More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

The Peculiarities of Robot Embodiment (EmCorp-Scale): Development, Validation and Initial Test of the Embodiment and Corporeality of Artificial Agents Scale

Authors:

Laura Hoffmann,

Astrid M. Rosenthal v.d. PüttenAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Pages 370 - 378

https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171242

Published: 26 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We propose a new theoretical framework assuming that embodiment effects in HAI and HRI are mediated by users' perceptions of an artificial entity's body-related capabilities. To enable the application of our framework to foster more theoretical-driven research, we developed a new self-report measurement that assesses bodilyrelated perceptions of the embodiment and corporeality - which we reveal as not being a binary characteristic of artificial entities. For the development and validation of the new scale we conducted two surveys and one video-based experiment. Exploratory factor analysis reveal a four-factorial solution with good reliability (Study 2, n = 442), which was confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis (Study 3, n = 260). In addition, we present first insights into the explanatory power of the scale: We reveal that humans? perceptions of an artificial entity's capabilities vary between virtual and physical embodiments, and that the evaluation of the artificial counterpart can be explained through the perceived capabilities. Practical applications and future research lines are discussed.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (fp1011.mp4)

Download
195.02 MB

References

[1]

Wilma A. Bainbridge, Justin W. Hart, Elizabeth S. Kim, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over VideoDisplayed Agents. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 1 (2011), 41--52.

[2]

M. S. Bartlett. 1937. Properties of Sufficiency and Statistical Tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 160, 901 (1937), 268--282.

[3]

Christoph Bartneck. 2003. Interacting with an embodied emotional character. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. ACM Press, New York, NY, 55--60.

Digital Library

[4]

Colleen M. Carpinella, Alisa B. Wyman, Michael A. Perez, and Steven J. Stroessner. 2017. The Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS). In Proceedings of the 2017 ACMIEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Bilge Mutlu (Ed.). ACM, {S.l.}, 254--262.

Digital Library

[5]

Juan Fasola and Maja Mataric. 2013. A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 2, 2 (2013), 3--32.

Digital Library

[6]

Eamonn Ferguson and Tom Cox. 1993. Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Users' Guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 1, 2 (1993), 84--94.

[7]

Andy P. Field. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock and roll) (3 ed.). Sage Publications, Los Angeles {i.e. Thousand Oaks and Calif.} and London. {8} Kerstin Fischer, Katrin S. Lohan, and Kilian Foth. 2012. Levels of embodiment: Linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'12). 463--470.

Digital Library

[8]

Dai Hasegawa, Justine Cassell, and Kenji Araki. 2010. The Role of Embodiment and Perspective in Direction-Giving Systems. In AAAI Fall Symposium: Dialog with Robots.

[9]

Laura Hoffmann and Nicole C. Krämer. 2013. Investigating the effects of physical and virtual embodiment in task-oriented and conversational contexts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71, 7--8 (2013), 763--774.

Digital Library

[10]

John L. Horn. 1965. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30, 2 (1965), 179--185.

[11]

Li-tze Hu and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6, 1 (1999), 1--55.

[12]

Henry F. Kaiser. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39, 1 (1974), 31--36.

[13]

Hiroko Kamide, Yasushi Mae, Koji Kawabe, Satoshi Shigemi, Masato Hirose, and Tatsuo Arai. 2012. New measurement of psychological safety for humanoid. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on HumanRobot Interaction. ACM, 49--56.

Digital Library

[14]

Hiroko Kamide, Yasushi Mae, Tomohito Takubo, Kenichi Ohara, and Tatsuo Arai. 2014. Direct comparison of psychological evaluation between virtual and real humanoids: Personal space and subjective impressions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 5 (2014), 451--459.

[15]

James Kennedy, Paul Baxter, and Tony Belpaeme. 2015. Comparing Robot Embodiments in a Guided Discovery Learning Interaction with Children. International Journal of Social Robotics 7, 2 (2015), 293--308.

[16]

C. D. Kidd and Cynthia L. Breazeal. 2004. Effect of a robot on user perceptions. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2004) (2004), 3559--3564.

[17]

Sara B. Kiesler, Aaron Powers, Susan R. Fussell, and C. Torrey. 2008. Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot-Like Agent. Social Cognition 26, 2 (2008), 169--181.

[18]

Takanori Komatsu. 2010. Comparison an On-screen Agent with a Robotic Agent in an Everyday Interaction Style: How to Make Users React Toward an On-screen Agent as if They are Reacting Toward a Robotic Agent. In Human-robot interaction, Daisuke Chugo (Ed.). InTech, Vukovar, Croatia.

[19]

Kwan Min Lee, Younbo Jung, Jaywoo Kim, and Sang Ryong Kim. 2006. Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human--robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 10 (2006), 962--973.

Digital Library

[20]

Iolanda Leite, André Pereira, Carlos Martinho, and Ana Paiva. 2008. Are emotional robots more fun to play with?. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2008). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 77--82.

[21]

Jamy Li. 2015. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 77 (2015), 23--37.

Digital Library

[22]

Jamy Li and Mark Chignell. 2011. Communication of Emotion in Social Robots through Simple Head and Arm Movements. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 2 (2011), 125--142.

[23]

Gitta H. Lubke and Bengt O. Muthén. 2004. Applying Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Models for Continuous Outcomes to Likert Scale Data Complicates Meaningful Group Comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 11, 4 (2004), 514--534.

[24]

J. C. McCroskey, P.R Hamilton, and A.N Weiner. 1974. The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research 1, 1 (1974), 42--52.

