolmie. 2015. Crowdsourcing the annotation of rumourous conversations in social media. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 347--353.

Digital Library

[74]

Arkaitz Zubiaga, Maria Liakata, Rob Procter, Geraldine Wong Sak Hoi, and Peter Tolmie. 2016. Analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads. PloS one 11, 3 (2016), e0150989.

Cited By

R. BO. G(2024)A Study of Ethical Implications of AI Tools Enhancing User Conveniences in the Indian Digital LandscapeJournal of Social Computing10.23919/JSC.2024.00185:3(206-231)Online publication date: Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2024.0018
Butenko A(2024)Libraries in Combating Destructive Influences in the Social Communications SphereNaukovì pracì Nacìonalʹnoï bìblìoteki Ukraïni ìmenì V Ì Vernadsʹkogo10.15407/np.71.398(398-412)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.15407/np.71.398
Puri PHassler GKatragadda SShenk A(2024)Digital cloning of online social networks for language-sensitive agent-based modeling of misinformation spreadPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030488919:6(e0304889)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304889
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Online Misinformation: Challenges and Future Directions
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
      1. User studies
2. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications
  2. World Wide Web
    1. Web applications
      1. Social networks

Recommendations

Online Misinformation Spread: A Systematic Literature Map
ICISDM '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data Mining

Misinformation is widely and rapidly spreading on social media platforms. This could result in severe negative effects on users and the quality of online generated content. Luckily, there is a growing interest among researchers to combat this spread of ...
Are Mutated Misinformation More Contagious? A Case Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
WebSci '22: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022

The spread of online misinformation has become a major global risk. Understanding how misinformation propagates on social media is vital. While prior studies suggest that the content factors, such as emotion and topic in texts, are closely related to the ...
The Dynamics of (Not) Unfollowing Misinformation Spreaders
WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024

Many studies explore how people "come into" misinformation exposure. But much less is known about how people "come out of" misinformation exposure. Do people organically sever ties to misinformation spreaders? And what predicts doing so? Over six months, ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018

April 2018

2023 pages

ISBN:9781450356404

General Chairs:
Pierre-Antoine Champin
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France
,
Fabien Gandon
Inria, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, I3S, France
,
Lionel Médini
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, LIRIS, France
,
Program Chairs:
Mounia Lalmas
Spotify, UK
,
Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis
New York University, USA

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

In-Cooperation

SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web

Publisher

International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

Publication History

Published: 23 April 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

H2020

Conference

WWW '18

Sponsor:

IW3C2

WWW '18: The Web Conference 2018

April 23 - 27, 2018

Lyon, France

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

68
Total Citations
View Citations
8,717
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3,041
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)204

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

R. BO. G(2024)A Study of Ethical Implications of AI Tools Enhancing User Conveniences in the Indian Digital LandscapeJournal of Social Computing10.23919/JSC.2024.00185:3(206-231)Online publication date: Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2024.0018
Butenko A(2024)Libraries in Combating Destructive Influences in the Social Communications SphereNaukovì pracì Nacìonalʹnoï bìblìoteki Ukraïni ìmenì V Ì Vernadsʹkogo10.15407/np.71.398(398-412)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.15407/np.71.398
Puri PHassler GKatragadda SShenk A(2024)Digital cloning of online social networks for language-sensitive agent-based modeling of misinformation spreadPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.030488919:6(e0304889)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304889
Nandakumar ARajivan P(2024)Beliefs Trump Facts: Effect of Frequent Corrections on Misinformation Beliefs during Extended Extreme EventsACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/36885987:1-4(1-31)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3688598
Foriest JMittal SBray KTran ADe Choudhury M(2024)A Cross Community Comparison of Muting in Conversations of Gendered Violence on RedditProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869408:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686940
Zhang YZong RShang LYue ZZeng HLiu YWang D(2024)Tripartite Intelligence: Synergizing Deep Neural Network, Large Language Model, and Human Intelligence for Public Health Misinformation Detection (Archival Full Paper)Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference10.1145/3643562.3672613(63-75)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643562.3672613
Fernandez MBellogín ACantador I(2024)Analysing the Effect of Recommendation Algorithms on the Spread of MisinformationProceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/3614419.3644003(159-169)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3614419.3644003
Wei ZXu XHui PChua TNgo CKumar RLauw HKa-Wei Lee R(2024)Digital Democracy at Crossroads: A Meta-Analysis of Web and AI Influence on Global ElectionsCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3652003(1126-1129)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3589335.3652003
Bodaghi ASchmitt KWatine PFung B(2024)A Literature Review on Detecting, Verifying, and Mitigating Online MisinformationIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2023.328903111:4(5119-5145)Online publication date: Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3289031
Zainudin JMohamad Ali NSmeaton ATaha Ijab M(2024)Intervention Strategies for Misinformation Sharing on Social Media: A Bibliometric AnalysisIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.346924812(140359-140379)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3469248
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten