[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3029798.3038351acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Understanding Attitudes of Adults Aging with Mobility Impairments toward Telepresence Robots

Published: 06 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We explored the attitudes of older adults with mobility impairment towards using telepresence robots to understand their openness to adopting these technologies. Participants (n = 14) with self-reported mobility impairments completed questionnaires and an interview following demonstrative videos of two telepresence technologies (Kubi, Beam). In this paper, we present findings regarding participants' perceptions of the mobility functionality of telepresence robots. These results highlight design considerations that may make telepresence technologies more accepted by adults aging with mobility impairments.

References

[1]
Ortman, J.M., Velkoff, V.A., and Hogan, H. An aging nation: the older population in the United States. US Census Bureau (2014), 25--1140.
[2]
He, W., and Larsen, L.J. Older Americans with a Disability: 2008--2012. American Community Survey Reports. (2014).
[3]
Beer, J.M., Mitzner, T.L., Stuck, R.E., and Rogers, W.A. 2015. Design considerations for technology interventions to support social and physical wellness for older adults with disability. International Journal of Automation and Smart Technology. 5(4), 249--264.
[4]
Melenhorst, A.S., Rogers, W.A., and Bouwhuis, D.G. 2006. Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychol Aging. 21(1), 190.
[5]
Beer, J.M., and Takayama, L. 2011. Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: acceptance, benefits, and concerns. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. 19--26. AC
[6]
Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85--109.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Not Only WEIRD but “Uncanny”? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human–Robot Interaction ResearchInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-00968-415:11(1841-1870)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Telepresence Robots for People with Special Needs: A Systematic ReviewInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.200967338:17(1651-1667)Online publication date: 10-Feb-2022
  • (2021)Perceptions of Agent Loyalty with Ancillary UsersInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-020-00725-x13:8(2039-2055)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2017
462 pages
ISBN:9781450348850
DOI:10.1145/3029798
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 March 2017

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. disability
  2. mobility impairment
  3. telepresence
  4. televideo

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Funding Sources

  • National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Community Living)

Conference

HRI '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

HRI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 51 of 211 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Not Only WEIRD but “Uncanny”? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human–Robot Interaction ResearchInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-00968-415:11(1841-1870)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Telepresence Robots for People with Special Needs: A Systematic ReviewInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.200967338:17(1651-1667)Online publication date: 10-Feb-2022
  • (2021)Perceptions of Agent Loyalty with Ancillary UsersInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-020-00725-x13:8(2039-2055)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2021
  • (2020)People with Motor Disabilities Using Gaze to Control TelerobotsExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382939(1-9)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
  • (2018)Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability StudyJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/jmir.946020:9(e264)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media