[25]

John McIver and Edward G. Carmines. 1981. Unidimensional scaling. Sage.

[26]

Tatsuya Nomura, Tomohiro Suzuki, Takayuki Kanda, and Kensuke Kato. 2006. Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies 7, 3 (2006), 437--454.

[27]

Albert Satorra. 2000. Scaled and Adjusted Restricted Tests in Multi-Sample Analysis of Moment Structures. In Innovations in Multivariate Statistical Analysis, R. D. H. Heijmans, D. S. G. Pollock, and A. Satorra (Eds.). Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, Vol. 36. Springer US, Boston, MA, 233--247.

[28]

Karin Schermelleh-Engel, Helfried Moosbrugger, and Hans Müller. 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online 8, 2 (2003), 23--74.

[29]

K. Shinozawa, F. Naya, J. Yamato, and K. Kogure. 2005. Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, 2 (2005), 267--279.

Digital Library

[30]

James Stevens. 2009. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5 ed.). Routledge, New York.

[31]

Wayne F. Velicer, Andrew C. Peacock, and Douglas N. Jackson. 1982. A comparison of component and factor patterns: A Monte Carlo approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research 17, 3 (1982), 371--388.

[32]

Joshua Wainer, David J. Feil-Seifer, Dylan Shell, and Maja J. Matarić. 2007. Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. In 16th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Piscataway, N.J., 872--877.

Cited By

Schulz DUnbehaun DDoernbach T(2025)Investigating the effects of embodiment on presence and perception in remote physician video consultations: a between-participants study comparing a tablet and a telepresence roboti-com10.1515/icom-2024-0045Online publication date: 14-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0045
Dong XXie JGong H(2025)A Meta-Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Technologies Use and Loneliness: Examining the Influence of Physical Embodiment, Age Differences, and Effect DirectionCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking10.1089/cyber.2024.0468Online publication date: 5-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2024.0468
Dautzenberg PLadwig SRosenthal-von der Pütten AGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Follow Me: Anthropomorphic Appearance and Communication Impact Social Perception and Joint Navigation BehaviorProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634955(175-183)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634955
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The Peculiarities of Robot Embodiment (EmCorp-Scale): Development, Validation and Initial Test of the Embodiment and Corporeality of Artificial Agents Scale
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Towards an integrated methodological framework for understanding embodiment in HCI
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The third wave in HCI reveals how embodiment matters in post-WIMP computing systems. Yet it is still unclear what methods provide effective insight into the nature of embodiment in HCI in relation to both design and use. This paper presents work in ...
The Influence of a Robot's Embodiment on Trust: A Longitudinal Study
HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Trust, taken from the human perspective, is an essential factor that determines the use of robots as companions or care robots, especially given the long-term character of the interaction. This study investigated the influence of a robot's embodiment on ...
Development of a scale to measure skepticism toward electronic word-of-mouth

In recent years, electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) has become an influential factor affecting Internet users' perceptions and behaviors (Chatterjee 2001; Lee et al. 2009). However, as more evidence demonstrating the utilization of fake eWOM has been ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

February 2018

468 pages

ISBN:9781450349536

DOI:10.1145/3171221

General Chairs:
Takayuki Kanda
ATR, Japan
,
Selma Ŝabanović
Indiana University Bloomington, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Guy Hoffman
Cornell University, USA
,
Adriana Tapus
ENSTA-ParisTech, France

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
IEEE-RAS: Robotics and Automation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 February 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

EU Horizon 2020

Conference

HRI '18

Sponsor:

SIGAI
SIGCHI
IEEE-RAS

HRI '18: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 5 - 8, 2018

IL, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 206 submissions, 24%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

40
Total Citations
View Citations
872
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)142
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)34

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Schulz DUnbehaun DDoernbach T(2025)Investigating the effects of embodiment on presence and perception in remote physician video consultations: a between-participants study comparing a tablet and a telepresence roboti-com10.1515/icom-2024-0045Online publication date: 14-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0045
Dong XXie JGong H(2025)A Meta-Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Technologies Use and Loneliness: Examining the Influence of Physical Embodiment, Age Differences, and Effect DirectionCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking10.1089/cyber.2024.0468Online publication date: 5-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2024.0468
Dautzenberg PLadwig SRosenthal-von der Pütten AGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Follow Me: Anthropomorphic Appearance and Communication Impact Social Perception and Joint Navigation BehaviorProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634955(175-183)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634955
Hou YCheon EJung MGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Power in Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634949(269-282)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634949
Moon ARhim J(2024)Rosie Is a RentalThe Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Policy, and Regulation for Human–Robot Interaction10.1017/9781009386708.022(341-361)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386708.022
(2024)Issues and Concerns for Human–Robot InteractionThe Cambridge Handbook of the Law, Policy, and Regulation for Human–Robot Interaction10.1017/9781009386708.013(171-390)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386708.013
Koban KBanks J(2024)It feels, therefore it isComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.108098153:COnline publication date: 12-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108098
Sasser JMcConnell DSmither J(2024)Investigation of Relationships Between Embodiment Perceptions and Perceived Social Presence in Human–Robot InteractionsInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-024-01138-w16:8(1735-1750)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01138-w
Minegishi TOsawa H(2024)Exploring Changes in Social Distance and Participant Discomfort with Virtual Robot Head and Visual FamiliarityHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_11(139-155)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_11
Paterson MHoffman GZheng C(2023)Introduction to the Special Issue on “Designing the Robot Body: Critical Perspectives on Affective Embodied Interaction”ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/359471312:2(1-9)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594713
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten