[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3144826.3145391acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analytics-driven redesign of an instructional course

Published: 18 October 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Learning Analytics1 is a powerful tool that provides rich information for students, teachers and academic authorities. There is a wide range of possible applications, and one of them is leveraging the information to improve the instructional design of a course. In this research, we introduce the results of a Learning Analytics engine to improve all the stages of an Action Research experience. We have carried out three iterations: iteration 1, devoted to design an instructional course using an automated learning platform that collects data from the students; iteration 2, focused on the analysis of the individual and aggregated data collected from the students to obtain group behaviors; and iteration 3, currently under way, devoted to improve the structure of the course using the results of the previous iterations. We have made use of some graphical representations of the data that help to understand the aggregated data and to detect important events and moments of intervention. We have detected that the behavior of the students is strongly conditioned by the deadline structure of the course and that there is usually a crucial moment, by halfway of the course, where the situation is tending to stabilize and which is a good moment to reinforce the supervision on the student. Finally, we have stated that low performance students are usually recoverable to the last moment.

References

[1]
John P. Campbell and Diana G. Oblinger. 2007. Academic Analytics. Educase (2007). Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB6101.pdf
[2]
Wilfred Carr and Stephen Kemmis. 1986. Becoming critical: education, knowledge, and action research. Falmer Press, London; Philadelphia.
[3]
Francisco José Gallego-Durán, Carlos José Villagra-Arnedo, Faraón Llorens-Largo, and Rafael Molina-Carmona. 2007. PLMan: A Game-Based Learning Activity for Teaching Logic Thinking and Programming. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 33, 2(B) (2007), 807--815.
[4]
Philip J. Goldstein and Richard N. Katz. 2005. Academic Analytics: The Uses of Management Information and Technology in Higher Education. Educase (2005). Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERS0508/ekf0508.pdf
[5]
Phillip A. Harris. 2013. Data Driven Design: How Today's Product Designer Approaches User Experience to Create Radically Innovative Digital Products (1 edition ed.). K & R Publications.
[6]
Magnus Karlberg, Magnus Löfstrand, Stefan Sandberg, and Michael Lundin. 2013. State of the art in simulation-driven design. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 18, 1 (2013), 68.
[7]
S. B. Kotsiantis. 2012. Use of Machine Learning Techniques for Educational Proposes: A Decision Support System for Forecasting Students' Grades. Artif. Intell. Rev. 37, 4 (April 2012), 331--344.
[8]
Ioanna Lykourentzou, Ioannis Giannoukos, Vassilis Nikolopoulos, George Mpardis, and Vassili Loumos. 2009. Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques. Comput. Educ. 53, 3 (2009), 950--965.
[9]
Leah P. Macfadyen and Shane Dawson. 2010. Mining LMS Data to Develop an "Early Warning System" for Educators: A Proof of Concept. Comput. Educ. 54, 2 (February 2010), 588--599.
[10]
Marriner David Merrill. 2009. Instructional-design Theories and Models: Building a common knowledge base. In A Reigeluth C.M. & Carr-Chellman (ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 41--56. Retrieved from https://books.google.es/books?id=MazF0wv5lkQC
[11]
Eric Miller. 2004. Analysis Driven Design For Electronic Systems. Phoenix Analysis & Design Technologies. Retrieved July 27, 2017 from http://www.ansys.com/-/media/Ansys/corporate/resourcelibrary/conference-paper/2004-Int-ANSYS-Conf-145.PDF
[12]
Gary R. Morrison (Ed.). 2011. Designing effective instruction (6th ed ed.). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
[13]
Lori Niles-Hofmann. Data-Driven Learning Design. Retrieved July 26, 2017 from http://www.loriniles.com/ebook/
[14]
Charles M. Reigeluth. 2011. An instructional theory for the post-industrial age. Educ. Technol. Mag. 51, 5 (October 2011), 25--29.
[15]
Robert A. Reiser and John V. Dempsey. 2007. Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed ed.). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
[16]
P.D. Schalk, D.P. Wick, P.R. Turner, and M.W. Ramsdell. 2011. Predictive assessment of student performance for early strategic guidance. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, S2H--1--S2H--5.
[17]
George Siemens. 2012. Learning analytics: envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice. In In: International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK, 4--8.
[18]
Carlos Villagra-Arnedo, Francisco J. Gallego-Durán, Patricia Compañ-Rosique, Faraón Llorens-Largo, and Rafael Molina-Carmona. 2016. Predicting academic performance from behavioural and learning data. Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodynamics 11, 3 (2016). Retrieved from http://www.witpress.com/journals/dne
[19]
Carlos Villagrá Arnedo, Francisco J. Gallego-Durán, Faraón Llorens Largo, Patricia Compañ, Rosana Satorre Cuerda, and Rafael Molina-Carmona. 2015. Detección precoz de dificultades en el aprendizaje. Herramienta para la predicción del rendimiento de los estudiantes (Early detection of learning difficulties. Tool for predicting student performance). In La Sociedad del Aprendizaje. Actas del III Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad. CINAIC 2015. Fundación General de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
[20]
Carlos Villagra-Arnedo, Francisco J. Gallego-Durán, Rafael Molina-Carmona, and Faraón Llorens-Largo. 2015. Boosting the Learning Process with Progressive Performance Prediction. In Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World, Gráinne Conole, Tomaž Klobučar, Christoph Rensing, Johannes Konert and Élise Lavoué (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 638--641. Retrieved January 28, 2016 from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_77
[21]
Alvin Y. Wang and Michael H. Newlin. 2002. Predictors of performance in the virtual classroom: Identifying and helping at-risk cyber-students. J. High. Educ. 29, 10 (2002), 21--25.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)What to Keep, What to DiscardHandbook of Research on Revisioning and Reconstructing Higher Education After Global Crises10.4018/978-1-6684-5934-8.ch015(305-318)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Learning analytics driven improvements in learning design in higher education: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1289440:2(510-524)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
  • (2019)Learning Analytics: A Brief Overview about Applications and its Advantages2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)10.1109/ICALT.2019.00064(190-191)Online publication date: Jul-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
TEEM 2017: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
October 2017
723 pages
ISBN:9781450353861
DOI:10.1145/3144826
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 October 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Learning analytics
  2. instructional design
  3. technology-enhanced learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

TEEM 2017

Acceptance Rates

TEEM 2017 Paper Acceptance Rate 84 of 109 submissions, 77%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)What to Keep, What to DiscardHandbook of Research on Revisioning and Reconstructing Higher Education After Global Crises10.4018/978-1-6684-5934-8.ch015(305-318)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Learning analytics driven improvements in learning design in higher education: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1289440:2(510-524)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
  • (2019)Learning Analytics: A Brief Overview about Applications and its Advantages2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)10.1109/ICALT.2019.00064(190-191)Online publication date: Jul-2019
  • (2019)Definition of a Feature Vector to Characterise Learners in Adaptive Learning SystemsResearch & Innovation Forum 201910.1007/978-3-030-30809-4_8(75-89)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Learning Analytics Intervention: A Review of Case Studies2018 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET)10.1109/ISET.2018.00047(178-182)Online publication date: Jul-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media